Jump to content

Talk:Raspberry: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
 
(36 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talkheader|search=yes}}
{{Talkheader|search=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Science|class=c|subpage=Biology}}
{{WikiProject Plants|class=c|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Plants|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Food and drink|class=c
{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=High}}
}}
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = no
{{Spoken Wikipedia request|Catfurball|Important}}
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = yes
|importance=High}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}}
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}}
Line 18: Line 13:
|archive = Talk:Raspberry/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Raspberry/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{Use American English}}
{{Annual readership}}


== More Raspberries ==
== Fibre per day ==

Not to blow raspberries at the existing definition, but could someone add more information about the source the comedic act of blowing raspberries. Saw something on google about a W.C. Fields movie reference to a Raspberry cart's tire loosing air and making the noise.
Mat

:Check the disambiguation page for more info. [[User:Shmooisalcap|Shmooisalcap]] ([[User talk:Shmooisalcap|talk]]) 07:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

== Question on Raspberries ==
I have raspberries in my garden... but no clue when they are ripe. They feel quite hard now, they should be soft, right?
--[[User:Enjoydotcom|Enjoydotcom]] 14:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

yes, should be soft and sweet (not tart).
if they are hard they need water and probably it is too sunny.

You don't seem to know much about raspberries...being too hard means they're unwripe which, if anything to do with the sun, means they haven't got enough of it. And the way to tell if a plant needs water is if the leaves begin to shrivel...the fruit will have never been produced if the plant wasn't getting enough water.

Also this article is jumbled and uses a lot of words and doesn't get much good information across.
I think it says something about our society that Britney Spears page is updated live to the minute with perfect information 24/7/365 and yet we still can't get a good raspberry page up. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.109.157.193|71.109.157.193]] ([[User talk:71.109.157.193|talk]]) 15:12, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


---

If they come off the bush easily they are ripe if they are hard or impossible to take off the bush then they are not ready yet (they should leave the center stem on the bush).

=== Another Question ===
Are Raspberries a North American plant or European or Asian in origin?

: The answer is roughly: Yes. There are several species which are called Raspberry and the cultivars are often hybrids of both. [[Rubus strigosus]] is a North American native plant, and [[Rubus idaeus]] is a European native plant. [[User:Quickos|Quickos]] ([[User talk:Quickos|talk]]) 17:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

All berries can be found throughout the Northern Hemisphere naturally and now they are grown commercially throughout the world on five continents. (U.S., Mexico, all over South America, U.K., Spain, Portugal, New Zealand, Australia, etc.--New Zealand and Australia actually supply each other at different times of the year.) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.109.157.193|71.109.157.193]] ([[User talk:71.109.157.193|talk]]) 15:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Well isn't that a bit wierd?
I mean, humanity originate from Rift Valley in Africa,
yeat Rasberries and Blackberries seems to have just all of a sudden
covered most of the northern hemisphere, doesn't make much sense to me.
Even if it existed during the Gondwana super-continent,
shouldn't it originate from a spesific region and im suprised there's so lite or no research/fact about this compared with other famous berries,fruits etc.

--[[User:Byzantios|Byzantios]] ([[User talk:Byzantios|talk]]) 12:19, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

:Raspberries (''Rubus strigos'', N. America, and ''Rubus idaeus'', Europe) are native plants to ocean coastal regions of [[British Columbia]] and [[Newfoundland]] in Canada and the [[Pacific Northwest]] American states of [[Oregon]] and [[Washington (state)|Washington]] around latitude 48 degrees north. They grow wild in forest borders and mountain slopes of these regions,[http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/wild-berries] and are successfully cultivated in BC,[http://www.davidsonia.org/files/17_1_raspberry.pdf][http://www.al.gov.bc.ca/berries/overview.htm] Oregon[http://www.oregon-berries.com/] and Washington[http://www.red-raspberry.org/] which collectively supply the majority of US and Canadian markets for raspberries, with Oregon as the largest producer.[http://www.berriesnw.com/SFU/2005/SFU11-01-05.pdf] --[[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 15:33, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
::To confuse matters, ''R. strigosus'' is sometimes called a subspecies of ''R. idaeus'', i.e., ''R. idaeus'' subsp. ''strigosus''. [[User:Ocotea|Ocotea]] ([[User talk:Ocotea|talk]]) 17:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

== Nutritional Chart ==

I can't find a nutritional chart any where on the web about Raspberries not even on this
</http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/> website. I think every page on a certain food
should have a nutritional chart like the [[wolfberry]] page. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/67.60.59.249|67.60.59.249]] ([[User talk:67.60.59.249|talk]]) 04:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->

I'm sure it has some unique health benefits that could me mentioned. [[User:Liam Skoda|cyclosarin]] 03:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Here is an article about red raspberry nutrition and antioxidants[http://www.berrydoctor.com/broadcast/2007/raspberries.htm] and the in-depth nutrient chart for red raspberries from World's Healthiest Foods, a great site with an informative article on raspberries, see links [http://whfoods.org/genpage.php?tname=nutrientprofile&dbid=23]--[[User:Paul144|Paul144]] 13:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm a bit confused about the nutritional chart that shows in 123 grams of raspberries there are 64 kcal. Based off of a quick use of google calculator that would indicate there are 64,000 calories in 123 grams of raspberries, which is a bit over 4 ounces. 32 times an average daily intake of 2000 calories seems a bit off. Am I reading the chart wrong or is my understanding of the numbers incorrect? [[User:Zharmad|Zharmad]] ([[User talk:Zharmad|talk]]) 21:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
: The calories typically discussed in nutritional contexts are actually kcals. [[Special:Contributions/128.187.198.199|128.187.198.199]] ([[User talk:128.187.198.199|talk]]) 16:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

== Picture Overkill ==

Umm.. most of the pics are redundant, of poor quality, or not particularly helpful or unique. I mean, do we really need a picture of raspberries, and then a picture of a wasp and raspberries? [[User:76.22.201.109|76.22.201.109]] 06:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

== In season? ==

When are raspberries traditionally in season? "Early season" is rather vague. --[[User:Eptin|Eptin]] ([[User talk:Eptin|talk]]) 07:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Raspberries are traditionally in season late spring through early summer (late June through late July/early August). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.109.157.193|71.109.157.193]] ([[User talk:71.109.157.193|talk]]) 15:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Gross Raspberry Bug ==
There is an insect that lives on raspberries that has a very distinct smell and flavour. I can't find any information about it anywhere. Any help?
[[User:Shmooisalcap|Shmooisalcap]] ([[User talk:Shmooisalcap|talk]]) 07:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Does it have an armored back that looks like a shield?
-- Stink bug.
If you're in Florida they have chiggers but you can barely see those and I don't think they smell.

== Is this an unusual variety? ==

We got some planting stocks from a very old person in our church about 20 years ago. They are very vigorous and cover about 30 ft square. The unusual thing is that they have berries for 5 months (late May to late October)in the San Francisco Bay Area. In July, August and Sept, we get a bowl (8" by 3" every 2-3 days), and June and October every 4-5 days. Most people are surprised by this. Is this unusual? Does anyone know the variety? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.107.78.102|69.107.78.102]] ([[User talk:69.107.78.102|talk]]) 17:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Not to beat a dead horse but it was probably someone who got their hands on Driscoll's plants...Driscoll spends more than any company in the world developing berry plants and their varieties have revolutionized commercial production because they grow outside the normal season (late spring, early summer). This actually just recently happened in the 80's and it has never been covered because journalists (ESPECIALLy the Californian stock) hate big ag companies. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.109.157.193|71.109.157.193]] ([[User talk:71.109.157.193|talk]]) 15:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


It is probably some sort of primocane fruiting variety, where the first year and second year canes can both produce fruit. This gives it a longer season. If you really want to know you could take pictures of the leaves and fruits and contact a horticultural department of a university, preferably one that does research in raspberry. If they can't ID it they might be interested in growing it themselves. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/174.109.180.85|174.109.180.85]] ([[User talk:174.109.180.85|talk]]) 21:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== thorns ==

Not a word is said on how these plants have thorns.

== Raspberry Nutritional Content ==

The current nutritional facts on the page for raspberries is incorrect. The amount of iron in raspberries is much less than what the page indicates. If you go to the USDA nutritional site where information supposedly came from, 100 grams of raspberries only yields .69 mg of iron, and the recommended daily intake for an adult is 18 mg. Thus, raspberries won't yield 40% dv of iron as the wikipedia page claims. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.109.236.37|68.109.236.37]] ([[User talk:68.109.236.37|talk]]) 14:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Argentina, Brazil and Chile==

This fruit is also planted in [[Argentina]], [[Brazil]] and [[Chile]]. In [[Brazil]] this is a rare plant, but in [[Chile]] , there's exportation of this fruit.[[User:Agre22|Agre22]] ([[User talk:Agre22|talk]]) 16:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC)agre22

== Merger proposal, merger with species ''[[Rubus idaeus]]'' ==
Oppose. The first sentence of this page explains the reason perfectly "The raspberry is the edible fruit of a multitude of plant species in the genus Rubus, most of which are in the subgenus Idaeobatus". This page corresponds more-or-less to the subgenus Idaeobatus, and absolutely not to the single species ''[[Rubus idaeus]]''. [[User:Nadiatalent|Nadiatalent]] ([[User talk:Nadiatalent|talk]]) 13:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

== Language links ==

If you look at the German article it has a lot more language links: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himbeere

I was merging the list when I noticed that none of the languages match (the list on en vs de). Can someone tell me why? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Micklweiss|Micklweiss]] ([[User talk:Micklweiss|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Micklweiss|contribs]]) 15:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:The English wikipedia has two pages, one called ''[[Rubus idaeus]]'', and this one called Raspberry, which is about the many different species that share that common name in English. Several of the pages in other languages with names that might match Raspberry are actually only about ''Rubus idaeus'', so links to them from this page have been removed. (I don't know enough about usage of common names in those other languages to know whether there is an equivalent to the English "raspberry".)[[User:Nadiatalent|Nadiatalent]] ([[User talk:Nadiatalent|talk]]) 17:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

==Potential references==
* Paredes-López, O. et al. ”Berries: improving human health and healthy aging, and promoting quality life – a review”, [http://www.springerlink.com/content/3425072185665507/fulltext.pdf Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (2010),65(3):299-308.]
* Rao, A.V. / Snyder, D.M. “Raspberries and human health: a review”, J. Agric. Food Chem (2010),58(7):3871-83. [http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf903484g Abstract only].
--[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 17:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


Thank you for your opinion and suggestion.

These reviews are meant for readers who would like to delve deeper into the subject.
The reviews are placed in the “further reading” – section because the Wikipedia guideline for this section read: “… publications that would help interested readers learn more about the article subject. The Further reading section (…) should normally not duplicate the content of the References section” ([[WP:FURTHER]]).

The Wikipedia content guideline for “Identifying reliable sources (medicine)” ([[WP:MEDRS]]) read: “It is usually best to use reviews and meta-analyses where possible.”


The British Heart Foundation recommend 30g for females and males. The statement that females should have less might be dangerously misleading. Physical size and work now being more equal. [https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/nutrition/fibre#:~:text=How%20much%20fibre%20should%20I,are%20rich%20in%20fibre%20too.]https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/nutrition/fibre#:~:text=How%20much%20fibre%20should%20I,are%20rich%20in%20fibre%20too. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9|2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9|talk]]) 23:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
The reviews in question reflect the latest research (last 10 years) in the field, they are scholarly and peer-reviewed, and they are published in academic journals. [[User:Granateple|Granateple]] ([[User talk:Granateple|talk]]) 22:55, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
:[[Dietary fiber]] comparisons among various foods is offtopic for this article. I removed the "comparison" table as having low relevance and inadequate sourcing. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 01:19, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
== Featured picture scheduled for POTD ==


Hello! This is to let editors know that [[:File:Raspberries (Rubus_idaeus).jpg]], a [[Wikipedia:Featured pictures|featured picture]] used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Picture of the day|picture of the day]] (POTD) for December 14, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at [[Template:POTD/2023-12-14]]. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the [[Main Page]]. If you have any concerns, please place a message at [[Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day]]. Thank you! &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 23:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC) <!-- Template:UpcomingPOTD -->
== Incomplete model ==


:{{u|Amakuru}} - please remove or rewrite the misinformation in the last sentence of the image caption: nutrient content for raspberries is provided in the USDA table already in the article as an expert source; raspberries contain negligible iron (see table), and the only dietary 'antioxidant' present is vitamin C. No [[WP:MEDRS]] sources and no national regulatory agency states that raspberries are rich in unnamed 'antioxidants' other than vitamin C. [[List of antioxidants in food|Only vitamins A-C-E are dietary antioxidants]]; other raspberry compounds like polyphenols are not nutrients but are only phytochemicals with unknown in vivo effects. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 00:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[[File:Modell von Rubus idaeus (Himbeere) -Osterloh Nr. 80-.jpg|thumb|Model of a section of a raspberry, [[Botanical Museum Greifswald]]]]
<div style="margin-top:4px; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background:#faf5ff; overflow:auto;"><div style="margin:0.6em 0.4em 0.1em;">{{POTD/Day|2023-12-14|excludeheader=yes}}</div></div>
This model is so strange that I've removed the photo of it from the page. It seems to suggest that by the time the fruit ripens the calyx has become quite fleshy. It also shows very long stigmas for ''Rubus idaeus'' (which the label says the model represents). [[User:Sminthopsis84|Sminthopsis84]] ([[User talk:Sminthopsis84|talk]]) 19:40, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


== Blue raspberry ==
== Production table ==


Per [[MOS:ACCESS#FLOAT]], floating elements should be placed inside the section they belong to; do not place the image at the end of the previous section. Consequently I have moved the production table into the production section.
I'm not sure about blue raspberry being ''R. leucodermis''. If blue raspberries were cultivated shortly after the American Revolution, they were probably ''R. occidentalis''; ''R. leucodermis'' grows further west than ''R. occidentalis'' (in spite of the species name), and wouldn't have been available for cultivation in the late 18th century. ''R. occidentalis'' remains the more widely cultivated of the two species today (with major production centers in areas where ''R. leucodermis'' is native). Both species share common names "black raspberry" and "blackcap (raspberry)". Presumably "blue raspberry" may also refer to both species. [[User:Plantdrew|Plantdrew]] ([[User talk:Plantdrew|talk]]) 18:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
:Yes, that is a problem. A web search yields several statements that the blue raspberry is ''R. leucodermis'', but nothing that would qualify as a citable source. Google scholar yields nothing. I'm equally unconvinced that these raspberries were cultivated shortly after the American Revolution, and haven't been able to track down with "Columbia" or "Columbian" really means that looks like a cultivar name. The citation that I removed because it was an advertisement for jam, used "Columbian" as if it were a cultivar name. I thought about deleting the material entirely, but suspect that it would be re-added because it seems clear that in Prince Edward County it is considered notable.
:I wonder if the "blue" actually refers to the stem, which is very notably glaucous on ''R. leucodermis'', as the Latin name reflects. [[User:Sminthopsis84|Sminthopsis84]] ([[User talk:Sminthopsis84|talk]]) 19:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
::I appreciate the effort you guys are putting into this clarification and I suppose that I should have some information to share on this topic but I know nothing about it and I feel a little ashamed. [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="cursor:help"><span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span></span>]] 20:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
::::Don't worry about that. This sort of question is unfortunately common with the plants that people eat, although the lack of information about this one is greater than usual. [[User:Sminthopsis84|Sminthopsis84]] ([[User talk:Sminthopsis84|talk]]) 22:41, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
:::I've spent a little bit of time looking for plants for sale, and trying to associate species with cultivars of black/purple raspberry, and I'm more firmly convinced that ''R. leucodermis'' is rarely cultivated at best (not that ''R. occidentalis'' is very commonly cultivated either, but of the two species it seems the far more likely candidate (searches for the actual term in question, "blue raspberry" aren't very helpful as this name is infrequently used). It seems odd to me that United Empire Loyalists would take name something [[Columbia (name)|Columbia]], which suggests to me that the cultivar might predate the Revolution (though this is entirely speculation on my part). [[User:Plantdrew|Plantdrew]] ([[User talk:Plantdrew|talk]]) 22:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
::::There are apparently pick-your-own blue raspberry farms in Prince Edward County, but the season is past. If only wikipedia could offer to pay a botanist to travel up there and identify what is growing (how many raspberries does one need to eat to be sure of what species they are?) I tried online to find a nursery offering plants or anyone offering frozen fruit for sale, but haven't found either. ''R. occidentalis'' turns up here in frozen fruit mixtures (with marionberries, blackberries, and red raspberries), presumably cultivated somewhere in western North America. [[User:Sminthopsis84|Sminthopsis84]] ([[User talk:Sminthopsis84|talk]]) 22:41, 29 September 2013 (UTC).
:::::I will be in Prince Edward County next summer during the height of the blue raspberry season. When I get some pictures, I will post on Wikipedia, and the botanists, can figure out how we ended up with true blue raspberries. I just took them for granted when I was a kid, little did I know that they were a very localized and rare fruit. The Columbia cultivar may be in reference to a New York County. There is a United Empire Loyalist Museum and Research Library in Adolphustown (near Prince Edward Country), that may shed some light on the Empire loyalists agricultural heritage.
::::::Photos would be helpful. The genus ''Rubus'', however, is extremely difficult to identify to the species level, and if the cultivar is somewhat different from its wild ancestors, that difficulty would be even greater. Close-up photos of as many parts of the plant as possible are needed, and it can sometimes be helpful to look at the leaves on both the fruiting canes and the new canes (that will fruit the following year), because the leaves can be different in the two years. It might not be possible to determine without DNA sequencing which species this cultivar belongs to, and it might be derived from a hybrid. Perhaps, if enough citations can be found that give solid statements about it (e.g., no advertising or blogs), these blue raspberries might warrant their own page, possibly including citations (if they exist) that say what species it is or that the species affinity is unknown. About the cultivar name, yes indeed, county names seem to show up often in fruit-cultivar names and might not represent the original source, as has happened, for example with the [[Tompkins King (apple)]]. [[User:Sminthopsis84|Sminthopsis84]] ([[User talk:Sminthopsis84|talk]]) 12:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
:::::::The New York suggestion is amazing! There is a wonderful series of books about the fruits of New York: The Apples of New York, The Plums of New York, ... The relevant one here is [http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/30382#page/120/mode/1up The Small Fruits of New York] where on page 96 (BHL's page index says page 98) the 'Columbian' cultivar of hybrid raspberry is described in great detail, and there's a photo on the following page. [[User:Sminthopsis84|Sminthopsis84]] ([[User talk:Sminthopsis84|talk]]) 13:36, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
::::::::From your source the Hybrid was created in the 1890's, way pass the time for the Empire Loyalists coming to Canada. The question is, are the blue raspberries growing in the county, actually Columbian, or did the county growers get their history mixed up. I realize the berry has to be a purple hybrid (unless it is a rare mutation), however the berry may fall on that borderline where the play of light, can not make you decide if the berry is purplish-blue or blueish-purple. Even blueberries are blue on the vine, but purple on the plate (as they get oxidized). At least I now have a colour sketch for the what the plants and berries should look like for the Columbian Cultivar (thanks to Sminthopsis84 for the reference). It will be an interesting and yummy research project next summer, when I vacation in the county.


This has the disadvantage of creating a tall thin table with 13 lines of text in desktop mode to display just 6 rows of data in a short 1-paragraph section which stacks it into the table in the next section. I attempted to alleviate this with these changes which were reverted by @[[User:Zefr|Zefr]]
== Pruning raspberry plants ==
# Moving the source text completely into a footnote and the footnote into the header. (-2 line)
# Changing width:14em to whitespace:nowrap. (-2 lines)
# Moving the units from the headers into each row. (-1 line)
# Eliminating the column headers. It is obvious that one column is the country and the other is amount produced. (-1 line)
# Right aligning the table cells so the units were aligned. In retrospect, I should have kept the countries left aligned so the flags lined up.
# Adding {{tl|clear}} at the end to prevent table stacking. In retrospect, I think this was a mistake.
The result is a table that is half the height and only slightly wider but still ok on narrow screens. I propose to restore #1-#4 and a revised #5. I am open to other suggestions on how to improve this table’s appearance in the article, eg, by adjusting or eliminating any of these.
— [[User:YBG|YBG]] ([[User talk:YBG|talk]]) 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


:I think you're overconcerned with minor technical issues. Over many years of editing this production section, I have checked the display of table and text on at least 4 different computers and various cell phones with narrow screens, with no issues that detract from informing the common user.
We have a few raspberry plants in our flower bed (former owners planted). They have wonderful fruit (when not eaten by the Japan beetles) How and when can they be pruned? There are 6 ft long branches that don't do anything but catch your leg when driving by in the lawn mower!
:Regarding your suggestions: 1. disagree; search sources like Google retrieve what is written in the text, so a footnote may not provide any information to the search user, and de-emphasizes the country volumes easily seen in the table and discussed by the text. 2. disagree; the 14em width was chosen to accommodate the flags and summary data, and has worked fine this way for years. It could be changed to 13em or 15em, but 14em was chosen as the narrowest good display on different devices. 3. disagree; the suggestion is illogically repetitive and adds width to each row; scientific tables would not repeat the same column measure as you suggest. 4. disagree; the header for thousands of tonnes explains the column values - think of the common user who may be unfamiliar with data displays - the current format is a simple presentation. 5. disagree; this is a style choice made during editing - centered flags and data are a more pleasing display, in my opinion. 6. in such a case as this table with short text content, the clear command creates unnecessary white space. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 21:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/108.66.166.17|108.66.166.17]] ([[User talk:108.66.166.17|talk]]) 14:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Nedra
:: {| class="wikitable" style="float:right; width:13em; text-align:center;"
|+ Raspberry production <br> <small> 2022, in thousands of [[tonne]]s<ref name="faostat"> [[Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database|FAOSTAT]] of the [[United Nations]]{{cite web|url=http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC|title=Production of raspberries in 2022; Pick lists by Crops/Regions/Production Quantity/Year|date=2024|publisher=United Nations, [[Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database]]|access-date=29 May 2024}}</ref></small>
|-
|{{RUS}} ||212
|-
|{{MEX}} ||174
|-
|{{SRB}} ||116
|-
|{{POL}} ||105
|-
|{{USA}} ||76
|-
|'''World''' ||'''948'''
|}
::Good points all, @[[User:Zefr|Zefr]], though I believe you misunderstood my point 1 and I am fairly confident that Google screenscrapes the entire page including the references section. Anyway, here is my compromise proposal.
::{{talk ref}}
::— [[User:YBG|YBG]] ([[User talk:YBG|talk]]) 23:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Thanks - looks good (13em works). [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 23:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
::::I moved it to the article with one minor change: changing "width:13em" to "white-space:nowrap". This guarantees that the width will be the minimum needed to avoid line wrapping no matter what weird combination of browser and font is being used. [[User:YBG|YBG]] ([[User talk:YBG|talk]]) 01:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:09, 8 July 2024


Fibre per day

[edit]

The British Heart Foundation recommend 30g for females and males. The statement that females should have less might be dangerously misleading. Physical size and work now being more equal. [1]https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/nutrition/fibre#:~:text=How%20much%20fibre%20should%20I,are%20rich%20in%20fibre%20too. 2A00:23C5:9E8E:3801:5874:DC26:9D8C:18B9 (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dietary fiber comparisons among various foods is offtopic for this article. I removed the "comparison" table as having low relevance and inadequate sourcing. Zefr (talk) 01:19, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Raspberries (Rubus_idaeus).jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 14, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-12-14. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 23:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amakuru - please remove or rewrite the misinformation in the last sentence of the image caption: nutrient content for raspberries is provided in the USDA table already in the article as an expert source; raspberries contain negligible iron (see table), and the only dietary 'antioxidant' present is vitamin C. No WP:MEDRS sources and no national regulatory agency states that raspberries are rich in unnamed 'antioxidants' other than vitamin C. Only vitamins A-C-E are dietary antioxidants; other raspberry compounds like polyphenols are not nutrients but are only phytochemicals with unknown in vivo effects. Zefr (talk) 00:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Raspberry

The raspberry is the edible fruit of a multitude of plant species in the genus Rubus of the rose family, most of which are in the subgenus Idaeobatus. The name also applies to the plant itself. Raspberry plants are perennial with woody stems. It is an aggregate fruit, developing from the numerous distinct carpels of a single flower. Originally occurring in East Asia, the raspberry is now cultivated across northern Europe and North America and is eaten in a variety of ways including as a whole fruit and in preserves, cakes, ice cream and liqueurs. Raspberries are a rich source of vitamin C, manganese, and dietary fiber.

Photograph credit: Ivar Leidus

Production table

[edit]

Per MOS:ACCESS#FLOAT, floating elements should be placed inside the section they belong to; do not place the image at the end of the previous section. Consequently I have moved the production table into the production section.

This has the disadvantage of creating a tall thin table with 13 lines of text in desktop mode to display just 6 rows of data in a short 1-paragraph section which stacks it into the table in the next section. I attempted to alleviate this with these changes which were reverted by @Zefr

  1. Moving the source text completely into a footnote and the footnote into the header. (-2 line)
  2. Changing width:14em to whitespace:nowrap. (-2 lines)
  3. Moving the units from the headers into each row. (-1 line)
  4. Eliminating the column headers. It is obvious that one column is the country and the other is amount produced. (-1 line)
  5. Right aligning the table cells so the units were aligned. In retrospect, I should have kept the countries left aligned so the flags lined up.
  6. Adding {{clear}} at the end to prevent table stacking. In retrospect, I think this was a mistake.

The result is a table that is half the height and only slightly wider but still ok on narrow screens. I propose to restore #1-#4 and a revised #5. I am open to other suggestions on how to improve this table’s appearance in the article, eg, by adjusting or eliminating any of these. — YBG (talk) 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're overconcerned with minor technical issues. Over many years of editing this production section, I have checked the display of table and text on at least 4 different computers and various cell phones with narrow screens, with no issues that detract from informing the common user.
Regarding your suggestions: 1. disagree; search sources like Google retrieve what is written in the text, so a footnote may not provide any information to the search user, and de-emphasizes the country volumes easily seen in the table and discussed by the text. 2. disagree; the 14em width was chosen to accommodate the flags and summary data, and has worked fine this way for years. It could be changed to 13em or 15em, but 14em was chosen as the narrowest good display on different devices. 3. disagree; the suggestion is illogically repetitive and adds width to each row; scientific tables would not repeat the same column measure as you suggest. 4. disagree; the header for thousands of tonnes explains the column values - think of the common user who may be unfamiliar with data displays - the current format is a simple presentation. 5. disagree; this is a style choice made during editing - centered flags and data are a more pleasing display, in my opinion. 6. in such a case as this table with short text content, the clear command creates unnecessary white space. Zefr (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Raspberry production
2022, in thousands of tonnes[1]
 Russia 212
 Mexico 174
 Serbia 116
 Poland 105
 United States 76
World 948
Good points all, @Zefr, though I believe you misunderstood my point 1 and I am fairly confident that Google screenscrapes the entire page including the references section. Anyway, here is my compromise proposal.

References

  1. ^ FAOSTAT of the United Nations"Production of raspberries in 2022; Pick lists by Crops/Regions/Production Quantity/Year". United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database. 2024. Retrieved 29 May 2024.
YBG (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - looks good (13em works). Zefr (talk) 23:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I moved it to the article with one minor change: changing "width:13em" to "white-space:nowrap". This guarantees that the width will be the minimum needed to avoid line wrapping no matter what weird combination of browser and font is being used. YBG (talk) 01:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]