Jump to content

Talk:Raspberry: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talkheader|search=yes}}
{{Talkheader|search=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Biology|class=c}}
{{WikiProject Plants|class=c|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Plants|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Food and drink|class=c
{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=High}}
}}
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = no
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = yes
|importance=High}}
{{Spoken Wikipedia request|Catfurball|Important}}
{{Spoken Wikipedia request|Catfurball|Important}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 19: Line 13:
|archive = Talk:Raspberry/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Raspberry/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{Use American English}}
{{Annual readership}}
{{Annual readership}}
== Pruning raspberry plants ==


== Fibre per day ==
We have a few raspberry plants in our flower bed (former owners planted). They have wonderful fruit (when not eaten by the Japan beetles) How and when can they be pruned? There are 6 ft long branches that don't do anything but catch your leg when driving by in the lawn mower! Nedra
[[Special:Contributions/108.66.166.17|108.66.166.17]] ([[User talk:108.66.166.17|talk]]) 14:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


The British Heart Foundation recommend 30g for females and males. The statement that females should have less might be dangerously misleading. Physical size and work now being more equal. [https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/nutrition/fibre#:~:text=How%20much%20fibre%20should%20I,are%20rich%20in%20fibre%20too.]https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/nutrition/fibre#:~:text=How%20much%20fibre%20should%20I,are%20rich%20in%20fibre%20too. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9|2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9|talk]]) 23:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
== Problem with iw links... ==
:[[Dietary fiber]] comparisons among various foods is offtopic for this article. I removed the "comparison" table as having low relevance and inadequate sourcing. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 01:19, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
== Featured picture scheduled for POTD ==


Hello! This is to let editors know that [[:File:Raspberries (Rubus_idaeus).jpg]], a [[Wikipedia:Featured pictures|featured picture]] used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Picture of the day|picture of the day]] (POTD) for December 14, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at [[Template:POTD/2023-12-14]]. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the [[Main Page]]. If you have any concerns, please place a message at [[Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day]]. Thank you! &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 23:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC) <!-- Template:UpcomingPOTD -->
Hello all,
I think we have a problem with interwiki links. This article is about the garden plant, and the plant people buy in shops. It should therefore link to [[:de:Himbeere]], but that page links to [[Rubus idaeus]] (the "European raspberry"?).


:{{u|Amakuru}} - please remove or rewrite the misinformation in the last sentence of the image caption: nutrient content for raspberries is provided in the USDA table already in the article as an expert source; raspberries contain negligible iron (see table), and the only dietary 'antioxidant' present is vitamin C. No [[WP:MEDRS]] sources and no national regulatory agency states that raspberries are rich in unnamed 'antioxidants' other than vitamin C. [[List of antioxidants in food|Only vitamins A-C-E are dietary antioxidants]]; other raspberry compounds like polyphenols are not nutrients but are only phytochemicals with unknown in vivo effects. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 00:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
I am not a biologist, but I think we should really make a differeence between a "raspberry", and one of the several 'varieties' there are. My idea:
<div style="margin-top:4px; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background:#faf5ff; overflow:auto;"><div style="margin:0.6em 0.4em 0.1em;">{{POTD/Day|2023-12-14|excludeheader=yes}}</div></div>
* An article about "raspberry" (this one) - the general term.This article should link the "most common" species/cultivar (if it doesn't already).
* Several articles about raspberry species ("R. iudaus is a kind of raspberry (with link) that mainly occurs in Europe (etc)"


== Production table ==
What do other people think? --[[User:Eptalon|Eptalon]] ([[User talk:Eptalon|talk]]) 18:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
:That seems a bit over the top. Instead, put it all in this one article and improve the links being made. [[User:Varybit|Varybit]] ([[User talk:Varybit|talk]]) 17:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


Per [[MOS:ACCESS#FLOAT]], floating elements should be placed inside the section they belong to; do not place the image at the end of the previous section. Consequently I have moved the production table into the production section.
== Jam ==


This has the disadvantage of creating a tall thin table with 13 lines of text in desktop mode to display just 6 rows of data in a short 1-paragraph section which stacks it into the table in the next section. I attempted to alleviate this with these changes which were reverted by @[[User:Zefr|Zefr]]
The only time jam is mentioned is in relation to one specific variety. I have made jam from at least two other varieties and I am sure that any Raspberry could make good jam. Is it OK to amend this article accordingly? [[User:Varybit|Varybit]] ([[User talk:Varybit|talk]]) 17:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
# Moving the source text completely into a footnote and the footnote into the header. (-2 line)
:Please don't make edits based on your own experience, as this is [[WP:OR]]. If there is a [[WP:SECONDARY]] source discussing jams from different berry varieties, then that would be usable, although "jam-making" falls into the "not" category for Wikipedia, [[WP:NOTRECIPE]]. --[[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 17:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
# Changing width:14em to whitespace:nowrap. (-2 lines)
# Moving the units from the headers into each row. (-1 line)
# Eliminating the column headers. It is obvious that one column is the country and the other is amount produced. (-1 line)
# Right aligning the table cells so the units were aligned. In retrospect, I should have kept the countries left aligned so the flags lined up.
# Adding {{tl|clear}} at the end to prevent table stacking. In retrospect, I think this was a mistake.
The result is a table that is half the height and only slightly wider but still ok on narrow screens. I propose to restore #1-#4 and a revised #5. I am open to other suggestions on how to improve this table’s appearance in the article, eg, by adjusting or eliminating any of these.
[[User:YBG|YBG]] ([[User talk:YBG|talk]]) 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


:I think you're overconcerned with minor technical issues. Over many years of editing this production section, I have checked the display of table and text on at least 4 different computers and various cell phones with narrow screens, with no issues that detract from informing the common user.
:[[User:Varybit|Varybit]], [[WP:BOLD|Be bold]] :) but you may want to find sources that support what you want to write. Here are a couple that might help.
:Regarding your suggestions: 1. disagree; search sources like Google retrieve what is written in the text, so a footnote may not provide any information to the search user, and de-emphasizes the country volumes easily seen in the table and discussed by the text. 2. disagree; the 14em width was chosen to accommodate the flags and summary data, and has worked fine this way for years. It could be changed to 13em or 15em, but 14em was chosen as the narrowest good display on different devices. 3. disagree; the suggestion is illogically repetitive and adds width to each row; scientific tables would not repeat the same column measure as you suggest. 4. disagree; the header for thousands of tonnes explains the column values - think of the common user who may be unfamiliar with data displays - the current format is a simple presentation. 5. disagree; this is a style choice made during editing - centered flags and data are a more pleasing display, in my opinion. 6. in such a case as this table with short text content, the clear command creates unnecessary white space. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 21:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
*[https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Jam_Maker_s_Garden/vUwmDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=raspberry+varieties+for+jam&printsec=frontcover Source 1]
:: {| class="wikitable" style="float:right; width:13em; text-align:center;"
*[https://www.google.com/books/edition/Old_Fashioned_Jams_Jellies_and_Sweet_Pre/dyuCDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1 Source 2]
|+ Raspberry production <br> <small> 2022, in thousands of [[tonne]]s<ref name="faostat"> [[Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database|FAOSTAT]] of the [[United Nations]]{{cite web|url=http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC|title=Production of raspberries in 2022; Pick lists by Crops/Regions/Production Quantity/Year|date=2024|publisher=United Nations, [[Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database]]|access-date=29 May 2024}}</ref></small>
*[https://www.google.com/search?q=raspberry+varieties+for+jam&tbm=bks&ei=XS-NXKKwN5Lj_Aalwp2YBw&start=0&sa=N&ved=0ahUKEwji0oqAlYfhAhWSMd8KHSVhB3M4ChDy0wMIZw&biw=1075&bih=638&dpr=1.5 Other sources] at Google books.
|-
:Hopefully this is helpful to you.<br />&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">Berean Hunter</span>]] [[User talk :Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">(talk)</span>]] 17:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
|{{RUS}} ||212

|-
::I don't understand. Why is it OK to keep a completely unsourced comment that Black Raspberries can be made into jam, but not OK to change that comment to include all raspberries. Is anyone contending that amending the comment on jam to include all raspberries would make the page more accurate? I am trying to wrap my head around all the confusing (and often conflicting) rules being thrown around on Wikipedia. Why is it so hard just to improve articles and help readers to get accurate information? [[User:Varybit|Varybit]] ([[User talk:Varybit|talk]]) 12:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
|{{MEX}} ||174
== Jazzberry ==
|-
:The term "jazzberry jam" shows up as well, searching for raspberry jam. Maybe they are the same thing? Jazzberry depending on where and what the term is for seems to be Raspberries mixed with yogurt. Gives it a bit more of a sweet flavor. Recent limited cereal Kellogg's "Crayola Jazzberry cereal" that uses the term, and then there is that cartoon that I already sick of hearing about [[Razzberry Jazzberry Jam]]. So it is a thing. I think it should be added the Raspberry article and a new redirect be used for "Jazzberry" because it's a word that is getting decent hits at this point and it should be address. [[User:Devilmanozzy|Devilmanozzy]] ([[User talk:Devilmanozzy|talk]]) 21:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
|{{SRB}} ||116

|-
== Fibre per day ==
|{{POL}} ||105

|-
The British Heart Foundation recommend 30g for females and males. The statement that females should have less might be dangerously misleading. Physical size and work now being more equal. [https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/nutrition/fibre#:~:text=How%20much%20fibre%20should%20I,are%20rich%20in%20fibre%20too.]https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/nutrition/fibre#:~:text=How%20much%20fibre%20should%20I,are%20rich%20in%20fibre%20too. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9|2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9|talk]]) 23:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
|{{USA}} ||76
|-
|'''World''' ||'''948'''
|}
::Good points all, @[[User:Zefr|Zefr]], though I believe you misunderstood my point 1 and I am fairly confident that Google screenscrapes the entire page including the references section. Anyway, here is my compromise proposal.
::{{talk ref}}
::— [[User:YBG|YBG]] ([[User talk:YBG|talk]]) 23:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Thanks - looks good (13em works). [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 23:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
::::I moved it to the article with one minor change: changing "width:13em" to "white-space:nowrap". This guarantees that the width will be the minimum needed to avoid line wrapping no matter what weird combination of browser and font is being used. [[User:YBG|YBG]] ([[User talk:YBG|talk]]) 01:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:09, 8 July 2024


Fibre per day

[edit]

The British Heart Foundation recommend 30g for females and males. The statement that females should have less might be dangerously misleading. Physical size and work now being more equal. [1]https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/nutrition/fibre#:~:text=How%20much%20fibre%20should%20I,are%20rich%20in%20fibre%20too. 2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9 (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dietary fiber comparisons among various foods is offtopic for this article. I removed the "comparison" table as having low relevance and inadequate sourcing. Zefr (talk) 01:19, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Raspberries (Rubus_idaeus).jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 14, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-12-14. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 23:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amakuru - please remove or rewrite the misinformation in the last sentence of the image caption: nutrient content for raspberries is provided in the USDA table already in the article as an expert source; raspberries contain negligible iron (see table), and the only dietary 'antioxidant' present is vitamin C. No WP:MEDRS sources and no national regulatory agency states that raspberries are rich in unnamed 'antioxidants' other than vitamin C. Only vitamins A-C-E are dietary antioxidants; other raspberry compounds like polyphenols are not nutrients but are only phytochemicals with unknown in vivo effects. Zefr (talk) 00:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Raspberry

The raspberry is the edible fruit of a multitude of plant species in the genus Rubus of the rose family, most of which are in the subgenus Idaeobatus. The name also applies to the plant itself. Raspberry plants are perennial with woody stems. It is an aggregate fruit, developing from the numerous distinct carpels of a single flower. Originally occurring in East Asia, the raspberry is now cultivated across northern Europe and North America and is eaten in a variety of ways including as a whole fruit and in preserves, cakes, ice cream and liqueurs. Raspberries are a rich source of vitamin C, manganese, and dietary fiber.

Photograph credit: Ivar Leidus

Production table

[edit]

Per MOS:ACCESS#FLOAT, floating elements should be placed inside the section they belong to; do not place the image at the end of the previous section. Consequently I have moved the production table into the production section.

This has the disadvantage of creating a tall thin table with 13 lines of text in desktop mode to display just 6 rows of data in a short 1-paragraph section which stacks it into the table in the next section. I attempted to alleviate this with these changes which were reverted by @Zefr

  1. Moving the source text completely into a footnote and the footnote into the header. (-2 line)
  2. Changing width:14em to whitespace:nowrap. (-2 lines)
  3. Moving the units from the headers into each row. (-1 line)
  4. Eliminating the column headers. It is obvious that one column is the country and the other is amount produced. (-1 line)
  5. Right aligning the table cells so the units were aligned. In retrospect, I should have kept the countries left aligned so the flags lined up.
  6. Adding {{clear}} at the end to prevent table stacking. In retrospect, I think this was a mistake.

The result is a table that is half the height and only slightly wider but still ok on narrow screens. I propose to restore #1-#4 and a revised #5. I am open to other suggestions on how to improve this table’s appearance in the article, eg, by adjusting or eliminating any of these. — YBG (talk) 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're overconcerned with minor technical issues. Over many years of editing this production section, I have checked the display of table and text on at least 4 different computers and various cell phones with narrow screens, with no issues that detract from informing the common user.
Regarding your suggestions: 1. disagree; search sources like Google retrieve what is written in the text, so a footnote may not provide any information to the search user, and de-emphasizes the country volumes easily seen in the table and discussed by the text. 2. disagree; the 14em width was chosen to accommodate the flags and summary data, and has worked fine this way for years. It could be changed to 13em or 15em, but 14em was chosen as the narrowest good display on different devices. 3. disagree; the suggestion is illogically repetitive and adds width to each row; scientific tables would not repeat the same column measure as you suggest. 4. disagree; the header for thousands of tonnes explains the column values - think of the common user who may be unfamiliar with data displays - the current format is a simple presentation. 5. disagree; this is a style choice made during editing - centered flags and data are a more pleasing display, in my opinion. 6. in such a case as this table with short text content, the clear command creates unnecessary white space. Zefr (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Raspberry production
2022, in thousands of tonnes[1]
 Russia 212
 Mexico 174
 Serbia 116
 Poland 105
 United States 76
World 948
Good points all, @Zefr, though I believe you misunderstood my point 1 and I am fairly confident that Google screenscrapes the entire page including the references section. Anyway, here is my compromise proposal.

References

  1. ^ FAOSTAT of the United Nations"Production of raspberries in 2022; Pick lists by Crops/Regions/Production Quantity/Year". United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database. 2024. Retrieved 29 May 2024.
YBG (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - looks good (13em works). Zefr (talk) 23:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I moved it to the article with one minor change: changing "width:13em" to "white-space:nowrap". This guarantees that the width will be the minimum needed to avoid line wrapping no matter what weird combination of browser and font is being used. YBG (talk) 01:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]