Jump to content

Talk:Ranfurly Shield 2000–2009: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Randy Kryn moved page Talk:Ranfurly Shield 2000–08 to Talk:Ranfurly Shield 2000–2008: full year if not consecutive (per Wikipedia style)
m PeeJay moved page Talk:Ranfurly Shield 2000–2008 to Talk:Ranfurly Shield 2000–2009: article includes info on 2009
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject New Zealand|class=start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Rugby union|class=start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject New Zealand|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Rugby union|importance=Low}}
}}


==Scope==
==Scope==
The article talks about "the decade" but the entry stops at 2008, with [[Ranfurly Shield in 2009|2009]] having its own article. Is there a good reason for it? Should the articles be merged, or should the prose be amended to clarify that this article doesn't cover the whole decade? '''<font color="#000000">[[User:Schwede66|Schwede]]</font><font color="#FF4500">[[User talk:Schwede66|66]]</font>''' 09:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
The article talks about "the decade" but the entry stops at 2008, with [[Ranfurly Shield in 2009|2009]] having its own article. Is there a good reason for it? Should the articles be merged, or should the prose be amended to clarify that this article doesn't cover the whole decade? '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:#000000;">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color:#FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 09:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:49, 14 July 2024

Scope

[edit]

The article talks about "the decade" but the entry stops at 2008, with 2009 having its own article. Is there a good reason for it? Should the articles be merged, or should the prose be amended to clarify that this article doesn't cover the whole decade? Schwede66 09:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]