Talk:Super Smash Bros. (video game): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Fails GA. |
Paper Luigi (talk | contribs) archiving discussions older than 6 months |
||
(283 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{talk header}} |
||
{{ArticleHistory |
|||
{{FailedGA}} |
|||
|action1=GAN |
|||
== Consider this: == |
|||
|action1date=18 April 2006 |
|||
|action1link=Talk:Super Smash Bros./Archive 1#Failed GA |
|||
|action1result=failed |
|||
|action1oldid=49063217 |
|||
|action2=GAN |
|||
Since Super Smash Bros. contains the Pokémon franchise, I think that the upwards ring out into the background is derived from Team Rocket's infamous "launch into the sky and disappear as a little dot". Any thoughts? Oh, and I think the same goes for Melee as well. --[[User:Geopgeop|Geopgeop]] 13:46, 8 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
|action2date=21 April 2007 |
|||
|action2link=Talk:Super Smash Bros./Archive 1#GA Pass |
|||
|action2result=listed |
|||
|action2oldid=124557784 |
|||
|action3=GAR |
|||
:I don't think so. But that's me :P [[User:Adam Marx Squared|Adam Marx Squared]] 19:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
|action3date=April 29, 2007 |
|||
|action3link=Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 17#Super Smash Bros. |
|||
|action3result=delisted |
|||
|action3oldid=126910265 |
|||
|action4=GAN |
|||
:It's definitely not related. [[User:Andrevan|<b><font color="mediumblue">Andre</font></b>]] ([[User_talk:Andrevan|<font color=royalblue>talk</font>]]) 20:00, 10 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
|action4date=3 February 2008 |
|||
|action4link=Talk:Super Smash Bros.#GA Status Awarded |
|||
|action4result=listed |
|||
|action4oldid=188838409 |
|||
|action5=GAR |
|||
|action5date=08:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
|action5link=Talk:Super Smash Bros.#GA delisted |
|||
|action5result=delisted |
|||
|action5oldid=211389015 |
|||
|action6=GAN |
|||
I improved the relevance and diction of the Character section, but I left the cleanup tag because it still needs work. Is all that stuff about the "pro circuit" really relevant to most readers? I think more specific info about items and attacks would be a big improvement.' |
|||
|action6date=05:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:68.42.164.153|68.42.164.153]] 20:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
|action6link=Talk:Super Smash Bros. (video game)/GA1 |
|||
|action6result=listed |
|||
|action6oldid=220876463 |
|||
|action7=FTC |
|||
== Mothra? == |
|||
|action7date=22:06, 25 July 2008 |
|||
|action7link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Super Smash Bros. series |
|||
|action7result=passed |
|||
|action7oldid=227519777 |
|||
|action8=FTR |
|||
Is it true that you can unlock Mothra? |
|||
|action8link=Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Super Smash Bros. series/archive1 |
|||
I don't think so myself, but at the time of my writing this, there is no refernce to the unlockableness of Jigglipuff. |
|||
|action8date=01:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
|action8result=demoted |
|||
|topic=video games |
|||
:Mothra instead of Jigglypuff? Whether this is not true or I have hallucinations. I have changed that lately, but some IP keeps including that. --[[User:Yuuki Mayuki|Yuuki Mayuki]] 06:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
|action9 = GAR |
|||
Jigglypuff is unlockable (I have it on my game) but, Mothra is not. During the opening song it shows all the main characters in thier environment (or fighting someone else in thiers). Then thier is a flash of the silowettes (ceck speeling) of the unlockable characters. When you unlock a unlockable character it is no longer a sillwette but a plain character picture i have unlocked all the characters and there is no other silowette for Mothra. |
|||
|action9date = 11:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
|action9link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Super Smash Bros. (video game)/1 |
|||
P.S. What is Mothra? |
|||
|action9result = delisted |
|||
|action9oldid = 1195549661 |
|||
[[User:Sherwharr|H-BOMB]] 18:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
|currentstatus = DGA |
|||
}} |
|||
== Failed GA == |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| |
|||
Not having sources is enough to fail this article, but there are other problems: |
|||
{{WikiProject Video games|class=B|importance=high|old-GCOTW=yes|Nintendo=yes}} |
|||
*Story: One paragraph is not enough for a section. Additionally, it should not ''speculate''. It may be enough to say, "The game's introductory video depicts Master Hand..." and not speculate as to whatever "story" the game has. |
|||
}} |
|||
*Gameplay/General mechanics: One paragraph is not enough for a section. |
|||
{{refideas |
|||
*Gameplay/Controls: [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a how-to]]. The [[WP:CVG|CVG project]] suggests that "if the content only has value to people actually playing the game, it's unsuitable." This entire section is game guide material, which doesn't belong here. |
|||
|1=https://archive.org/details/64dream-may-1999-ozidual/64Dream%201999%2005%20%28J%20OCR%29/page/n91/mode/2up (interview) |
|||
*Gameplay/Items: Again, too short for a section. Merge these three subsections together. |
|||
|2= {{cite AV media | people = Sakurai, Masahiro (host) | date = 2023-12-16 | title = Teaching Players How to Play [Design Specifics] | type = Web Video | language = Japanese | url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Icl-jMlz1iY | access-date = 2024-01-24 | publisher = Masahiro Sakurai on Creating Games | via = YouTube}} |
|||
*Characters: An awful mess. The names of moves are guide material, and unsuitable. The charging nonsense is just that. |
|||
}} |
|||
*Secret Stage: Not only is it one paragraph, it's the only bullet point there. Bullets are for ''lists'', and lists have more than one item in them. |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
*Non-playable stages: A misnomer, since they are played in 1P mode. |
|||
| algo = old(555d) |
|||
*Criticism: One-paragraph section again, no references (which are ''vital'' to reception sections), and reads like an advertisement. |
|||
| archive = Talk:Super Smash Bros. (video game)/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
So! That's why you fail GA! [[User:Nifboy|Nifboy]] 00:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
| counter = 2 |
|||
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
| archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
|||
}} |
Latest revision as of 05:32, 26 July 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Super Smash Bros. (video game) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Super Smash Bros." video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 18 months |
Super Smash Bros. (video game) was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|