Jump to content

Talk:California gold rush: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|archive_age=360|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Vital article|topic=History|class=FA|level=5}}
{{Article history
{{Article history
|action1=PR
|action1=PR
Line 37: Line 36:
|otd16date=2020-01-24|otd16oldid=937274726
|otd16date=2020-01-24|otd16oldid=937274726
|otd17date=2021-01-24|otd17oldid=1002027787
|otd17date=2021-01-24|otd17oldid=1002027787
|otd18date=2024-01-24|otd18oldid=1198126924
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject California|importance=High|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=High|selected-article=yes}}

{{WikiProject California|class=FA|importance=High|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=High|selected-article=yes}}
{{WikiProject Mining|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Mining|class=FA|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=High|AsianAmericans=yes|AsianAmericans-importance=mid|HLA=yes|HLA-importance=mid|MexAm= yes|MexAm-importance= mid|UShistory=yes|UShistory-importance=high|USOldwest=Yes|USOldwest-importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia|En-California Gold Rush Part 1.ogg|204347893}}
{{WikiProject United States
|class=FA
|importance=High
|AsianAmericans=yes
|AsianAmericans-importance=mid
|HLA=yes
|HLA-importance=mid
|MexAm= yes
|MexAm-importance= mid
|UShistory=yes|UShistory-importance=high
|USOldwest=Yes
|USOldwest-importance=High
}}
{{WP1.0|v0.7=pass|class=FA|category=History|importance=Low}}
}}
}}
{{banner holder|collapsed=yes|
{{banner holder|collapsed=yes|
Line 66: Line 52:
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}}
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 3
|counter = 4
|minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadsleft = 3
|algo = old(360d)
|algo = old(360d)
|archive = Talk:California Gold Rush/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:California gold rush/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>[[Random House#Subsidiaries and affiliates|Anchor Books]]</nowiki> The anchor (#Subsidiaries and affiliates) has been [[Special:Diff/309266188|deleted by other users]] before. <!-- {"title":"Subsidiaries and affiliates","appear":{"revid":190235740,"parentid":190234359,"timestamp":"2008-02-09T20:04:31Z","removed_section_titles":[],"added_section_titles":["Subsidiaries and affiliates"]},"disappear":{"revid":309266188,"parentid":309081058,"timestamp":"2009-08-21T15:52:23Z","removed_section_titles":["Subsidiaries and affiliates"],"added_section_titles":[]}} -->
}}
}}


{{old move|date=3 January 2024|from=California Gold Rush|destination=California gold rush|result=moved|link=Special:Permalink/1193696059#Requested move 3 January 2024}}
== Errors with ''History of California'' links ==


== Semi-protected edit request on 4 November 2023 ==
{{u|The Rambling Man}} had reported at [[WP:ERRORS]] that the Jan 24, 1848 was not verifiable in the body by the cited source.[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Main_Page/Errors&oldid=1002023653] Looking at the page's history, it seems like the links to Bancroft's ''History of California'' were incorrectly changed to point to Volume XXII instead of XXIII since October 2019.[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=California_Gold_Rush&diff=919393918&oldid=916151363] I fixed the links with [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=California_Gold_Rush&diff=1002047561&oldid=1002019437 this edit]. I verified that the link in footnote 4 to "Bancroft, Hubert (1888), pp. 32–34" now correctly verifies the text for the Jan 24 date.


{{Edit semi-protected|California Gold Rush|answered=yes}}
I'm not a subject matter expert, so others might want to verify that other citations to that work are correct now. Regards.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 16:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Italicize hatnote for "California Gold Rush (film)" per [[WP:ITHAT]]. [[Special:Contributions/49.150.4.134|49.150.4.134]] ([[User talk:49.150.4.134|talk]]) 02:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> Thank you. [[User:Liu1126|Liu1126]] ([[User talk:Liu1126|talk]]) 17:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


== Requested move 3 January 2024 ==
== Please remove the far-left Marxist propaganda from the introduction. ==


<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
There was no "California Genocide." Indians dying from a smallpox epidemic is not a genocide. The vast majority of historians writing about the gold rush do not refer to the California American Indians' deaths and mistreatment as a genocide. Only a tiny, [[WP:Fringe|fringe]] minority of activist scholars do, and it is highly controversial. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/114.32.84.229|114.32.84.229]] ([[User talk:114.32.84.229#top|talk]]) 22:28, 5 July 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''


The result of the move request was: '''moved.''' <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small> [[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 16:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
:Yes, there was, by definition, and there is even a linked article about it. Please provide reliable sources to back your claim if you feel that the sources cited by the article are in some way erroneous. [[User:UpdateNerd|UpdateNerd]] ([[User talk:UpdateNerd|talk]]) 01:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
----


== New Yorkers relocating to California ==
* [[:California Gold Rush]] {{no redirect|California gold rush}}
* [[:Pike's Peak Gold Rush]] → {{no redirect|Pike's Peak gold rush}}
* [[:Vermilion Lake Gold Rush]] → {{no redirect|Vermilion Lake gold rush}}
* [[:Mount Baker Gold Rush]] → {{no redirect|Mount Baker gold rush}}
* [[:Carolina Gold Rush]] → {{no redirect|Carolina gold rush}}
* [[:Black Hills Gold Rush]] → {{no redirect|Black Hills gold rush}}
– Per [[MOS:CAPS]], we should only render titles as proper names if they are consistently capitalized in a significant majority of reliable sources. That is not at all the case for these gold rush articles. See ngram results: [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=california+gold+rush&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3&case_insensitive=true][https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Pike%27s+Peak+Gold+Rush&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&case_insensitive=on&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3][https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Carolina+Gold+Rush&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&case_insensitive=on&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3][https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=black+hills+Gold+Rush&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&case_insensitive=on&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3] - in some cases ''gold rush'' has an outright lead, while in others the ''Gold Rush'' variant leads but it is close enough that the "significant majority" mark is not met. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 14:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


*'''Support''' ''Gold rush'' is a descriptive term. Just because it happened at a particular place and this place is used attributively in the noun phrase|name does not ''ipso facto'' mean that the whole noun phrase should be capitalised and treated as a proper name. This is a common misperception. It is still a descriptive name (a gold rush that occurred at place X) and therefore intrinsically a common name|noun phrase. This aside, the ngram evidence clearly shows that we should not cap these terms (per [[WP:NCCAPS]] and [[MOS:CAPS]]) as they are clearly not being capped consistently in sources and do not meet the threshold (not even close) whereby these terms would be capped on Wiki. [[User:Cinderella157|Cinderella157]] ([[User talk:Cinderella157|talk]]) 23:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
No information about the exact numbers of people who immigrated from New York City to California in the 1800's but I am assuming it is 3,000 people moved from New York City to California in order to seek gold. [[Special:Contributions/2603:7000:B901:8500:1C16:C236:D720:C571|2603:7000:B901:8500:1C16:C236:D720:C571]] ([[User talk:2603:7000:B901:8500:1C16:C236:D720:C571|talk]]) 00:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
*'''Support''' no evidence of consistent capitalization ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] &#183; [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 08:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
* '''Support''' obvious application on [[WP:LOWERCASE]], [[WP:NCCAPS]] and [[MOS:CAPS]] in light of source stats linked by nom, which I have reviewed. [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 04:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->
</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>


== Location ==
:Sources population of California from 1850 to 1900 [[Special:Contributions/2603:7000:B901:8500:1C16:C236:D720:C571|2603:7000:B901:8500:1C16:C236:D720:C571]] ([[User talk:2603:7000:B901:8500:1C16:C236:D720:C571|talk]]) 00:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
::https://depts.washington.edu/moving1/NewYork.shtml [[Special:Contributions/2603:7000:B901:8500:1C16:C236:D720:C571|2603:7000:B901:8500:1C16:C236:D720:C571]] ([[User talk:2603:7000:B901:8500:1C16:C236:D720:C571|talk]]) 00:49, 19 August 2022 (UTC)


Consider updating the location - the infobox suggests that this took place in a very small area around 100 yards square which is not backed up by the maps and other data within the article [[Special:Contributions/90.240.165.192|90.240.165.192]] ([[User talk:90.240.165.192|talk]]) 08:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
==[[WP:URFA/2020]]==
[[:File:CaliforniaGoldRush.png]] isn't sourced. The rest of the article looks good. [[User:A455bcd9|A455bcd9]] ([[User talk:A455bcd9|talk]]) 22:59, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
:Coordinate precision reduced per [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers]] [[User:WCCasey|WCCasey]] ([[User talk:WCCasey|talk]]) 15:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:39, 10 July 2024

Featured articleCalifornia gold rush is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 14, 2007.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 20, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
November 14, 2006Good article nomineeListed
December 10, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 19, 2004, December 5, 2004, January 24, 2005, August 19, 2005, January 24, 2006, August 19, 2006, January 24, 2007, January 24, 2008, January 24, 2009, January 24, 2010, January 24, 2012, January 24, 2013, January 24, 2015, January 24, 2017, January 24, 2018, January 24, 2020, January 24, 2021, and January 24, 2024.
Current status: Featured article

Semi-protected edit request on 4 November 2023

[edit]

Italicize hatnote for "California Gold Rush (film)" per WP:ITHAT. 49.150.4.134 (talk) 02:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 January 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


– Per MOS:CAPS, we should only render titles as proper names if they are consistently capitalized in a significant majority of reliable sources. That is not at all the case for these gold rush articles. See ngram results: [1][2][3][4] - in some cases gold rush has an outright lead, while in others the Gold Rush variant leads but it is close enough that the "significant majority" mark is not met.  — Amakuru (talk) 14:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Gold rush is a descriptive term. Just because it happened at a particular place and this place is used attributively in the noun phrase|name does not ipso facto mean that the whole noun phrase should be capitalised and treated as a proper name. This is a common misperception. It is still a descriptive name (a gold rush that occurred at place X) and therefore intrinsically a common name|noun phrase. This aside, the ngram evidence clearly shows that we should not cap these terms (per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS) as they are clearly not being capped consistently in sources and do not meet the threshold (not even close) whereby these terms would be capped on Wiki. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support no evidence of consistent capitalization (t · c) buidhe 08:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support obvious application on WP:LOWERCASE, WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS in light of source stats linked by nom, which I have reviewed. Dicklyon (talk) 04:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Location

[edit]

Consider updating the location - the infobox suggests that this took place in a very small area around 100 yards square which is not backed up by the maps and other data within the article 90.240.165.192 (talk) 08:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate precision reduced per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers WCCasey (talk) 15:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]