User talk:Ekantik: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:02, 27 July 2024

Ekantik is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Archive1 - Archive2 - Archive3 - Archive4

MfD nomination of User:Ekantik/Shilpa Shetty

User:Ekantik/Shilpa Shetty, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ekantik/Shilpa Shetty and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ekantik/Shilpa Shetty during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Ekantik,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ekantik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ekantik. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Winget

Her article needs to get updated.There are lots of things miaaing in her article.Her achievements,awards.plz update her article Shahsameer117 (talk) 06:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ekantik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mukul Nag for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mukul Nag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukul Nag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 13:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sanskarlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sanskarlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. GoldenHayato (talk) 09:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kesava Bharati

The article Kesava Bharati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article's only source is not RS, and the person doesnot meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nitish shetty (talk) 07:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shafilea Ahmed.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shafilea Ahmed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{busy|[[User:Ekantik|Ekantik]]}}
 {{archive box|
-*[[User talk:Ekantik/Archive1|Archive1]] - [[User talk:Ekantik/Archive2|Archive2]] - [[User talk:Ekantik/Archive3|Archive3]]}}
+*[[User talk:Ekantik/Archive1|Archive1]] - [[User talk:Ekantik/Archive2|Archive2]] - [[User talk:Ekantik/Archive3|Archive3]] - [[User talk:Ekantik/Archive4|Archive4]]}}
 {{Signpost-subscription|right}}
+==MfD nomination of [[User:Ekantik/Shilpa Shetty]]==
-==British Indians==
+[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|30px]] [[User:Ekantik/Shilpa Shetty]], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ekantik/Shilpa Shetty]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[User:Ekantik/Shilpa Shetty]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[User:Ricky81682|Ricky81682]] ([[User talk:Ricky81682|talk]]) 20:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
+== New deal for page patrollers ==
-I see you are a British Indian.
+Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}},
-You might like to read these pages to understand how kind Ian Wilmut is to British Indians.  He unlawfully fired the only British Indian senior scientist employed by the BBSRC.
+In order to  better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the [[WP:Page Curation|current system we introduced in 2011]] is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group '''New Page Reviewer''' has been created.
-From Daily Telegraph newspaper ( U.K. ) (3 articles)
-[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/03/08/ndolly08.xml Article 1]
-[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/11/29/nwilmut29.xml Article 2]
-[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/11/24/nwilm24.xml Article 3]
+Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed.  However, this is nothing to worry about - most ''current'' experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
-From Guardian newspaper ( U.K. ) (2 articles)
-[http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1728626,00.html Article 1]
-[http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,,1728613,00.html Article 2]
-From the Scotsman newspaper (4 articles)
-[http://news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=371292006 Article 1]
-[http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=2325982005 Article 2]
-[http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=2331892005 Article 3]
-[http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=441282006Article 4]  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/209.77.137.57|209.77.137.57]] ([[User talk:209.77.137.57|talk]]) 22:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+Find out more about this exiting new user right now at [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers|'''''New Page Reviewers''''']] and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
-:What does this have to do with the editing of [[Ian Wilmut]]? You can't expect me not to edit the article on the basis that Wilmut ''might'' be racist towards Indians. [[User:Ekantik|Ekantik]] <sup>[[User talk:Ekantik|talk]]</sup> 22:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
+<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Mailing2&oldid=749223519 -->
+== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! ==
-Funny that's what white people say.  They always look for a reason to protect the more powerful.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/209.77.137.57|209.77.137.57]] ([[User talk:209.77.137.57|talk]]) 17:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-Please see [[Uncle Tom]]  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/209.77.137.57|209.77.137.57]] ([[User talk:209.77.137.57|talk]]) 00:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+{{Ivmbox|Hello, Ekantik. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
-Geron Corp possibly scammed?
-http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/jan2008/petition_wilmut.html  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/209.77.137.57|209.77.137.57]] ([[User talk:209.77.137.57|talk]]) 23:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
-Dear Ekantik,
+If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
-When was Wilmut knighted?  I do not think the investiture has happen yet.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/209.77.137.57|209.77.137.57]] ([[User talk:209.77.137.57|talk]]) 18:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
+<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/19&oldid=750577592 -->
+== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
-The question is does the Queen make somebody a knight or the BBC?  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/209.77.137.57|209.77.137.57]] ([[User talk:209.77.137.57|talk]]) 16:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+{{Ivmbox|Hello, Ekantik. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
-I notice you devote pages to Shipla Setty, a very girly and peripheral thing, but seem affronted by the case of a British Indian scientist's plight.  You are not open-minded to Dr. Singh's case as you went out of your way to put the might in "might be racist" in italics.  Why did you put "might" in italtics?  It is the equivalent to the way girls wobble their heads to indicate that they mean the opposite from what they are saying.
+The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
-You are the one who put a sign indicating that you are British Indian.  Is it just some fashion statement?  The green and orange and spinning wheel would appeal to the girly minded fashion victims.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/153.96.84.2|153.96.84.2]] ([[User talk:153.96.84.2|talk]]) 10:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
-==Bhutto assasin pic==
+|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
+<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=813406758 -->
+== Jennifer Winget ==
-Hello! I noticed the picture you uploaded under a fair use rationale at [[Assassination of Benazir Bhutto|this]] article was of poor quality. While pictures uploaded under fair use rationales are supposed to be of low resolution, that copy was so poor you could barely make out the assasins features or the outline of the gun he was holding.
+Her article needs to get updated.There are lots of things miaaing in her article.Her achievements,awards.plz update her article [[User:Shahsameer117|Shahsameer117]] ([[User talk:Shahsameer117|talk]]) 06:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
-I wanted to update the picture with my own edited version of the same pic. But I somehow ended up duplicating your copy, and because the whole point was to put it on the Bhutto article, I had to orphan your image. I hope you don't mind, and would agree to have your uploaded image deleted for being of poor quality. I retained your comprehensive fair use rationale.
+== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
-Cheers!
+{{Ivmbox|Hello, Ekantik. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
-[[User:Zaindy87|Zaindy87]] ([[User talk:Zaindy87|talk]]) 04:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
+The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
-== [[Shilpa Shetty]] ==
+If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
-Hello, as you are one of those who mainly expanded the above-mentioned article, I would like to ask you to reduce the controversy section. I know, you were a major contributor to this article, thus decided to ask ''you'' to reduce the section, and not do it for myself. I was willing to reduce this section since long time ago, but now that you're here, maybe you will feel better doing that for yourself.
+|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
+<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=866998073 -->
+== Nomination of [[:Mukul Nag]] for deletion ==
+<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Mukul Nag]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
+The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukul Nag]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
-The main problem of this article is, as said the GA reviewer, [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]], and the controversy section, especially the mafia links, is amazingly huge. It needs to be cut down and reduced; there is no need to go into minute details.
+Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> [[User:Boleyn|Boleyn]] ([[User talk:Boleyn|talk]]) 13:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
-Also, very long sections of criticism and controversy are frequently tagged with a request for merging and integration into the rest of the text. Please see [[Wikipedia:Words to avoid#Article_structure]] and [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Article_structure]] for further information.
+==Orphaned non-free image File:Sanskarlogo.jpg==
-Thanks, [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 19:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
+[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Sanskarlogo.jpg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).
+Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:GoldenHayato|GoldenHayato]] ([[User talk:GoldenHayato|talk]]) 09:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
-:As for Romanov Vodka, I can't get the reason to mentioning it. Actors endorse numerous products every year. Unless there is some controversy behind it, something that is genuinely notable, a description of her work (it only states that she was chosen) -- it's non-notable. You also can't compare it to PETA and HIV drives, you know.
+==  [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Kesava Bharati]] ==
-:It might also be a good idea to rename 'commitments' to something more descriptive. The term "commitments" could have a pretty wide range of meanings. Regards, [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 19:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
+[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]
+The article [[:Kesava Bharati]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
-::Hi again! I'm sorry, but I disagree with you in that particular case. I have absolutely no problem with mentioning endorsements of actors, as long as they are notable. Launching a new perfume is great and definitely can be mentioned, but Vodka? I can't understand the matter of making a whole section for endorsement for Vodka, when actually nothing regarding her actual work there is mentioned.
+<blockquote>'''Article's only source is not RS, and the person doesnot meet GNG.'''</blockquote>
+While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
-::Well, the Britney Spears article is not a good template for inspiration. It has recently failed an FAC. And even if you want to do the same, remember that while her article presents numerous endorsements, you have a whole section dedicated to only one. Have a look at some FAs and you will see that there are no such mentions. But still, I repeat, I have no problem with endorsements, but there must be some significance to it. As I said above, unless there is some controversy behind it, something that is genuinely notable, ''a description of her work'' -- it's non-notable. So this one is clearly non-notable. Launching her own perfume is notable, but an endorsement for some vodka, one of thousands endorsements she may have done, is...
+You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Kesava Bharati|the article's talk page]].
-::A BLP should provide biographical information; a new own perfume is great, and endorsements are great only for one of the above-mentioned reasons, but mentioning one of many endorsements in one section is definitely not an encyclopedic stuff. Have you seen an encyclopedia entry for some actor mentioning something of the sort? PETA and HIV drives are great causes, part of her humanitarian work, therefore ''very'' notable, as they constitute a part of her very biography.
+Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Nitish shetty|Nitish shetty]] ([[User talk:Nitish shetty|talk]]) 07:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
-::As for "It is also not a very good practice to remove sourced/referenced information, as it may be done with good intentions but it can also be construed as vandalism." - Just to note, it doesn't apply to established editors who have been working on an article, and although I immesely appreciate your terrific work on this article, I have full right (and equal to yours) to edit this article. We better try to expand her brief career section, rather than adding things to make the article longer. I have expanded her career section, her lead, fought vandalism down the months, and impolite editors on the talk page as well; so I also can remove something which is non-notable. I'm not going to remove it now, I hope you get the matter and do it for yourself. I don't want an [[WP:EW|edit war]]. If you still disagree, we'll take it to some noticeboard or a better idea will be to turn to some editors, whom I met on FACs and who constantly vote on FACs, for their opinion. Then it will get clear. In fact, I believe, we both are trying to improve the article.
+==Orphaned non-free image File:Shafilea Ahmed.jpg==
+[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Shafilea Ahmed.jpg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).
+Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 18:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
-::My best regards, [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 09:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
-:::Why should I have a problem with endorsements? Yes, I personally wouldn't like such section in an article I mainly work on, because my opinion of what a BLP (actors) should include and what it shouldn't is firm -- Early life-career-other work (including humanitarian work and even endorsements)-personal life (including controversies)-Media lists (including controversies)-and so forth. That's how we'll have a well-written '''BLP''' in the full sense of the word - Biography of a living person.
-:::Now, if you want a section for her endorsements, so first of all, that's how it should be named - endorsements, not Romanov Vodka, and not only a brief mention of that. It is literally silly to have an entire section ''only'' for this Vodka. If you really want a section for endorsements, so it's better to include other endorsements too, many of these she has endorsed, and name it "endorsements" - not Romanov Vodka, which is a little part of thousand products she has endorsed.
-:::When I say that I want to consult an editor who regularly votes on FACs, I don't mean that I want to make the article an FA, I mean that I want an opinion of an intelligent editor who knows and understands what the perfect standard for a BLP is. In fact, the article is far from reaching a GA status, let alone FA. I can assure you that if I turn to editors like Sandy, they won't support the existence of a section named Romanov Vodka.
-:::Now, Britney Spears, Beyonce, Jessica Simpson, are not good enough to serve us as rolemodels and your points that "other article has that and that, therefore this article should" are not valid, see [[WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS]]. They are full of gossip and data that resembles a gossip magazine at times rather than an encyclopedia. I have always used articles like [[Jolie]], [[Mariah Carey]] and other FAs to promote INDICINE articles, but these???
-No probs friend, feel free to shift this discussion. Kind regards, [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 22:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
-:Hello Ekantik!
-:I made some changes from your revision. I know what a [[WP:AGF|good faith edit]] is, that's why I explained my reversion of the anon's addition. The fact that his edit was not a vandalism doesn't stop me from reverting it, yet assuming good faith. How many scripts can we have on one page? Why specifically Hindi? She speaks nearly ten Indian langs, no? ''Tulu'' is her mother tongue, so that's the only version that should be bracketed there.
-:Could you tell me please if you plan to reduce the controversy section? If you don't, please let me know. These mafia and obscenity charges sections etc deserve at most two short paragraphs each. They were never as well publicised as the celebrity big brother contro. Plus, the former (mafia links) is not even related to her directly, and, BTW, was not as famous as the Bharat Shah case for example.
-:I hope you find more time to come in more often. As you know, I had expanded the career section back in time, but it's still too short even when not compared to her other activities. And I repeat, ''other''; she is, first of all, an actress. We have to highlight the fact that she is an actor, a performer; but the article, on the contrary, presents her as a celebrity, a star, a "Celebrity big brother" winner, a famous woman, an activist, which is great but secondary to the most important (and unfortunately, short) film career section. I do agree that CBB contributed much to her status, but for Shilpa, the actress, it's not as important as her acting career (I personally think she deserved every possible award for Phir Milenge. Have you seen the movie?) Do you agree with me regarding that? Do you have some idea how to expand it?
-:My best regards, [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 23:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
-::Dear Ekantik!
-::I know very well what I can and what I cannot revert. I'm a well experienced editor. Vandalism - revert; [[WP:AGF]] edit, but still wrong - revert. You have also reverted some of my edits back in time. When I revert good faith edits, I explain my reversion in the edit summary. When I disagree on something, I usually do turn to the talk page, but some things here are just obvious.
-::I repeat, her ''mother tongue'' is Tulu, therefore, it's the language which should appear there. If she went now to Germany and lived there for 2 year, would you agree with adding a German script as well? I know it's a silly comparison, but that's it. The fact that she has mostly worked in Hindi cinema is not really valid. Her native tongue, that's what counts. She has also worked in Kannada and Telugu films. So what? Also see [[Gandhi]] and [[Satyajit Ray]] (FAs), there is only one foreign script for each.
-::Miss Bollywood is a recent event. The lead is here to summarise the article. We still don't know what the reception is, how it benefited her, how it contributed to her success, if that is notable, if that builds her image. It is still on going (and it has nothing to do with the fact that Wikipedia is an ongoing project in that context). Currently, Amitji works in some 10 films or so. So what? What's the problem? We can wait and see the result. According to [[WP:WBA]]: "...the first paragraph should be short and to the point, with a clear explanation of what the subject of the page is. The following paragraphs should give a summary of the article. They should provide an overview of the '''main points''' the article will make, summarizing '''the primary reasons''' the subject matter is interesting..." - is Shilpa (in our particular case) known for ''Miss Bollywood'' among others?
-::As for the controversies, you can see the policies and my original message on the very top of this section. I have absolutely no problem with controversies, nor does Wikipedia, but the controversy section is huge, the longest on the page, and should be reduced, as per the above-mentioned reasons. [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 07:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
-:::As for the National Film Awards, yeh it was a hard task, I turned to almost every possible administrator. The reason is clear: a veteran, prestigious, and the most prominent award ceremony in India, with a distinguished jury, selected by the government. The award is given by the government itself etc etc. Haven't you seen Phir Milenge? Oh how could you miss the film? You should see it. Shilpa was brilliant! [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 07:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
-::::Oh and great work on [[WP:INDICINE]]. I'm not surprised. I know that you're a brilliant editor.:) Great work, I hope to see this project evolving. Best regards, [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 17:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
-==Biblical references abound in Christianity-oriented articles==
-I agree completely with you but I don't know what to do about it that isn't going to take a lot of effort. You might want to start at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lutheranism]], or [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity]], or [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability]] and post a comment. Your description of the use of biblical verse to "prove the point" in liu of actual citations of secondary sources is, unfortunately, tied up in some Christians reliance on [[prooftext]]ing in making an argument. They might not get your point at all. Still, the fight would be worthwhile. Cheers! [[User:Wassupwestcoast|Wassupwestcoast]] ([[User talk:Wassupwestcoast|talk]]) 02:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
-==Indian lists==
-Hey friend how are you? Happy New Year!!!
-Yes I have done a lot of work on Indian films and lists but predominantly Bollywood which I have split by year. Due the fact that the original Tamil and Telugu list were so incomprehendable I only split them by decade and haven't cleaned them up because I have no knowledge of the films and imdb is very poor for tamil and telugu. I had strongly hoped that somebody from Indian cinema would come along and beautify them like the Bollywood films which I split by year and are now linked in [[Template:Bollywood]]. I strongly urge somebody to do the same with Tamil and Telegu films - a detailed guide by year (given the sheer amount of films) and have the [[Template:Tamilcinema]] linked with the years in Tamil film at the bottom of every article like bollywood. i'd like to see cleaned up and developed pages like [[Tamil films of 1972]] like [[Bollywood films of 1972]]etc. Unfortunately it never seems like anybody except Shahid, Bollywood dreamz and universal hero are consistently active in this group aside from myself, let alone in Tamil or telugu cinema. pLease can somebody clean up the tamil and telegu lists and perhaps from 1950 onwards split by year like Bollywood. Regards [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''♦ Sir Blofeld ♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''Talk?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
-Bollywood is in the middle of development. Ideally I want tamil and telugu to have pages like :
-{{Bollywood}}
-[[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''♦ Sir Blofeld ♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''Talk?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
-Yep, glad you agree amigo. Thats why I created around 70 odd locator maps a few days ago for all the countries which don't have maps and will begin adding infoboxes and the locator maps. Its a shame Jimbo can't bring himself to spare me a few words -particularly after all I;ve done for his project. Hope you are well! [[User:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''♦ Sir Blofeld ♦'''''</font>]]</span>     <sup>[[User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">'''Talk?'''</font></font color> ]]</sup> 11:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
-==User Thylacinus cynocephalus==
-. Yeah, it is not the first time the user has had some more, shall we say, youthful mistakes. before the user changed their username, they had just come off a block for ''precisely'' that sort of behavior. He just removed posts to his talk page wthout answering, under the very misguided view that his actions are escaping notice. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:black">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 05:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
-==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bhutto assasin 2.jpg)==
-[[Image:Nuvola apps important blue.svg|25px]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Bhutto assasin 2.jpg]]'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, it is currently [[Wikipedia:Orphan|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).
-If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 01:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
-==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bhutto assassin 1.jpg)==
-[[Image:Nuvola apps important blue.svg|25px]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Bhutto assassin 1.jpg]]'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, it is currently [[Wikipedia:Orphan|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).
-If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 01:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
-== WikiProject Films coordinator elections ==
-The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators|WikiProject Films coordinator]] selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/Election 2|'''sign up here''']] by March 28! [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 10:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)