Jump to content

Template talk:Neuroscience-stub: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JessicaX (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Stub sorting}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=NA}}
{{WikiProject Psychology}}
}}

== Stupid Move ==
== Stupid Move ==
I'd appreciate if you didn't remove the things i've created -> also, i'm changing it because it's a representation that such an article has been formatted, and expanded by the Neuroscience Wikiproject. I was aware this existed, but the idea was that an actual brain is more noticable than a cat brain, which when shrunk looks nothing resembling a brain until viewed in a larger format.
I'd appreciate if you didn't remove the things i've created -> also, i'm changing it because it's a representation that such an article has been formatted, and expanded by the Neuroscience Wikiproject. I was aware this existed, but the idea was that an actual brain is more noticable than a cat brain, which when shrunk looks nothing resembling a brain until viewed in a larger format.

Latest revision as of 18:53, 12 July 2024

Stupid Move

[edit]

I'd appreciate if you didn't remove the things i've created -> also, i'm changing it because it's a representation that such an article has been formatted, and expanded by the Neuroscience Wikiproject. I was aware this existed, but the idea was that an actual brain is more noticable than a cat brain, which when shrunk looks nothing resembling a brain until viewed in a larger format.

I would appreciate that if you did such a thing, that you at lease post reasoning for it, because as of now, the move wasn't really needed, nor was it much good changing the stub, because now i have to recreate the template AGAIN.

I know you're probably thinking you've done good, but you've actually done more harm than good. so please don't do it again. (Jessica 12:21, 5 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]