Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Johnstone: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Deus et lex (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m Fix "The result of this discussion was" to "The result was" -- that's what twinkle and xfdcloser use, and no use writing edge-case handling into everything for 19 pages (via WP:JWB) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
===[[ |
===[[Amanda Johnstone]]=== |
||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
|||
:''The result was '''keep'''. The actual discussion has been [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Courtesy blanking|hidden from view]] but can still be accessed by following the "history" link at the top of the page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). <span style="color:red">'''No further edits should be made to this page.'''</span>'' __NOINDEX__ __NOTOC__<!-- inserted using Template:xfd-privacy --></div> |
|||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
|||
:{{la|Amanda Johnstone}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Johnstone|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 15#{{anchorencode:Amanda Johnstone}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
|||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Amanda Johnstone}}) |
|||
Amanda Johnstone is not notable. Also almost the entire article was created by Amanda Johnstone herself, and thus is heavily bias and made to her to look good. [[User:JJK2000|JJK2000]] ([[User talk:JJK2000|talk]]) 14:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Businesspeople|list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 15:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women|list of Women-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 15:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 15:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:*'''Keep''' as per sufficient independent media coverage: TIME, CEO, IrishNews, France24 etc. pp. [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 15:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Psychiatry|list of Psychiatry-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 15:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Psychology|list of Psychology-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 15:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 15:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Keep''' As per available resources subject satisfies [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Timberlack|Timberlack]] ([[User talk:Timberlack|talk]]) 07:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' - as the nom pointed out, this article was a complete mess, full of promotional language and sections supported by nothing other than personal and promotional websites. I have tried to remove some but it probably still needs a fair bit of work. However, I take note of [[WP:NOTCLEANUP]]. There is clearly significant coverage by independent sources to meet [[WP:BIO]] as CommanderWaterford points out. [[User:Deus et lex|Deus et lex]] ([[User talk:Deus et lex|talk]]) 08:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*<s>'''Delete''' Its good that the article is being fixed but it is still not notable. [[User:JJK2000|JJK2000]] ([[User talk:JJK2000|talk]]) 14:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)</s> |
|||
**'''Comment''' - struck through as nominator can't add an additional !vote. [[User:Deus et lex|Deus et lex]] ([[User talk:Deus et lex|talk]]) 09:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Speedy keep''': .... Big concern nominator has invalidly !voted in this and there are likely significant other issues in the nomination as well.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 01:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||