Jump to content

Moore's second law: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Added brief description of Moore's law, so we don't have to look it up to understand the discussion here.
m Added short description #article-add-desc
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Observation on the growth of construction costs for a semiconductor fab}}
'''Rock's law''' or '''Moore's second law''', named for [[Arthur Rock]] or [[Gordon Moore]], says that the cost of a [[integrated circuit|semiconductor chip]] [[semiconductor fabrication plant|fabrication plant]] doubles every four years.<ref>{{cite web |first= |last= |title=FAQs |date= |work= |publisher=India Electronics & Semiconductor Association |url=http://www.iesaonline.org/aboutus/faq_pg3.html}}</ref> As of 2015, the price had already reached about 14 billion US dollars.<ref>{{cite web |first=Lucian |last=Armasu |title=Samsung's New $14 Billion Chip Plant To Manufacture DRAM, Processors In 2017 |agency=Reuters |date=8 May 2015 |work= |publisher=Tom's Hardware |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-14-billion-chip-plant,29058.html}}</ref>
'''Rock's law''' or '''Moore's second law''', named for [[Arthur Rock]] or [[Gordon Moore]], says that the cost of a [[integrated circuit|semiconductor chip]] [[semiconductor fabrication plant|fabrication plant]] doubles every four years.<ref>{{cite web |title=FAQs |publisher=India Electronics & Semiconductor Association |url=http://www.iesaonline.org/aboutus/faq_pg3.html |access-date=2013-04-09 |archive-date=2017-11-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171120175509/http://www.iesaonline.org/aboutus/faq_pg3.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> As of 2015, the price had reached about 14 billion US dollars.<ref>{{cite web |first=Lucian |last=Armasu |title=Samsung's New $14 Billion Chip Plant To Manufacture DRAM, Processors In 2017 |agency=Reuters |date=8 May 2015 |publisher=Tom's Hardware |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-14-billion-chip-plant,29058.html}}</ref>


Rock's law can be seen as the economic flip side to [[Moore's law|Moores (first) law]] - that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years. The latter is a direct consequence of the ongoing growth of the capital-intensive semiconductor industry&mdash;innovative and popular products mean more profits, meaning more capital available to invest in ever higher levels of [[Integrated circuit#LSI|large-scale integration]], which in turn leads to creation of even more innovative products.
Rock's law can be seen as the economic flip side to [[Moore's law|Moore's (first) law]] that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles every two years. The latter is a direct consequence of the ongoing growth of the capital-intensive semiconductor industry&mdash; innovative and popular products mean more profits, meaning more capital available to invest in ever higher levels of [[Integrated circuit#LSI|large-scale integration]], which in turn leads to the creation of even more innovative products.{{Citation needed|date=May 2023}}


The semiconductor industry has always been extremely capital-intensive, with ever-dropping manufacturing [[unit cost]]s. Thus, the ultimate [[limits to growth]] of the industry will constrain the maximum amount of capital that can be invested in new products; at some point, Rock's Law will collide with Moore's Law.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060506114410/http://www.edavision.com/200111/feature.pdf |format=PDF |archive-date=6 May 2006 |last=Dorsch |first=Jeff |title=Does Moore's Law Still Hold Up? |publisher=Edavision.com }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081113014641/http://research.microsoft.com/~gray/Moore_Law.html |archive-date=13 November 2008 |last=Schaller |first=Bob |date=1996 |title=The Origin, Nature, and Implications of 'Moore's Law' |publisher=Research.Microsoft.com }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=Jean-François |last=Tremblay |title=Riding On Flat Panels |journal=Chemical & Engineering News |volume=84 |issue=26 |pages=13–16 |date=26 June 2006 |doi= 10.1021/cen-v084n026.p013|url=http://cen.acs.org/articles/84/i26/Riding-Flat-Panels.html}}</ref>
The semiconductor industry has always been extremely capital-intensive, with ever-dropping manufacturing [[unit cost]]s. Thus, the ultimate limits to growth of the industry will constrain the maximum amount of capital that can be invested in new products; at some point, Rock's Law will collide with Moore's Law.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.edavision.com/200111/feature.pdf |archive-date=6 May 2006 |last=Dorsch |first=Jeff |title=Does Moore's Law Still Hold Up? |publisher=Edavision.com |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060506114410/http://www.edavision.com/200111/feature.pdf }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://research.microsoft.com/~gray/Moore_Law.html |archive-date=13 November 2008 |last=Schaller |first=Bob |date=1996 |title=The Origin, Nature, and Implications of 'Moore's Law' |publisher=Research.Microsoft.com |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081113014641/http://research.microsoft.com/~gray/Moore_Law.html }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=Jean-François |last=Tremblay |title=Riding On Flat Panels |journal=Chemical & Engineering News |volume=84 |issue=26 |pages=13–16 |date=26 June 2006 |doi= 10.1021/cen-v084n026.p013|url=http://cen.acs.org/articles/84/i26/Riding-Flat-Panels.html}}</ref>


It has been suggested that fabrication plant costs have not increased as quickly as predicted by Rock's law – indeed plateauing in the late 1990s<ref name=Ross03>{{cite journal |first=Philip E. |last=Ross |title=5 Commandments |journal=IEEE Spectrum |volume= |issue= |pages= |year=2003 |doi= |url=http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/materials/5-commandments/2}}</ref> – and also that the fabrication plant cost ''per transistor'' (which has shown a pronounced downward trend<ref name=Ross03/>) may be more relevant as a constraint on Moore's Law.
It has been suggested that fabrication plant costs have not increased as quickly as predicted by Rock's law – indeed plateauing in the late 1990s<ref name=Ross03>{{cite journal |first=Philip E. |last=Ross |title=5 Commandments: The rules engineers live by weren't always set in stone |journal=IEEE Spectrum |year=2003 |url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/5-commandments}}</ref> – and also that the fabrication plant cost ''per transistor'' (which has shown a pronounced downward trend<ref name=Ross03/>) may be more relevant as a constraint on Moore's Law.


==See also==
==See also==
*[[Semiconductor device fabrication]]
*[[Semiconductor device fabrication]]
*[[Fabless manufacturing]]
*[[Fabless manufacturing]]
*[[Wirth's law]], an analogous law about software complicating over time
*[[Semiconductor consolidation]]
*[[Semiconductor consolidation]]


Line 16: Line 18:


==External links==
==External links==
*{{cite web |first=Michael |last=Kanellos |title=Soaring costs of chipmaking recast industry |date=2003 |work=CNET |publisher=News.com |url=https://archive.is/20130119214941/http://news.com.com/Semi+survival/2009-1001_3-981418.html}}
*{{cite web |first=Michael |last=Kanellos |title=Soaring costs of chipmaking recast industry |date=2003 |work=CNET |publisher=News.com |url=http://news.com.com/Semi+survival/2009-1001_3-981418.html |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130119214941/http://news.com.com/Semi+survival/2009-1001_3-981418.html |archive-date=2013-01-19 }}


{{Computer laws}}
{{Computer laws}}


[[Category:Adages]]
[[Category:Adages]]
[[Category:Computer architecture statements]]
[[Category:Computer industry]]
[[Category:Computing culture]]
[[Category:Computing culture]]
[[Category:Electronic design]]
[[Category:Electronic design]]
[[Category:Exponentials]]
[[Category:Temporal exponentials]]
[[Category:Computer industry]]
[[Category:Rules of thumb]]
[[Category:Rules of thumb]]
[[Category:Electronics industry]]

Latest revision as of 09:10, 3 July 2024

Rock's law or Moore's second law, named for Arthur Rock or Gordon Moore, says that the cost of a semiconductor chip fabrication plant doubles every four years.[1] As of 2015, the price had reached about 14 billion US dollars.[2]

Rock's law can be seen as the economic flip side to Moore's (first) law – that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles every two years. The latter is a direct consequence of the ongoing growth of the capital-intensive semiconductor industry— innovative and popular products mean more profits, meaning more capital available to invest in ever higher levels of large-scale integration, which in turn leads to the creation of even more innovative products.[citation needed]

The semiconductor industry has always been extremely capital-intensive, with ever-dropping manufacturing unit costs. Thus, the ultimate limits to growth of the industry will constrain the maximum amount of capital that can be invested in new products; at some point, Rock's Law will collide with Moore's Law.[3][4][5]

It has been suggested that fabrication plant costs have not increased as quickly as predicted by Rock's law – indeed plateauing in the late 1990s[6] – and also that the fabrication plant cost per transistor (which has shown a pronounced downward trend[6]) may be more relevant as a constraint on Moore's Law.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "FAQs". India Electronics & Semiconductor Association. Archived from the original on 2017-11-20. Retrieved 2013-04-09.
  2. ^ Armasu, Lucian (8 May 2015). "Samsung's New $14 Billion Chip Plant To Manufacture DRAM, Processors In 2017". Tom's Hardware. Reuters.
  3. ^ Dorsch, Jeff. "Does Moore's Law Still Hold Up?" (PDF). Edavision.com. Archived from the original on 6 May 2006.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  4. ^ Schaller, Bob (1996). "The Origin, Nature, and Implications of 'Moore's Law'". Research.Microsoft.com. Archived from the original on 13 November 2008.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  5. ^ Tremblay, Jean-François (26 June 2006). "Riding On Flat Panels". Chemical & Engineering News. 84 (26): 13–16. doi:10.1021/cen-v084n026.p013.
  6. ^ a b Ross, Philip E. (2003). "5 Commandments: The rules engineers live by weren't always set in stone". IEEE Spectrum.
[edit]