Jump to content

Talk:Suleman octuplets: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{Talk header}}
{{ITN talk|28 January|2009}}
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=Start|priority=|listas=Suleman octuplets}}
{{Image requested|medical subjects|human behavior|people of California}}
{{WikiProject California|class=start|importance=|southerncalifornia=yes}}
{{ITNtalk|28 January|2009}}
{{reqphoto|medical subjects|human behavior|in=California}}
{{oldmergefull
{{oldmergefull
| otherpage = Nadya Burns
| otherpage = Nadya Suleman
| date = March 2009
| date = March 2009
| result = Speedy Close
| result = Speedy Close
Line 19: Line 17:
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 1
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadsleft = 3
|algo = old(60d)
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Suleman octuplets/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Suleman octuplets/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{AutoArchivingNotice
|small=no
|age=60
|index=./Archive index
|bot=MiszaBot}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Talk:Suleman octuplets/Archive index|mask=Talk:Suleman octuplets/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=no}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=Talk:Suleman octuplets/Archive index|mask=Talk:Suleman octuplets/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=no}}
{{OnThisDay|date1=2022-01-26|oldid1=1067677939}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=Start|listas=Suleman Octuplets|
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject California|importance=low|southerncalifornia=yes|southerncalifornia-importance=low}}
}}


== Octomom? ==
== Which babies are identical ==

Nadya stated on a Radaronline.com video that it was Makai and Jeremiah,and Jonah and Josiah that were identical.
There is also another online article stating that Jonah,the one with the cleft lip,was one of the identical ones,and due to this,Nadya stated that she had no trouble telling him apart from his twin brother.

(scroll to bottom):
http://insidesocal.com/octorazzi/2009/04/world-wide-breaking-news-last-octuplet-arrives-home-with-proof.html

[[User:Nc40lady|Nc40lady]] ([[User talk:Nc40lady|talk]]) 08:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

::Isn't a [[cleft lip]] thought to be genetic, and if so wouldn't both twins have it? I have the feeling shes making up the twinning or just is guessing. DNA tests are going to be necessary to prove this.. —&nbsp;<b><i><font color="#6600FF">[[User:Raeky|raeky]]</font></i></b>&nbsp;<sup>(<font color="#0033FF">[[User talk:Raeky|talk]]</font>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<font color="#00CC00">[[Special:Contributions/Raeky|edits]]</font>)</sup> 13:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

It can be,although it can be caused by lack of nutrients,which I would presume is very possible in a pregnancy of eight babies,all competing for nutrition. [[User:Nc40lady|Nc40lady]] ([[User talk:Nc40lady|talk]]) 17:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

::Not sure the article for it mentions that at all... we're going to need rock solid sources for this to add it to the page. —&nbsp;<b><i><font color="#6600FF">[[User:Raeky|raeky]]</font></i></b>&nbsp;<sup>(<font color="#0033FF">[[User talk:Raeky|talk]]</font>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<font color="#00CC00">[[Special:Contributions/Raeky|edits]]</font>)</sup> 04:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


Of course.But whether she will ever submit them to DNA testing to be sure is anyone's guess !
Here's another one of her stating Jonah and Josiah are identical,although she fails to identify the other set in this video.Again,only her word,so who knows.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2396027.ece?OTC-RSS&ATTR=News
[[User:Nc40lady|Nc40lady]] ([[User talk:Nc40lady|talk]]) 07:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

In this article,Ms Suleman admits that eight embryos were implanted.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/03/earlyshow/leisure/celebspot/main5207772.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nc40lady|Nc40lady]] ([[User talk:Nc40lady|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nc40lady|contribs]]) 03:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Is this the famous "octomom"? If so, why isn't that mentioned in the lead. [[Special:Contributions/124.168.221.239|124.168.221.239]] ([[User talk:124.168.221.239|talk]]) 13:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
== Suleman, not Solomon ==


=="Later Years"==
The page listed the children's last name as Solomon, instead of Suleman, so I changed it. I'm still not quite sure how that mistake can be made, considering that the article's title is ''Suleman'' Octuplets. If this was in fact supposed to be a second middle name of some sort, then I apologize. [[User:IwishIwereabird|IwishIwereabird]] ([[User talk:IwishIwereabird|talk]]) 14:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
This section- "In a March 2019 interview with the Australian current affairs program Sunday Night for the octoplets’ tenth birthday, the reporter, Angela Cox, noted that the Suleman household is run with “military precision”, and the children are fed a largely organic, plant-based diet. Cox described the children as “happy, healthy, and well-mannered” and Ms. Suleman as going “from Octomom to Supermom” "- seems to be going out of its way to vindicate the mother against the backlash she encountered at the time of the octuplets' birth. Just because one Australian reporter said these things doesn't seem to necessarily justify this being effectively the final word on the subject in the article. Interestingly, the article cited doesn't really give any insight into how she supports this family aside from welfare, which covers less than a third of their monthly expenses. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.144.67.24|78.144.67.24]] ([[User talk:78.144.67.24#top|talk]]) 01:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:It's in this sentence: "The children carry their biological father's last name." The real inconvenience here is that the children's father have a last name so similar to their mother's, since this causes no end of confusion. :) --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 15:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
::I have no idea how I missed that sentence. Thank you so much for the correction! --[[User:IwishIwereabird|IwishIwereabird]] ([[User talk:IwishIwereabird|talk]]) 15:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
:::Believe me, you are not the first. I have tweaked the sentence a bit in a way that I hope will clarify for others. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] rabbits are cool<sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 15:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:38, 15 July 2024

Octomom?

[edit]

Is this the famous "octomom"? If so, why isn't that mentioned in the lead. 124.168.221.239 (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Later Years"

[edit]

This section- "In a March 2019 interview with the Australian current affairs program Sunday Night for the octoplets’ tenth birthday, the reporter, Angela Cox, noted that the Suleman household is run with “military precision”, and the children are fed a largely organic, plant-based diet. Cox described the children as “happy, healthy, and well-mannered” and Ms. Suleman as going “from Octomom to Supermom” "- seems to be going out of its way to vindicate the mother against the backlash she encountered at the time of the octuplets' birth. Just because one Australian reporter said these things doesn't seem to necessarily justify this being effectively the final word on the subject in the article. Interestingly, the article cited doesn't really give any insight into how she supports this family aside from welfare, which covers less than a third of their monthly expenses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.67.24 (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]