Richard Semon: Difference between revisions
Lindsay658 (talk | contribs) |
m Clean up spacing around commas and other punctuation fixes, replaced: ],[ → ], [ |
||
(40 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|German zoologist, explorer, evolutionary biologist and memory researcher}} |
|||
[[File:Richard Semon.jpg|Richard Semon|thumb]] |
[[File:Richard Semon.jpg|Richard Semon|thumb]] |
||
'''Richard Wolfgang Semon''' (22 August 1859, in [[Berlin]] – 27 December 1918, in [[Munich]]) was a German zoologist |
'''Richard Wolfgang Semon''' (22 August 1859, in [[Berlin]] – 27 December 1918, in [[Munich]]) was a German [[zoologist]], [[explorer]], [[evolutionary biologist]], a memory researcher who believed in the [[inheritance of acquired characteristics]] and applied this to [[Sociobiology|social evolution]]. He is known for coining the terms ''[[Engram (neuropsychology)|engram]]'' and ''[[wikt:ecphory|ecphory]]''. |
||
==Australia== |
|||
Before taking up his appointment at the University of Jena, he spent three years travelling around Australia;<ref>See, for instance, Anon (1895).</ref> and the Indonesian Archipelago and, as a consequence, he was one of a number of influential German-speaking residents {{em-dash}} such as [[Ludwig Becker (explorer)|Ludwig Becker]], [[Hermann Beckler]], [[William Blandowski]], [[Amalie Dietrich]], [[Wilhelm Haacke]], [[Diedrich Henne]], [[Gerard Krefft]], [[Johann George Luehmann|Johann Luehmann]], [[Johann Menge]], [[Carl Muecke (editor)|Carl Mücke (a.k.a. Muecke)]], [[Ludwig Preiss]], [[Carl Ludwig Christian Rümker|Carl Ludwig Christian Rümker (a.k.a. Ruemker)]], [[Moritz Richard Schomburgk]], [[Karl Theodor Staiger]], [[George Henry Frederick Ulrich|George Ulrich]], [[Eugene von Guerard|Eugene von Guérard]], [[Robert J. Lendlmayer von Lendenfeld|Robert von Lendenfeld]], [[Ferdinand von Mueller]], [[Georg von Neumayer]], and [[Carl Wilhelmi]] {{em-dash}} who brought their "epistemic traditions" to Australia, and not only became "deeply entangled with the Australian colonial project", but also were "intricately involved in imagining, knowing and shaping colonial Australia" (Barrett, et al., 2018, p. 2).<ref>In relation to "Australasia", another German-speaking explorer and geologist, [[Julius von Haast|Julius von Haast (1822-1887)]], was appointed as the inaugural Curator/Director of the [[Canterbury Museum, Christchurch|Canterbury Museum]], in [[Christchurch|Christchurch, New Zealand]] in 1867.</ref> |
|||
==Thesis== |
==Thesis== |
||
Semon proposed psycho-physiological parallelism according to which every psychological state corresponds to alterations in the [[nerves]]. His ideas of the ''mneme'' (based on the Greek goddess, [[Mneme]], the muse of memory) were developed early in the 20th century. The mneme represented the memory of an external-to-internal experience. The resulting "mnemic trace" (or "[[engram (neuropsychology)|engram]]") would be revived when an element resembling a component of the original complex of stimuli was encountered. Semon’s mnemic principle was based upon how stimuli produce a "permanent record,... written or engraved on the irritable substance", i.e. upon cellular material energetically predisposed to such inscription.<ref>Semon 1921, p. 24.</ref> According to historian Petteri Pietikainen: |
Semon proposed psycho-physiological parallelism according to which every psychological state corresponds to alterations in the [[nerves]]. His ideas of the ''mneme'' (based on the Greek goddess, [[Mneme]], the muse of memory) were developed early in the 20th century. The mneme represented the memory of an external-to-internal experience. The resulting "mnemic trace" (or "[[engram (neuropsychology)|engram]]") would be revived when an element resembling a component of the original complex of stimuli was encountered. Semon’s mnemic principle was based upon how stimuli produce a "permanent record,... written or engraved on the irritable substance", i.e. upon cellular material energetically predisposed to such inscription.<ref>Semon 1921, p. 24.</ref> According to historian Petteri Pietikainen: |
||
<blockquote>Semon argued not only that information is encoded into memory and that there are 'memory traces' (engrams) or after-effects of stimulation that conserve the changes in the nervous system, he also contended that these changes in the brain (that is, engrams) are inherited. Semon's mneme-theory fell into disrepute largely because in a Lamarckian fashion it proposed that memory units are passed from one generation to another.<ref>Pietikainen, |
<blockquote>Semon argued not only that information is encoded into memory and that there are 'memory traces' (engrams) or after-effects of stimulation that conserve the changes in the nervous system, he also contended that these changes in the brain (that is, engrams) are inherited. Semon's mneme-theory fell into disrepute largely because in a Lamarckian fashion it proposed that memory units are passed from one generation to another.<ref>Pietikainen, (2007), p.100.</ref></blockquote> |
||
⚫ | Semon was a proponent of the theory of [[organic memory]], which was popular amongst [[biologist]]s and [[psychologist]]s from 1870 to 1918. The theory later lost scientific legitimacy as it yielded no reliable data and advances in [[genetics]] made the theory untenable.<ref>Landsberg (2004), p.7.</ref><ref>Richards (2002), pp.133-134.</ref> |
||
⚫ | Semon was a proponent of the theory of [[organic memory]], which was popular amongst [[biologist]]s and [[psychologist]]s from 1870 to 1918. The theory later lost scientific legitimacy as it yielded no reliable data and advances in [[genetics]] made the theory untenable.<ref>Landsberg |
||
==Evidence== |
==Evidence== |
||
Semon found evidence in the way that different parts of the body relate to each other involuntarily, such as "reflex spasms, co-movements, sensory radiations," to infer distribution of "engraphic influence." He also took inventive recourse to [[phonograph]]y, the "mneme machine," to explain the uneven distribution and revival of engrams. |
Semon found evidence in the way that different parts of the body relate to each other involuntarily, such as "reflex spasms, co-movements, sensory radiations," to infer distribution of "engraphic influence." He also took inventive recourse to [[phonograph]]y, the "mneme machine," to explain the uneven distribution and revival of engrams. |
||
Semon's book, ''Die Mneme'', influenced the ''Mnemosyne'' project of the idiosyncratic art historian [[Aby Warburg]].<ref>Rampley (2000), p.88.</ref> '''N.B.''': Semon's ''Mneme'' should not be confused with ''[[meme]], ''a separate concept coined by [[Richard Dawkins]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/1238007082 |title=The selfish gene |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1976 |isbn=978-0-19-857519-1 |edition=1st |pages=199–210 |oclc=1238007082}}</ref> Despite Dawkins having coined 'meme' distinctly from ''mneme'', that has not stopped Dawkins' contemporaries from comparing the concepts for being remarkably similar. [[David Hull (philosopher)|David Hull]], a philosopher of biology, argued that meme and mneme are parallel concepts of which Dawkins inadvertently provided the first development of since Semon.<ref>{{Citation |last=Hull |first=David L. |title=Taking memetics seriously: Memetics will be what we make it |date=2001-01-04 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780192632449.003.0003 |work=Darwinizing CultureThe Status of Memetics as a Science |pages=43–67 |access-date=2023-04-25 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}</ref> Nevertheless, the two concepts are not often discussed together. |
|||
Semon's book, ''Die Mneme'', was directly influenced the ''Mnemosyne'' project of the idiosyncratic art historian [[Aby Warburg]]<ref>Rampley, Matthew (2000). ''The Remembrance of Things Past: On Aby M. Warburg and Walter Benjamin''. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz Verlag, p. 88.</ref> {{em-dash}} Semon's ''Mneme'' should not be confused with ''[[meme]], ''a separate concept coined by [[Richard Dawkins]]. |
|||
== |
==Suicide== |
||
In 1918 in Munich, shortly after the end of [[World War I]], Semon committed suicide wrapped in a German flag allegedly because he was depressed by Germany's |
In 1918 in Munich, shortly after the end of [[World War I]], Semon committed suicide wrapped in a German Imperial flag allegedly because he was depressed by Germany's defeat.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Suicide in Nazi Germany |author1= Christian Goeschel |publisher= Oxford University Press| year=2015| isbn=9780199606115| page=11}}</ref> |
||
==Legacy== |
==Legacy== |
||
Semon is commemorated in the scientific name of a [[species]] of green-blooded skink (''[[Prasinohaema|Prasinohaema semoni]])''<ref name="Bo2011">Beolens, |
Semon is commemorated in the scientific name of a [[species]] of green-blooded skink (''[[Prasinohaema|Prasinohaema semoni]])'',<ref name="Bo2011">Beolens, et al. (2011), p.240.</ref> and an Acantocephalan (''[[Australiformis semoni]])''.<ref name="Linstow1898">von Linstow (1898).</ref> |
||
== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
== |
==Bibliography== |
||
{{div col|colwidth=30em}} |
{{div col|colwidth=30em}} |
||
* [http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article21630397 Anon (1895), "'''''The Ceratodus''''': a German Scientist's Work", ''The Queenslander'', (Saturday, 30 March 1895), p.597]: in part, refers to Semon (1894). |
|||
* Barrett, L., Eckstein, L., Hurley, A.W. & Schwarz A. (2018), "Remembering German-Australian Colonial Entanglement: An Introduction", ''Postcolonial Studies'', Vol.21, No.1, (January 2018), pp. 1–5. {{doi|10.1080/13688790.2018.1443671}} |
|||
* Beolens, B., Watkins, M. & Grayson, M. (2011), "Semon", p. 240, in B. Beolens, M. Watkins, & M. Grayson (eds.), ''The Eponym Dictionary of Reptiles''. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. {{ISBN|978-1-4214-0135-5}}. |
|||
* {{cite book |author=Dawkins, R. |author-link=Richard Dawkins |year=1976 |title=[[The Selfish Gene]]|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]}} |
* {{cite book |author=Dawkins, R. |author-link=Richard Dawkins |year=1976 |title=[[The Selfish Gene]]|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]}} |
||
* {{cite book |last=Schacter |first=Daniel |author-link=Daniel Schacter |title=Forgotten Ideas, Neglected Pioneers: Richard Semon and the Story of Memory |year=2001 |location=Philadelphia |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=1-84169-052-X }} |
* {{cite book |last=Schacter |first=Daniel |author-link=Daniel Schacter |title=Forgotten Ideas, Neglected Pioneers: Richard Semon and the Story of Memory |year=2001 |location=Philadelphia |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=1-84169-052-X }} |
||
*{{Cite book|title=Suicide in Nazi Germany |author=Goeschel, Christian |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-19-953256-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EIjccRg7_UYC&pg=PA11}} |
*{{Cite book|title=Suicide in Nazi Germany |author=Goeschel, Christian |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-19-953256-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EIjccRg7_UYC&pg=PA11}} |
||
* Landsberg, A. (2004), ''Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture'', New York, NY: Columbia University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-231-12927-5}} |
|||
* {{cite book |author=Ludwig, Lars |year=2013 |url=https://kluedo.ub.uni-kl.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3662 |title=Extended Artificial Memory. Toward an integral cognitive theory of memory and technology.|publisher=University of Kaiserslautern}} (includes a summary, an actualization and extension of the Semonian theory of memory) |
* {{cite book |author=Ludwig, Lars |year=2013 |url=https://kluedo.ub.uni-kl.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3662 |title=Extended Artificial Memory. Toward an integral cognitive theory of memory and technology.|publisher=University of Kaiserslautern}} (includes a summary, an actualization and extension of the Semonian theory of memory) |
||
* Pietikainen, P. (2007), ''Alchemists of Human Nature: Psychological Utopianism in Gross, Jung, Reich and Fromm'', London: Routledge. {{ISBN|978-1-85196-923-4}} |
* Pietikainen, P. (2007), ''Alchemists of Human Nature: Psychological Utopianism in Gross, Jung, Reich and Fromm'', London: Routledge. {{ISBN|978-1-85196-923-4}} |
||
* Rampley, Matthew (2000), ''The Remembrance of Things Past: On Aby M. Warburg and Walter Benjamin'', Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz Verlag. {{ISBN|3-447-04299-0}} |
|||
* Richards, G. (2002), ''Putting Psychology in Its Place: A Critical Historical Overview'', London: Routledge. {{ISBN|1-84169-233-6}} |
|||
* [https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k972889.image# Semon, R. (1894), ''Zoologische Forschungsreisen in Australien und dem Malayischen Archipel, ausgeführt in den Jahren 1891-1893 von Prof. Dr. R. Semon, Erster Band: Ceratodus'', Jena: Gustav Fischer.] |
|||
* [https://ia803408.us.archive.org/20/items/inaustralianbush00semo/inaustralianbush00semo.pdf Semon, R. (1899), ''In the Australian Bush and on the Coast of the Coral Sea: Being the Experiences and Observations of a Naturalist in Australia, New Guinea and the Moluccas'', London: Macmillan & Co.] |
* [https://ia803408.us.archive.org/20/items/inaustralianbush00semo/inaustralianbush00semo.pdf Semon, R. (1899), ''In the Australian Bush and on the Coast of the Coral Sea: Being the Experiences and Observations of a Naturalist in Australia, New Guinea and the Moluccas'', London: Macmillan & Co.] |
||
* [https://ia800205.us.archive.org/31/items/cu31924100387210/cu31924100387210.pdf Semon, R. (1921), ''The Mneme'', London: George Allen & Unwin.] |
* [https://ia800205.us.archive.org/31/items/cu31924100387210/cu31924100387210.pdf Semon, R. (1921), ''The Mneme'', London: George Allen & Unwin.] |
||
Line 35: | Line 45: | ||
* [https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_uRRFAQAAIAAJ/page/n457/mode/2up von Linstow, O.F.B. (1898), "Nemathelminthen von Herrn Richard Semon in Australien gesammelt", ''Denkschriften der Medizinisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft zu Jena'', '''8''': 467–472]: (in German) |
* [https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_uRRFAQAAIAAJ/page/n457/mode/2up von Linstow, O.F.B. (1898), "Nemathelminthen von Herrn Richard Semon in Australien gesammelt", ''Denkschriften der Medizinisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft zu Jena'', '''8''': 467–472]: (in German) |
||
{{div col end}} |
{{div col end}} |
||
{{Authority control}} |
{{Authority control}} |
||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Semon, Richard Wolfgang}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Semon, Richard Wolfgang}} |
||
[[Category:1859 births]] |
[[Category:1859 births]] |
||
[[Category:1918 suicides]] |
[[Category:1918 suicides]] |
||
[[Category:1918 deaths]] |
|||
[[Category:19th-century German zoologists]] |
[[Category:19th-century German zoologists]] |
||
[[Category:20th-century German zoologists]] |
[[Category:20th-century German zoologists]] |
Latest revision as of 15:46, 26 July 2024
Richard Wolfgang Semon (22 August 1859, in Berlin – 27 December 1918, in Munich) was a German zoologist, explorer, evolutionary biologist, a memory researcher who believed in the inheritance of acquired characteristics and applied this to social evolution. He is known for coining the terms engram and ecphory.
Australia
[edit]Before taking up his appointment at the University of Jena, he spent three years travelling around Australia;[1] and the Indonesian Archipelago and, as a consequence, he was one of a number of influential German-speaking residents — such as Ludwig Becker, Hermann Beckler, William Blandowski, Amalie Dietrich, Wilhelm Haacke, Diedrich Henne, Gerard Krefft, Johann Luehmann, Johann Menge, Carl Mücke (a.k.a. Muecke), Ludwig Preiss, Carl Ludwig Christian Rümker (a.k.a. Ruemker), Moritz Richard Schomburgk, Karl Theodor Staiger, George Ulrich, Eugene von Guérard, Robert von Lendenfeld, Ferdinand von Mueller, Georg von Neumayer, and Carl Wilhelmi — who brought their "epistemic traditions" to Australia, and not only became "deeply entangled with the Australian colonial project", but also were "intricately involved in imagining, knowing and shaping colonial Australia" (Barrett, et al., 2018, p. 2).[2]
Thesis
[edit]Semon proposed psycho-physiological parallelism according to which every psychological state corresponds to alterations in the nerves. His ideas of the mneme (based on the Greek goddess, Mneme, the muse of memory) were developed early in the 20th century. The mneme represented the memory of an external-to-internal experience. The resulting "mnemic trace" (or "engram") would be revived when an element resembling a component of the original complex of stimuli was encountered. Semon’s mnemic principle was based upon how stimuli produce a "permanent record,... written or engraved on the irritable substance", i.e. upon cellular material energetically predisposed to such inscription.[3] According to historian Petteri Pietikainen:
Semon argued not only that information is encoded into memory and that there are 'memory traces' (engrams) or after-effects of stimulation that conserve the changes in the nervous system, he also contended that these changes in the brain (that is, engrams) are inherited. Semon's mneme-theory fell into disrepute largely because in a Lamarckian fashion it proposed that memory units are passed from one generation to another.[4]
Semon was a proponent of the theory of organic memory, which was popular amongst biologists and psychologists from 1870 to 1918. The theory later lost scientific legitimacy as it yielded no reliable data and advances in genetics made the theory untenable.[5][6]
Evidence
[edit]Semon found evidence in the way that different parts of the body relate to each other involuntarily, such as "reflex spasms, co-movements, sensory radiations," to infer distribution of "engraphic influence." He also took inventive recourse to phonography, the "mneme machine," to explain the uneven distribution and revival of engrams.
Semon's book, Die Mneme, influenced the Mnemosyne project of the idiosyncratic art historian Aby Warburg.[7] N.B.: Semon's Mneme should not be confused with meme, a separate concept coined by Richard Dawkins.[8] Despite Dawkins having coined 'meme' distinctly from mneme, that has not stopped Dawkins' contemporaries from comparing the concepts for being remarkably similar. David Hull, a philosopher of biology, argued that meme and mneme are parallel concepts of which Dawkins inadvertently provided the first development of since Semon.[9] Nevertheless, the two concepts are not often discussed together.
Suicide
[edit]In 1918 in Munich, shortly after the end of World War I, Semon committed suicide wrapped in a German Imperial flag allegedly because he was depressed by Germany's defeat.[10]
Legacy
[edit]Semon is commemorated in the scientific name of a species of green-blooded skink (Prasinohaema semoni),[11] and an Acantocephalan (Australiformis semoni).[12]
References
[edit]- ^ See, for instance, Anon (1895).
- ^ In relation to "Australasia", another German-speaking explorer and geologist, Julius von Haast (1822-1887), was appointed as the inaugural Curator/Director of the Canterbury Museum, in Christchurch, New Zealand in 1867.
- ^ Semon 1921, p. 24.
- ^ Pietikainen, (2007), p.100.
- ^ Landsberg (2004), p.7.
- ^ Richards (2002), pp.133-134.
- ^ Rampley (2000), p.88.
- ^ Dawkins, Richard (1976). The selfish gene (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 199–210. ISBN 978-0-19-857519-1. OCLC 1238007082.
- ^ Hull, David L. (2001-01-04), "Taking memetics seriously: Memetics will be what we make it", Darwinizing CultureThe Status of Memetics as a Science, Oxford University Press, pp. 43–67, retrieved 2023-04-25
- ^ Christian Goeschel (2015). Suicide in Nazi Germany. Oxford University Press. p. 11. ISBN 9780199606115.
- ^ Beolens, et al. (2011), p.240.
- ^ von Linstow (1898).
Bibliography
[edit]- Anon (1895), "The Ceratodus: a German Scientist's Work", The Queenslander, (Saturday, 30 March 1895), p.597: in part, refers to Semon (1894).
- Barrett, L., Eckstein, L., Hurley, A.W. & Schwarz A. (2018), "Remembering German-Australian Colonial Entanglement: An Introduction", Postcolonial Studies, Vol.21, No.1, (January 2018), pp. 1–5. doi:10.1080/13688790.2018.1443671
- Beolens, B., Watkins, M. & Grayson, M. (2011), "Semon", p. 240, in B. Beolens, M. Watkins, & M. Grayson (eds.), The Eponym Dictionary of Reptiles. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-1-4214-0135-5.
- Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
- Schacter, Daniel (2001). Forgotten Ideas, Neglected Pioneers: Richard Semon and the Story of Memory. Philadelphia: Psychology Press. ISBN 1-84169-052-X.
- Goeschel, Christian (2009). Suicide in Nazi Germany. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-953256-8.
- Landsberg, A. (2004), Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture, New York, NY: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-12927-5
- Ludwig, Lars (2013). Extended Artificial Memory. Toward an integral cognitive theory of memory and technology. University of Kaiserslautern. (includes a summary, an actualization and extension of the Semonian theory of memory)
- Pietikainen, P. (2007), Alchemists of Human Nature: Psychological Utopianism in Gross, Jung, Reich and Fromm, London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-85196-923-4
- Rampley, Matthew (2000), The Remembrance of Things Past: On Aby M. Warburg and Walter Benjamin, Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz Verlag. ISBN 3-447-04299-0
- Richards, G. (2002), Putting Psychology in Its Place: A Critical Historical Overview, London: Routledge. ISBN 1-84169-233-6
- Semon, R. (1894), Zoologische Forschungsreisen in Australien und dem Malayischen Archipel, ausgeführt in den Jahren 1891-1893 von Prof. Dr. R. Semon, Erster Band: Ceratodus, Jena: Gustav Fischer.
- Semon, R. (1899), In the Australian Bush and on the Coast of the Coral Sea: Being the Experiences and Observations of a Naturalist in Australia, New Guinea and the Moluccas, London: Macmillan & Co.
- Semon, R. (1921), The Mneme, London: George Allen & Unwin.
- Semon, R. (1922), Die mnemischen Empfindungen in ihren Beziehungen zu den Originalempfindungen, Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann: (in German)
- Semon, R. (Duffy, B. trans.) (1923), Mnemic Psychology, London: George Allen & Unwin.
- von Linstow, O.F.B. (1898), "Nemathelminthen von Herrn Richard Semon in Australien gesammelt", Denkschriften der Medizinisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft zu Jena, 8: 467–472: (in German)