Talk:Bernardine Dohrn: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:42, 15 July 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bernardine Dohrn article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: FBI Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject FBI (assessed as High-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Weather Underground Organization#Declaration of a state of war.2C May 1970|"Declaration of a State of War"]] The anchor (#Declaration of a state of war.2C May 1970) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Arrests and trials

The article currently contains the following:

On October 31, 1969, a grand jury indicted 22 people, including Dohrn, for their involvement with the trial of the Chicago Eight, and she was again indicted on April 2, 1970, when a Federal Grand Jury indicted twelve members of the Weatherman group on conspiracy charges in violation of anti-riot acts during the "Days of Rage." However, all of these convictions were reversed on November 21, 1972, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on the basis the judge was biased in his refusal to permit defense attorneys to screen prospective jurors for cultural and racial bias.

The first problem is that the third sentence refers to convictions. What convictions? There is no indication that Dohrn had been convicted of anything at that point. So the sentence makes no sense. The second problem is that a quick search of the cited source for the third sentence (U.S. v. Dellinger, 472 F.2d 340 (7th Cir. 1972)) reveals that Dohrn's name is not even mentioned in it. How could her conviction (if there was one) have been reversed in a court decision that didn't mention her name? That doesn't make sense. There is a verification problem. I don't have time to dig into this right now. Does anybody who is more familiar with Dohrn's history have any light to shed? SunCrow (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on whether the term "Terrorist organisation" belongs in the header

As per MOS:TERRORIST, we should avoid using the term "terrorist" in articles, generally. Maybe use "militant", if anything? Besides, it's kinda obvious that it's a militant organisation, both due to Weather Underground's article and the fact that the article's subject is wanted by the FBI. Thanks for y'alls time. Opalzukor (talk) 07:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit made was obviously in direct violation of MOS:TERRORIST, since there was no attribution. I would oppose inclusion even with attribution, since the article makes it clear what they did without any needless labelling. FDW777 (talk) 08:18, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The opening paragraph states Dohrn was a wanted fugitive without stating the crimes she was wanted for. It seems like an obvious omission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuleting (talk • contribs) 08:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged crimes, since she doesn't appear to have been convicted of them (misdemeanor charges of aggravated battery and bail jumping are a separate matter). Also the alleged bombings committed by Dohrn are not mentioned in the body of the article, they would need to be mentioned there before even considering adding them to the lead. FDW777 (talk) 08:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks FDW777, Firestar464, and Opalzukor. I see the Proud Boys article lead describes them as "neo-fascist" but the article itself never explains what beliefs or activities justify the label. I'm not a fan of the Proud Boys (I decided to check their page because they're a much less aggressive group than Dohrn's organization, but are on the other side of the political spectrum). In the interest of fairness, since you were concerned about labeling Bernardine Dohrn a terrorist, will you go to the Proud Boys page and remove the "neo-fascist" label until someone provides a basis for it within the body of the article? If nothing else, you'll restore my faith that the reversal of my edits was not based on political bias but on objective content standards. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuleting (talk • contribs) 08:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remove.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intention of making any such edit to Proud Boys, nor suggesting such an edit. That would be against the consensus from the recently closed (11 November) request for comment at Talk:Proud Boys/Archive 5#RfC: Statements in lead. In the absence of any significant change in the last two weeks as to how references see the Proud Boys, even suggesting such a change would be a waste of time. FDW777 (talk) 10:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FDW777Are you sure that's the consensus? Here is the quote: "Support 2 [the label "neo-fascist"]: 13/36..." Sounds like only 13 out of 36 supported the label. Oh well, good to know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:160E:C2F9:6420:472C:6445:24DF (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a rough consensus for 2. 2 is "Neo-fascist". Not my decision, and not a vote. FDW777 (talk) 10:55, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Skip to talk}}
 {{Talk header}}
-{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|1=
+{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=B|listas=Dohrn, Bernardine|1=
-{{WikiProject Biography |living=yes |class=B |s&a-work-group=yes |listas=Dohrn, Bernardine |s&a-priority=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Biography|s&a-work-group=yes |s&a-priority=Low}}
-{{WikiProject Wisconsin |class=B |importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Wisconsin|importance=low}}
-{{WikiProject Chicago |class=B |importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Low}}
-{{WikiProject United States |class=B |importance=low |FBI=yes |FBI-importance=High |listas=Dohrn, Bernardine}}
+{{WikiProject United States|importance=low |FBI=yes |FBI-importance=High }}
-{{WikiProject Women |class=B |importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Women}}
+{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=}}
 }}
+{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=blp}}{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=ap}}
-{{Auto archiving notice|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=30|dounreplied=yes}}
 {{User:MiszaBot/config
 |archiveheader = {{Talkarchivenav}}
@@ Line 18: / Line 19: @@
 |archive = Talk:Bernardine Dohrn/Archive %(counter)d
 }}
-{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Criminals|class=B}}
+{{Broken anchors|links=
-== Verifiable Evidence? ==
+* <nowiki>[[Weather Underground Organization#Declaration of a state of war.2C May 1970|"Declaration of a State of War"]]</nowiki>  The anchor (#Declaration of a state of war.2C May 1970) is no longer available because it was [[Special:Diff/592118517|deleted by a user]] before. <!-- {"title":"Declaration of a state of war, May 1970","appear":{"revid":502691670,"parentid":496943100,"timestamp":"2012-07-16T21:48:57Z","replaced_anchors":{"Anti-imperialism, Anti-racism & White privilege":"Anti-imperialism, anti-racism & White privilege","Major Activities and Suspected activities":"Major activities and suspected activities","Underground Strategy Change":"Underground strategy change","Declaration of a State of War, May 1970":"Declaration of a state of war, May 1970","June 1970 NYC Police Bombing":"June 1970 NYC Police bombing","Plot to Bomb Office of California State Senator John Briggs (1977)":"Plot to bomb office of California State Senator John Briggs (1977)"},"removed_section_titles":["Anti-imperialism, Anti-racism & White privilege","Major Activities and Suspected activities","Underground Strategy Change","Declaration of a State of War, May 1970","June 1970 NYC Police Bombing","Federal Grand Jury Indicts 13 Weathermen Leaders","Pentagon Bombing, 1972","Charges Dropped, 1973","COINTELPRO","Plot to Bomb Office of California State Senator John Briggs (1977)"],"added_section_titles":["Anti-imperialism, anti-racism & White privilege","Major activities and suspected activities","Underground strategy change","Declaration of a state of war, May 1970","June 1970 NYC Police bombing","Indictment of 13 Weathermen leaders","Pentagon bombing, 1972","Withdrawal of charges, 1973","Cointelpro","Plot to bomb office of California State Senator John Briggs (1977)"]},"disappear":{"revid":592118517,"parentid":592118387,"timestamp":"2014-01-24T03:27:05Z","replaced_anchors":{"Declaration of a state of war, May 1970":"Declaration of war, May 1970"},"removed_section_titles":["Declaration of a state of war, May 1970"],"added_section_titles":["Declaration of war, May 1970"]},"very_different":false,"rename_to":"Declaration of war, May 1970"} -->
+}}
-<<While attending law school, Dohrn began working with Martin Luther King, Jr.>>
-Seems a weak attempt to associate Dohrn with King without any verifiable evidence.   No reasonable person would assume she actually "worked" with King.  I find the association to be highly questionable, a clear definition of "worked with" needs to be made in this context.  My belief would be more aspired to, believed in, supported rallies (such as in millions of others) but hardly "worked with" on any personal level with him or the movement that this quote gives the impression of.  It also seems purposefully placed at the top and out of context to her actual history and notoriety.  <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tslateonex|Tslateonex]] ([[User talk:Tslateonex|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tslateonex|contribs]]) 20:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:It is [[WP:V|verifiable]] in the sense that the claim includes a cited source (Siegel, Bill et. al. (2004). "The Weather Underground". [ahr.oxfordjournals.org American Historical Review].)  Have you reviewed the source?  Please do so before challenging the claim. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">[[User:Dwpaul|<font color="#006633">Dwpaul</font>]]</span> <sup>''[[User talk:Dwpaul|<font color="#000666">Talk  </font>]] ''</sup> 20:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
-:"During her years as a law student at Chicago, Bernardine was drawn to activism. [Dohrn] spent a summer in New York City working with an anti-poverty program before returning to Chicago to support the efforts of Martin Luther Ling, Jr. to integrate all-white suburbs."  (Browne, Blaine T; Cottrell, Robert C.: ''Modern American Lives: Individuals and Issues in American History Since 1945''. [https://books.google.com/books?id=kkTfBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA232&lpg=PA232&dq=Dohrn+began+working+with+Martin+Luther+King,+Jr&source=bl&ots=p7H5zzSHML&sig=0FoF9gSvcgGU6EXUV3qdNk5UC3g&hl=en&sa=X&ei=IchrVdGHBYvRggSGp4D4CQ&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=Dohrn%20began%20working%20with%20Martin%20Luther%20King%2C%20Jr&f=false p232])   That source was easy to find; I'm sure with just a little effort you will find others.  <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">[[User:Dwpaul|<font color="#006633">Dwpaul</font>]]</span> <sup>''[[User talk:Dwpaul|<font color="#000666">Talk  </font>]] ''</sup> 02:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
-That source says she supported King's efforts, like millions of others. It is not evidence that she actually worked with him, which is what is implied by the current wording. Sounds like this should be fixed.[[User:StormWillLaugh|StormWillLaugh]] ([[User talk:StormWillLaugh|talk]]) 12:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
-Concur. I've never seen anything about this; direct work with King would be quite a feather in her cap and she would document it clearly; the wording is evasive and apparently desined to mislead.  This woman worked with killers. She was NOT admitted to the bar due to her poor ethics and history of criminal behavior. It should not be upon the reader to have to disprove extraordinary claims; it should be on the article to support them. [[Special:Contributions/70.127.17.241|70.127.17.241]] ([[User talk:70.127.17.241|talk]]) 08:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
-:That is utterly ridiculous, particularly considering the wording has already been changed.--[[User:Jack Upland|Jack Upland]] ([[User talk:Jack Upland|talk]]) 20:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
-== Name spelling ==
-Is the name Bernadine or Bernardine, with an 'r' before the d? The article uses both spellings interchangeably. The New York Times, in their archives, seems to prefer the latter (with the 'r'.)  I believe I remember reading it an errata in some article somewhere correcting it to the 'r' spelling. Anyone have a better handle on this? [[Special:Contributions/23.240.216.105|23.240.216.105]] ([[User talk:23.240.216.105|talk]]) 20:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
-:It looks like Bernadine is just a mispelling. I've corrected it.--[[User:Jack Upland|Jack Upland]] ([[User talk:Jack Upland|talk]]) 09:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 == Arrests and trials ==
@@ Line 51: / Line 36: @@
 The opening paragraph states Dohrn was a wanted fugitive without stating the crimes she was wanted for. It seems like an obvious omission.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Yuleting|Yuleting]] ([[User talk:Yuleting#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yuleting|contribs]]) 08:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:Alleged crimes, since she doesn't appear to have been convicted of them (misdemeanor charges of aggravated battery and bail jumping are a separate matter). Also the alleged bombings committed by Dohrn are not mentioned in the body of the article, they would need to be mentioned there before even considering adding them to the lead. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 08:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
+Thanks [[User:FDW777|FDW777]], [[User:Firestar464|Firestar464]], and [[User:Opalzukor|Opalzukor]]. I see the Proud Boys article lead describes them as "neo-fascist" but the article itself never explains what beliefs or activities justify the label. I'm not a fan of the Proud Boys (I decided to check their page because they're a much less aggressive group than Dohrn's organization, but are on the other side of the political spectrum). In the interest of fairness, since you were concerned about labeling Bernardine Dohrn a terrorist, will you go to the Proud Boys page and remove the "neo-fascist" label until someone provides a basis for it within the body of the article?  If nothing else, you'll restore my faith that the reversal of my edits was not based on political bias but on objective content standards. Thank you.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Yuleting|Yuleting]] ([[User talk:Yuleting#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yuleting|contribs]]) 08:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+::Remove.--[[User:Jack Upland|Jack Upland]] ([[User talk:Jack Upland|talk]]) 08:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
+:I have no intention of making any such edit to Proud Boys, nor suggesting such an edit. That would be against the consensus from the recently closed (11 November) request for comment at [[Talk:Proud Boys/Archive 5#RfC: Statements in lead]]. In the absence of any significant change in the last two weeks as to how references see the Proud Boys, even suggesting such a change would be a waste of time. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 10:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
+[[User:FDW777|FDW777]]Are you sure that's the consensus? Here is the quote: "Support 2 [the label "neo-fascist"]: 13/36..." Sounds like only 13 out of 36 supported the label. Oh well, good to know.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2605:E000:160E:C2F9:6420:472C:6445:24DF|2605:E000:160E:C2F9:6420:472C:6445:24DF]] ([[User talk:2605:E000:160E:C2F9:6420:472C:6445:24DF#top|talk]]) 10:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:{{tq|There is a rough consensus for 2}}. 2 is "Neo-fascist". Not my decision, and [[WP:NOTAVOTE|not a vote]]. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 10:55, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
+== Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion ==
+The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
+* [[commons:File:Bernardine Dohrn published 1970.jpg|Bernardine Dohrn published 1970.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2022-05-14T02:41:29.388787 | Bernardine Dohrn published 1970.jpg -->
+* [[commons:File:Young Dohrn profile sketch.jpg|Young Dohrn profile sketch.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2022-05-14T02:41:29.388787 | Young Dohrn profile sketch.jpg -->
+Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with FBI most wanted|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 02:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)