Jump to content

Talk:Onion routing: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Minor talk-page layout fix etc. And yes, I just moved the page, not trying to hide that. :))
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
== Vandal attack ==
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Mid}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| archiveheader = {{tan}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 0
| maxarchivesize = 175k
| counter = 1
| algo = old(730d)
| archive = Talk:Onion routing/Archive %(counter)d
}}


== edit war ==
Anybody know why this page has been getting a DDOS vandal attack? {{User:Brockert/sig}} 09:00, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
Please don't remove the (not to be confused with Onions and routing) from the page <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:CoolberryWiki|CoolberryWiki]] ([[User talk:CoolberryWiki#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CoolberryWiki|contribs]]) 03:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


:@[[User:CoolberryWiki|CoolberryWiki]] You need to explain not only why the article needs it but why it needs to be there in a non-standard form. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 03:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
:It's linked from a new Slashdot article. [[User:Adamsan|adamsan ]] 09:08, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
::FYI, @[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]], the user who said that is the one who repeatedly inserted this nonsense on the article - including [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Onion_routing&diff=prev&oldid=1142737280 while logged out]. [[User:LilianaUwU|<span style="font-family:default;color:#00c6ff;">''Liliana''</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#ff879a;">''UwU''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:LilianaUwU|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/LilianaUwU|contributions]])</sup> 03:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

:::What if people think that onion routing is about onions [[User:CoolberryWiki|CoolberryWiki]] ([[User talk:CoolberryWiki|talk]]) 03:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
::[http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/22/0113244 Ah]. Why do they always use the same image? I thought the slashdotters were usually pro-wikipedia. Anyway, I've sent abuse messages to eleven places so far, I'll be happy if one of these dorks gets booted off their provider for this. Really, it's a pity, the article could have used some constructive editing. {{User:Brockert/sig}} 10:12, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
::::@[[User:CoolberryWiki|CoolberryWiki]] The introduction provides sufficient context to make clear that's not the case. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 03:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

::::@[[User:CoolberryWiki|CoolberryWiki]] No one who would search for "onion routing" think it's about onions after reading the first sentence of the article. [[User:LilianaUwU|<span style="font-family:default;color:#00c6ff;">''Liliana''</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#ff879a;">''UwU''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:LilianaUwU|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/LilianaUwU|contributions]])</sup> 03:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
:::See also: [[Anonymous P2P]] link used twice // page locked

== Contents ==

In the intruduction should be added, that Tor (the 2. Generation Onion Router) was initially designed and developed as part of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory's [http://www.onion-router.net Onion Routing program] with support from [[Office_of_Naval_Research|ONR]] and [[DARPA]].

: That's a bit misleading; Onion Routing began as an NRL project funded by ONR, and later by DARPA. Much of the Tor (2nd generation) work was contracted by NRL to Moria Research Labs (all of this in covered on the original [http://www.onion-router.net Onion Routing website]). But you're right: there is no mention of NRL in the article, yet they were the ones who created this.

== TOC ==

When this page gets unlocked perhaps someone can add <nowiki>__NOTOC__</nowiki> as the Table of Contents looks a bit silly given the pages layout. [[User:Dalf|Dalf]] | [[User talk:Dalf|Talk]] 21:33, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
: I did, but then thought better of it and just added normal sections, so that the TOC would look right. {{User:Brockert/sig}} 22:28, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

==Capitals==

It seems unusual for both Onion Routing and Onion Router to be capitalized. Most of the former I found on Google were capitalized, but it appears that common use of the latter is moving away from capitalization. If popular use continues in that direction, at some point the article may need to be moved to [[Onion routing]] and the article changed accordingly. {{User:Brockert/sig}} 22:28, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

:Well according to Wikipedia article naming policy the article should be name "Onion routing" with a small r. And even THE onion router ([[Tor]]) writes it as "onion routing" and not "Onion Routing" on its official main page. So it seemed to be a clear case, I moved it. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 17:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

== JAP ==

Someone should add JAP, the java anonymous proxy, to the software list-
http://anon.inf.tu-dresden.de/index_en.html
[[User:Family Guy Guy|Family Guy Guy]] 08:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

== Garlic routing? ==

Anyone have some info, or comparison of garlic and onion routing? Would such comparison be an appropriate extension of this article? -aryah, 20.04.2006 14:22 GMT

Latest revision as of 23:12, 10 July 2024

edit war

[edit]

Please don't remove the (not to be confused with Onions and routing) from the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoolberryWiki (talk • contribs) 03:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CoolberryWiki You need to explain not only why the article needs it but why it needs to be there in a non-standard form. —C.Fred (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, @C.Fred, the user who said that is the one who repeatedly inserted this nonsense on the article - including while logged out. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What if people think that onion routing is about onions CoolberryWiki (talk) 03:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@CoolberryWiki The introduction provides sufficient context to make clear that's not the case. —C.Fred (talk) 03:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@CoolberryWiki No one who would search for "onion routing" think it's about onions after reading the first sentence of the article. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Onion_routing&oldid=1233798125"