Jump to content

Japhetites: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Minor fixes.
m Clean up/copyedit
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
[[File:T and O map Guntherus Ziner 1472.jpg|thumb|230px|right|This [[T and O map]], from the first [[Printing press|printed]] version of [[Isidore of Seville|Isidore]]'s ''[[Etymologiae]]'' ([[Augsburg]] 1472), identifies the three known continents ([[Asia]], [[Europe]], and [[Africa]]) as respectively populated by descendants of ''Sem'' ([[Shem]]), ''Iafeth'' ([[Japheth]]), and ''Cham'' ([[Ham (son of Noah)|Ham]]).]]
[[File:T and O map Guntherus Ziner 1472.jpg|thumb|230px|right|This [[T and O map]], from the first [[Printing press|printed]] version of [[Isidore of Seville|Isidore]]'s ''[[Etymologiae]]'' ([[Augsburg]] 1472), identifies the three known continents ([[Asia]], [[Europe]], and [[Africa]]) as respectively populated by descendants of ''Sem'' ([[Shem]]), ''Iafeth'' ([[Japheth]]), and ''Cham'' ([[Ham (son of Noah)|Ham]]).]]


The term '''Japhetites''' (sometimes spelled '''Japhethites'''; in adjective form '''Japhetic''' or '''Japhethitic''') refers to the descendants of [[Japheth]], one of the three [[sons of Noah]] in the [[Book of Genesis]].<ref name="JE 1906">{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Hirsch |first1=Emil G. |last2=Seligsohn |first2=M. |last3=Schechter |first3=Solomon |author1-link=Emil G. Hirsch |author3-link=Solomon Schechter |year=1906 |title=Japheth |url=http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/8516-japheth |url-status=live |encyclopedia=[[Jewish Encyclopedia]] |publisher=[[Kopelman Foundation]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121017135108/https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/8516-japheth |archive-date=17 October 2012 |access-date=27 February 2024}}</ref> The term was used in [[Ethnology|ethnological]] and [[Linguistics|linguistic]] writings from the 18th to the 20th centuries as a [[Biblical terminology for race|Biblically derived racial classification]] for the [[European peoples]], but is now considered obsolete.<ref name="Augstein 2014"/> [[Middle Ages|medieval]] [[ethnography|ethnographers]] believed that the world had been divided into three large-scale groupings, corresponding to the three classical continents: the Semitic peoples of [[Near East|Asia]], the Hamitic peoples of [[Ancient Libya|Africa]], and the Japhetic peoples of [[Europe]].<ref name="Medieval 1983, pp. 375-90">{{cite journal |last=Reynolds |first=Susan |author-link=Susan Reynolds |date=October 1983 |title=Medieval ''Origines Gentium'' and the Community of the Realm |journal=[[History (journal)|History]] |location=[[Chichester|Chichester, West Sussex]] |publisher=[[Wiley-Blackwell]] |volume=68 |issue=224 |pages=375–390 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-229X.1983.tb02193.x |jstor=24417596}}</ref><ref name="Ivane Javakhishvili 1950, pp. 130">[[Ivane Javakhishvili|Javakhishvili, Ivane]] (1950), ''Historical-Ethnological problems of Georgia, the Caucasus and the Near East''. [[Tbilisi]], pp. 130–135 (in [[Georgian language|Georgian]]).</ref>
The term '''Japhetites''' (sometimes spelled '''Japhethites'''; in adjective form '''Japhetic''' or '''Japhethitic''') refers to the descendants of [[Japheth]], one of the three [[sons of Noah]] in the [[Book of Genesis]].<ref name="JE 1906">{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Hirsch |first1=Emil G. |last2=Seligsohn |first2=M. |last3=Schechter |first3=Solomon |author1-link=Emil G. Hirsch |author3-link=Solomon Schechter |year=1906 |title=Japheth |url=http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/8516-japheth |url-status=live |encyclopedia=[[Jewish Encyclopedia]] |publisher=[[Kopelman Foundation]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121017135108/https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/8516-japheth |archive-date=17 October 2012 |access-date=27 February 2024}}</ref> The term was used in [[Ethnology|ethnological]] and [[Linguistics|linguistic]] writings from the 18th to the 20th centuries as a [[Biblical terminology for race|Biblically derived racial classification]] for the [[European peoples]], but is now considered obsolete.<ref name="Augstein 2014"/> [[Middle Ages|Medieval]] [[ethnography|ethnographers]] believed that the world had been divided into three large-scale groupings, corresponding to the three classical continents: the Semitic peoples of [[Near East|Asia]], the Hamitic peoples of [[Ancient Libya|Africa]], and the Japhetic peoples of [[Europe]].<ref name="Medieval 1983, pp. 375-90">{{cite journal |last=Reynolds |first=Susan |author-link=Susan Reynolds |date=October 1983 |title=Medieval ''Origines Gentium'' and the Community of the Realm |journal=[[History (journal)|History]] |location=[[Chichester|Chichester, West Sussex]] |publisher=[[Wiley-Blackwell]] |volume=68 |issue=224 |pages=375–390 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-229X.1983.tb02193.x |jstor=24417596}}</ref><ref name="Ivane Javakhishvili 1950, pp. 130">[[Ivane Javakhishvili|Javakhishvili, Ivane]] (1950), ''Historical-Ethnological problems of Georgia, the Caucasus and the Near East''. [[Tbilisi]], pp. 130–135 (in [[Georgian language|Georgian]]).</ref>


The term has been used in modern times as a designation in [[physical anthropology]], [[ethnography]], and [[comparative linguistics]]. In anthropology, it was used in a racial sense for [[White people]] (the [[Caucasian race]]).<ref name="Augstein 2014">{{cite book |author-last=Augstein |author-first=Hannah F. |chapter=Shifting ideas on the origin of humankind – Shifting geographies: Blumenbach and the Caucasus |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HrKEAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA61 |year=2014 |orig-year=1999 |editor1-last=Ernst |editor1-first=Waltraud |editor2-last=Harris |editor2-first=Bernard |title=Race, Science and Medicine, 1700–1960 |location=[[London]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Routledge]] |edition=1st |series=Routledge Studies in the Social History of Medicine |pages=61–74 |isbn=9780415757478}}</ref> In linguistics, it referred to the [[Indo-European languages]].<ref name="Augstein 2014"/> Both of these uses are considered obsolete nowadays.<ref name="Augstein 2014"/> Only the [[Semitic peoples]] form a well-defined language family. The Indo-European group is no longer known as "Japhetite", and the [[Hamites|Hamitic]] group is now recognized as [[paraphyletic]] within the [[Afro-Asiatic languages|Afro-Asiatic]] family.
The term has been used in modern times as a designation in [[physical anthropology]], [[ethnography]], and [[comparative linguistics]]. In anthropology, it was used in a racial sense for [[White people]] (the [[Caucasian race]]).<ref name="Augstein 2014">{{cite book |author-last=Augstein |author-first=Hannah F. |chapter=Shifting ideas on the origin of humankind – Shifting geographies: Blumenbach and the Caucasus |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HrKEAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA61 |year=2014 |orig-year=1999 |editor1-last=Ernst |editor1-first=Waltraud |editor2-last=Harris |editor2-first=Bernard |title=Race, Science and Medicine, 1700–1960 |location=[[London]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Routledge]] |edition=1st |series=Routledge Studies in the Social History of Medicine |pages=61–74 |isbn=9780415757478}}</ref> In linguistics, it referred to the [[Indo-European languages]].<ref name="Augstein 2014"/> Both of these uses are considered obsolete nowadays.<ref name="Augstein 2014"/> Only the [[Semitic peoples]] form a well-defined language family. The Indo-European group is no longer known as "Japhetite", and the [[Hamites|Hamitic]] group is now recognized as [[paraphyletic]] within the [[Afro-Asiatic languages|Afro-Asiatic]] family.
Line 81: Line 81:
* [[Madai]]: [[Mitanni]], [[Mannai]], [[Medes]], more generally [[Persian people|Persians]] or even their relatives
* [[Madai]]: [[Mitanni]], [[Mannai]], [[Medes]], more generally [[Persian people|Persians]] or even their relatives
* [[Javan]]: [[Ancient Greeks]], [[Ionia]]ns, [[Tartessians]]
* [[Javan]]: [[Ancient Greeks]], [[Ionia]]ns, [[Tartessians]]
* [[Tubal]]: [[Tabal]]i, [[Circassians]], [[Irish people|Irishmen]], [[Georgians]] (including most of other related peoples in the Caucasus), [[Illyrians]], [[Ancient Italic peoples|Italics]] (excluding the [[Latins]] who are of Etruscan origins), [[Basque people|Basques]], [[Iberians]]
* [[Tubal]]: [[Tabal (state)|Tabal]]i, [[Circassians]], [[Irish people|Irishmen]], [[Georgians]] (including most of other related peoples in the Caucasus), [[Illyrians]], [[Ancient Italic peoples|Italics]] (excluding the [[Latins]] who are of Etruscan origins), [[Basque people|Basques]], [[Iberians]]
*[[Meshech]]: [[Early Slavs]] (including Russians), [[Phrygia]]ns (possibly), [[Mushki|Moschoi]], [[Meskheti]], [[Georgians]], [[Armenians]], [[Illyrians]], [[Irish people|Irishmen]]
*[[Meshech]]: [[Early Slavs]] (including Russians), [[Phrygia]]ns (possibly), [[Mushki|Moschoi]], [[Meskheti]], [[Georgians]], [[Armenians]], [[Illyrians]], [[Irish people|Irishmen]]
* [[Tiras]]: [[Thracians]], [[Etruscans]], [[Romanians]]
* [[Tiras]]: [[Thracians]], [[Etruscans]], [[Romanians]]
Line 100: Line 100:
{{main|Caucasian race|Biblical terminology for race}}
{{main|Caucasian race|Biblical terminology for race}}


The term "[[Caucasian race|Caucasian]]" as a racial label for [[European peoples|Europeans]] derives in part from the assumption that the tribe of Japheth developed its distinctive racial characteristics in the [[Caucasus]] area, having migrated there from [[Mount Ararat]] before populating the [[European continent]].<ref name="Augstein 2014"/> The [[Georgia (country)|Georgian]] historian and linguist [[Ivane Javakhishvili]] associated Japheth's sons with certain ancient tribes, called [[Tubal]]s ([[Tabal]]s, in Greek: ''Tibarenoi'') and [[Meshech]]s (Meshekhs/Mosokhs, in Greek: ''Moschoi''), who claimed to represent non-Indo-European and non-Semitic, possibly "Proto-Iberian" tribes that inhabitated [[Anatolia]] during the [[3rd millennium BC|3rd]]-[[1st millennium BC|1st millennia BC]].<ref name="Ivane Javakhishvili 1950, pp. 130"/> This theory influenced the use of the term ''Japhetic'' in the linguistic theories of [[Nikolai Marr]] (see below).
The term "[[Caucasian race|Caucasian]]" as a racial label for [[European peoples|Europeans]] derives in part from the assumption that the tribe of Japheth developed its distinctive racial characteristics in the [[Caucasus]] area, having migrated there from [[Mount Ararat]] before populating the [[European continent]].<ref name="Augstein 2014"/> The [[Georgia (country)|Georgian]] historian and linguist [[Ivane Javakhishvili]] associated Japheth's sons with certain ancient tribes, called [[Tubal]]s ([[Tabal (state)|Tabal]]s, in Greek: ''Tibarenoi'') and [[Meshech]]s (Meshekhs/Mosokhs, in Greek: ''Moschoi''), who claimed to represent non-Indo-European and non-Semitic, possibly "Proto-Iberian" tribes that inhabitated [[Anatolia]] during the [[3rd millennium BC|3rd]]-[[1st millennium BC|1st millennia BC]].<ref name="Ivane Javakhishvili 1950, pp. 130"/> This theory influenced the use of the term ''Japhetic'' in the linguistic theories of [[Nikolai Marr]] (see below).
During the 18th and 19th centuries, the Biblical statement attributed to Noah that "God shall enlarge Japheth" (Genesis 9:27) was used by some Christian preachers<ref>Meagher, James L. "The Bread, Wine, Water, Oil, and Incense in the Temple" [https://archive.org/details/HowChristSaidTheFirstMass ''How Christ Said The First Mass.'' New York: Christian Press Association, 1908.] 95-96. ''Internet Archive.'' Web. 4 Jun. 2017</ref> as a justification for the "enlargement" of European territories through [[imperialism]], which they interpreted as part of God's plan for the world.<ref name="Swift Superstition">John N. Swift and Gigen Mammoser, "'Out of the Realm of Superstition: Chesnutt's 'Dave's Neckliss' and the Curse of Ham'", ''American Literary Realism'', vol. 42 no. 1, Fall 2009, 3</ref> The subjugation of Africans was similarly justified by the [[curse of Ham]].<ref name="Swift Superstition" />
During the 18th and 19th centuries, the Biblical statement attributed to Noah that "God shall enlarge Japheth" (Genesis 9:27) was used by some Christian preachers<ref>Meagher, James L. "The Bread, Wine, Water, Oil, and Incense in the Temple" [https://archive.org/details/HowChristSaidTheFirstMass ''How Christ Said The First Mass.'' New York: Christian Press Association, 1908.] 95-96. ''Internet Archive.'' Web. 4 Jun. 2017</ref> as a justification for the "enlargement" of European territories through [[imperialism]], which they interpreted as part of God's plan for the world.<ref name="Swift Superstition">John N. Swift and Gigen Mammoser, "'Out of the Realm of Superstition: Chesnutt's 'Dave's Neckliss' and the Curse of Ham'", ''American Literary Realism'', vol. 42 no. 1, Fall 2009, 3</ref> The subjugation of Africans was similarly justified by the [[curse of Ham]].<ref name="Swift Superstition" />

Latest revision as of 16:23, 11 July 2024

This T and O map, from the first printed version of Isidore's Etymologiae (Augsburg 1472), identifies the three known continents (Asia, Europe, and Africa) as respectively populated by descendants of Sem (Shem), Iafeth (Japheth), and Cham (Ham).

The term Japhetites (sometimes spelled Japhethites; in adjective form Japhetic or Japhethitic) refers to the descendants of Japheth, one of the three sons of Noah in the Book of Genesis.[1] The term was used in ethnological and linguistic writings from the 18th to the 20th centuries as a Biblically derived racial classification for the European peoples, but is now considered obsolete.[2] Medieval ethnographers believed that the world had been divided into three large-scale groupings, corresponding to the three classical continents: the Semitic peoples of Asia, the Hamitic peoples of Africa, and the Japhetic peoples of Europe.[3][4]

The term has been used in modern times as a designation in physical anthropology, ethnography, and comparative linguistics. In anthropology, it was used in a racial sense for White people (the Caucasian race).[2] In linguistics, it referred to the Indo-European languages.[2] Both of these uses are considered obsolete nowadays.[2] Only the Semitic peoples form a well-defined language family. The Indo-European group is no longer known as "Japhetite", and the Hamitic group is now recognized as paraphyletic within the Afro-Asiatic family.

Among Muslim historians, Japheth is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, and, at times, of the Turks, Khazars, and Slavs.[5][6]

In the Book of Genesis

[edit]
Noah's Drunkenness, painting by James Tissot (between 1896 and 1902), Jewish Museum (Manhattan, New York). The painting depicts Noah lying in his tent; Shem and Japheth are holding up the cloak with their back to Noah; Ham is standing to the side.

Japheth first appears in the Hebrew Bible as one of the three sons of Noah, saved from the Flood through the Ark.[1] In the Book of Genesis, they are always in the order "Shem, Ham, and Japheth" when all three are listed.[7][8] Genesis 9:24 calls Ham the youngest,[8] and Genesis 10:21 refers ambiguously to Shem as "brother of Japheth the elder", which could mean that either is the eldest.[9] Most modern writers accept Shem–Ham–Japheth as reflecting their birth order, but this is not always the case: Moses and Rachel also appear at the head of such lists despite explicit descriptions of them as younger siblings.[10] However, Japheth is considered to have been the eldest son of Noah in Rabbinic literature.[1]

Following the Flood, Japheth is featured in the story of Noah's drunkenness.[1] Ham sees Noah drunk and naked in his tent and tells his brothers, who then cover their father with a cloak while avoiding the sight; when Noah awakes he curses Canaan, the son of Ham, and blesses Shem and Japheth:[1] "Blessed be the Lord God of Shem and may Canaan be his slave; and may God enlarge Japheth and may he dwell in the tents of Shem, and may Canaan be his slave!"[11] Chapter 10 of Genesis, the Table of Nations, describes how earth was populated by the sons of Noah following the Flood, beginning with the descendants of Japheth:

Japheth
GomerMagogMadaiJavanTubalMeshechTiras
AshkenazRiphathTogarmahElishahTarshishKittimDodanim


Biblical genealogy

[edit]

Japheth is mentioned as one of the three sons of Noah in the Book of Genesis. The other two sons of Noah, Shem and Ham, are the eponymous ancestors of the Semites and the Hamites, respectively. In the Biblical Table of Nations (Genesis Genesis 10:2–5), seven sons and seven grandsons of Japheth are mentioned:

The intended ethnic identity of these "descendants of Japheth" is not certain; however, over history, they have been identified by Biblical scholars with various historical nations who were deemed to be descendants of Japheth and his sons — a practice dating back at least to the classical Jewish-Greek encounters. According to the Roman–Jewish historian Flavius Josephus in Antiquities of the Jews, I.VI.122 (Whiston):

Japhet, the son of Noah, had seven sons: they inhabited so, that, beginning at the mountains Taurus and Amanus, they proceeded along Asia, as far as the river Tanais (Don), and along Europe to Cadiz; and settling themselves on the lands which they light upon, which none had inhabited before, they called the nations by their own names.

Ancient and medieval ethnography

[edit]

Ethnogenetic interpretations

[edit]
A map showing the distribution of the descendants of Noah according to the Table of Nations. The descendants of Japheth are shown in red.

Japheth (in Hebrew: Yā́p̄eṯ or Yép̄eṯ) may be a transliteration of the Greek Iapetos, the ancestor of the Hellenic peoples.[12][13] His sons and grandsons associate him with the geographic area comprising the Aegean Sea, Greece, the Caucasus, and Anatolia: Ionia/Javan, Rhodes/Rodanim, Cyprus/Kittim, and other places in the Eastern Mediterranean region.[13][14] The point of the "blessing of Japheth" seems to be that Japheth (a Greek-descended people) and Shem (the Israelites) would rule jointly over Canaan (Palestine).

From the 19th century until the late 20th century, it was usual to see Japheth as a reference to the Philistines, who shared dominion over Canaan during the pre-monarchic and early monarchic period of Israel and Judah.[15] This view accorded with the understanding of the origin of the Book of Genesis, which was seen as having been composed in stages beginning with the time of King Solomon, when the Philistines still existed (they vanished from history after the Assyrian conquest of Canaan). However, Genesis 10:14 identifies their ancestor as Ham rather than Japheth.[12]

Pseudo-Philo

[edit]

An ancient, relatively obscure text known as Pseudo-Philo and thought to have been originally written ca. 70 AD, contains an expanded genealogy that is seemingly garbled from that of the Book of Genesis, and also different from the much later one found in the 17th-century Rabbinic text Sefer haYashar ("Book of Jasher"):[16]

  • Sons of Japheth: "Gomer, Magog, and Madai, Nidiazech, Tubal, Mocteras, Cenez, Riphath, and Thogorma, Elisa, Dessin, Cethin, Tudant."
    • Sons of Gomer: Thelez, Lud, Deberlet.
    • Sons of Magog: Cesse, Thipha, Pharuta, Ammiel, Phimei, Goloza, Samanach.
    • Sons of Duden: Sallus, Phelucta Phallita.
    • Sons of Tubal: Phanatonova, Eteva.
    • Sons of Tyras: Maac, Tabel, Ballana, Samplameac, Elaz.
    • Sons of Mellech: Amboradat, Urach, Bosara.
    • Sons of Ascenez: Jubal, Zaraddana, Anac.
    • Sons of Heri: Phuddet, Doad, Dephadzeat, Enoc.
    • Sons of Togorma: Abiud, Saphath, Asapli, Zepthir.
    • Sons of Elisa: Etzaac, Zenez, Mastisa, Rira.
    • Sons of Zepti: Macziel, Temna, Aela, Phinon.
    • Sons of Tessis: Meccul, Loon, Zelataban.
    • Sons of Duodennin: Itheb, Beath, Phenech.

Later writers

[edit]

Some of the nations that various later writers (including Jerome and Isidore of Seville, as well as other traditional accounts) have attempted to describe as Japhetites are listed below:

Renaissance to Early Modern ethnography

[edit]

Book of Jasher

[edit]

The Sefer haYashar ("Book of Jasher"), written by Talmudic rabbis in the 17th century (first printed in 1625), ostensibly based on an earlier edition of 1552, provides some new names for Japheth's grandchildren:

Anthropology

[edit]

The term "Caucasian" as a racial label for Europeans derives in part from the assumption that the tribe of Japheth developed its distinctive racial characteristics in the Caucasus area, having migrated there from Mount Ararat before populating the European continent.[2] The Georgian historian and linguist Ivane Javakhishvili associated Japheth's sons with certain ancient tribes, called Tubals (Tabals, in Greek: Tibarenoi) and Meshechs (Meshekhs/Mosokhs, in Greek: Moschoi), who claimed to represent non-Indo-European and non-Semitic, possibly "Proto-Iberian" tribes that inhabitated Anatolia during the 3rd-1st millennia BC.[4] This theory influenced the use of the term Japhetic in the linguistic theories of Nikolai Marr (see below).

During the 18th and 19th centuries, the Biblical statement attributed to Noah that "God shall enlarge Japheth" (Genesis 9:27) was used by some Christian preachers[23] as a justification for the "enlargement" of European territories through imperialism, which they interpreted as part of God's plan for the world.[24] The subjugation of Africans was similarly justified by the curse of Ham.[24]

Linguistics

[edit]

The term Japhetic was also applied by philologists such as William Jones, Rasmus Rask, and others to what is now known as the Indo-European language group. The term was used in a different sense by the Soviet linguist Nicholas Marr, in his Japhetic theory, which was intended to demonstrate that the languages of the Caucasus formed part of a once-widespread pre-Indo-European language group.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Hirsch, Emil G.; Seligsohn, M.; Schechter, Solomon (1906). "Japheth". Jewish Encyclopedia. Kopelman Foundation. Archived from the original on 17 October 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2024.
  2. ^ a b c d e Augstein, Hannah F. (2014) [1999]. "Shifting ideas on the origin of humankind – Shifting geographies: Blumenbach and the Caucasus". In Ernst, Waltraud; Harris, Bernard (eds.). Race, Science and Medicine, 1700–1960. Routledge Studies in the Social History of Medicine (1st ed.). London and New York: Routledge. pp. 61–74. ISBN 9780415757478.
  3. ^ Reynolds, Susan (October 1983). "Medieval Origines Gentium and the Community of the Realm". History. 68 (224). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell: 375–390. doi:10.1111/j.1468-229X.1983.tb02193.x. JSTOR 24417596.
  4. ^ a b Javakhishvili, Ivane (1950), Historical-Ethnological problems of Georgia, the Caucasus and the Near East. Tbilisi, pp. 130–135 (in Georgian).
  5. ^ Heller, B.; Rippin, A. (2012) [1993]. "Yāfith". In Bearman, P. J.; Bianquis, Th.; Bosworth, C. E.; van Donzel, E. J.; Heinrichs, W. P. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_7941. ISBN 978-90-04-16121-4.
  6. ^ Leslie, Donald Daniel (1984). "Japhet in China". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 104 (3). American Oriental Society: 403–409. doi:10.2307/601652. ISSN 0003-0279. JSTOR 601652.
  7. ^ Genesis 5:32, 9:18, and 10:1.
  8. ^ a b Haynes 2002, pp. 204, 269.
  9. ^ Garcia Martinez 2012, p. 33 fn.7.
  10. ^ Greenspahn 1994, p. 65.
  11. ^ Genesis 9:20–27.
  12. ^ a b Day 2014, p. 39.
  13. ^ a b Glouberman 2012, p. 112.
  14. ^ Gmirkin 2006, p. 165 fn.192.
  15. ^ Day 2014, pp. 38–39.
  16. ^ Pseudo-Philo
  17. ^ Parry, J. H. (ed.). "7:3". Book of Jasher. Translated by Moses, Samuel.
  18. ^ Parry, J. H. (ed.). "7:4". Book of Jasher. Translated by Moses, Samuel.
  19. ^ Parry, J. H. (ed.). "7:6". Book of Jasher. Translated by Moses, Samuel.
  20. ^ Parry, J. H. (ed.). "7:7". Book of Jasher. Translated by Moses, Samuel.
  21. ^ Parry, J. H. (ed.). "7:8". Book of Jasher. Translated by Moses, Samuel.
  22. ^ Parry, J. H. (ed.). "7:9". Book of Jasher. Translated by Moses, Samuel.
  23. ^ Meagher, James L. "The Bread, Wine, Water, Oil, and Incense in the Temple" How Christ Said The First Mass. New York: Christian Press Association, 1908. 95-96. Internet Archive. Web. 4 Jun. 2017
  24. ^ a b John N. Swift and Gigen Mammoser, "'Out of the Realm of Superstition: Chesnutt's 'Dave's Neckliss' and the Curse of Ham'", American Literary Realism, vol. 42 no. 1, Fall 2009, 3

Bibliography

[edit]


[edit]