Talk:College of William & Mary: Difference between revisions
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Universities}}, {{WikiProject Virginia}}. Tag: |
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30) |
||
(37 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader|search=yes |
{{talkheader|search=yes}} |
||
{{Article history |
{{Article history |
||
|action1=FAC |
|action1=FAC |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| maxarchivesize=100K |
| maxarchivesize=100K |
||
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} |
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} |
||
| minthreadsleft= |
| minthreadsleft=3 |
||
| minthreadstoarchive=1 |
| minthreadstoarchive=1 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{old move|date=11 April 2024|destination=College of William and Mary|result=no consensus|link=Special:Permalink/1219638003#Requested move 11 April 2024}} |
|||
__TOC__ |
__TOC__ |
||
== |
== Promotional Content == |
||
Removal of Promotional Content in accordance to Wikipedia Policy outlined in [[Talk:George Mason University#Removal of Notable faculty and alumni]]. [[Special:Contributions/129.174.255.57|129.174.255.57]] ([[User talk:129.174.255.57|talk]]) 20:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hi @[[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]], you reverted my good faith edits. The sentences that need sourcing or deletion are as follows: |
|||
*"a spirited mass meeting protesting infringement of the sacred principles" is not necessary as quote. |
|||
*Pls delete "reverend" according to MOS. |
|||
*The fire in Jefferson Hall, with no casualties, is not that important for an encyclopedia. |
|||
*_done_ "William & Mary is making efforts to grant more financial aid to applicants (and has a new plan" is boosterism. It is unsourced, too. |
|||
*_done_ ''Tribe Attaché'' - the student news blog has no sourcing. And is this important for an encyclopedia? We call that boosterism. |
|||
*Explaining that the Student Council "consists of Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches" is UNDUE. Not that unusual. |
|||
*Ever read an advertisement for a resort? "Also, the beaches of the [[Delmarva Peninsula]] are just a few hours away via the [[Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel]]." Boosterism. |
|||
*UNDUE detail here: Black Student Organizations, Campus Ministry, Hillel, and so on. These are obvious. |
|||
*here is some boosterism: "At W&M, the Honor System stands as one of the college's most important traditions" |
|||
*As for the lede, the list of alumni is overwhelming and undue detail, especially in the lede. The business about George Washington's surveyor's license shouldn't come here, since he was in absentia, got the diploma in the mail. That is covered later on in the article, which is the appropriate place for it. |
|||
[[User:Melchior2006|Melchior2006]] ([[User talk:Melchior2006|talk]]) 07:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::These removals are largely unnecessary. For example, "reverend" is necessary to distinguish the clergyman from the Virginian founding father of the same name. Similarly, details on prominent alumni involved in the revolution go directly to the college's role in history and are often the first things mentioned in academic references to the school. Not every detail that provides context is "boosterism". I stand by my reversal of your mass removal and caution you against doing likewise on other articles. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 12:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::noted the two changes @[[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] made. --[[User:Melchior2006|Melchior2006]] ([[User talk:Melchior2006|talk]]) 15:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::Mentioning "George Washington received his surveyor's license from the college in 1749" in the lede is slightly misleading, since it was a mail-order affair. I suggest deleting it in the lede and keeping it in the body of the article. --[[User:Melchior2006|Melchior2006]] ([[User talk:Melchior2006|talk]]) 19:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Just a lot of vandalism. If you choose to have others regard your attempts as [[WP:AGF|in good faith]], you should take some time to read the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] and [[WP:LEAD|lead section]] [[User:Tedickey|TEDickey]] ([[User talk:Tedickey|talk]]) 22:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== User Pbritti: Conflict of Interest, NPOV == |
|||
== Requested move 11 April 2024 == |
|||
{{connected contributor}} @[[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] is a recent alum of W&M, which may be part of the problem. [[User:Melchior2006|Melchior2006]] ([[User talk:Melchior2006|talk]]) 15:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:{{re|Melchior2006}} Given that my authorship on the article currently stands at 8.3%, I've {{Diff2|1112331888|consistently edited}} to remove PUFFERY in this article, and have substantial impartial creations and expansions in this subject area, I'm going to offer you a little bit to reconsider this very UNCIVIL response to being told that a drive-by content removal was mostly unfounded. Heck, I even went and implemented a few of your suggested removals because I agreed. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 15:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::Thank you for implementing the changes. It would have been good to note that on the talk page, but I can add that now. I don't find it uncivil to point out that you are a recent alum of W&M. It's just a fact you note on your own user talk page, and it's important to consider. Pax! --[[User:Melchior2006|Melchior2006]] ([[User talk:Melchior2006|talk]]) 15:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{re|Melchior2006}} The [[WP:EXTERNALREL|EXTERNALREL]] portion of the COI policy is pertinent here: if you have reason to believe I am failing to fulfill my {{tq|primary role}} as an editor, which {{tq|is to further the interests of the encyclopedia}}, raising a COI concern is relevant. Besides some minor additions to images and caption, the only substantial portion of the article I've written is a paragraph on the recent renaming of a few academic halls (see paragraph starting "Following the George Floyd protests"). This is a good opportunity to mention that the [[Wikipedia:Who Wrote That?|Who Wrote That? tool]] enables you to quickly scan for evidence of real COI editing by checking the authorship of particular portions of any article. I highly recommend it if you plan on continuing your effort to combat PUFFERY in collegiate articles. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 15:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> |
|||
=== College Building, the President's House, and Brafferton "restoration" === |
|||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.'' |
|||
The result of the move request was: '''no consensus.''' After extended time for discussion, there is a clear absence of consensus for the move as proposed at this time. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:gold">'''''BD2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 18:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
@[[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]]: could you find a reference for your edit today about College Building, the President's House and the Brafferton being initiated by a said prof and paid for with a said donation? That would be necessary; I'm sure you have access to some publications about this as a recent alum. [[User:Melchior2006|Melchior2006]] ([[User talk:Melchior2006|talk]]) 15:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:{{re|Melchior2006}} You can subordinate this information in existing sections and there's no need to ping me for further discussion as this is on my watchlist. A good starting point is [https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2016/januaryfebruary/feature/my-own-private-williamsburg this], but I'm currently away for Thanksgiving holiday and don't have access to my volumes on Williamsburg (including my favorite, a copy of ''A Historical Sketch of Bruton Church, Williamsburg, Virginia'' signed by Goodwin). I'd encourage you to tag unverified historic information with the [[Template:Citation needed|cn template]] so I can come back and either delete or reference the material when I get home early next week. If you notice that deletions haven't or citations haven't been made by Wednesday, I'd encourage you to delete the material then per the [[WP:V|verifiability policy]]. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 16:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
[[:College of William & Mary]] → {{no redirect|College of William and Mary}} – In the formal documents of the college, "College of William and Mary" is the way how the institute addresses itself. This is the usage in the institute's documents, including the [https://www.wm.edu/sites/facultyassembly/constitutionandbylaws/ Constitution of the Faculty Assembly of the College of William and Mary] and the [https://www.wm.edu/sites/studentassembly/_documents/student-assembly-constitution-updated-march-12-2019.pdf Constitution of the Student Assembly of the College of William and Mary]. [[User:Cfls|Cfls]] ([[User talk:Cfls|talk]]) 15:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC) <small>— '''''Relisting.''''' [[User:Natg 19|Natg 19]] ([[User talk:Natg 19|talk]]) 23:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Oppose''' per [[WP:COMMONNAME|COMMONNAME]]. The ampersand appears in reporting, promotional material, and academic contexts. Of note, the ampersand constitutes one of the symbols used by the school. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 16:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Comment''', how the school officially writes its name is irrelevent. Wikipedia is based on what reliable sources call it. Can you provide news articles that use "and" instead of "&"? [[User:Esolo5002|Esolo5002]] ([[User talk:Esolo5002|talk]]) 19:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes: [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/10/us/virginia-legacy-admissions-public-colleges-universities.html ''New York Times''], [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/30/us/virginia-legacy-college-admissions.html ''New York Times''], [https://www.wsj.com/articles/thomas-jeffersons-education-and-educated-in-tyranny-review-the-dream-of-a-better-society-11569596940 ''Wall Street Journal''], [https://www.wsj.com/articles/wait-listed-at-colleges-of-your-dreams-some-offer-semester-abroad-as-way-in-11628942401 ''Wall Street Journal''], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/03/09/virginia-college-legacy-preferences/ ''Washington Post''], [https://www.dailypress.com/2024/04/09/tribe-squads-excel-at-colonial-relays/ ''Daily Press'']. I can do more but I think this makes the point. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 00:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Comment''': Maybe both titles should be mentioned, with the ampersand-less version appearing as the title. |
|||
:[[User:23emr|23emr]] ([[User_talk:23emr|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/23emr|contributions]]) [[User:23emr|23emr]] ([[User_talk:23emr|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/23emr|contributions]]) 20:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:<small>Note: [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Virginia|WikiProject Virginia]] and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Higher education|WikiProject Higher education]] have been notified of this discussion. [[User:RodRabelo7|RodRabelo7]] ([[User talk:RodRabelo7|talk]]) 01:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Support''' per nom. Ampersands are usually best avoided. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 13:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
**{{re|Necrothesp}} Per [[MOS:AMP]], that's not true given this is a proper noun. Additionally, the only rationale provided is that documents by organizations affiliated with the institution (not the institution itself, as is mistakenly said) use "and" instead of the ampersand. Reliable sources appear to prefer usage of the ampersand. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 14:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
***In the university's [https://www.wm.edu/about/history/#:~:text=The%20College%20of%20William%20and%20Mary%20in%20Virginia History and Tradition page], it says that {{xt|On February 8, 1693, King William III and Queen Mary II of England signed the charter for a "perpetual College of Divinity, Philosophy, Languages, and other good Arts and Sciences" to be established in the Virginia Colony as "The College of William and Mary in Virginia."}} The name "College of William and Mary" is also used by the university's various offices, such as listing its [https://www.wm.edu/offices/iae/accreditation/ accreditation] and [https://catalog.wm.edu/content.php?catoid=12&navoid=2189#:~:text=The-,College%20of%20William%20and%20Mary,-confers%20in%20course Requirements for Degrees]. While "William & Mary" seems to be the brand name for marketing and campus cohesion purposes, the "College of William and Mary" name seems to be the use in official documents for record and bylaws. Thank you. [[User:Cfls|Cfls]] ([[User talk:Cfls|talk]]) 16:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
****Well, you may notice the original charter refers to it as the "Colledge", so that's not the strongest case. Again, independent, reliable sources like the ''New York Times'' and ''Wall Street Journal'' indicate the COMMONNAME use is with the ampersand (as noted in the general coverage of papers of record and local sources above). [https://www.britannica.com/topic/College-of-William-Mary ''Britannica''] uses "College of William & Mary", as does the [https://www.chea.org/college-william-mary Center for Higher Education Accreditation]. Further, in every public release from W&M (through their [https://news.wm.edu/ W&M News] arm), they use "William & Mary". For what it's worth, I was in Williamsburg over the weekend, and all the public road signage uses the ampersand. ~ [[User:Pbritti|Pbritti]] ([[User talk:Pbritti|talk]]) 16:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' Not only do we not allow subjects to control or dictate the contents of articles, including titles, it's difficult to believe that the subject's "official" name uses the word "and" when its webpage so prominently and consistently uses an ampersand as does its [https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?s=all&pg=1&id=231624 official name filed with the U.S. Department of Education]. [[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] ([[User talk:ElKevbo|talk]]) 22:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] --> |
|||
</div><div style="clear:both;" class=></div> |
Latest revision as of 18:13, 17 July 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the College of William & Mary article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
College of William & Mary is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Nu Kappa Epsilon, was copied or moved into The College of William & Mary with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||
|
On 11 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to College of William and Mary. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Promotional Content
[edit]Removal of Promotional Content in accordance to Wikipedia Policy outlined in Talk:George Mason University#Removal of Notable faculty and alumni. 129.174.255.57 (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Just a lot of vandalism. If you choose to have others regard your attempts as in good faith, you should take some time to read the manual of style and lead section TEDickey (talk) 22:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 11 April 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. After extended time for discussion, there is a clear absence of consensus for the move as proposed at this time. BD2412 T 18:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
College of William & Mary → College of William and Mary – In the formal documents of the college, "College of William and Mary" is the way how the institute addresses itself. This is the usage in the institute's documents, including the Constitution of the Faculty Assembly of the College of William and Mary and the Constitution of the Student Assembly of the College of William and Mary. Cfls (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Natg 19 (talk) 23:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per COMMONNAME. The ampersand appears in reporting, promotional material, and academic contexts. Of note, the ampersand constitutes one of the symbols used by the school. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment, how the school officially writes its name is irrelevent. Wikipedia is based on what reliable sources call it. Can you provide news articles that use "and" instead of "&"? Esolo5002 (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes: New York Times, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Daily Press. I can do more but I think this makes the point. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Maybe both titles should be mentioned, with the ampersand-less version appearing as the title.
- 23emr (talk | contributions) 23emr (talk | contributions) 20:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Virginia and WikiProject Higher education have been notified of this discussion. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Ampersands are usually best avoided. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Necrothesp: Per MOS:AMP, that's not true given this is a proper noun. Additionally, the only rationale provided is that documents by organizations affiliated with the institution (not the institution itself, as is mistakenly said) use "and" instead of the ampersand. Reliable sources appear to prefer usage of the ampersand. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- In the university's History and Tradition page, it says that On February 8, 1693, King William III and Queen Mary II of England signed the charter for a "perpetual College of Divinity, Philosophy, Languages, and other good Arts and Sciences" to be established in the Virginia Colony as "The College of William and Mary in Virginia." The name "College of William and Mary" is also used by the university's various offices, such as listing its accreditation and Requirements for Degrees. While "William & Mary" seems to be the brand name for marketing and campus cohesion purposes, the "College of William and Mary" name seems to be the use in official documents for record and bylaws. Thank you. Cfls (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you may notice the original charter refers to it as the "Colledge", so that's not the strongest case. Again, independent, reliable sources like the New York Times and Wall Street Journal indicate the COMMONNAME use is with the ampersand (as noted in the general coverage of papers of record and local sources above). Britannica uses "College of William & Mary", as does the Center for Higher Education Accreditation. Further, in every public release from W&M (through their W&M News arm), they use "William & Mary". For what it's worth, I was in Williamsburg over the weekend, and all the public road signage uses the ampersand. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- In the university's History and Tradition page, it says that On February 8, 1693, King William III and Queen Mary II of England signed the charter for a "perpetual College of Divinity, Philosophy, Languages, and other good Arts and Sciences" to be established in the Virginia Colony as "The College of William and Mary in Virginia." The name "College of William and Mary" is also used by the university's various offices, such as listing its accreditation and Requirements for Degrees. While "William & Mary" seems to be the brand name for marketing and campus cohesion purposes, the "College of William and Mary" name seems to be the use in official documents for record and bylaws. Thank you. Cfls (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Necrothesp: Per MOS:AMP, that's not true given this is a proper noun. Additionally, the only rationale provided is that documents by organizations affiliated with the institution (not the institution itself, as is mistakenly said) use "and" instead of the ampersand. Reliable sources appear to prefer usage of the ampersand. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not only do we not allow subjects to control or dictate the contents of articles, including titles, it's difficult to believe that the subject's "official" name uses the word "and" when its webpage so prominently and consistently uses an ampersand as does its official name filed with the U.S. Department of Education. ElKevbo (talk) 22:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)