Open channel spillway: Difference between revisions
→Spillway Types: move citations |
Gamapamani (talk | contribs) m fix unpaired tags |
||
(42 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Spillway channel Colt Crag Reservoir - geograph.org.uk - 1008550.jpg|thumb|Spillway channel example at the Colt Crag Reservoir]] |
|||
{{Multiple issues| |
|||
⚫ | '''Open channel spillways''' are [[dam]] [[spillway]]s that utilize the principles of [[open-channel flow]] to convey impounded water in order to prevent [[dam failure]]. They can function as principal spillways, emergency spillways, or both. They can be located on the dam itself or on a natural grade in the vicinity of the dam. |
||
{{copy edit|for=style|date=January 2015}} |
|||
{{orphan|date=January 2015}} |
|||
{{procon|date=January 2015}} |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | '''Open channel spillways''' are dam [[spillway]]s that utilize the principles of open |
||
== Spillway |
== Spillway types == |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
* Inlet |
|||
* Vertical curve section (ogee curve) |
|||
* Steep-sloped channel |
|||
* Outlet |
|||
=== Chute spillway === |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Chute spillways carry [[supercritical flow]] through the steep slope of an open channel. There are four main components of a chute spillway:<ref name="refone">{{cite book |last=Beauchamp |first=K.H. |title=Engineering Field Manual |chapter=Structures |publisher=United States Department of Agriculture – Soil Conservation Service. |chapter-url= http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=17545.wba}}</ref> The elements of a spillway are the inlet, the vertical curve section (ogee curve), the steep-sloped channel and the outlet. |
||
''Design'' |
|||
In order to avoid a [[hydraulic jump]], the slope of the spillway must be steep enough for the flow to remain supercritical. |
In order to avoid a [[hydraulic jump]], the slope of the spillway must be steep enough for the flow to remain supercritical. |
||
Proper spillways help with flood control, prevent erosion at the ends of terraces, outlets, and waterways, reduce runoff over drainage ditch banks and are simple to construct. |
|||
''Advantages/Uses'' |
|||
* Helps with flood control |
|||
* Prevents erosion at the ends of terraces, outlets, and waterways |
|||
* Reduces runoff over drainage ditch banks |
|||
* Simple construction |
|||
⚫ | |||
''Disadvantages'' |
|||
⚫ | |||
* Shorter life expectancy than other spillways |
|||
=== Stepped spillways === |
|||
[[Stepped spillway]]s are used to dissipate energy along the chute of the channel. The steps of the spillway greatly reduce the kinetic energy of the flow and therefore reduce flow velocity. [[Roller-compacted concrete|Roller-compacted concrete (RCC)]] stepped spillways have become increasingly popular because of their use in rehabilitating aged flood control dams.<ref name="reftwo">Hunt |
[[Stepped spillway]]s are used to dissipate energy along the chute of the channel. The steps of the spillway greatly reduce the [[kinetic energy]] of the flow and therefore reduce flow velocity. [[Roller-compacted concrete|Roller-compacted concrete (RCC)]] stepped spillways have become increasingly popular because of their use in rehabilitating aged flood control dams.<ref name="reftwo">{{cite web |last1=Hunt |first1=S.L. |last2=Kadavy |first2=K.C. |year=2010 |title=Energy Dissipation on Flat-Sloped Stepped Spillways: Part 2. Downstream of the Inception Point |publisher=American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. |issn=2151-0032 |volume=53 |issue=1 |pp=111–118 |url=http://naldc-legacy.nal.usda.gov/naldc/download.xhtml?id=41026&content=PDF}}</ref> |
||
[[File:Stepped Spillway.jpg|thumb|center|Stepped |
[[File:Stepped Spillway.jpg|thumb|center|Stepped spillway]] |
||
⚫ | |||
''Design'' |
|||
⚫ | Design guidelines for these spillways are limited. However, research |
||
Stepped spillways are useful for flood control, increasing [[Oxygen saturation|dissolved oxygen (DO)]] levels downstream of a dam, aid wastewater treatment plants for air-water transfer of gases and for [[Volatile organic compound|volatile organic compound (VOC)]] removal and reduces the spillway length or eliminates need for stilling basin.<ref name="three">{{cite web |last=Frizell |first=K.H. |title=Hydraulics of Stepped Spillways for RCC Dams and Dam Rehabilitations. PAP-596. |publisher=United States Department of the Interior – Bureau of Reclamation. |url= http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/PAP/PAP-0596.pdf}}</ref> |
|||
* Used for discharge of excess water (flood control) |
|||
* Used for increasing [[Oxygen saturation|dissolved oxygen (DO)]] levels downstream of a dam |
|||
* Used at wastewater treatment plants for air-water transfer of gases and for [[Volatile organic compound|volatile organic compound (VOC)]] removal |
|||
* Cost benefit (reduces length or eliminates need for stilling basin) |
|||
⚫ | |||
''Disadvantages''<ref name="three"/> |
|||
* There are not many design guidelines in place |
|||
⚫ | |||
=== Side channel spillways === |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Side channel spillways are typically used to discharge floods perpendicular to the general direction of flow by placing the control weir parallel to the upper portion of the discharge channel.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Hager |first1=W.H. |author-link1=Willi H. Hager| last2=Phister |first2=M. |year=2011 |title=Historical Development of Side-Channel Spillway in Hydraulic Engineering |location=Brisbane, Australia |url=http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/170044/files/2011-805_Hager_Pfister_Historical_development_%20of_%20side_channel_spillway_hydraulic_engineering_1.pdf}}</ref> |
||
''Advantages/Uses'' |
|||
⚫ | |||
* Minimizes erosion |
|||
⚫ | |||
''Disadvantages'' |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Different agencies have different methods and formulas for quantifying flows and conveyance capacities for chute spillways. The [[Natural Resources Conservation Service|Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)]] |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Different agencies have different methods and formulas for quantifying flows and conveyance capacities for chute spillways. The [[Natural Resources Conservation Service|Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)]] produced handbooks on dam design. In the National Engineering Handbook, Section 14, Chute Spillways (NEH14),<ref name="five">United States Department of Agriculture – Soil Conservation Service (1985). [http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/viewerFS.aspx?id=3885 ''Engineering Handbook''], Section 14, Chute Spillways (NEH14).</ref> flow equations are given for straight inlets and box inlets. |
||
NEH14 provides the following discharge-head relationship for straight inlets of chute spillways, which is given by the flow equation for a weir: |
NEH14 provides the following discharge-head relationship for straight inlets of chute spillways, which is given by the flow equation for a weir: |
||
Q = 3.1W[H + v<sub>a</sub><sup>2</sup>/2g]<sup>3/2</sup> = 3.1H<sub>e</sub><sup>3/2</sup> |
{{block indent|1=Q = 3.1W[H + v<sub>a</sub><sup>2</sup>/2g]<sup>3/2</sup> = 3.1H<sub>e</sub><sup>3/2</sup>}} |
||
where: |
|||
Where: |
|||
* Q = discharge of inlet (ft<sup>3</sup>/s) |
* Q = discharge of inlet (ft<sup>3</sup>/s) |
||
* W = width of the chute or inlet (ft) |
* W = width of the chute or inlet (ft) |
||
Line 71: | Line 50: | ||
* g = 32.16 ft/s<sup>2</sup> |
* g = 32.16 ft/s<sup>2</sup> |
||
[[File:Straight Inlet.jpg|thumb|center|Straight |
=== Straight inlet === |
||
[[File:Straight Inlet.jpg|thumb|center|Straight inlet]] |
|||
''Straight Inlet''<ref name="five"/> |
|||
If the flow rate per unit width is defined as q = Q/W, then the equation can be written as |
If the flow rate per unit width is defined as q = Q/W, then the equation can be written as:<ref name="five" /> |
||
q = Q/W = 3.1[H + v<sub>a</sub><sup>2</sup>/2g]<sup>3/2</sup> = 3.1H<sub>e</sub><sup>3/2</sup> |
{{block indent|1=q = Q/W = 3.1[H + v<sub>a</sub><sup>2</sup>/2g]<sup>3/2</sup> = 3.1H<sub>e</sub><sup>3/2</sup>}} |
||
The coefficient, 3.1 varies for different entrance conditions. The value of the coefficient is slightly higher if the conveyance channel has a greater width than the inlet. The value 3.1 is based on the assumption that H<sub>e</sub> and v<sub>a</sub> are measured at a location that exhibits subcritical flow conditions. |
The coefficient, 3.1 varies for different entrance conditions. The value of the coefficient is slightly higher if the conveyance channel has a greater width than the inlet. The value 3.1 is based on the assumption that H<sub>e</sub> and v<sub>a</sub> are measured at a location that exhibits subcritical flow conditions. |
||
Line 82: | Line 61: | ||
NEH14 also provides the following relationship for side channel inlets: |
NEH14 also provides the following relationship for side channel inlets: |
||
Q<sub>mi</sub> = 3.1Lh<sup>3/2</sup> |
{{block indent|1=Q<sub>mi</sub> = 3.1Lh<sup>3/2</sup>}} |
||
where: |
|||
Where: |
|||
* Q<sub>mi</sub> = discharge capacity without freeboard (ft<sup>3</sup>/s) |
* Q<sub>mi</sub> = discharge capacity without freeboard (ft<sup>3</sup>/s)<br />(In this case, freeboard is the vertical distance from the water surface to the dam crest when the water surface is at a lower elevation.) |
||
:(In this case, freeboard is the vertical distance from the water surface to the dam crest when the water surface is at a lower elevation.) |
|||
* L = length of the spillway crest (ft) |
* L = length of the spillway crest (ft) |
||
* H = height of the sidewalls above the spillway crest (ft) |
* H = height of the sidewalls above the spillway crest (ft) |
||
=== Side channel inlet === |
|||
[[File:Side Channel Inlet.jpg|thumb|center|Side Channel Inlet]] |
|||
[[File:Side Channel Inlet.jpg|thumb|center|Side channel inlet]] |
|||
The [[United States Bureau of Reclamation|United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR)]] also uses the weir formula to quantify flow over a chute spillway. The USBR flow equation is |
The [[United States Bureau of Reclamation|United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR)]] also uses the weir formula to quantify flow over a chute spillway. The USBR flow equation is:<ref name="five" /><ref>{{cite web |last1=Blair |first1=H. K. |last2=Rhone |first2=T. J. |year=1987 |title=Design of Small Dams |edition=3rd |publisher=United States Department of the Interior – Bureau of Reclamation |url=http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/manuals/SmallDams.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222000504/http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/manuals/SmallDams.pdf |archive-date=2014-02-22 }}</ref> |
||
Q = CLH<sup>3/2</sup> |
{{block indent|1=Q = CLH<sup>3/2</sup>}} |
||
where: |
|||
Where: |
|||
* Q = flow (ft<sup>3</sup>/s) |
* Q = flow (ft<sup>3</sup>/s) |
||
* L = spillway crest length (or width) (ft) |
* L = spillway crest length (or width) (ft) |
||
Line 119: | Line 97: | ||
|3.8 |
|3.8 |
||
|} |
|} |
||
Example: For a spillway crest length/width of 25 ft, Q will vary with H as follows: |
|||
[[File:Discharge as a function of water surface elevation for NRCS and USBR formulas.jpg|thumb|center|Discharge as a function of water surface elevation for NRCS and USBR formulas]] |
[[File:Discharge as a function of water surface elevation for NRCS and USBR formulas.jpg|thumb|center|Discharge as a function of water surface elevation for NRCS and USBR formulas]] |
||
⚫ | For the NRCS computations, the mean velocity of approach was assumed to be zero. For the USBR computations, it was assumed that linear [[interpolation]] could be used to obtain C from H. For a given depth at the spillway crest, the flows calculated using the USBR method are higher than those from the NRCS method because of the higher discharge coefficients. C increases with H under the USBR method, whereas C is assumed to be constant with respect to H under the NRCS method. |
||
''Discharge as a function of water surface elevation for NRCS and USBR formulas'' |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | For the NRCS computations, the mean velocity of approach was assumed to be zero. For the USBR computations, it was assumed that linear interpolation could be used to obtain C from H. For a given depth at the spillway crest, the flows calculated using the USBR method are higher than those from the NRCS method because of the higher discharge coefficients. C increases with H under the USBR method, whereas C is assumed to be constant with respect to H under the NRCS method. |
||
===Chute spillways=== |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
'''Chute Spillways''' |
|||
⚫ | |||
===Stepped spillway=== |
|||
The flow over a [[stepped spillway]] is classified as either nappe flow or skimming flow. Nappe flow regimes occur for small discharges and flat slopes. If the discharge is increased or the slope of the channel is increased, a skimming flow regime can occur (Shahheydari et al. 2015). Nappe flow has pockets of air at each step whereas skimming flow does not. The onset of skimming flow can be defined as: |
|||
(d<sub>c</sub>)=1.057*h - 0.465*h<sup>2</sup>/l |
(d<sub>c</sub>)=1.057*h - 0.465*h<sup>2</sup>/l |
||
Line 138: | Line 116: | ||
* h = step height (m) |
* h = step height (m) |
||
* l = step length (m) |
* l = step length (m) |
||
* (d<sub>c</sub>)<sub>onset</sub> = the critical depth of the onset of skimming flow (m) |
|||
[[File:Skimming and Nappe flow figure.jpg|thumb|center|Image of |
[[File:Skimming and Nappe flow figure.jpg|thumb|center|Image of nappe and skimming flow]] |
||
====Nappe flow==== |
|||
For the nappe flow regime, a partially or fully developed hydraulic jump occurs as a result of the jets created between each step.<ref> |
For the nappe flow regime, a partially or fully developed hydraulic jump occurs as a result of the jets created between each step.<ref name="eight">{{cite journal|doi=10.1080/00221686.1994.10750036 | volume=32 | issue=2 | title=Comparison of energy dissipation between nappe and skimming flow regimes on stepped chutes | journal=Journal of Hydraulic Research | pages=213–218| url=https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:9383/jhr94_2.pdf | year=1994 | last1=Chanson | first1=Hubert }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Chatila | first1 = Jean G. | last2 = Jurdi | first2 = Bassam R. | year = 2004 | title = Stepped Spillway as an Energy Dissipater | journal = Canadian Water Resources Journal | volume = 29 | issue = 3| pages = 147–158 | doi=10.4296/cwrj147| doi-access = free }}</ref> |
||
Ungated spillway: |
|||
''Energy Dissipation''<ref name="eight">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221686.1994.10750036#.VE6vWvnF9Tx |
|||
<math title="Energy Dissipation equations for Nappe flow – Un-gated spillway" display="block">\frac{\Delta H}{H_{max}}=1-\frac{0.54\left(\frac{d_c}{h}\right)^{0.275}+1.715\left(\frac{d_c}{h}\right)^{-0.55}}{{\color{red}{\frac{2}{3}}}+\frac{H_{dam}}{d_c}}</math> |
|||
Jean G Chatila & Bassam R Jurdi, (2004) Stepped Spillway as an Energy Dissipater. Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques 29:3, pages 147-158.</ref> |
|||
Gated spillway: |
|||
[[File:Nappe flow equations.jpg|left|center|Energy Dissipation equations for Nappe flow]] |
|||
<math title="Energy Dissipation equations for Nappe flow – Gated spillway" display="block">\frac{\Delta H}{H_{max}}=1-\frac{0.54\left(\frac{d_c}{h}\right)^{0.275}+1.715\left(\frac{d_c}{h}\right)^{-0.55}}{\frac{H_{dam}+{\color{red}{H_0}}}{d_c}}</math> |
|||
Where: |
Where: |
||
Line 157: | Line 136: | ||
* H = head loss (m) |
* H = head loss (m) |
||
Skimming |
====Skimming flow regime==== |
||
Under a skimming flow regime, water flows in a coherent stream down the step. Water skims the top of each step as it flows down the chute. Recirculating vortices are developed between each step which allow the water to flow over the top of the vortices and skim over each step.<ref name="eight"/> |
Under a skimming flow regime, water flows in a coherent stream down the step. Water skims the top of each step as it flows down the chute. Recirculating vortices are developed between each step which allow the water to flow over the top of the vortices and skim over each step.<ref name="eight"/> |
||
=====Energy dissipation===== |
|||
''Energy Dissipation''<ref name="eight"/> |
|||
Un-gated spillway: |
|||
[[File:Skimming flow equations.jpg.png.jpg|left|center|Energy Dissipation equations for Skimming flow]] |
|||
<math title="Energy Dissipation equations for Skimming flow – Un-gated spillway" display="block">\frac{\Delta H}{H_{max}}=1-\frac{\left(\frac{f}{8\sin(\alpha)}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}\cos(\alpha)+\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{f}{8\sin(\alpha)}\right)^{-\frac{2}{3}}}{{\color{red}{\frac{2}{3}}}+\frac{H_{dam}}{d_c}}</math> |
|||
Gated spillway: |
|||
Where: |
|||
<math title="Energy Dissipation equations for Skimming flow – Gated spillway" display="block">\frac{\Delta H}{H_{max}}=1-\frac{\left(\frac{f}{8\sin(\alpha)}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}\cos(\alpha)+\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{f}{8\sin(\alpha)}\right)^{-\frac{2}{3}}}{\frac{H_{dam}+{\color{red}{H_0}}}{d_c}}</math> |
|||
where: |
|||
* H<sub>dam</sub> = dam crest head above the downstream toe (m) |
* H<sub>dam</sub> = dam crest head above the downstream toe (m) |
||
* H<sub>0</sub> = free surface elevation above the spillway crest (m) |
* H<sub>0</sub> = free surface elevation above the spillway crest (m) |
||
Line 171: | Line 154: | ||
* H = head loss (m) |
* H = head loss (m) |
||
* f = friction factor |
* f = friction factor |
||
* |
* α = channel slope [rad] |
||
== Cavitation == |
== Cavitation == |
||
[[Cavitation]] is the formation of a void, such as a bubble, within a liquid. A fluid passes from a liquid state to a vapor state due to a change in the local pressure while the temperature remains constant. In the case of a dam spillway, this can be caused by turbulence or vortices in flowing water. |
[[Cavitation]] is the formation of a void, such as a bubble, within a liquid. A fluid passes from a liquid state to a vapor state due to a change in the local pressure while the temperature remains constant. In the case of a dam spillway, this can be caused by [[turbulence]] or [[Vortex|vortices]] in flowing water. |
||
Cavitation occurs within the body of flow of a given distributed roughness. However, the exact location where it will occur cannot be predicted. In the case of chute spillways, cavitation occurs at velocities between 12 and 15 m/s.<ref>Chanson, H. Design of Spillway Aeration Devices to prevent Cavitation Damage on Chutes and Spillways. http://staff.civil.uq.edu.au/h.chanson/aer_dev.html</ref> |
Cavitation occurs within the body of flow of a given distributed roughness. However, the exact location where it will occur cannot be predicted. In the case of chute spillways, cavitation occurs at velocities between 12 and 15 m/s.<ref>Chanson, H. Design of Spillway Aeration Devices to prevent Cavitation Damage on Chutes and Spillways. http://staff.civil.uq.edu.au/h.chanson/aer_dev.html</ref> |
||
Line 180: | Line 163: | ||
When cavitation occurs on a spillway, it can cause severe damage. This is especially true when the velocities exceed 25 m/s. Therefore, protection is needed at these velocities. Cavitation can be prevented by decreasing the flow velocity or by increasing the boundary pressure.<ref>^ Kells, J.A. Smith, C.D. (1991). Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1991, 18:358-377, 10.1139/l91-047</ref> |
When cavitation occurs on a spillway, it can cause severe damage. This is especially true when the velocities exceed 25 m/s. Therefore, protection is needed at these velocities. Cavitation can be prevented by decreasing the flow velocity or by increasing the boundary pressure.<ref>^ Kells, J.A. Smith, C.D. (1991). Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1991, 18:358-377, 10.1139/l91-047</ref> |
||
== Energy |
== Energy dissipation == |
||
Every dam needs |
Every dam needs some form of energy dissipation in its discharge structure to prevent erosion and scour on the downstream side of the dam, since these phenomena can result in dam failure. Plunge pools (also called stilling basins) and impact boxes are two examples of energy dissipators used on dams. |
||
Many USBR dams use energy dissipating blocks for chute spillways (also called baffled aprons). These blocks help induce a hydraulic jump to establish subcritical flow conditions on the downstream side of the dam.<ref>Peterka, A.J. (1984 (Eighth Printing)). Hydraulic Design of Stilling Basins and Energy Dissipators (Engineering Monograph No. 25). United States Department of the Interior – Bureau of Reclamation. http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/EM/EM25.pdf</ref> |
Many USBR dams use energy dissipating blocks for chute spillways (also called baffled aprons). These blocks help induce a hydraulic jump to establish subcritical flow conditions on the downstream side of the dam.<ref>Peterka, A.J. (1984 (Eighth Printing)). Hydraulic Design of Stilling Basins and Energy Dissipators (Engineering Monograph No. 25). United States Department of the Interior – Bureau of Reclamation. http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/EM/EM25.pdf</ref> |
||
The steps on stepped spillways can be used for energy dissipation. However, they tend to |
The steps on stepped spillways can be used for energy dissipation. However, they tend to be effective only at dissipating energy at low flows (i.e. skimming flow).<ref name="eight"/> |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
*[[Dam]] |
*[[Dam]] |
||
*[[Lake Discharge Problem]] |
|||
*[[Spillway]] |
*[[Spillway]] |
||
*[[Stepped spillway |
*[[Stepped spillway]] |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist|colwidth=35em}} |
||
11. Shahheydari, H., Nodoshan, E. J., Barati, R., & Moghadam, M. A. (2015). Discharge coefficient and energy dissipation over stepped spillway under skimming flow regime. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(4), 1174-1182. |
|||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Spillways|+]] |
||
[[Category:Hydraulic structures]] |
Latest revision as of 03:10, 25 July 2024
Open channel spillways are dam spillways that utilize the principles of open-channel flow to convey impounded water in order to prevent dam failure. They can function as principal spillways, emergency spillways, or both. They can be located on the dam itself or on a natural grade in the vicinity of the dam.
Spillway types
[edit]Chute spillway
[edit]Chute spillways carry supercritical flow through the steep slope of an open channel. There are four main components of a chute spillway:[1] The elements of a spillway are the inlet, the vertical curve section (ogee curve), the steep-sloped channel and the outlet.
In order to avoid a hydraulic jump, the slope of the spillway must be steep enough for the flow to remain supercritical.
Proper spillways help with flood control, prevent erosion at the ends of terraces, outlets, and waterways, reduce runoff over drainage ditch banks and are simple to construct.
However, they can only be constructed at sites with natural drainage and moderate temperature variation and have a shorter life expectancy than other spillways.
Stepped spillways
[edit]Stepped spillways are used to dissipate energy along the chute of the channel. The steps of the spillway greatly reduce the kinetic energy of the flow and therefore reduce flow velocity. Roller-compacted concrete (RCC) stepped spillways have become increasingly popular because of their use in rehabilitating aged flood control dams.[2]
Design guidelines for these spillways are limited. However, research attempts to assist engineers. The two main design components are the inception point (where flow bulking first occurs—increased flow depth) and the energy dissipation that occurs.[2]
Stepped spillways are useful for flood control, increasing dissolved oxygen (DO) levels downstream of a dam, aid wastewater treatment plants for air-water transfer of gases and for volatile organic compound (VOC) removal and reduces the spillway length or eliminates need for stilling basin.[3]
However, few design guidelines are in place and stepped spillways have only been successful for small unit discharges where step height can influence the flow.[3]
Side channel spillways
[edit]Side channel spillways are typically used to discharge floods perpendicular to the general direction of flow by placing the control weir parallel to the upper portion of the discharge channel.[4]
It offers low flow velocities upstream and minimizes erosion.
However, it can cause a sudden increase in reservoir level if the channel is submerged.
Flow rates
[edit]Different agencies have different methods and formulas for quantifying flows and conveyance capacities for chute spillways. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) produced handbooks on dam design. In the National Engineering Handbook, Section 14, Chute Spillways (NEH14),[5] flow equations are given for straight inlets and box inlets.
NEH14 provides the following discharge-head relationship for straight inlets of chute spillways, which is given by the flow equation for a weir:
where:
- Q = discharge of inlet (ft3/s)
- W = width of the chute or inlet (ft)
- H = depth of flow over the crest (or floor) of the inlet (ft)
- He = specific energy head in reference to the crest of the inlet, or the head over the crest of the inlet (ft)
- va = mean velocity of approach at which the depth H is measured (ft/s)
- g = 32.16 ft/s2
Straight inlet
[edit]If the flow rate per unit width is defined as q = Q/W, then the equation can be written as:[5]
The coefficient, 3.1 varies for different entrance conditions. The value of the coefficient is slightly higher if the conveyance channel has a greater width than the inlet. The value 3.1 is based on the assumption that He and va are measured at a location that exhibits subcritical flow conditions.
NEH14 also provides the following relationship for side channel inlets:
where:
- Qmi = discharge capacity without freeboard (ft3/s)
(In this case, freeboard is the vertical distance from the water surface to the dam crest when the water surface is at a lower elevation.) - L = length of the spillway crest (ft)
- H = height of the sidewalls above the spillway crest (ft)
Side channel inlet
[edit]The United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) also uses the weir formula to quantify flow over a chute spillway. The USBR flow equation is:[5][6]
where:
- Q = flow (ft3/s)
- L = spillway crest length (or width) (ft)
- H = elevation difference between the reservoir water surface and the spillway crest
- C = discharge coefficient, which varies as follows:
For H = 1 ft | C = 3.2 |
2 | 3.4 |
3 | 3.6 |
4 | 3.7 |
5 | 3.8 |
Example: For a spillway crest length/width of 25 ft, Q will vary with H as follows:
For the NRCS computations, the mean velocity of approach was assumed to be zero. For the USBR computations, it was assumed that linear interpolation could be used to obtain C from H. For a given depth at the spillway crest, the flows calculated using the USBR method are higher than those from the NRCS method because of the higher discharge coefficients. C increases with H under the USBR method, whereas C is assumed to be constant with respect to H under the NRCS method.
Flow regimes
[edit]Chute spillways
[edit]The flow coming into the spillway is subcritical. The slope of the chute causes the flow velocity to increase. Typically, supercritical flow is maintained in the chute.
Stepped spillway
[edit]The flow over a stepped spillway is classified as either nappe flow or skimming flow. Nappe flow regimes occur for small discharges and flat slopes. If the discharge is increased or the slope of the channel is increased, a skimming flow regime can occur (Shahheydari et al. 2015). Nappe flow has pockets of air at each step whereas skimming flow does not. The onset of skimming flow can be defined as:
(dc)=1.057*h - 0.465*h2/l
Where:
- h = step height (m)
- l = step length (m)
- (dc)onset = the critical depth of the onset of skimming flow (m)
Nappe flow
[edit]For the nappe flow regime, a partially or fully developed hydraulic jump occurs as a result of the jets created between each step.[7][8]
Ungated spillway:
Gated spillway:
Where:
- Hdam = dam crest head above the downstream toe (m)
- H0 = free surface elevation above the spillway crest (m)
- Hmax = total head (m)
- dc = critical flow depth
- H = head loss (m)
Skimming flow regime
[edit]Under a skimming flow regime, water flows in a coherent stream down the step. Water skims the top of each step as it flows down the chute. Recirculating vortices are developed between each step which allow the water to flow over the top of the vortices and skim over each step.[7]
Energy dissipation
[edit]Un-gated spillway:
Gated spillway:
where:
- Hdam = dam crest head above the downstream toe (m)
- H0 = free surface elevation above the spillway crest (m)
- Hmax = maximum head available (m)
- dc = critical flow depth (m)
- H = head loss (m)
- f = friction factor
- α = channel slope [rad]
Cavitation
[edit]Cavitation is the formation of a void, such as a bubble, within a liquid. A fluid passes from a liquid state to a vapor state due to a change in the local pressure while the temperature remains constant. In the case of a dam spillway, this can be caused by turbulence or vortices in flowing water.
Cavitation occurs within the body of flow of a given distributed roughness. However, the exact location where it will occur cannot be predicted. In the case of chute spillways, cavitation occurs at velocities between 12 and 15 m/s.[9]
When cavitation occurs on a spillway, it can cause severe damage. This is especially true when the velocities exceed 25 m/s. Therefore, protection is needed at these velocities. Cavitation can be prevented by decreasing the flow velocity or by increasing the boundary pressure.[10]
Energy dissipation
[edit]Every dam needs some form of energy dissipation in its discharge structure to prevent erosion and scour on the downstream side of the dam, since these phenomena can result in dam failure. Plunge pools (also called stilling basins) and impact boxes are two examples of energy dissipators used on dams.
Many USBR dams use energy dissipating blocks for chute spillways (also called baffled aprons). These blocks help induce a hydraulic jump to establish subcritical flow conditions on the downstream side of the dam.[11]
The steps on stepped spillways can be used for energy dissipation. However, they tend to be effective only at dissipating energy at low flows (i.e. skimming flow).[7]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Beauchamp, K.H. "Structures". Engineering Field Manual. United States Department of Agriculture – Soil Conservation Service.
- ^ a b Hunt, S.L.; Kadavy, K.C. (2010). "Energy Dissipation on Flat-Sloped Stepped Spillways: Part 2. Downstream of the Inception Point". American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. pp. 111–118. ISSN 2151-0032.
- ^ a b Frizell, K.H. "Hydraulics of Stepped Spillways for RCC Dams and Dam Rehabilitations. PAP-596" (PDF). United States Department of the Interior – Bureau of Reclamation.
- ^ Hager, W.H.; Phister, M. (2011). "Historical Development of Side-Channel Spillway in Hydraulic Engineering" (PDF). Brisbane, Australia.
- ^ a b c United States Department of Agriculture – Soil Conservation Service (1985). Engineering Handbook, Section 14, Chute Spillways (NEH14).
- ^ Blair, H. K.; Rhone, T. J. (1987). "Design of Small Dams" (PDF) (3rd ed.). United States Department of the Interior – Bureau of Reclamation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-22.
- ^ a b c Chanson, Hubert (1994). "Comparison of energy dissipation between nappe and skimming flow regimes on stepped chutes" (PDF). Journal of Hydraulic Research. 32 (2): 213–218. doi:10.1080/00221686.1994.10750036.
- ^ Chatila, Jean G.; Jurdi, Bassam R. (2004). "Stepped Spillway as an Energy Dissipater". Canadian Water Resources Journal. 29 (3): 147–158. doi:10.4296/cwrj147.
- ^ Chanson, H. Design of Spillway Aeration Devices to prevent Cavitation Damage on Chutes and Spillways. http://staff.civil.uq.edu.au/h.chanson/aer_dev.html
- ^ ^ Kells, J.A. Smith, C.D. (1991). Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1991, 18:358-377, 10.1139/l91-047
- ^ Peterka, A.J. (1984 (Eighth Printing)). Hydraulic Design of Stilling Basins and Energy Dissipators (Engineering Monograph No. 25). United States Department of the Interior – Bureau of Reclamation. http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/EM/EM25.pdf
11. Shahheydari, H., Nodoshan, E. J., Barati, R., & Moghadam, M. A. (2015). Discharge coefficient and energy dissipation over stepped spillway under skimming flow regime. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(4), 1174-1182.