Talk:Hotel California (album): Difference between revisions
Tariqabjotu (talk | contribs) m Tariqabjotu moved page Talk:Hotel California to Talk:Hotel California (Eagles album) without leaving a redirect: per move request |
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30) |
||
(40 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{Album|class=c|importance=High}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(365d) | archive = Talk:Hotel California (album)/Archive %(counter)d | counter = 1 | maxarchivesize = 150K | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | minthreadsleft = 4 }} |
|||
{{WPRock|class=c|importance=High}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Albums}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Rock music|importance=Top}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{old move|date=13 December 2023|from=Hotel California (Eagles album)|destination=Hotel California (album)|result=moved|link=Special:Permalink/1192455497#Requested move 13 December 2023}} |
|||
== Jethro Tull Connection == |
|||
== Requested automated help == |
|||
Can anybody find a decent and reputable reference/interview citing how the Eagles "borrowed" the chord progression from an early Jethro Tull song when they were on tour together? I have seen Ian Anderson in interview jokingly state that he's still waiting for the royalty cheques to come in, but I'm looking for a copy of that in print. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.99.34.217|216.99.34.217]] ([[User talk:216.99.34.217|talk]]) 15:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
FYI regarding page moves above. Per discussion at [[User talk:Tariqabjotu#Hotel California page move]] I have made a bot request to make the necessary link changes. --[[User:Racerx11|<span style="color:orange;">Racer</span><span style="color:black;">X<sup>11</sup></span>]] <small>''[[User talk:Racerx11|Talk to me]]''</small>''[[Special:Contributions/Racerx11|<sup>Stalk me</sup>]]'' 06:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:I noticed this the very first time I heard "Hotel California". Anyway, the jethrotull.com website under "discography", under "Stand Up" has a sidebar that says "We Used to Know" was the "inspiration" for Henley's "Hotel California", at best a euphemistic way of putting it. Henley stole the chord progression, no question. [[User:TheScotch|TheScotch]] ([[User talk:TheScotch|talk]]) 11:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== Category == |
||
This article should not be in [[:Category:Fictional hotels]], but [[Hotel California]] should. “Hotel California” is the only song about a fictional hotel, as well as the name of the hotel itself. Unfortunately, this page is semi-protected. [[Special:Contributions/165.91.13.163|165.91.13.163]] ([[User talk:165.91.13.163|talk]]) 01:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Who does the Lead vocals? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/83.84.138.101|83.84.138.101]] ([[User talk:83.84.138.101|talk]]) 18:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Fair point. Done. Happy days, '''[[User:LindsayH|Lindsay]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:LindsayH|Hello]]</sup> 12:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
All of the members do except Don Felder (He only does backing vocals and lead vocals on "Visions" from "One Of These Nights") |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2018 == |
|||
Here goes |
|||
Hotel California |
{{edit semi-protected|Hotel California (Eagles album)|answered=y}} |
||
My request is to add information of each song from the album please so people know about each song, if it is not too much pressure. Yours sincerely, Jack. [[User:Ilikemusic67|Ilikemusic67]] ([[User talk:Ilikemusic67|talk]]) 18:59, 25 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ", nor cited [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to back up your request.<br>In any case, the most notable songs already have their own articles, and we would not want to duplicate that information in this article. - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 14:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Requested move 13 December 2023 == |
|||
New Kid In Town-Glenn Frey |
|||
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|||
Life In The Fast Lane-Don Henley |
|||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.'' |
|||
Wasted Time-Don Henley |
|||
Wasted Time (Reprise)-N/A (Instrumental) |
|||
Victim Of Love-Don Henley |
|||
Pretty Maids All In A Row-Joe Walsh |
|||
Try And Love Again-Randy Meisner |
|||
The Last Resort-Don Henley |
|||
<span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/59.154.2.61|59.154.2.61]] ([[User talk:59.154.2.61|talk]]) 23:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
i've noticed before this post, Don Henley sings 5 songs on this record. Glenn, Randy, and Joe all only sing one. Felder was denied lead vocal on VOL. 5 songs is alot for one member to sing. Don Hnely is a great singer in my opnion, but everyone should be allowed to sing nearly equally |
|||
== Best Pop Artist??? == |
|||
Does anyone know who awarded the "Best Pop Artist" award? [[User:DCEdwards1966|DCEdwards1966]] 03:17, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC) |
|||
==Interpretation of lyrics== |
|||
I never read as much nonsense as when I read Wiki goings-on about music lyrics. Here's another good example. JD Souther had a friend who got roped in by the Children of God cult in California. There are lots of cults like this and it's exactly as it says in the lyrics: you can check in any time but you can never leave. I have seen places like this - they lock the gates and don't let anyone loose. Civil slavery. To put it mildly. Souther didn't write the lyrics to this one but Felder, Frey and Henley who did wrote it for what Souther told them - and one has to agree: it was a good reaction. Being a friend of a friend of Joe Walsh and hearing the story personally - and the lyrics are not that hard to understand - not unless you want to misunderstand them. And/or are 'American'. So enough of this nonsense. It's a good song against cults and parts of Americana and always has been and always will be. Blech. |
|||
I don't see how "New Kid in Town" is about innocence, or "Life in the Fast Lane" about temptations. If you see Hotel California as a metaphor for the US, then it's a quite critical album. |
|||
The "Hotel California" that could be Heaven or Hell, where it is one big party, everybody welcomes you, but you only ''call'' people friends. And if you want to get out, you can't. |
|||
The "New Kid in Town" that is very popular, "till somebody new comes along". |
|||
"Life in the Fast Lane" which is about a perfect couple just enjoying there success a bit too much, and going under. |
|||
And "The Last Resort", describing the ''American Dream'': "They call it paradise, I don't know why". How the white man brings christianity: "They even brought a neon sign that said 'Jesus is coming'", prefers to forget what he did to the original inhabitants of the continent: "We satisfy our endless needs / |
|||
And justify our bloody deeds / In the name of destiny / And the name of God". |
|||
This is probably not the only way to look at the album. But I don't think that "innocence" and "temptations" are the best fitting words to describe the songs. |
|||
[[User:Taka|Taka]] 21:30, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Agreed. To me, the album itself is a critical commentary of the "American Dream", California, show business in general, shallow relationships, marriages destroyed by fame, etc. As soon as I have a little more time, I'll probably attempt an edit. |
|||
[[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 18:53, 20 May 2005 (UTC) |
|||
"The most important obviously was the referral to [[Alaska purchase|Seward's Folly]] in the song Hotel California." |
|||
:Maybe this is obvious to somebody, but it isn't to me, and a search didn't find anybody else drawing this parallel either. What referral? Taken out of the article until explanation given. [[User:Wasted Time R|Wasted Time R]] 19:49, 21 July 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Compare the 1969 Jethro Tull song "We used to know" to the 1976 Hotel California. |
|||
Almost identical chord progression, very similar metre, very similar melody. |
|||
My mom looked up the interpretation for this song once and it said that the song was talking about how people get stuck in the entertainment business, like with agents and stuff. Or something like that. Really, I think that everyone has a different interpretation. Just throwing that one out there! -Taliesin2 <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Taliesin2|Taliesin2]] ([[User talk:Taliesin2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Taliesin2|contribs]]) 01:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::::To me it is clear that this song is about a rehab clinic. "And in the master's chambers they gather for the feast (group therapy session). They stab it with their steely knives ((blaming others for their addictions) but they just can't kill the beast (the beast which is their addiction persists)" |
|||
"I called to the porter, please bring me my wine. He said 'we haven't had that spirit here since 1969',". This is a reference to a person who was there in '69 I would guess. |
|||
"You can check out anytime you like but you can never leave" - you can leave the rehab centre but the addiction disease will never leave you. |
|||
The song 29 Palms by Robert Plant was a reference to this same rehab clinic where he met Alannah Myles of whom this song 29 Palms is about. So, Hotel California isn't about Satan, its about a guy going to rehab. The actual hotel may be Camarillo Psychiatric hospital in LA, where musicians spent time rehabbing and electroshocking. Chris66 9:31, 4 Aug 2006 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/206.192.35.125|206.192.35.125]] ([[User talk:206.192.35.125|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::::To me, the song sounds like a Satantic story of a Hotel run by employees who are possessed by evil spirits. Why does this interpretation get widespread denial? Mainstream audiences enjoy horror movies, and books with satantic themes. The 70s was the beginning of the popularity of Steven King's books. And yet, in a ridiculous contradiction, The Eagles bandmembers, and fans and music critics, deny that the song has any Satanic meaning. We dont have to sanitize the song to make the Evangelicals happy!! The Evangelicals dont have to listen to the song, if they dont like it. Satanic themes are a popular genre in literature, and in film. Why are we pandering to the Evangelicals with regard to this song? Marc Smilen, Dania Florida [[Special:Contributions/206.192.35.125|206.192.35.125]] ([[User talk:206.192.35.125|talk]]) 19:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==The inspirational hotel== |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hotel_California&curid=189003&diff=32349072&oldid=32347688] Is there any reference to any hotel claiming to be THE Hotel California of the song? (rather than the hotel in the picture, which is well known) [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] 18:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:I've been to the one in Todo Santos ... It's about an hours drive north of Los Cabos. However it turns out its claim has been [http://www.todossantos-baja.com/todos-santos/eagles/hotel-california.htm refuted]. -- <i>[[User:ProveIt|ProveIt]] <sup>[[User talk:ProveIt|(talk)]]</sup></i> 17:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== link added == |
|||
I included a link that was indicated as being needed in the "Album Cover" section where the allegation of the song having satanic lyrics is located. If the link is an appropriate source, can someone with more knowledge than me about editing Wikipedia articles make it more presentable in the article? Thanks![[User:Jlujan69|Jlujan69]] 01:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:The research in the Snopes article doesn't really give much information on the album cover except to say that the person hired for the shoot was a woman, and even that isn't sourced. The quality of Snopes factfinding varies widely and doesn't always support their conclusions which are almost always dogmatic. It also has little to do with the actual controversy that occurred as the emails circulating around are over 20 years after the album was released and the original premise of the snopes article meandered into areas that had little to do with the album cover. [[User:66.75.8.138|66.75.8.138]] 21:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
This is my interpretation of the lyrics: |
|||
On a dark desert highway, (Highway to Las Vegas)cool wind in my hair |
|||
Warm smell of colitas, rising up through the air (He is going there specifically to engage a prostitute, colitis referring to her genitalia). |
|||
Up ahead in the distance, I saw a shimmering light (Vegas) |
|||
My head grew heavy and my sight grew dim (Not tired, but the male response to sexual expectation) |
|||
I had to stop for the night |
|||
There she stood in the doorway (The prostitute) |
|||
I heard the mission bell (His mission on this journey was to get sex) |
|||
And I was thinking to myself, |
|||
’this could be heaven or this could be hell’ (He is conflicted in this “Mission”) |
|||
Then she lit up a candle and she showed me the way |
|||
There were voices down the corridor, |
|||
I thought I heard them say... |
|||
Welcome to the hotel California (A metaphor for Nevada Cathouses, because this is where Californians go for legal prostitution) |
|||
Such a lovely place (Cathouse in Vegas Area) |
|||
Such a lovely face (The prostitute) |
|||
Plenty of room at the hotel California (Johns are not turned away) |
|||
Any time of year, you can find it here (Find sex here anytime of year) |
|||
Her mind is tiffany-twisted, (She is focused more on the money, then on him. Tiffany meaning fine jewelry). She got the mercedes bends (A well paid prostitutes can buy a Mercedes Benz) |
|||
She got a lot of pretty, pretty boys, that she calls friends (All of her Johns) |
|||
How they dance (have sex) in the courtyard, sweet summer sweat. |
|||
Some dance (have sex) to remember (To remember the good times of sexual encounters), some dance (have sex) to forget (To forget a poor marriage, or provincial life) |
|||
So I called up the captain, (The lead madam) |
|||
’please bring me my wine’ |
|||
He said, ’we haven’t had that spirit here since nineteen sixty nine’ (The year a law was legislated to prevent the serving of alcohol at Nevada Cathouses). |
|||
And still those voices are calling from far away, |
|||
Wake you up in the middle of the night |
|||
Just to hear them say... |
|||
Welcome to the hotel california |
|||
Such a lovely place |
|||
Such a lovely face |
|||
They livin’ it up at the hotel california |
|||
What a nice surprise, bring your alibis (Obviously for your wife back in California) |
|||
Mirrors on the ceiling, (Cathouse décor) |
|||
The pink champagne on ice (Legendary favorite for prostitutes) |
|||
And she said ’we are all just prisoners here, of our own device’ (They stay for the money, but not enjoyment.) |
|||
And in the master’s chambers, |
|||
They gathered for the feast (The feast is a metaphor for sex) |
|||
The stab it with their steely knives, (Sexual Penetration) |
|||
But they just can’t kill the beast (The beast is a metaphor for male passion, a beast that can truly never be killed) |
|||
Last thing I remember, I was |
|||
Running for the door |
|||
I had to find the passage back (This is not a passage back out of the cathouse, but a passage back to his own innocence…Remember, he is conflicted) |
|||
To the place I was before (innocence, fidelity) |
|||
’relax,’ said the night man, |
|||
We are programmed to receive. |
|||
You can checkout any time you like, |
|||
But you can never leave! (He will never overcome this act of infidelity, even when driving back to his home and life in California, a part of him, his innocence, will never leave that Cathouse). |
|||
Interpreted by Fred Young |
|||
==Alternative Interpretations== |
|||
Can someone back up the currently shown "Alternative Interpretation" on the album title song [[Hotel_California_(song)]] page which involves Alien Abduction??!? I've never heard this theory before, cannot find references, and seems to be just as valid as my "joke" theory that I came up with ten years ago (see Cecil Adams "Straight Dope" article) involving a fireworks factory blowing up! (and at least my joke theory has web references and is in print (Cecil Adams' "Triumph of the Straight Dope" ISBN 0-345-42008-X) [[User:Dzubint|Dzubint]] 15:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:See [[Talk:Hotel California (song)]] ... I took care of it. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 00:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Track Listing== |
|||
Excuse me If I'm being stupid but shouldn't this article have a track listing?--[[User:158.143.151.123|158.143.151.123]] 19:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Restored[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Hotel_California&diff=139976907&oldid=139387302] / [[User:Edgarde|edgarde]] 20:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== mystery figure == |
|||
Does anyone know any truth to the rumor of there being a figure of someone on the cover that the photographer says wasn't there when he took the photo?----[[Special:Contributions/69.229.5.163|69.229.5.163]] ([[User talk:69.229.5.163|talk]]) 09:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Search for "Hotel California" at [http://www.snopes.com Snopes.com] . - [[User:Jgm|Jgm]] ([[User talk:Jgm|talk]]) 12:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Whether or not the claim about a mystery figure in the photo is true, I think enough people have heard and spread the rumor to warrant a mention in the article itself, if only to debunk the story (if it indeed is untrue). Furthermore, I have heard a rumor that the mystery figure and the album in general is linked to the band's interest in Satanism, which, if this is a common rumor, should be mentioned in the article proper, if only to debunk it. --[[Special:Contributions/70.154.152.141|70.154.152.141]] ([[User talk:70.154.152.141|talk]]) 20:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Saxophone??== |
|||
In the track listing on this page it says for the song "Life In The Fast Lane", that Joe Walsh played a saxophone on the track. I've listened to this song over and onver again, and I cant find anything that sounds like a sax. And i've never seen it credited anywhere. Can someone verify this?? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/59.154.2.61|59.154.2.61]] ([[User talk:59.154.2.61|talk]]) 08:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== How long was this song written? == |
|||
How long was the song "hotel california" written? |
|||
If anyone knows the answer please do edit this part of the page. Thanks. |
|||
== "Members of Eagles" == |
|||
Look, I'm aware that the band is officially called "Eagles" and not "the Eagles". But I am incredibly dubious that reliable sources would say "Members of Eagles" rather than "members of the Eagles." Some bands that don't officially have "the" in their band name are still referred to with "the" in running text and conversation. The Eagles are one such band. It is not incorrect to do so, and it is pedantic and obtrusive to reflexively insist on not using "the" when it is actually used. [[User:John K|john k]] ([[User talk:John K|talk]]) 22:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::::Bronx? THE Bronx??? Vietnam? The Nam? Marc S. Dania Fl [[Special:Contributions/206.192.35.125|206.192.35.125]] ([[User talk:206.192.35.125|talk]]) 20:17, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== The album was ranked #3 on Rolling Stone's list of the "500 Greatest Albums Of All Time" == |
|||
"The album was ranked #3 on Rolling Stone's list of the "500 Greatest Albums Of All Time"" |
|||
Ehm, no, it wasn't! That rank goes to the album "Revolver" by the Beatles...removing it now... |
|||
Sources: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/500-greatest-albums-of-all-time-19691231/revolver-the-beatles-19691231 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.159.47.124|84.159.47.124]] ([[User talk:84.159.47.124|talk]]) 00:05, 3 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Country Rock? == |
|||
I don't really think any of the songs on this album are country songs. "In my opinion" the eagles were only a country band for the first 3 records (Eagles, Desperado, On the Border). I don't really see alot of country influence in One of these Nights <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.80.24.90|72.80.24.90]] ([[User talk:72.80.24.90|talk]]) 14:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::::Correct. They were not a country Rock group. In 2013, there is a documentary airing on Cable TV: "The History of the Eagles." In the documentary, its stated that Bernie Leadon wasnt happy with the musical direction of the band. The music became more Rock oriented; Bernie wanted to go more country-music. Marc S., Dania Fl [[Special:Contributions/206.192.35.125|206.192.35.125]] ([[User talk:206.192.35.125|talk]]) 20:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Hotel California or Hotel California (album) == |
|||
I'm just wondering, should the title be called "Hotel California (Eagles album)," to distinguish it from the song, the Tyga album, and the films? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.54.187.27|67.54.187.27]] ([[User talk:67.54.187.27|talk]]) 12:35, 3 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:In effect, you are also suggesting we redirect [[Hotel California]] to [[Hotel California (disambiguation)]] and thus have all uses disambiguated. We could possibly do that but please read [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation]] if you haven't already. --[[User:Racerx11|<font color = "orange">Racer</font><font color = "black">X<sup>11</sup></font>]] <small>''[[User talk:Racerx11|Talk to me]]''</small>''[[Special:Contributions/Racerx11|<sup>Stalk me</sup>]]'' 02:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Requested move== |
|||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of a [[WP:requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
The result of the move request was: '''move [[:Hotel California]] to {{no redirect|Hotel California (Eagles album)}}, [[Hotel California (song)]] to [[Hotel California]]'''. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 05:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
The result of the move request was: '''moved.''' There was only one convincing oppose, but that oppose included acknowledgement that the Eagles album is more notable. There was consensus in support of the nomination rationale; At close to 100 times the pageviews the Tyga album, the Eagles album overwhelms all other usages and can be considered the [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]]. <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small> <small>'''''[[User:Polyamorph|Polyamorph]]''''' ([[User talk:Polyamorph#top|talk]])</small> 15:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
---- |
||
[[:Hotel California (Eagles album)]] → {{no redirect|Hotel California (album)}} – Seems to be the pretty clear [[WP:INCDAB]] primary topic to me. It's just this article and [[Hotel California (Tyga album)]] – between the two, this article takes 96% of the pageviews, while the latter takes 4%. [[user:theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • she/her) 22:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC) <small>— '''''Relisting.''''' ''[[User:BegbertBiggs|BegbertBiggs]] ([[User talk:BegbertBiggs|talk]])'' 14:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)</small> |
|||
* [[:Hotel California]] → {{no redirect|Hotel California (Eagles album)}} |
|||
* [[:Hotel California (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Hotel California}} |
|||
– Both album and song by Eagles are equally significant in terms of history and impact. [http://stats.grok.se/en/201308/Hotel_California The album] is less viewed than [http://stats.grok.se/en/201308/Hotel_California_(song) the song]. There is another album of similar name by different artist. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 02:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' or move the song to the prime location. Disambiguation is also good -- [[Special:Contributions/76.65.128.222|76.65.128.222]] ([[User talk:76.65.128.222|talk]]) 05:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' [[Hotel California]] → [[Hotel California (Eagles album)]] but also recommend moving [[Hotel California (song)]] to [[Hotel California]] as the primary topic. I recall the first time I searched for the song I entered "Hotel California" only to get the album (in fact I still do that now:). The above stats show that I am not in the minority. Furthermore, wouldn't those stats be skewed in favor of the album because currently the album ''is'' the primary topic and readers are directed there against their will? And despite this [[Hotel California (song)]] is ''still'' more visited makes even a stronger argument? --[[User:Racerx11|<font color = "orange">Racer</font><font color = "black">X<sup>11</sup></font>]] <small>''[[User talk:Racerx11|Talk to me]]''</small>''[[Special:Contributions/Racerx11|<sup>Stalk me</sup>]]'' 12:05, 10 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:FlightTime|<span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FlightTime|<span style="color:#1C0978">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' [[Hotel California]] → [[Hotel California (Eagles album)]] and [[Hotel California (song)]] to [[Hotel California]] as the primary topic per Racerx11's commments. [[User:Piriczki|Piriczki]] ([[User talk:Piriczki|talk]]) 12:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' per nom. [[User:JohnCWiesenthal|JohnCWiesenthal]] ([[User talk:JohnCWiesenthal|talk]]) 16:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support''' Racerx11's solution. That's exactly what I came here to suggest. This is a prime example of when a song can be a primary topic, even over its own album. Top 50 in ''Rolling Stone''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s 500 Greatest is big. --[[User:BDD|BDD]] ([[User talk:BDD|talk]]) 16:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
* |
*'''Support''' per nom. [[User:Station1|Station1]] ([[User talk:Station1|talk]]) 00:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
* |
*'''Support''' per nom. --[[User:Born2cycle|В²C]] [[User_talk:Born2cycle#top|☎]] 23:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
*''' |
*'''Weak oppose''' I'm not sure 96% is enough. '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 17:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' |
*'''Support''' per nom. As for "not sure 96% is enough", would 97% do? '''Speedy close'''. [[User:Randy Kryn|Randy Kryn]] ([[User talk:Randy Kryn|talk]]) 15:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose'''. I'm not a fan of the slippery slope we seem to be on lately with [[WP:PDAB]] titles. The idea behind the PDAB exception is that if a title overwhelmingly, without the shadow of a doubt, refers to a certain topic, we PDAB it. That's not the case here - [[Hotel California (Tyga album)]] charted in multiple countries (including at #7 in the US), is certified Gold by the RIAA, and its lead single "[[Dope (Tyga song)|Dope]]" charted on the Billboard Hot 100. Is as notable as the Eagles album? Of course not. But it's not so insignificant that we should intentionally introduce ambiguity into an article title. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 18:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[WP:move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
|||
*'''Support''' per nom. — [[User:MaterialWorks|<span style="color:#00008b">m</span><span style="color:#2F4F4F">w</span>]] ([[User talk:MaterialWorks|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/MaterialWorks|contribs]]) 13:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] --> |
|||
</div><div style="clear:both;"></div> |
Latest revision as of 18:38, 15 July 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hotel California (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||
|
On 13 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Hotel California (Eagles album) to Hotel California (album). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested automated help
[edit]FYI regarding page moves above. Per discussion at User talk:Tariqabjotu#Hotel California page move I have made a bot request to make the necessary link changes. --RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me 06:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Category
[edit]This article should not be in Category:Fictional hotels, but Hotel California should. “Hotel California” is the only song about a fictional hotel, as well as the name of the hotel itself. Unfortunately, this page is semi-protected. 165.91.13.163 (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Fair point. Done. Happy days, LindsayHello 12:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2018
[edit]This edit request to Hotel California (Eagles album) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
My request is to add information of each song from the album please so people know about each song, if it is not too much pressure. Yours sincerely, Jack. Ilikemusic67 (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ", nor cited reliable sources to back up your request.
In any case, the most notable songs already have their own articles, and we would not want to duplicate that information in this article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 13 December 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. There was only one convincing oppose, but that oppose included acknowledgement that the Eagles album is more notable. There was consensus in support of the nomination rationale; At close to 100 times the pageviews the Tyga album, the Eagles album overwhelms all other usages and can be considered the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (closed by non-admin page mover) Polyamorph (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Hotel California (Eagles album) → Hotel California (album) – Seems to be the pretty clear WP:INCDAB primary topic to me. It's just this article and Hotel California (Tyga album) – between the two, this article takes 96% of the pageviews, while the latter takes 4%. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 14:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support - FlightTime (open channel) 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Station1 (talk) 00:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. --В²C ☎ 23:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not sure 96% is enough. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. As for "not sure 96% is enough", would 97% do? Speedy close. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. I'm not a fan of the slippery slope we seem to be on lately with WP:PDAB titles. The idea behind the PDAB exception is that if a title overwhelmingly, without the shadow of a doubt, refers to a certain topic, we PDAB it. That's not the case here - Hotel California (Tyga album) charted in multiple countries (including at #7 in the US), is certified Gold by the RIAA, and its lead single "Dope" charted on the Billboard Hot 100. Is as notable as the Eagles album? Of course not. But it's not so insignificant that we should intentionally introduce ambiguity into an article title. 162 etc. (talk) 18:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. — mw (talk) (contribs) 13:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC)