Jump to content

Lenna: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
top: Fixed grammar
Tags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
m There is a dormant discussion in the talk page under "So as to not start an edit war". Please contribute to that discussion instead. Undid revision 1237400318 by Zacwill (talk)
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Standard test image}}
{{Short description|Unauthorized standard test image}}
{{Other uses}}
{{Other uses}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2022}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2022}}
[[File:Lenna (test image).png|thumb|Image of [[Lena Forsén]] used in many image processing experiments{{noprint inline|. ''(Click on the image to access the actual 512×512px standard test version.)''}}]]
[[File:Lenna (test image).png|thumb|Image of [[Lena Forsén]] used in many image processing experiments{{noprint inline|. ''(Click on the image to access the actual 512×512px standard test version.)''}}]]


'''Lenna''' (or '''Lena''') is a [[standard test image]] used in the field of [[digital image processing]] starting in 1973,<ref name="bbc-human-hair">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19260550|title=Playboy Centrefold Photo Shrunk to Width of Human Hair|work=BBC News Online|date=14 August 2012|access-date=15 August 2012}}</ref> but it is no longer considered appropriate by some authors.<ref name="Eismann" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name="oleary" /><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3" /><ref name=":4" /> It is a picture of the [[Sweden|Swedish]] model [[Lena Forsén]], shot by photographer [[Dwight Hooker]], cropped from the [[centerfold]] of the November 1972 issue of ''[[Playboy]]'' magazine. The continued use of the image has attracted controversy, on both technical and social grounds, and many journals have discouraged or banned its use.<ref name=":2">{{cite web|title=SIIMS – Instructions for Authors|url=https://epubs.siam.org/journal/siims/instructions-for-authors|access-date=2022-10-22}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=A note on the Lena image|journal=Nature Nanotechnology |year=2018 |volume=13 |issue=12 |page=1087 |doi=10.1038/s41565-018-0337-2 |pmid=30523301 |bibcode=2018NatNa..13Q1087. |s2cid=54522374 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Express Journals Online Style Guide: OPTICS EXPRESS, BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS |url=https://opg.optica.org/submit/style/oestyleguide.cfm |access-date=2022-10-22 }}</ref><ref>[https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/03/playboy-image-from-1972-gets-ban-from-ieee-computer-journals/ Ars Technica: "Playboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journals" 29 March 2024}</ref> Forsén herself has said "It's time I retired from tech."<ref name=":5" />
'''Lenna''' (or '''Lena''') is a [[standard test image]] used in the field of [[digital image processing]], starting in 1973.<ref name="bbc-human-hair">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19260550|title=Playboy Centrefold Photo Shrunk to Width of Human Hair|work=BBC News Online|date=14 August 2012|access-date=15 August 2012|archive-date=5 October 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121005184214/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19260550|url-status=live}}</ref> It is a picture of the [[Sweden|Swedish]] model [[Lena Forsén]], shot by photographer [[Dwight Hooker]] and cropped from the [[centerfold]] of the November 1972 issue of ''[[Playboy]]'' magazine. The image has attracted controversy in recent years because of its subject matter,<ref name="Eismann"/> and many journals have deemed it inappropriate and discouraged its use, while others have banned it from publication outright.<ref name=":2">{{cite web|title=SIIMS – Instructions for Authors|url=https://epubs.siam.org/journal/siims/instructions-for-authors|access-date=2022-10-22|archive-date=22 October 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221022200028/https://epubs.siam.org/journal/siims/instructions-for-authors|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=A note on the Lena image|journal=Nature Nanotechnology |year=2018 |volume=13 |issue=12 |page=1087 |doi=10.1038/s41565-018-0337-2 |pmid=30523301 |bibcode=2018NatNa..13Q1087. |s2cid=54522374 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Express Journals Online Style Guide: OPTICS EXPRESS, BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS |url=https://opg.optica.org/submit/style/oestyleguide.cfm |access-date=2022-10-22 |archive-date=22 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221022200024/https://opg.optica.org/submit/style/oestyleguide.cfm |url-status=deviated }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Edwards |first=Benj |date=2024-03-29 |title=Playboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journals |url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/03/playboy-image-from-1972-gets-ban-from-ieee-computer-journals/ |access-date=2024-03-30 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-us |archive-date=30 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240330165935/https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/03/playboy-image-from-1972-gets-ban-from-ieee-computer-journals/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Forsén herself has called for it to be retired, saying "It's time I retired from tech."<ref name=":5" />


The spelling "Lenna" came from the model's desire to encourage the proper pronunciation of her name. "I didn't want to be called ''Lee''na [{{IPAc-en|lang|'|l|i:|n|ə}}]," she explained.<ref name="Wired2019">
The spelling "Lenna" came from the model's desire to encourage the proper pronunciation of her name. "I didn't want to be called ''Lee''na [{{IPAc-en|lang|'|l|i:|n|ə}}]," she explained.<ref name="Wired2019">{{cite magazine
{{cite magazine
|url=https://www.wired.com/story/finding-lena-the-patron-saint-of-jpegs/
|url=https://www.wired.com/story/finding-lena-the-patron-saint-of-jpegs/
|title=Finding Lena, the Patron Saint of JPEGS
|title=Finding Lena, the Patron Saint of JPEGS
Line 14: Line 13:
|date=January 31, 2019
|date=January 31, 2019
|magazine=Wired
|magazine=Wired
|access-date=March 1, 2019
|access-date=March 1, 2019
|archive-date=22 April 2020
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200422090150/https://www.wired.com/story/finding-lena-the-patron-saint-of-jpegs/
|url-status=live
}} IPA pronunciation of ''Lee''na inserted into the quotation in brackets for clarity. {{IPAc-en|'|l|i:|n|ə}} is a common English pronunciation of the name ''Lena''. The quotation reads, "At her suggestion, the editors [of Playboy] spelled her first name with an extra 'n,' to encourage proper pronunciation. 'I didn't want to be called Leena," she explained.'</ref>
}} IPA pronunciation of ''Lee''na inserted into the quotation in brackets for clarity. {{IPAc-en|'|l|i:|n|ə}} is a common English pronunciation of the name ''Lena''. The quotation reads, "At her suggestion, the editors [of Playboy] spelled her first name with an extra 'n,' to encourage proper pronunciation. 'I didn't want to be called Leena," she explained.'</ref>


Line 30: Line 32:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Intended for high resolution color image processing study, the Lenna picture's history was described in the May 2001 newsletter of the [[IEEE Professional Communication Society]], in an article by Jamie Hutchinson:<ref name=JH>
The Lenna image was originally intended for high resolution color image processing study. Its history was described in the May 2001 newsletter of the [[IEEE Professional Communication Society]], in an article by Jamie Hutchinson:<ref name=JH>{{cite journal
|last=Hutchison
{{cite journal
|last=Hutchison |first=Jamie
|first=Jamie
|date=2001
|date=2001
|title=Culture, Communication, and an Information Age Madonna
|title=Culture, Communication, and an Information Age Madonna
|url=http://www.lenna.org/pcs_mirror/may_june01.pdf
|url=http://www.lenna.org/pcs_mirror/may_june01.pdf
|journal=IEEE Professional Communication Society Newsletter
|journal=IEEE Professional Communication Society Newsletter
|volume=45 |number=3 |pages=1, 5–7
|volume=45
|number=3
|pages=1, 5–7
|access-date=21 January 2019
}}</ref>
|archive-date=18 April 2019
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190418221033/http://www.lenna.org/pcs_mirror/may_june01.pdf
|url-status=live
}}</ref>
{{blockquote|Alexander Sawchuk estimates that it was in June or July of 1973 when he, then an assistant professor of electrical engineering at the [[University of Southern California]] Signal and Image Processing Institute (SIPI), along with a graduate student and the SIPI lab manager, was hurriedly searching the lab for a good image to scan for a colleague's conference paper. They got tired of their stock of usual test images, dull stuff dating back to television standards work in the early 1960s. They wanted something glossy to ensure good output dynamic range, and they wanted a human face. Just then, somebody happened to walk in with a recent issue of ''Playboy''.
{{blockquote|Alexander Sawchuk estimates that it was in June or July of 1973 when he, then an assistant professor of electrical engineering at the [[University of Southern California]] Signal and Image Processing Institute (SIPI), along with a graduate student and the SIPI lab manager, was hurriedly searching the lab for a good image to scan for a colleague's conference paper. They got tired of their stock of usual test images, dull stuff dating back to television standards work in the early 1960s. They wanted something glossy to ensure good output dynamic range, and they wanted a human face. Just then, somebody happened to walk in with a recent issue of ''Playboy''.


The engineers tore away the top third of the centerfold so they could wrap it around the drum of their Muirhead [[wirephoto]] scanner, which they had outfitted with analog-to-digital converters (one each for the red, green, and blue channels) and a [[HP 2100|Hewlett Packard 2100]] minicomputer. The Muirhead had a fixed resolution of 100 lines per inch and the engineers wanted a 512×512 image, so they limited the scan to the top 5.12 inches of the picture, effectively cropping it at the subject's shoulders.}}
The engineers tore away the top third of the centerfold so they could wrap it around the drum of their Muirhead [[wirephoto]] scanner, which they had outfitted with analog-to-digital converters (one each for the red, green, and blue channels) and a [[HP 2100|Hewlett Packard 2100]] minicomputer. The Muirhead had a fixed resolution of 100 lines per inch and the engineers wanted a 512×512 image, so they limited the scan to the top 5.12 inches of the picture, effectively cropping it at the subject's shoulders.}}
The image's reach was limited in the 1970s and 80s, which is reflected in it initially only appearing in [[.org]] domains. But in July 1991, the image featured on the cover of ''[[Optical Engineering (journal)|Optical Engineering]]'' alongside Peppers, another popular test image.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Pudding|first=The|title=Can Data Die? Tracking the Lenna Image|url=https://pudding.cool/2021/10/lenna|access-date=2022-02-02|website=The Pudding|language=en}}</ref> This drew the attention of ''Playboy'' to the potential copyright infringement.<ref name=Thompson>{{cite journal |first=Brian J. |last=Thompson |date=1992 |title=Editorial: Copyright Problems |journal=[[Optical Engineering (journal)|Optical Engineering]] |volume=31 |number=1 |page=5 |doi=10.1117/12.60707 |bibcode=1992OptEn..31....5T |doi-access=free }}</ref> The peak of image hits on the internet was in 1995.<ref name=":0" /> The scan became one of the most used images in computer history.<ref name="PBN07">
The image's reach was limited in the 1970s and 80s, which is reflected in it initially only appearing in [[.org]] domains. But in July 1991, the image featured on the cover of ''[[Optical Engineering (journal)|Optical Engineering]]'' alongside Peppers, another popular test image.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Pudding|first=The|title=Can Data Die? Tracking the Lenna Image|url=https://pudding.cool/2021/10/lenna|access-date=2022-02-02|website=The Pudding|language=en|archive-date=2 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211102161154/https://pudding.cool/2021/10/lenna/|url-status=live}}</ref> This drew the attention of ''Playboy'' to the potential copyright infringement.<ref name=Thompson>{{cite journal |first=Brian J. |last=Thompson |date=1992 |title=Editorial: Copyright Problems |journal=[[Optical Engineering (journal)|Optical Engineering]] |volume=31 |number=1 |page=5 |doi=10.1117/12.60707 |bibcode=1992OptEn..31....5T |doi-access=free }}</ref> The peak of image hits on the internet was in 1995.<ref name=":0" /> The scan became one of the most used images in computer history.<ref name="PBN07">
{{cite web|date=1997|title=The Search for Lena: Discovering one Playmate's role in the history of the Internet|url=http://www.playboy.com/news/lena/lena.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19970704201816/http://www.playboy.com/news/lena/lena.html|archive-date=July 4, 1997|access-date=December 20, 2012|work=Playboy Newsdesk|publisher=[[Playboy]]}}</ref> The use of the photo in electronic imaging has been described as "clearly one of the most important events in [its] history".<ref name="technologyreview zax 2012">
{{cite web|date=1997|title=The Search for Lena: Discovering one Playmate's role in the history of the Internet|url=http://www.playboy.com/news/lena/lena.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19970704201816/http://www.playboy.com/news/lena/lena.html|archive-date=July 4, 1997|access-date=December 20, 2012|work=Playboy Newsdesk|publisher=[[Playboy]]}}</ref> The use of the photo in electronic imaging has been described as "clearly one of the most important events in [its] history".<ref name="technologyreview zax 2012">{{cite web |last=Zax |first=David |date=16 August 2012 |title=A Playboy Model and Nanoscale Printing |url=http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428928/a-playboy-model-and-nanoscale-printing/ |access-date=24 September 2013 |work=[[MIT Technology Review]] |archive-date=24 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924140908/http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428928/a-playboy-model-and-nanoscale-printing/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The image spread to over 100 different domains, particularly [[.com]] and [[.edu]].<ref name=":0" />
{{cite web |last=Zax |first=David |date=16 August 2012 |title=A Playboy Model and Nanoscale Printing |url=http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428928/a-playboy-model-and-nanoscale-printing/ |access-date=24 September 2013 |work=[[MIT Technology Review]] }}</ref> The image spread to over 100 different domains, particularly [[.com]] and [[.edu]].<ref name=":0" />


In a 1999 issue of ''[[IEEE Transactions on Image Processing]]'' "Lena" was used in three separate articles,<ref name="oleary">
In a 1999 issue of ''[[IEEE Transactions on Image Processing]]'' "Lena" was used in three separate articles,<ref name="oleary">{{cite web
|last=O'Leary
{{cite web
|last=O'Leary |first=Dianne P.
|first=Dianne P.
|date=June 25, 1999
|date=June 25, 1999
|title=But the instructor's attitude can't make the female student fail, can it?
|title=But the instructor's attitude can't make the female student fail, can it?
Line 55: Line 62:
|publisher=[[University of Maryland]], Department of Computer Science
|publisher=[[University of Maryland]], Department of Computer Science
|access-date=October 26, 2013
|access-date=October 26, 2013
|archive-date=5 November 2015
}}</ref> and the picture continued to appear in scientific journals throughout the beginning of the 21st century.<ref name="JH" />
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151105072752/https://www.cs.umd.edu/users/oleary/faculty/node8.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref> and the picture continued to appear in scientific journals throughout the beginning of the 21st century.<ref name="JH" />


Lenna is so widely accepted in the image processing community that Forsén was a guest at the 50th annual Conference of the [[Society for Imaging Science and Technology]] (IS&T) in 1997.<ref name="chuck">
Lenna is so widely accepted in the image processing community that Forsén was a guest at the 50th annual Conference of the [[Society for Imaging Science and Technology]] (IS&T) in 1997.<ref name="chuck">{{cite web
|last=Rosenberg
{{cite web
|last=Rosenberg |first=Chuck
|first=Chuck
|date=November 3, 2001
|date=November 3, 2001
|title=The Lenna Story: Imaging Experts Meet Lenna in Person
|title=The Lenna Story: Imaging Experts Meet Lenna in Person
Line 65: Line 75:
|publisher=[[Carnegie Mellon University]]
|publisher=[[Carnegie Mellon University]]
|access-date=2017-02-03
|access-date=2017-02-03
|archive-date=29 September 2018
}}</ref> In 2015, Lena Forsén was also guest of honor at the banquet of IEEE ICIP 2015.<ref>{{cite web
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180929001758/http://www.lenna.org/lenna_visit.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref> In 2015, Lena Forsén was also guest of honor at the banquet of IEEE ICIP 2015.<ref>{{cite web
|date=2015
|date=2015
|title=ICIP 2015 Banquet & Awards Ceremony
|title=ICIP 2015 Banquet & Awards Ceremony
Line 76: Line 89:
}}</ref> After delivering a speech, she chaired the best paper award ceremony.
}}</ref> After delivering a speech, she chaired the best paper award ceremony.


To explain why the image became a standard in the field, [[David C. Munson]], editor-in-chief of ''[[Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers|IEEE]] Transactions on Image Processing'', stated that it was a good test image because of its detail, flat regions, shading, and texture. He also noted that "the Lena image is a picture of an attractive woman. It is not surprising that the (mostly male) image processing research community gravitated toward an image that they found attractive."<ref name=Munson>
To explain why the image became a standard in the field, [[David C. Munson]], editor-in-chief of ''[[Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers|IEEE]] Transactions on Image Processing'', stated that it was a good test image because of its detail, flat regions, shading, and texture. He also noted that "the Lena image is a picture of an attractive woman. It is not surprising that the (mostly male) image processing research community gravitated toward an image that they found attractive."<ref name=Munson>{{cite journal
|last=Munson
{{cite journal
|last=Munson |first=David C. Jr.
|first=David C. Jr.
|date=1996
|date=1996
|title=A Note on Lena
|title=A Note on Lena
|url=http://www.lenna.org/editor.html
|url=http://www.lenna.org/editor.html
|journal=[[IEEE Transactions on Image Processing]]
|journal=[[IEEE Transactions on Image Processing]]
|volume=5 |number=1 |page=3
|volume=5
|number=1
|page=3
|doi=10.1109/TIP.1996.8100841
|doi=10.1109/TIP.1996.8100841
|bibcode=1996ITIP....5....3M
|bibcode=1996ITIP....5....3M
|access-date=2017-02-03
|access-date=2017-02-03
|doi-access=free
|doi-access=free
|archive-date=12 April 2023
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230412224205/http://www.lenna.org/editor.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


While ''Playboy'' often cracks down on illegal uses of its material and did initially send a notice to the publisher of ''[[Optical Engineering]]'' about its unauthorized use in that publication,<ref name=Thompson/> over time it has decided to overlook the wide use of Lena. Eileen Kent, VP of new media at ''Playboy'', said, "We decided we should exploit this, because it is a phenomenon."<ref name="Wired97">
While ''Playboy'' often cracks down on illegal uses of its material and did initially send a notice to the publisher of ''[[Optical Engineering (journal)|Optical Engineering]]'' about its unauthorized use in that publication,<ref name=Thompson/> over time it has decided to overlook the wide use of Lena. Eileen Kent, VP of new media at ''Playboy'', said, "We decided we should exploit this, because it is a phenomenon."<ref name="Wired97">{{cite magazine
|last=Brown
{{cite magazine
|last=Brown |first=Janelle
|first=Janelle
|date=May 20, 1997
|date=May 20, 1997
|title=Playmate Meets Geeks Who Made Her a Net Star
|title=Playmate Meets Geeks Who Made Her a Net Star
Line 98: Line 116:
|magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]
|magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]
|access-date=2017-02-03
|access-date=2017-02-03
|archive-date=22 July 2023
}}</ref>
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230722102912/https://www.wired.com/1997/05/playmate-meets-geeks-who-made-her-a-net-star/
|url-status=live
}}</ref>


== Criticism ==
== Criticism ==
Line 112: Line 133:
|eprint=1202.6429
|eprint=1202.6429
|class=cs.CV
|class=cs.CV
}}</ref><ref>
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|last=Carron
{{cite web
|last=Carron |first=Igor
|first=Igor
|date=March 9, 2012
|date=March 9, 2012
|title=I can't believe it's not Lena
|title=I can't believe it's not Lena
Line 120: Line 141:
|work=Nuit Blanche
|work=Nuit Blanche
|access-date=2017-02-03
|access-date=2017-02-03
|archive-date=10 March 2017
}}</ref><ref>
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170310221124/http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.it/2012/03/i-cant-believe-its-not-lena.html
{{cite web
|url-status=live
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=May 2, 2013
|date=May 2, 2013
|title=Every Picture Tells A Story
|title=Every Picture Tells A Story
Line 127: Line 150:
|publisher=[[Claremont McKenna College]]
|publisher=[[Claremont McKenna College]]
|access-date=2017-02-03
|access-date=2017-02-03
|archive-date=14 April 2015
}}</ref><ref>
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150414001858/http://www.claremontmckenna.edu/news/every-picture-tells-a-story/
{{cite web
|url-status=live
|last=Matthews |first=Richard
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|last=Matthews
|first=Richard
|date=May 12, 2015
|date=May 12, 2015
|title=How Fabio and Playboy helped invent the internet: The bizarre photos used in research papers revealed
|title=How Fabio and Playboy helped invent the internet: The bizarre photos used in research papers revealed
Line 135: Line 161:
|work=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]]
|work=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]]
|access-date=2017-02-03
|access-date=2017-02-03
|archive-date=4 February 2017
}}</ref>
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170204170452/http://theconversation.com/the-playboy-centrefold-at-the-centre-of-computer-science-41457
|url-status=live
}}</ref>


The use of the test image at the [[magnet school]] [[Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology]] in [[Fairfax County]], Virginia provoked a guest editorial by a senior in ''[[The Washington Post]]'' in 2015 about its detrimental impact on aspiring female students in computer science.<ref name=":4">
The use of the test image at the [[magnet school]] [[Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology]] in [[Fairfax County, Virginia]], provoked a guest editorial by a senior in ''[[The Washington Post]]'' in 2015 about its detrimental impact on aspiring female students in computer science.<ref name=":4">{{cite news
|first=Maddie
{{cite news
|first=Maddie |last=Zug
|last=Zug
|date=24 April 2015
|date=24 April 2015
|title=A centerfold does not belong in the classroom
|title=A centerfold does not belong in the classroom
Line 145: Line 174:
|newspaper=[[Washington Post]]
|newspaper=[[Washington Post]]
|access-date=7 July 2015
|access-date=7 July 2015
|archive-date=13 May 2019
}}</ref>
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190513152313/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-playboy-centerfold-does-not-belong-in-tj-classrooms/2015/04/24/76e87fa4-e47a-11e4-81ea-0649268f729e_story.html
|url-status=live
}}</ref>


In 2017, the ''[[Journal of Modern Optics]]'' published an editorial titled "On alternatives to Lenna"<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|date=2017|title=On alternatives to Lenna|journal=Journal of Modern Optics|volume=64|issue=12|pages=1119–1120|doi=10.1080/09500340.2016.1270881|bibcode=2017JMOp...64.1119.|doi-access=free}}</ref> suggesting three images (Pirate, Cameraman, and Peppers) that "are reasonably close to Lenna in feature space".
In 2017, the ''[[Journal of Modern Optics]]'' published an editorial titled "On alternatives to Lenna" suggesting three images (Pirate, Cameraman, and Peppers) that "are reasonably close to Lenna in feature space".<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|date=2017|title=On alternatives to Lenna|journal=Journal of Modern Optics|volume=64|issue=12|pages=1119–1120|doi=10.1080/09500340.2016.1270881|bibcode=2017JMOp...64.1119.|doi-access=free}}</ref>


In 2018, the ''[[Nature Nanotechnology]]'' journal announced that they would no longer consider articles using the Lenna image.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|date=2018|title=A note on the Lena image|journal=Nature Nanotechnology |volume=13|issue=12|page=1087|doi=10.1038/s41565-018-0337-2|pmid=30523301|bibcode=2018NatNa..13Q1087.|issn=1748-3395|doi-access=free}}</ref> In the same year [[SPIE]], the publishers of ''[[Optical Engineering (journal)|Optical Engineering]]'', also announced that they "strongly discourage" the use of the Lenna image, and would no longer consider new submissions containing the image "without convincing scientific justification for its use". They noted that aside from the copyright and ethical issues, that it was also no longer useful as a standard image: "In today's age of high-resolution digital image technology, it seems difficult to argue that a 512 × 512 image produced with a 1970s-era analog scanner is the best we have to offer as an image quality test standard".<ref name="Eismann">
In 2018, the ''[[Nature Nanotechnology]]'' journal announced that they would no longer consider articles using the Lenna image.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|date=2018|title=A note on the Lena image|journal=Nature Nanotechnology |volume=13|issue=12|page=1087|doi=10.1038/s41565-018-0337-2|pmid=30523301|bibcode=2018NatNa..13Q1087.|issn=1748-3395|doi-access=free}}</ref> In the same year [[SPIE]], the publishers of ''[[Optical Engineering (journal)|Optical Engineering]]'', also announced that they "strongly discourage" the use of the Lenna image, and would no longer consider new submissions containing the image "without convincing scientific justification for its use". They noted that aside from the copyright and ethical issues, that it was also no longer useful as a standard image: "In today's age of high-resolution digital image technology, it seems difficult to argue that a 512 × 512 image produced with a 1970s-era analog scanner is the best we have to offer as an image quality test standard".<ref name="Eismann">
{{Cite journal |last=Eismann |first=Michael T. |author-link=Michael Eismann |date=2018 |title=Farewell, Lena |journal=[[Optical Engineering (journal)|Optical Engineering]] |language=en |volume=57 |issue=12 |page=120101 |bibcode=2018OptEn..57l0101E |doi=10.1117/1.OE.57.12.120101 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
{{Cite journal |last=Eismann |first=Michael T. |author-link=Michael Eismann |date=2018 |title=Farewell, Lena |journal=[[Optical Engineering (journal)|Optical Engineering]] |language=en |volume=57 |issue=12 |page=120101 |bibcode=2018OptEn..57l0101E |doi=10.1117/1.OE.57.12.120101 |doi-access=free}}</ref>


Forsén stated in the 2019 documentary film ''Losing Lena'', "I retired from modeling a long time ago. It's time I retired from tech, too... Let's commit to losing me."<ref name=":5">{{cite news |first=Kayla |last=Kibbe |url=https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/How-a-Nude-Playboy-Photo-Became-a-Fixture-14878319.php |title=How a Nude 'Playboy' Photo Became a Fixture in the Tech World |work=Inside Hook |via=San Francisco Chronicle |date=2019-12-03 }}</ref>
Forsén stated in the 2019 documentary film ''Losing Lena'', "I retired from modeling a long time ago. It's time I retired from tech, too... Let's commit to losing me."<ref name=":5">{{cite news |first=Kayla |last=Kibbe |url=https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/How-a-Nude-Playboy-Photo-Became-a-Fixture-14878319.php |title=How a Nude 'Playboy' Photo Became a Fixture in the Tech World |work=Inside Hook |via=San Francisco Chronicle |date=2019-12-03 |access-date=3 November 2021 |archive-date=24 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191224184828/https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/How-a-Nude-Playboy-Photo-Became-a-Fixture-14878319.php |url-status=live }}</ref>

The [[Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers]] (IEEE) announced that, starting April 1, 2024, it will no longer allow use of the Lena image in its publications.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/mar/31/tech-publisher-bans-playboy-centrefold-test-image-from-its-journals "Trade body urges removal of Playboy centrefold test image from members’ journals", The Guardian, March 31, 2024]</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 169: Line 203:
== Sources ==
== Sources ==
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite web |last=Mayer|first=Gregory|title=the waterloo image repository|url=http://links.uwaterloo.ca/Repository.html|year=2009|publisher=[[University of Waterloo|uwaterloo.ca]]|access-date=2013-12-31}}
* {{cite web|last=Mayer|first=Gregory|title=the waterloo image repository|url=http://links.uwaterloo.ca/Repository.html|year=2009|publisher=[[University of Waterloo|uwaterloo.ca]]|access-date=2013-12-31|archive-date=22 July 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230722102921/https://links.uwaterloo.ca/Repository.html|url-status=live}}
* {{cite web |url=http://sipi.usc.edu/database/database.php?volume=misc&image=12#top|title=The USC-SIPI Image Database|publisher=[[USC Viterbi School of Engineering|Viterbi School of Engineering]]|date=1981<!-- between 1977 and 1981, check the misc archive -->|quote=cksum misc/4.2.04.tiff 4014024639|access-date=2013-12-31}}
* {{cite web|url=http://sipi.usc.edu/database/database.php?volume=misc&image=12#top|title=The USC-SIPI Image Database|publisher=[[USC Viterbi School of Engineering|Viterbi School of Engineering]]|date=1981<!-- between 1977 and 1981, check the misc archive -->|quote=cksum misc/4.2.04.tiff 4014024639|access-date=2013-12-31|archive-date=1 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230101043745/https://sipi.usc.edu/database/database.php?volume=misc&image=12#top|url-status=live}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


Line 189: Line 223:
[[Category:Playboy]]
[[Category:Playboy]]
[[Category:Test items]]
[[Category:Test items]]
[[Category:Obscenity controversies in photography]]

Latest revision as of 08:21, 30 July 2024

Image of Lena Forsén used in many image processing experiments. (Click on the image to access the actual 512×512px standard test version.)

Lenna (or Lena) is a standard test image used in the field of digital image processing, starting in 1973.[1] It is a picture of the Swedish model Lena Forsén, shot by photographer Dwight Hooker and cropped from the centerfold of the November 1972 issue of Playboy magazine. The image has attracted controversy in recent years because of its subject matter,[2] and many journals have deemed it inappropriate and discouraged its use, while others have banned it from publication outright.[3][4][5][6] Forsén herself has called for it to be retired, saying "It's time I retired from tech."[7]

The spelling "Lenna" came from the model's desire to encourage the proper pronunciation of her name. "I didn't want to be called Leena [English: /ˈlnə/]," she explained.[8]

History

[edit]

Before Lenna, the first use of a Playboy magazine image to illustrate image processing algorithms was in 1961. Lawrence G. Roberts used two cropped six-bit grayscale facsimile scanned images from Playboy's July 1960 issue featuring Playmate Teddi Smith, in his MIT master's thesis on image dithering.[9]

The Lenna image was originally intended for high resolution color image processing study. Its history was described in the May 2001 newsletter of the IEEE Professional Communication Society, in an article by Jamie Hutchinson:[10]

Alexander Sawchuk estimates that it was in June or July of 1973 when he, then an assistant professor of electrical engineering at the University of Southern California Signal and Image Processing Institute (SIPI), along with a graduate student and the SIPI lab manager, was hurriedly searching the lab for a good image to scan for a colleague's conference paper. They got tired of their stock of usual test images, dull stuff dating back to television standards work in the early 1960s. They wanted something glossy to ensure good output dynamic range, and they wanted a human face. Just then, somebody happened to walk in with a recent issue of Playboy. The engineers tore away the top third of the centerfold so they could wrap it around the drum of their Muirhead wirephoto scanner, which they had outfitted with analog-to-digital converters (one each for the red, green, and blue channels) and a Hewlett Packard 2100 minicomputer. The Muirhead had a fixed resolution of 100 lines per inch and the engineers wanted a 512×512 image, so they limited the scan to the top 5.12 inches of the picture, effectively cropping it at the subject's shoulders.

The image's reach was limited in the 1970s and 80s, which is reflected in it initially only appearing in .org domains. But in July 1991, the image featured on the cover of Optical Engineering alongside Peppers, another popular test image.[11] This drew the attention of Playboy to the potential copyright infringement.[12] The peak of image hits on the internet was in 1995.[11] The scan became one of the most used images in computer history.[13] The use of the photo in electronic imaging has been described as "clearly one of the most important events in [its] history".[14] The image spread to over 100 different domains, particularly .com and .edu.[11]

In a 1999 issue of IEEE Transactions on Image Processing "Lena" was used in three separate articles,[15] and the picture continued to appear in scientific journals throughout the beginning of the 21st century.[10]

Lenna is so widely accepted in the image processing community that Forsén was a guest at the 50th annual Conference of the Society for Imaging Science and Technology (IS&T) in 1997.[16] In 2015, Lena Forsén was also guest of honor at the banquet of IEEE ICIP 2015.[17] After delivering a speech, she chaired the best paper award ceremony.

To explain why the image became a standard in the field, David C. Munson, editor-in-chief of IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, stated that it was a good test image because of its detail, flat regions, shading, and texture. He also noted that "the Lena image is a picture of an attractive woman. It is not surprising that the (mostly male) image processing research community gravitated toward an image that they found attractive."[18]

While Playboy often cracks down on illegal uses of its material and did initially send a notice to the publisher of Optical Engineering about its unauthorized use in that publication,[12] over time it has decided to overlook the wide use of Lena. Eileen Kent, VP of new media at Playboy, said, "We decided we should exploit this, because it is a phenomenon."[19]

Criticism

[edit]

The use of the image has produced controversy because Playboy is "seen (by some) as being degrading to women".[18] In a 1999 essay on reasons for the male predominance in computer science, applied mathematician Dianne P. O'Leary wrote:

Suggestive pictures used in lectures on image processing ... convey the message that the lecturer caters to the males only. For example, it is amazing that the "Lena" pin-up image is still used as an example in courses and published as a test image in journals today.[15]

A 2012 paper on compressed sensing used a photo of the model Fabio Lanzoni as a test image to draw attention to this issue.[20][21][22][23]

The use of the test image at the magnet school Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Fairfax County, Virginia, provoked a guest editorial by a senior in The Washington Post in 2015 about its detrimental impact on aspiring female students in computer science.[24]

In 2017, the Journal of Modern Optics published an editorial titled "On alternatives to Lenna" suggesting three images (Pirate, Cameraman, and Peppers) that "are reasonably close to Lenna in feature space".[25]

In 2018, the Nature Nanotechnology journal announced that they would no longer consider articles using the Lenna image.[26] In the same year SPIE, the publishers of Optical Engineering, also announced that they "strongly discourage" the use of the Lenna image, and would no longer consider new submissions containing the image "without convincing scientific justification for its use". They noted that aside from the copyright and ethical issues, that it was also no longer useful as a standard image: "In today's age of high-resolution digital image technology, it seems difficult to argue that a 512 × 512 image produced with a 1970s-era analog scanner is the best we have to offer as an image quality test standard".[2]

Forsén stated in the 2019 documentary film Losing Lena, "I retired from modeling a long time ago. It's time I retired from tech, too... Let's commit to losing me."[7]

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) announced that, starting April 1, 2024, it will no longer allow use of the Lena image in its publications.[27]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Playboy Centrefold Photo Shrunk to Width of Human Hair". BBC News Online. 14 August 2012. Archived from the original on 5 October 2012. Retrieved 15 August 2012.
  2. ^ a b Eismann, Michael T. (2018). "Farewell, Lena". Optical Engineering. 57 (12): 120101. Bibcode:2018OptEn..57l0101E. doi:10.1117/1.OE.57.12.120101.
  3. ^ "SIIMS – Instructions for Authors". Archived from the original on 22 October 2022. Retrieved 22 October 2022.
  4. ^ "A note on the Lena image". Nature Nanotechnology. 13 (12): 1087. 2018. Bibcode:2018NatNa..13Q1087.. doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0337-2. PMID 30523301. S2CID 54522374.
  5. ^ "Express Journals Online Style Guide: OPTICS EXPRESS, BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, OPTICAL MATERIALS EXPRESS". Archived from the original on 22 October 2022. Retrieved 22 October 2022.
  6. ^ Edwards, Benj (29 March 2024). "Playboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journals". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 30 March 2024. Retrieved 30 March 2024.
  7. ^ a b Kibbe, Kayla (3 December 2019). "How a Nude 'Playboy' Photo Became a Fixture in the Tech World". Inside Hook. Archived from the original on 24 December 2019. Retrieved 3 November 2021 – via San Francisco Chronicle.
  8. ^ Kinstler, Linda (31 January 2019). "Finding Lena, the Patron Saint of JPEGS". Wired. Archived from the original on 22 April 2020. Retrieved 1 March 2019. IPA pronunciation of Leena inserted into the quotation in brackets for clarity. /ˈlnə/ is a common English pronunciation of the name Lena. The quotation reads, "At her suggestion, the editors [of Playboy] spelled her first name with an extra 'n,' to encourage proper pronunciation. 'I didn't want to be called Leena," she explained.'
  9. ^ Roberts, Lawrence G. (1961). "Picture Coding Using Pseudo-Random Noise". Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Archived from the original on 26 September 2006. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  10. ^ a b Hutchison, Jamie (2001). "Culture, Communication, and an Information Age Madonna" (PDF). IEEE Professional Communication Society Newsletter. 45 (3): 1, 5–7. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 April 2019. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  11. ^ a b c Pudding, The. "Can Data Die? Tracking the Lenna Image". The Pudding. Archived from the original on 2 November 2021. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
  12. ^ a b Thompson, Brian J. (1992). "Editorial: Copyright Problems". Optical Engineering. 31 (1): 5. Bibcode:1992OptEn..31....5T. doi:10.1117/12.60707.
  13. ^ "The Search for Lena: Discovering one Playmate's role in the history of the Internet". Playboy Newsdesk. Playboy. 1997. Archived from the original on 4 July 1997. Retrieved 20 December 2012.
  14. ^ Zax, David (16 August 2012). "A Playboy Model and Nanoscale Printing". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2013.
  15. ^ a b O'Leary, Dianne P. (25 June 1999). "But the instructor's attitude can't make the female student fail, can it?". Accessibility of Computer Science: A Reflection for Faculty Members. University of Maryland, Department of Computer Science. Archived from the original on 5 November 2015. Retrieved 26 October 2013.
  16. ^ Rosenberg, Chuck (3 November 2001). "The Lenna Story: Imaging Experts Meet Lenna in Person". Carnegie Mellon University. Archived from the original on 29 September 2018. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  17. ^ "ICIP 2015 Banquet & Awards Ceremony". International Conference on Image Processing. 2015. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
  18. ^ a b Munson, David C. Jr. (1996). "A Note on Lena". IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 5 (1): 3. Bibcode:1996ITIP....5....3M. doi:10.1109/TIP.1996.8100841. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  19. ^ Brown, Janelle (20 May 1997). "Playmate Meets Geeks Who Made Her a Net Star". Wired. Archived from the original on 22 July 2023. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  20. ^ Needell, Deanna; Ward, Rachel (29 February 2012). "Stable image reconstruction using total variation minimization". arXiv:1202.6429 [cs.CV].
  21. ^ Carron, Igor (9 March 2012). "I can't believe it's not Lena". Nuit Blanche. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  22. ^ "Every Picture Tells A Story". Claremont McKenna College. 2 May 2013. Archived from the original on 14 April 2015. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  23. ^ Matthews, Richard (12 May 2015). "How Fabio and Playboy helped invent the internet: The bizarre photos used in research papers revealed". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 4 February 2017. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
  24. ^ Zug, Maddie (24 April 2015). "A centerfold does not belong in the classroom". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 13 May 2019. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  25. ^ "On alternatives to Lenna". Journal of Modern Optics. 64 (12): 1119–1120. 2017. Bibcode:2017JMOp...64.1119.. doi:10.1080/09500340.2016.1270881.
  26. ^ "A note on the Lena image". Nature Nanotechnology. 13 (12): 1087. 2018. Bibcode:2018NatNa..13Q1087.. doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0337-2. ISSN 1748-3395. PMID 30523301.
  27. ^ "Trade body urges removal of Playboy centrefold test image from members’ journals", The Guardian, March 31, 2024

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Gonzalez, Rafael C.; Woods, Richard E. (2002). Digital Image Processing (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-201-18075-6. – image used numerous times in chapter 6
[edit]