Jump to content

Talk:2012 Quebec student protests: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Canada|qc=yes|education=yes|class=C|importance=mid|Montreal=yes|Montreal-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Universities|class=C}}
{{WikiProject Politics}}
}}
{{Canadian English}}
{{Canadian English}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Canada|qc=yes|education=yes|importance=mid|Montreal=yes|Montreal-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Higher education}}
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Low}}
}}
{{Translated page|fr|Grève étudiante québécoise de 2012}}
{{Translated page|fr|Grève étudiante québécoise de 2012}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 16: Line 16:
}}
}}
{{Archive box|auto=long|search=yes}}
{{Archive box|auto=long|search=yes}}
{{Auto archiving notice |bot=MiszaBot I |age=90 |small=yes}}


== NPOV ==
== References Used Here ==


{{reflist}}
The Gazette is used as a source several times to justify politically charged edits as NPOV. Several times a week, the Gazette publishes an editor's opinion on the second page and an official "Gazette's View" in the editorials which explicitly states the paper's non-support of student protests. Moreover, the editors with the greatest access to this page are those from an English background and therefore also more likely to be from western Canada or members of the government and english media. As such, it is wishful thinking to believe that the selective reporting and synthesis featured in this article constitute NPOV. Would somebody please go through and indicate which claims are made by proponents and opponents of the strike. Finally (as far as I can tell) the article begins, runs and ends citing arguments against and opposition to the protests, with very little text dedicated to the protests themselves; this "drowning out" of the other (and demographically significant) viewpoints constitutes blatant abuse of what can reasonably be called NPOV.[[Special:Contributions/132.216.68.110|132.216.68.110]] ([[User talk:132.216.68.110|talk]]) 00:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)


== The Red Square ==
: I agree. The article is full of problems re NPOV. Even starting with the Events section, a fairly important statement regarding the wounded student is made without any source or reference to back it up. Even worse, later it is said that at the Victo riot "vandals started throwing projectiles at the crowd" which is absolutely false: according the the videos I was able to see of the event, police through plastic bullets, flash grenades and tear gas canisters in the crowd, and the crowd have thrown things at the police, but "vandals have *not* thrown things in the crowd, unless you consider police to be vandals. At the very least, "vandals" is a weasel word there.
: I wish we could have proper third party sources for a lot of the claims done in this article, or just have those claims removed. This is a sensitive issue and making such claim without proper sources seems like a very bad idea, in a time when things are still tense in Quebec. At this point, edit protection is actually hurting the neutrality of this article, as a lot of unsubstanciated claims and weasel words remain. -- [[User:TheAnarcat|TheAnarcat]] ([[User talk:TheAnarcat|talk]]) 17:02, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
::I think we need to follow [[WP:RS]] and not our own opinions. If theres a reliable source (even if you think its biased), its still a reliable source. There are plenty of pro student items in this and the French version of the article that come from sympathetic sources. as for this article needing to be neutered because things are still tense in Quebec, well I really don't think People will worry too much about a Wikipedia article.[[User:Mattnad|Mattnad]] ([[User talk:Mattnad|talk]]) 17:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
:::Some of the "reliable sources" are actually [http://www.montrealgazette.com/MacDonald+Students+know+good+they+have/6474332/story.html opinion pieces], not journalistic articles. So there were "pro-student" items in this - I don't think the solution is to change those to "pro-fees-hike" items, that would make it non-neutral in the other way. I think the solution is to clearly mark those controversies as such. One of those would be, for example, the decision by the government to refer to the "strike" as a "boycott", which this article now seems to have decided is also an appropriate word here. Furthermore, some of the "sources" do not actually refer to the quoted material, for example "Only an estimated one-third of students agreed with the boycott, while the majority of students completed their courses" the [http://bigstory.ap.org/content/emergency-law-considered-quebec-student-protest-1 source provided] doesn't actually mention any statistics about the number of students that agreed with the boycott (when?!). I am really beginning to question whether the editors of this article actually want a neutral article here. --[[User:TheAnarcat|TheAnarcat]] ([[User talk:TheAnarcat|talk]]) 21:45, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
::::And anyone who tries to make the page reflect the sources are either bullied (by "concensus") that what is here is right, or labeled as a "sock puppet" of a user who tried to correct it. Just my opinion from observing. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Notwillywanka|Notwillywanka]] ([[User talk:Notwillywanka|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Notwillywanka|contribs]]) 22:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Hello everyone! Under the section of 'The Red Square Symbol' it should note that the connotation of the red square symbolizes being 'squarely in the red' - which emphasizes being in debt. Students visibly wore these squares (similar to activist buttons) to publicize their student debt. --[[User:Danacs|Danacs]] ([[User talk:Danacs|talk]]) 20:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
== References Used Here ==


I don't remember it being because of that... What I remember is that it was used in some South American country and our association leads came up with it some day... [[User:PhysiqueUL09|PhysiqueUL09]] ([[User talk:PhysiqueUL09|talk]]) 02:24, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
{{reflist}}


== recent edit ==
== Transfer payments ==


I removed the part on transfer payments.
why was fringe put inside of quotes? does not make any sense. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Notwillywanka|Notwillywanka]] ([[User talk:Notwillywanka|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Notwillywanka|contribs]]) 04:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
It was originally added by: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2012_Quebec_student_protests&diff=prev&oldid=498175476
and is obviously politically motivated. However unfair it may be that other provinces charge their students more relative to Quebec, it has no relevance to the article's subject. It's simply added in opposition, claiming selfishness on part of the protesters. May as well claim Canadians are selfish beggars for demanding free public services as opposed to cheap ones. [[User:Bonusbox|Bonusbox]] ([[User talk:Bonusbox|talk]]) 02:30, 18 November 2017 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
Actually, the word fringe itself is a weasel word in this context. Instead of naming the groups, they are lumped together and labelled "fringe" - whatever that is supposed to mean other than something most likely negative. [[Special:Contributions/131.137.247.6|131.137.247.6]] ([[User talk:131.137.247.6|talk]]) 14:46, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


Hello fellow Wikipedians,
== Edit request on 14 April 2013 ==


I have just modified one external link on [[2012 Quebec student protests]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/819788415|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{edit protected|answered=yes}}
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150916171906/http://feuq.qc.ca/ to http://www.feuq.qc.ca/
<!-- Begin request -->


When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
The following claim:


{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
: ''Quebec is a net recipient of transfer payments from the federal government, and it uses those payments to pay for social programs, including education. The province does not disclose precisely how it spends the transfer payments, which have become politically charged for people in provinces that give more than they receive.[14]''


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 08:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Seems {{dubious}} to me. The reference provided for "The province does not disclose precisely how it spends the transfer payments" doesn't actually say that. Furthermore, it is an *editorial* from the National Post, which is widely known as a right-wing media outlet. As a person living in Quebec, I see the above statement as strongly charged politically and far from NPOV. In general, the historical context section seems far from the neutrality I expect from wikipedia, and should at least be marked as such.


== Opener translations? ==
Furthermore, shouldn't this article be semi-protected so that participation can resume? It has been locked down for months now...
<!-- End request -->
[[User:TheAnarcat|TheAnarcat]] ([[User talk:TheAnarcat|talk]]) 16:54, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EP --> The article protection has now been lowered to semi-protection, so you should be able to make the edit yourself. Best — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 12:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
::Le devoir is not exactly a centrist publication, but it's writing is cited in the article. Why pick on the national post only?[[User:Mattnad|Mattnad]] ([[User talk:Mattnad|talk]]) 02:30, 14 October 2013 (UTC)


''"The 2012 Quebec student protests (movement) were a series of student demonstrations led by student unions such as the Association pour une solidarité syndicale étudiante (ASSÉ), the Fédération étudiante universitaire du Québec, and the Fédération étudiante collégiale du Québec against a proposal by the Quebec Cabinet, headed by Liberal Premier Jean Charest, to raise university tuition from $2,168 to $3,793 between 2012 and 2018."''
== History of the Red Square ==
The French names of the unions make up 16 out of the 64 words in this first sentence - a full quarter. Now, speaking for myself (native English speaker, pretty much zero knowledge of French), this didn't read right at all; it took much longer for me to parse than expected. Would it be worth using translations of the union names initially, thereafter the French acronyms? [[User:Wodgester|Wodgester]] ([[User talk:Wodgester|talk]]) 20:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


{{re|Wodgester}} Hi, I agree it might be a mouthful, but this is something we need to keep in some way. You could probably agree with me that proper nouns almost always are translated improperly. Maybe I could add some sort of "free translation" after their French names. [[User:PhysiqueUL09|PhysiqueUL09]] ([[User talk:PhysiqueUL09|talk]]) 02:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
The article says "The square first appeared in October 2004 when the Collectif pour un Québec sans pauvreté (Collective for a Quebec without Poverty) used it in a campaign against Bill 57." But Bill 57 was/is the Sustainable Forest Development Act which, on the face of it, has nothing to do with Poverty.


:You're right, {{re|PhysiqueUL09}}, I had overlooked that important problem with translations. I guess if different English-language sources had used different literal translations (or none at all) then adding some there could increase confusion. Especially since union names are often different arrangements of similar words... [[User:Wodgester|Wodgester]] ([[User talk:Wodgester|talk]]) 10:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=5&file=2010C3A.PDF <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/50.71.130.74|50.71.130.74]] ([[User talk:50.71.130.74|talk]]) 15:02, 23 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


I think that even in the English CBC broadcasts they used the littéral French words followed by a short explanation. But I can agree that a small translation could be added if these associations don't all have their wikipedia page already. [[User:PhysiqueUL09|PhysiqueUL09]] ([[User talk:PhysiqueUL09|talk]]) 12:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
During every Legislative Assembly Session, the "Bill" numbers start over. In the 37th Legislature of Québec, Bill 57 was the [http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=5&file=2005C15A.PDF Individual and Family Assistance Act] tabled on June 11th 2004. The Article contains the correct information on this. The Bill 57 mentioned by the IP above was a 2009 Bill, introduced on June 12th 2009, 5 years later.


Omg I remember seeing this page as a battlefield in 2012 hahaha [[User:PhysiqueUL09|PhysiqueUL09]] ([[User talk:PhysiqueUL09|talk]]) 12:55, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
== The PQ did not lower tuition .. ==


== Strike vs Boycott ==
Whoever created this wikipedia page seems bias to PQ and nationalism.
The PQ created an indexation that has in the long term raised tuition higher than the Liberals.


The archived talk contains a healthy debate over the use of strike vs boycott to describe the student's refusal to attend classes.
Can you please either make the article open to edit for everyone or just delete it?
This discussion has been purged from the Talk as well as the article itself. The term "strike" was used by the students themselves (grève in french) and was repeated by others including some media outlets. By any objective analysis of the action inlight of dictionary definitions of both terms, this was a boycott and not a strike. The article is guilty of biais by uncritically adopting the student's misleading terminology. The article should at the very least include and acknowledgement that while the students called their action a strike, they were not employees they were clients and so technically speaking the action was more of a boycott.
The sources you cite are also really bad sources. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.23.45.34|96.23.45.34]] ([[User talk:96.23.45.34|talk]]) 22:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This would be truthful and informative as it highlights the extent to which the students adopted the trappings, terminology and tactics of the labour movement, event though by definition they were not, and could not be considered part of any labour movement. [[User:Tokuiwaza|Tokuiwaza]] ([[User talk:Tokuiwaza|talk]]) 17:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
:If you can write out what you have in mind with a source, I'll see what I can do to incorporate. [[User:Mattnad|Mattnad]] ([[User talk:Mattnad|talk]]) 22:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
::Correct the PQ did not lower tuition, they indexed the increases to inflation. However the article has strayed away from the subject: The Student Protests.--[[User:Notwillywanka|Notwillywanka]] ([[User talk:Notwillywanka|talk]]) 17:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:10, 17 July 2024

References Used Here

[edit]

The Red Square

[edit]

Hello everyone! Under the section of 'The Red Square Symbol' it should note that the connotation of the red square symbolizes being 'squarely in the red' - which emphasizes being in debt. Students visibly wore these squares (similar to activist buttons) to publicize their student debt. --Danacs (talk) 20:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember it being because of that... What I remember is that it was used in some South American country and our association leads came up with it some day... PhysiqueUL09 (talk) 02:24, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer payments

[edit]

I removed the part on transfer payments. It was originally added by: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2012_Quebec_student_protests&diff=prev&oldid=498175476 and is obviously politically motivated. However unfair it may be that other provinces charge their students more relative to Quebec, it has no relevance to the article's subject. It's simply added in opposition, claiming selfishness on part of the protesters. May as well claim Canadians are selfish beggars for demanding free public services as opposed to cheap ones. Bonusbox (talk) 02:30, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2012 Quebec student protests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Opener translations?

[edit]

"The 2012 Quebec student protests (movement) were a series of student demonstrations led by student unions such as the Association pour une solidarité syndicale étudiante (ASSÉ), the Fédération étudiante universitaire du Québec, and the Fédération étudiante collégiale du Québec against a proposal by the Quebec Cabinet, headed by Liberal Premier Jean Charest, to raise university tuition from $2,168 to $3,793 between 2012 and 2018." The French names of the unions make up 16 out of the 64 words in this first sentence - a full quarter. Now, speaking for myself (native English speaker, pretty much zero knowledge of French), this didn't read right at all; it took much longer for me to parse than expected. Would it be worth using translations of the union names initially, thereafter the French acronyms? Wodgester (talk) 20:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wodgester: Hi, I agree it might be a mouthful, but this is something we need to keep in some way. You could probably agree with me that proper nouns almost always are translated improperly. Maybe I could add some sort of "free translation" after their French names. PhysiqueUL09 (talk) 02:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, @PhysiqueUL09:, I had overlooked that important problem with translations. I guess if different English-language sources had used different literal translations (or none at all) then adding some there could increase confusion. Especially since union names are often different arrangements of similar words... Wodgester (talk) 10:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that even in the English CBC broadcasts they used the littéral French words followed by a short explanation. But I can agree that a small translation could be added if these associations don't all have their wikipedia page already. PhysiqueUL09 (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Omg I remember seeing this page as a battlefield in 2012 hahaha PhysiqueUL09 (talk) 12:55, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strike vs Boycott

[edit]

The archived talk contains a healthy debate over the use of strike vs boycott to describe the student's refusal to attend classes. This discussion has been purged from the Talk as well as the article itself. The term "strike" was used by the students themselves (grève in french) and was repeated by others including some media outlets. By any objective analysis of the action inlight of dictionary definitions of both terms, this was a boycott and not a strike. The article is guilty of biais by uncritically adopting the student's misleading terminology. The article should at the very least include and acknowledgement that while the students called their action a strike, they were not employees they were clients and so technically speaking the action was more of a boycott. This would be truthful and informative as it highlights the extent to which the students adopted the trappings, terminology and tactics of the labour movement, event though by definition they were not, and could not be considered part of any labour movement. Tokuiwaza (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]