Talk:Women's Rights Party: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 01:07, 11 July 2024

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 October 2023. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This is the talk page for discussing Women's Rights Party and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 14 days

This page was proposed for deletion by HenryCrun15 (talk · contribs) on 8 August 2023.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article, in a manner that does not comply with Wikipedia's policies. Editors are encouraged to use neutral mechanisms for requesting outside input (e.g. a "request for comment", a third opinion or other noticeboard post, or neutral criteria: "pinging all editors who have edited this page in the last 48 hours"). If someone has asked you to provide your opinion here, examine the arguments, not the editors who have made them. Reminder: disputes are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

This redirect is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Political parties task force.

New Zealand: Politics

	New Zealand portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
	This redirect is supported by the New Zealand politics task force.

Discrimination Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Feminism

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism

Gender studies Low‑importance

This redirect is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this redirect, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

LGBTQ+ studies

This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Old AfD multi |date=31 October 2023 |result='''redirect''' |page=Women's Rights Party}}
-{{Talk header|search=yes|arpol=no|wp=no|disclaimer=no|bottom=no||age=14|units=days|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|minthreadsleft=0|}}
+{{Talk header|search=yes|arpol=no|wp=no|disclaimer=no|bottom=no||}}
 {{Old prod|nom=HenryCrun15|nomdate=2023-08-08}}
 {{contentious topics/talk notice|gg}}
@@ Line 6: / Line 7: @@
 {{Calm}}
 {{New Zealand English|date=November 2023}}
-{{WikiProject banner shell |collapsed=yes |class=start |1=
+{{WikiProject banner shell |collapsed=yes |1=
 {{WikiProject Politics|importance=low|political-parties=yes}}
-{{WikiProject New Zealand |importance=Low|politics=yes|politics-importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject New Zealand |politics=yes}}
 {{WikiProject Discrimination |importance=low}}
 {{WikiProject Feminism |importance=}}
@@ Line 25: / Line 26: @@
 | minthreadsleft      = 0
 }}
-== Restricted Editing ==
-This page contains inaccuracies. The Women's Rights Party NZ is not "transphobic". This is a slur used to silence women who call for accurate data collection on sex and a review of sex self identification in policy and legislation. Why has the editing function on this page been restricted? [[User:6Bluedoves|6Bluedoves]] ([[User talk:6Bluedoves|talk]]) 19:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
-::"A slur used to silence women" is transphobic propaganda pure and simple. These people are not victims...the language of that manner is like saying that calling the KKK racist is a slur used to silence white people. [[User:PicturePerfect666|PicturePerfect666]] ([[User talk:PicturePerfect666|talk]]) 18:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
-:@[[User:6Bluedoves|6Bluedoves]] I have just removed it. I have not seen any source describe it this way so it appears to be [[WP:OR]]. If anyone could provide a source that would be great; older versions of this article did not have transphobia as a listed ideology. —<span style="font-family:Poppins">[[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]]</span> [[User_talk:Panamitsu|(talk)]] 21:12, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
-::Thank you for that. The party supports full and open expression of gender and identity but defends the need for single sex spaces in prisons, refuges, rape crisis centres and sports to ensure fairness, dignity and safety for women and girls who make up 85% of victims of sexual assault - 98% of which are committed by male perpetrators. [[User:6Bluedoves|6Bluedoves]] ([[User talk:6Bluedoves|talk]]) 21:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
-:::The page is still describing the party as transphobic. The page is generally written in a polemical tone with several defamatory statements. It omits major contextual information around the events that lead to the formation of the party after New Zealand effectively erased the identity of women by passing self-ID legislation giving any man the right to enter women and girls' private spaces. This is not controversial but a matter of record. I request permission to edit the page to remove the defamation and supply appropriate factual context. [[User:ChrisPook|ChrisPook]] ([[User talk:ChrisPook|talk]]) 20:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
-::::You appear to have an extreme interpretation of the law. For you to edit the article would not be appropriate.-<span style="font-family:cursive; color:grey;">[[User talk:gadfium|gadfium]]</span> 21:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
-:::::I think it's telling that you are hurling around accusations of extremism. I'm not hiding behind an anonymous identity here. I'm an actual scientist biologist with an interest in equity. The Womens' Rights Party was set up to advance the interests of an oppressed class and they are legally allowed to pursue those rights under the Human Rights Act 1993. Claiming that they are 'phobic for doing so is the extreme, misogynist position. [[Special:Contributions/2404:4408:8786:600:B82:C3E2:8EF4:3319|2404:4408:8786:600:B82:C3E2:8EF4:3319]] ([[User talk:2404:4408:8786:600:B82:C3E2:8EF4:3319|talk]]) 22:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
-::::::Whoops. Didn't realise I wasn't logged in. Here's my reply to Gadfium: I think it's telling that you are hurling around accusations of extremism. I'm not hiding behind an anonymous identity here. I'm an actual scientist, a biologist, with an interest in equity. The Womens' Rights Party was set up to advance the interests of an oppressed class and they are legally allowed to pursue those rights under the Human Rights Act 1993. Claiming that they are 'phobic for doing so is the extreme, misogynist position. [[User:ChrisPook|ChrisPook]] ([[User talk:ChrisPook|talk]]) 22:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
-:::::::Thanks for your comments, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate to go into this detail about this in the talk page, it should be more about improving the article. —<span style="font-family:Poppins">[[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]]</span> [[User_talk:Panamitsu|(talk)]] 23:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
-:::::::You appear to be engaged in the [[Dunning–Kruger effect]] and [[Argument from authority]] fallacy. "I'm an actual scientist, a biologist" comments and claims of this nature are not relevant on Wikipedia. It is an argument from authority attempting to give more weight to your contributions and diminish the weight of other users contributions. No single user acting in good faith and within the policies of Wikipedia has any more of less weight just because it is being 'said by an expert'. Secondly there is no way of verifying what you are saying without you giving out personal identifying information, which [[Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion|Wikipedia strongly discourages]]. The content of the comments, not who the user is, determines the weight given to comments. The Dunning-Kruger effect is you saying you are an expert in one field and then inferring that because of that expertise, you are an expert in another area. In this case inferring expertise in the law and political science. This is seen with the claims "they are legally allowed to pursue those rights under the Human Rights Act 1993". The comments you are stating also seem to be from someone very close to the party "The Womens'[sic] Rights Party was set up to advance the interests of an oppressed class". This is a potential [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]; and specific rules surrounding that apply.
-:::::::Finally you are making [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]] and not [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assuming good faith]] which are core principles of Wikipedia. Comments such as "Claiming that they are 'phobic for doing so is the extreme, misogynist position". This is making assertions that those who are using a term you disagree with are doing so rooted in negative stereotypes and are doing so deliberately. In this case, calling those describing the party as 'transphobic' as 'extreme' and 'misogynist'. Wikipedia is [[WP:BATTLEGROUND|not a battle ground]] and must not devolve into one.
-:::::::The above is not a personal attack but an analysis of the comments and why they do not carry the weight or influence more or less than anyone else simply because. It is also designed to point out and show the flaws in making such comments, as they do not benefit Wikipedia particularly on contentious and political topics. It generally entrenches positions and reduces the ability to resolve the content issues at hand. [[User:PicturePerfect666|PicturePerfect666]] ([[User talk:PicturePerfect666|talk]]) 15:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
-::::@[[User:ChrisPook|ChrisPook]] How about if you want to make changes, you make edit requests in the talk page. As you have certain views, it may constitute a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] which may introduce bias (ignoring any potential bias on the article, I have not read it properly). —<span style="font-family:Poppins">[[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]]</span> [[User_talk:Panamitsu|(talk)]] 22:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
-:::::I am trying to work out how to do that. It's not intuitive. [[User:ChrisPook|ChrisPook]] ([[User talk:ChrisPook|talk]]) 22:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
-::::::Just write in this talk page "change x to y", making sure to provide sources. —<span style="font-family:Poppins">[[User:Panamitsu|Panamitsu]]</span> [[User_talk:Panamitsu|(talk)]] 23:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
-This talk page is also not a soap box for the general positions of the party. Discussions of this kind need to be avoided.
-I would also like to point out these edits have been made shortly after the following was released by the party itself. It seems more than coincidental that the edits have started all of a sudden after this was released.
-[https://womensrightsparty.nz/cancel-your-donations-to-wikipedia-its-a-peddler-of-disinformation/ womens rights party press release on Wikiepdia]
-The closeness of this release and these edits is strong evidence of a conflict of interest and the subject of an article directing the content of an article [[User:PicturePerfect666|PicturePerfect666]] ([[User talk:PicturePerfect666|talk]]) 18:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
-* @[[User:Kiwichris]]: Please be aware of 1RR in effect on the contentious topic area. Could you explain why you consider Substack a reliable source in this case? [[User:Fermiboson|Fermiboson]] ([[User talk:Fermiboson|talk]]) 09:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
-*:In that vein please justify the inclusion of the dog whistle part platform language ‘erosion of sex based rights’ and the inclusion of a sideshow film by a us bigot being shown in NZ where the party jumped on the bandwagon of synthetic outrage. I shall give a 3 day deadline here otherwise I will consider the reverts to be without justification and the discussion not engaged with and will remove the content. The content will not get to stay through non-engagement. That would subvert the purpose of Wikipedia and override the 1RR requirements and those are not designed to be perverse and retain content that is not agreed upon, contentious, overtly promotion or biased in its coverage. [[User:PicturePerfect666|PicturePerfect666]] ([[User talk:PicturePerfect666|talk]]) 13:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)