Talk:Hotel California (album): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Requested move 13 December 2023: new section Tags: Disambiguation links added New topic |
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30) |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(365d) | archive = Talk:Hotel California (album)/Archive %(counter)d | counter = 1 | maxarchivesize = 150K | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | minthreadsleft = 4 }} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|1= |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Albums}} |
||
{{WikiProject Rock music|importance=Top}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{old move|date=13 December 2023|from=Hotel California (Eagles album)|destination=Hotel California (album)|result=moved|link=Special:Permalink/1192455497#Requested move 13 December 2023}} |
|||
== Requested automated help == |
== Requested automated help == |
||
| Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
== Requested move 13 December 2023 == |
== Requested move 13 December 2023 == |
||
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|||
{{requested move/dated|Hotel California (album)}} |
|||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.'' |
|||
The result of the move request was: '''moved.''' There was only one convincing oppose, but that oppose included acknowledgement that the Eagles album is more notable. There was consensus in support of the nomination rationale; At close to 100 times the pageviews the Tyga album, the Eagles album overwhelms all other usages and can be considered the [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]]. <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small> <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 15:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
| ⚫ | [[:Hotel California (Eagles album)]] → {{no redirect|Hotel California (album)}} – Seems to be the pretty clear [[WP:INCDAB]] primary topic to me. It's just this article and [[Hotel California (Tyga album)]] – between the two, this article takes 96% of the pageviews, while the latter takes 4%. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 22:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC) <small>— '''''Relisting.''''' ''[[User:BegbertBiggs|BegbertBiggs]] ([[User talk:BegbertBiggs|talk]])'' 14:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Support''' - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:FlightTime|<span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FlightTime|<span style="color:#1C0978">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | [[:Hotel California (Eagles album)]] → {{no redirect|Hotel California (album)}} – Seems to be the pretty clear [[WP:INCDAB]] primary topic to me. It's just this article and [[Hotel California (Tyga album)]] – between the two, this article takes 96% of the pageviews, while the latter takes 4%. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 22:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' per nom. [[User:JohnCWiesenthal|JohnCWiesenthal]] ([[User talk:JohnCWiesenthal|talk]]) 16:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per nom. [[User:Station1|Station1]] ([[User talk:Station1|talk]]) 00:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per nom. --[[User:Born2cycle|В²C]] [[User_talk:Born2cycle#top|☎]] 23:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Weak oppose''' I'm not sure 96% is enough. '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 17:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per nom. As for "not sure 96% is enough", would 97% do? '''Speedy close'''. [[User:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] ([[User talk:Randy Kryn|talk]]) 15:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose'''. I'm not a fan of the slippery slope we seem to be on lately with [[WP:PDAB]] titles. The idea behind the PDAB exception is that if a title overwhelmingly, without the shadow of a doubt, refers to a certain topic, we PDAB it. That's not the case here - [[Hotel California (Tyga album)]] charted in multiple countries (including at #7 in the US), is certified Gold by the RIAA, and its lead single "[[Dope (Tyga song)|Dope]]" charted on the Billboard Hot 100. Is as notable as the Eagles album? Of course not. But it's not so insignificant that we should intentionally introduce ambiguity into an article title. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 18:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per nom. — [[User:MaterialWorks|<span style="color:#00008b">m</span><span style="color:#2F4F4F">w</span>]] ([[User talk:MaterialWorks|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/MaterialWorks|contribs]]) 13:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] --> |
|||
</div><div style="clear:both;"></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:38, 15 July 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hotel California (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | On 13 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Hotel California (Eagles album) to Hotel California (album). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested automated help
[edit]FYI regarding page moves above. Per discussion at User talk:Tariqabjotu#Hotel California page move I have made a bot request to make the necessary link changes. --RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me 06:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Category
[edit]This article should not be in Category:Fictional hotels, but Hotel California should. “Hotel California” is the only song about a fictional hotel, as well as the name of the hotel itself. Unfortunately, this page is semi-protected. 165.91.13.163 (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Fair point. Done. Happy days, LindsayHello 12:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2018
[edit] | This edit request to Hotel California (Eagles album) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
My request is to add information of each song from the album please so people know about each song, if it is not too much pressure. Yours sincerely, Jack. Ilikemusic67 (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ", nor cited reliable sources to back up your request.
In any case, the most notable songs already have their own articles, and we would not want to duplicate that information in this article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 13 December 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. There was only one convincing oppose, but that oppose included acknowledgement that the Eagles album is more notable. There was consensus in support of the nomination rationale; At close to 100 times the pageviews the Tyga album, the Eagles album overwhelms all other usages and can be considered the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (closed by non-admin page mover) Polyamorph (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Hotel California (Eagles album) → Hotel California (album) – Seems to be the pretty clear WP:INCDAB primary topic to me. It's just this article and Hotel California (Tyga album) – between the two, this article takes 96% of the pageviews, while the latter takes 4%. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 14:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support - FlightTime (open channel) 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Station1 (talk) 00:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. --В²C ☎ 23:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not sure 96% is enough. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. As for "not sure 96% is enough", would 97% do? Speedy close. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. I'm not a fan of the slippery slope we seem to be on lately with WP:PDAB titles. The idea behind the PDAB exception is that if a title overwhelmingly, without the shadow of a doubt, refers to a certain topic, we PDAB it. That's not the case here - Hotel California (Tyga album) charted in multiple countries (including at #7 in the US), is certified Gold by the RIAA, and its lead single "Dope" charted on the Billboard Hot 100. Is as notable as the Eagles album? Of course not. But it's not so insignificant that we should intentionally introduce ambiguity into an article title. 162 etc. (talk) 18:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. — mw (talk) (contribs) 13:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.