Jump to content

Federal Court of Canada: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m remove unused bgcolor in wikitable
 
(47 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{about|the federal court before it was split in 2003|the active federal courts|Federal Court (Canada)|and|Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)}}
{{Short description|Former court of Canada for matters under some federal powers}}
{{About|the federal court before it was split in 2003|the active federal courts|Federal Court (Canada)|and|Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)}}

The '''Federal Court of Canada''', which succeeded the '''Exchequer Court of Canada''' in 1971, was a national court of Canada that had limited jurisdiction to hear certain types of disputes arising under the [[Parliament of Canada|federal government]]'s [[Canadian federalism|legislative jurisdiction]]. The Court was split in 2003 into two separate Courts, the [[Federal Court (Canada)|Federal Court]] and the [[Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)|Federal Court of Appeal]], although the jurisdiction and powers of the Courts remained largely unchanged.


The '''Federal Court of Canada''', which succeeded the '''Exchequer Court of Canada''' in 1971, was a national court of Canada that had limited jurisdiction to hear certain types of disputes arising under the [[Parliament of Canada|federal government]]'s [[Canadian federalism|legislative jurisdiction]]. Originally composed of two divisions, the Appellate Division and the Trial Division, in 2003 the Court was split into two separate Courts, the [[Federal Court (Canada)|Federal Court]] and the [[Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)|Federal Court of Appeal]].
The court used facilities as the [[Supreme Court of Canada Building]] as well as [[Thomas D'Arcy McGee Building]] and registry office at 90 Elgin Street.
The court used facilities as the [[Supreme Court of Canada Building]] as well as [[Thomas D'Arcy McGee Building]] and registry office at 90 Elgin Street.


==History==
==History==
===Pre-Confederation to Confederation===
===Pre-Confederation to Confederation===
Prior to [[Canadian Confederation|Confederation]], the predominantly English-speaking [[Canada West]] (which succeeded [[Upper Canada]]) and the predominantly French-speaking [[Canada East]] (which succeeded [[Lower Canada]]) each had a separate system of courts. During pre-Confederation negotiations, the creation of a national court had been contemplated to deal with matters relating to federal law.<ref name=Bushnell>{{cite book |author=Ian Bushnell|authorlink=|title=The Federal Court of Canada: A History, 1875-1992|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=b5nYZTnI5MwC|accessdate=2013-01-06|year=1997|publisher=[[University of Toronto Press]]|location=Toronto|isbn=0-8020-4207-4}}</ref> The ''[[Constitution Act, 1867]]'' thus provided under s. 101 that:
Prior to [[Canadian Confederation|Confederation]], the predominantly English-speaking [[Canada West]] (which succeeded [[Upper Canada]]) and the predominantly French-speaking [[Canada East]] (which succeeded [[Lower Canada]]) each had a separate system of courts. During pre-Confederation negotiations, the creation of a national court had been contemplated to deal with matters relating to federal law.<ref name=Bushnell>{{cite book |author=Ian Bushnell|title=The Federal Court of Canada: A History, 1875-1992|url=https://archive.org/details/federalcourtofca0000bush|url-access=registration|access-date=2013-01-06|year=1997|publisher=[[University of Toronto Press]]|location=Toronto|isbn=0-8020-4207-4}}</ref> The ''[[Constitution Act, 1867]]'' thus provided under s. 101 that:


<blockquote>The Parliament of Canada may, notwithstanding anything in this Act, from Time to Time provide for the Constitution, Maintenance, and Organization of a General Court of Appeal for Canada, and for the Establishment of any additional Courts for the better Administration of the Laws of Canada.<ref>''Constitution Act, 1867'', s 101.</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>The Parliament of Canada may, notwithstanding anything in this Act, from Time to Time provide for the Constitution, Maintenance, and Organization of a General Court of Appeal for Canada, and for the Establishment of any additional Courts for the better Administration of the Laws of Canada.<ref>''Constitution Act, 1867'', s 101.</ref></blockquote>
Line 18: Line 18:
In 1875, the Liberal government of Prime Minister [[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]] passed ''The Supreme and Exchequer Court Act''<ref name=1875Act>{{Cite canlaw|short title =The Supreme and Exchequer Court Act|abbr =S.C.|year =1875|chapter =11|link=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015074701205?urlappend=%3Bseq=275}}</ref> (introduced by Minister of Justice [[Telesphore Fournier]]), which was based on Macdonald's earlier unsuccessful bill of 1870. This act created both the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] and the Exchequer Court. The jurisdiction of the Exchequer Court was provided under sections 58 and 59 of the Act:
In 1875, the Liberal government of Prime Minister [[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]] passed ''The Supreme and Exchequer Court Act''<ref name=1875Act>{{Cite canlaw|short title =The Supreme and Exchequer Court Act|abbr =S.C.|year =1875|chapter =11|link=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015074701205?urlappend=%3Bseq=275}}</ref> (introduced by Minister of Justice [[Telesphore Fournier]]), which was based on Macdonald's earlier unsuccessful bill of 1870. This act created both the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] and the Exchequer Court. The jurisdiction of the Exchequer Court was provided under sections 58 and 59 of the Act:


{{quote|'''58'''. The Exchequer Court shall have and possess concurrent original jurisdiction in the Dominion of Canada, in all cases in which it shall be sought to enforce any law of the Dominion of Canada relating to the revenue, including actions, suits, and proceedings, by way of information, to enforce penalties and proceedings by way of information ''in rem'', and as well in ''qui tam'' suits for penalties or forfeitures as where the suit is on behalf of the Crown alone; and the said Court shall have exclusive original jurisdiction in all cases in which demand shall be made or relief sought in respect of any matter which might in England by the subject of a suit or action in the Court of Exchequer on its revenue side against the Crown, or any officer of the Crown.
{{blockquote|'''58'''. The Exchequer Court shall have and possess concurrent original jurisdiction in the Dominion of Canada, in all cases in which it shall be sought to enforce any law of the Dominion of Canada relating to the revenue, including actions, suits, and proceedings, by way of information, to enforce penalties and proceedings by way of information ''in rem'', and as well in ''qui tam'' suits for penalties or forfeitures as where the suit is on behalf of the Crown alone; and the said Court shall have exclusive original jurisdiction in all cases in which demand shall be made or relief sought in respect of any matter which might in England by the subject of a suit or action in the Court of Exchequer on its revenue side against the Crown, or any officer of the Crown.


'''59'''. The Exchequer Court shall also have concurrent original jurisdiction with the Courts of the several Provinces in all other suits of a civil nature at common law or equity in which the Crown in the interest of the Dominion of Canada is plaintiff or petitioner.<ref name=1875Act/>}}
'''59'''. The Exchequer Court shall also have concurrent original jurisdiction with the Courts of the several Provinces in all other suits of a civil nature at common law or equity in which the Crown in the interest of the Dominion of Canada is plaintiff or petitioner.<ref name=1875Act/>}}


''The Supreme and Exchequer Court Act'' made it clear that the Exchequer Court of Canada was inspired by the [[Exchequer of Pleas|Court of Exchequer]] in England, both in name and in jurisdiction, focusing as it did on matters of revenue.<ref name=Iacobucci>{{cite journal |author=Frank Iacobucci|authorlink=Frank Iacobucci|year= 1990|title= The Federal Court of Canada: Some Comments on its Origin, Traditions and Evolution|journal=Advocates Quarterly|volume=11|issue=|page=318|doi= |pmid= |pmc= |url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/aqrty11&div=26}}{{Subscription needed|via=[[HeinOnline]]}}</ref> In the same year, however, England abolished the Court of Exchequer, merging its jurisdiction into the High Court of Justice.<ref name=Bushnell/> Nonetheless, the jurisdiction provided to the Exchequer Court of Canada initially consisted of:
''The Supreme and Exchequer Court Act'' made it clear that the Exchequer Court of Canada was inspired by the [[Exchequer of Pleas|Court of Exchequer]] in England, both in name and in jurisdiction, focusing as it did on matters of revenue.<ref name=Iacobucci>{{cite journal |author=Frank Iacobucci|author-link=Frank Iacobucci|year= 1990|title= The Federal Court of Canada: Some Comments on its Origin, Traditions and Evolution|journal=Advocates Quarterly|volume=11|page=318|url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/aqrty11&div=26}}{{Subscription required|via=[[HeinOnline]]}}</ref> In the same year, however, England abolished the Court of Exchequer, merging its jurisdiction into the High Court of Justice.<ref name=Bushnell/> Nonetheless, the jurisdiction provided to the Exchequer Court of Canada initially consisted of:


:* concurrent original jurisdiction over all cases relating to the enforcement of the revenue laws;
:* concurrent original jurisdiction over all cases relating to the enforcement of the revenue laws;
Line 29: Line 29:


The independence of the Exchequer Court was not immediately established. Indeed, justices of the Supreme Court also sat as justices of the Exchequer Court in the early years.<ref name=Iacobucci/> The two Courts were not separated until 1887, at which time the functions of the Official Arbitrators were subsumed into the Exchequer Court.<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =An Act to amend "The Supreme and Exchequer Courts Act," and to make better provision for the Trial of Claims against the Crown|abbr =S.C.|year =1887|chapter =16|link=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/coo.31924065701652?urlappend=%3Bseq=296}}</ref> [[George Burbidge|George W. Burbidge]], a [[lawyer]] from [[New Brunswick]], was the first Exchequer Court judge appointed under this new arrangement.<ref name=Iacobucci/> At the same time, the Court's jurisdiction was expanded to include exclusive original jurisdiction over all claims against the Crown.<ref>1887 Act, ss. 15-17</ref>
The independence of the Exchequer Court was not immediately established. Indeed, justices of the Supreme Court also sat as justices of the Exchequer Court in the early years.<ref name=Iacobucci/> The two Courts were not separated until 1887, at which time the functions of the Official Arbitrators were subsumed into the Exchequer Court.<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =An Act to amend "The Supreme and Exchequer Courts Act," and to make better provision for the Trial of Claims against the Crown|abbr =S.C.|year =1887|chapter =16|link=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/coo.31924065701652?urlappend=%3Bseq=296}}</ref> [[George Burbidge|George W. Burbidge]], a [[lawyer]] from [[New Brunswick]], was the first Exchequer Court judge appointed under this new arrangement.<ref name=Iacobucci/> At the same time, the Court's jurisdiction was expanded to include exclusive original jurisdiction over all claims against the Crown.<ref>1887 Act, ss. 15-17</ref>

===Jurisdiction over railway insolvency===
Beginning in 1901, [[railway]]s gained the ability under the ''Railway Act'' to apply to the Court to secure a [[scheme of arrangement]] in the event of [[insolvency]].<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =An Act to amend the Railway Act|abbr =S.C.|year =1901|chapter =31|link=https://archive.org/stream/actsofparl1901v01cana#page/142/mode/2up}}, later consolidated as {{Cite canlaw|short title =The Railway Act, 1903|abbr =S.C.|year =1903|chapter =58|part=XIII|link=https://archive.org/stream/actsofparl1903v01cana#page/380/mode/2up}}</ref>


===Acquisition of admiralty jurisdiction===
===Acquisition of admiralty jurisdiction===
While s. 96 of the ''BNA Act, 1867'' constituted the superior courts in the provinces, [[admiralty law]] jurisdiction was not conferred on them, which continued to be vested in the [[admiralty court|vice-admiralty court]]s under the British ''Vice Admiralty Courts Act, 1863''.<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =Vice-Admiralty Courts Act 1863|abbr =|year =1863|chapter =24|link=https://ucadia.s3.amazonaws.com/statutes_uk/1800_1899/uk_1863_26&27Vict_c24_vice_admiralty_court.pdf}}</ref> Separate courts existed in [[British Columbia]], [[Lower Canada]], [[New Brunswick]] and [[Nova Scotia]].<ref>1863 Act, Schedule A</ref> The absence of such a court for Ontario led to the [[Parliament of Canada]], exercising its power under s. 101, to create the Maritime Court of Ontario through the passage of the ''Maritime Jurisdiction Act 1877''.<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =The Maritime Jurisdiction Act, 1877|abbr =S.C.|year =1877|chapter =21|link=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015074701221?urlappend=%3Bseq=285}}</ref> This was held to be a valid exercise of federal jurisdiction by the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] in 1879.<ref>{{cite CanLII|litigants=The Picton|link=|year=1879|court=scc|num=42|format=canlii|parallelcite=4 SCR 648|date=1879-12-13}}</ref>
While s. 96 of the ''BNA Act, 1867'' constituted the superior courts in the provinces, [[admiralty law]] jurisdiction was not conferred on them, which continued to be vested in the [[admiralty court|vice-admiralty court]]s under the British [[Vice Admiralty Courts Act 1863]] ([[26 & 27 Vict.]] c. 24 (UK)).<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =Vice-Admiralty Courts Act 1863|abbr =|year =1863|chapter =24|link=https://ucadia.s3.amazonaws.com/statutes_uk/1800_1899/uk_1863_26&27Vict_c24_vice_admiralty_court.pdf}}</ref> Separate courts existed in [[British Columbia]], [[Lower Canada]], [[New Brunswick]] and [[Nova Scotia]].<ref>1863 Act, Schedule A</ref> The absence of such a court for Ontario led to the [[Parliament of Canada]], exercising its power under s. 101, to create the [[Maritime Court of Ontario]] through the passage of the ''Maritime Jurisdiction Act 1877''.<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =The Maritime Jurisdiction Act, 1877|abbr =S.C.|year =1877|chapter =21|link=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015074701221?urlappend=%3Bseq=285}}</ref> This was held to be a valid exercise of federal jurisdiction by the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] in 1879.<ref>{{cite CanLII|litigants=The Picton|link=|year=1879|court=scc|num=42|format=canlii|parallelcite=4 SCR 648|date=1879-12-13}}</ref>


This mix of courts was rationalized after the [[British Parliament]] passed the ''Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890'',<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890|abbr =|year =1890|chapter =27|link=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1890/27/pdfs/ukpga_18900027_en.pdf}}</ref> where British possessions were authorized to create their own courts of [[admiralty jurisdiction]].<ref>1890 Act, s. 3</ref> This was followed shortly with the passage of the ''Admiralty Act 1891'',<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =The Admiralty Act, 1891|abbr =S.C.|year =1891|chapter =29|link=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015074700934?urlappend=%3Bseq=320}}</ref> which consolidated such jurisdiction throughout Canada in the Exchequeur Court of Canada, which under the British Act "may exercise such jurisdiction in like manner and to as full an extent as the [[High Court of Justice|High Court in England]], and shall have the same regard as that Court to [[international law]] and the [[comity of nations]]."<ref>1890 Act, s. 2(2)</ref>
This mix of courts was rationalized after the [[British Parliament]] passed the ''Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890'',<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890|abbr =|year =1890|chapter =27|link=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1890/27/pdfs/ukpga_18900027_en.pdf}}</ref> where British possessions were authorized to create their own courts of [[admiralty jurisdiction]].<ref>1890 Act, s. 3</ref> This was followed shortly with the passage of the ''Admiralty Act 1891'',<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =The Admiralty Act, 1891|abbr =S.C.|year =1891|chapter =29|link=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015074700934?urlappend=%3Bseq=320}}</ref> which consolidated such jurisdiction throughout Canada in the Exchequeur Court of Canada, which under the British Act could "exercise such jurisdiction in like manner and to as full an extent as the [[High Court of Justice|High Court in England]], and shall have the same regard as that Court to [[international law]] and the [[comity of nations]]."<ref>1890 Act, s. 2(2)</ref>


The extent of this jurisdiction was held to be only that which existed on 1 July 1891, in an appeal decided in 1927 by the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]].<ref>{{cite BAILII|litigants=The Yuri Maru|link=|court=UKPC|year=1927|num=69|parallelcite=[1927] AC 906, (1927) 28 Ll L Rep 221|date=5 July 1927|juris=Canada}}</ref> This situation only changed after the ''[[Statute of Westminster 1931]]'' came into force, after which Canada passed the ''Admiralty Act 1934'',<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =The Admiralty Act, 1934|abbr =S.C.|year =1934|chapter =31|link=https://archive.org/stream/actsofparl1934v01cana#page/299/mode/1up}}</ref> which broadened Canadian admiralty jurisdiction to match that of the High Court of England at that time:
The extent of this jurisdiction was held to be only that which existed on 1 July 1891, in an appeal decided in 1927 by the [[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]].<ref>{{cite BAILII|litigants=The Yuri Maru|link=|court=UKPC|year=1927|num=69|parallelcite=[1927] AC 906, (1927) 28 Ll L Rep 221|date=5 July 1927|juris=Canada}}</ref> This situation only changed after the ''[[Statute of Westminster 1931]]'' came into force, after which Canada passed the ''Admiralty Act 1934'',<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =The Admiralty Act, 1934|abbr =S.C.|year =1934|chapter =31|link=https://archive.org/stream/actsofparl1934v01cana#page/299/mode/1up}}</ref> which broadened Canadian admiralty jurisdiction to match that of the High Court of England at that time:
{{quote|'''18'''(1) The jurisdiction of the Court on its Admiralty side shall extend to and be exercised in respect of all navigable waters, tidal and non-tidal, whether naturally navigable or artificially made so, and although such waters be within the body of a county or other judicial district, and, generally, such jurisdiction shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, be over the like places, persons, matters and things as the Admiralty jurisdiction now possessed by the High Court of Justice in England, whether existing by virtue of any statute or otherwise, and be exercised by the Court in like manner and to as full an extent as by such High Court.<ref>1934 Act, s. 18</ref>}}
{{blockquote|'''18'''(1) The jurisdiction of the Court on its Admiralty side shall extend to and be exercised in respect of all navigable waters, tidal and non-tidal, whether naturally navigable or artificially made so, and although such waters be within the body of a county or other judicial district, and, generally, such jurisdiction shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, be over the like places, persons, matters and things as the Admiralty jurisdiction now possessed by the High Court of Justice in England, whether existing by virtue of any statute or otherwise, and be exercised by the Court in like manner and to as full an extent as by such High Court.<ref>1934 Act, s. 18</ref>}}


===Federal Court of Canada===
===Federal Court of Canada===
In 1971, the '''Federal Court of Canada''' was established, consisting of two divisions (the "Federal Court &ndash; Trial Division" and the "Federal Court &ndash; Appeal Division"), inheriting much of the jurisdiction of the Exchequer Court.<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =Federal Court Act|abbr =S.C.|year =1970-72|chapter =1|link=https://archive.org/details/actsofparl197072v01cana/page/1}}</ref> The Federal Court of Canada gained the jurisdiction to hear judicial reviews from federal agencies and tribunals.<ref>1970-72 Act, s. 18</ref> With respect to maritime jurisdiction, the Trial Division was declared to have:
In 1971, the '''Federal Court of Canada''' was established, consisting of two divisions (the "Federal Court &ndash; Trial Division" and the "Federal Court &ndash; Appeal Division"), inheriting much of the jurisdiction of the Exchequer Court.<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =Federal Court Act|abbr =S.C.|year =1970-72|chapter =1|link=https://archive.org/details/actsofparl197072v01cana/page/1}}</ref> The Federal Court of Canada gained the jurisdiction to hear judicial reviews from federal agencies and tribunals.<ref>1970-72 Act, s. 18</ref> With respect to maritime jurisdiction, the Trial Division was declared to have:


{{quote|concurrent original jurisdiction ... in all cases in which a claim for relief is made or a remedy is sought under or by virtue of Canadian maritime law or any other law of Canada relating to any matter coming within the class of subject of navigation and shipping except to the extent that jurisdiction has been otherwise specially assigned.<ref>1970-72 Act, s. 22(1)</ref>}}
{{blockquote|concurrent original jurisdiction ... in all cases in which a claim for relief is made or a remedy is sought under or by virtue of Canadian maritime law or any other law of Canada relating to any matter coming within the class of subject of navigation and shipping except to the extent that jurisdiction has been otherwise specially assigned.<ref>1970-72 Act, s. 22(1)</ref>}}


On July 2, 2003 the Court was split into two separate Courts, with the "Trial Division" continued as the [[Federal Court (Canada)|Federal Court]] and the "Appeal Division" continued as the [[Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)|Federal Court of Appeal]].<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =Courts Administration Service Act |abbr =S.C.|year =2002|chapter =8|section=13-58|link=https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/AnnualStatutes/2002_8/FullText.html}}</ref>
On July 2, 2003, the Court was split into two separate Courts, with the "Trial Division" continued as the [[Federal Court (Canada)|Federal Court]] and the "Appeal Division" continued as the [[Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)|Federal Court of Appeal]].<ref>{{Cite canlaw|short title =Courts Administration Service Act |abbr =S.C.|year =2002|chapter =8|section=13-58|link=https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/AnnualStatutes/2002_8/FullText.html}}</ref>


Until 1976, there was substantial judicial support<ref>{{cite journal |author= Stephen A. Scott|year= 1982|title= Canadian Federal Courts and the Constitutional Limits of Their Jurisdiction|journal= [[McGill Law Journal]]|volume= 27|issue= 2|pages= 137{{endash}}195|publisher= [[McGill Law School]]|doi= |pmid= |pmc= |url=http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/userfiles/other/3336476-scott.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite BAILII|litigants=Consolidated Distilleries, Limited, and another v The King|link=|court=UKPC|year=1933|num=34|para=|format=1|parallelcite=[1933] AC 508|date=10 April 1933|courtname=[[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council|P.C.]]|juris=Canada}}</ref> for the view that Parliament could give a federal court jurisdiction over any matter (even a matter not regulated by federal statute law), on the basis that "the Laws of Canada" meant not only federal statutes, but provincial ones as well. However, in ''Quebec North Shore Paper Co. v. Canadian Pacific'',<ref>{{cite CanLII|litigants=Quebec North Shore Paper v. C.P. Ltd.|link=|year=1976|court=scc|num=10|format=canlii|pinpoint=|parallelcite=[1977] 2 SCR 1054|date=1976-06-29|courtname=|juris=}}</ref> the Supreme Court of Canada rejected this notion, as:
Until 1976, there was substantial judicial support<ref>{{cite journal|author= Stephen A. Scott|year= 1982|title= Canadian Federal Courts and the Constitutional Limits of Their Jurisdiction|journal= [[McGill Law Journal]]|volume= 27|issue= 2|pages= 137{{endash}}195|publisher= [[McGill Law School]]|url= http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/userfiles/other/3336476-scott.pdf|access-date= 2019-01-25|archive-date= 2019-01-26|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190126061152/http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/userfiles/other/3336476-scott.pdf|url-status= dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite BAILII|litigants=Consolidated Distilleries, Limited, and another v The King|link=|court=UKPC|year=1933|num=34|para=|format=1|parallelcite=[1933] AC 508|date=10 April 1933|courtname=[[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council|P.C.]]|juris=Canada}}</ref> for the view that Parliament could give a federal court jurisdiction over any matter (even a matter not regulated by federal statute law), on the basis that "the Laws of Canada" meant not only federal statutes, but provincial ones as well. However, in ''Quebec North Shore Paper Co. v. Canadian Pacific'',<ref>{{cite CanLII|litigants=Quebec North Shore Paper v. C.P. Ltd.|link=|year=1976|court=scc|num=10|format=canlii|pinpoint=|parallelcite=[1977] 2 SCR 1054|date=1976-06-29|courtname=|juris=}}</ref> the Supreme Court of Canada rejected this notion, as:


:* provincial law is not ''[[pro tanto]]'' federal law, nor can it be transposed into federal law for the purposes of giving jurisdiction to the Federal Court.
:* provincial law is not ''[[pro tanto]]'' federal law, nor can it be transposed into federal law for the purposes of giving jurisdiction to the Federal Court.
Line 54: Line 57:
The Court consisted of a first-level trial court, known as the '''Federal Court of Canada &ndash; Trial Division''', and an appellate Court, known as the '''Federal Court of Canada &ndash; Appeal Division''' (more commonly referred to as the '''Federal Court of Appeal''').
The Court consisted of a first-level trial court, known as the '''Federal Court of Canada &ndash; Trial Division''', and an appellate Court, known as the '''Federal Court of Canada &ndash; Appeal Division''' (more commonly referred to as the '''Federal Court of Appeal''').


The '''Trial Division''' had jurisdiction to hear judicial review of decisions of federal boards and tribunals, including most immigration matters, as well as jurisdiction in [[admiralty]], [[intellectual property]], and disputes involving the federal government.
The '''Trial Division''' had jurisdiction to hear judicial review of decisions of federal boards and tribunals, including most immigration matters, as well as jurisdiction in [[Admiralty law|admiralty]], [[intellectual property]], and disputes involving the federal government.


The '''Appeal Division''' had jurisdiction to hear appeals of decisions of the '''Trial Division''', as well as to determine applications for judicial review of decisions made by specific boards and tribunals, set out in section 28 of the [[Federal Court Act]]. Decisions of the '''Appeal Division''' could be appealed to the [[Supreme Court of Canada]], but only if leave (permission) was granted by either court.
The '''Appeal Division''' had jurisdiction to hear appeals of decisions of the '''Trial Division''', as well as to determine applications for judicial review of decisions made by specific boards and tribunals, set out in section 28 of the [[Federal Court Act]]. Decisions of the '''Appeal Division''' could be appealed to the [[Supreme Court of Canada]], but only if leave (permission) was granted by either court.
Line 67: Line 70:
===Presidents of the Exchequer Court of Canada===
===Presidents of the Exchequer Court of Canada===


The position of President of the Court was not created until 1923. Before that time, justices of the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] sat as judges of the Exchequer Court from 1875 to 1887, at which time [[George Burbidge|George Wheelock Burbidge]] was appointed as the first full-time judge of the Court. He served until 1908. when [[Walter Gibson Pringle Cassels]] was appointed. In 1912, authority was given to appoint an associate judge to the Court, and [[Louis Arthur Audette]] was appointed to that position. In 1945, authority was given to appoint more judges to the Court.
The position of President of the Court was not created until 1923. Before that time, justices of the [[Supreme Court of Canada]] sat as judges of the Exchequer Court from 1875 to 1887, at which time [[George Burbidge|George Wheelock Burbidge]] was appointed as the first full-time judge of the Court. He served until 1908. when [[Walter Cassels]] was appointed. In 1912, authority was given to appoint an associate judge to the Court, and [[Louis Arthur Audette]] was appointed to that position. In 1945, authority was given to appoint more judges to the Court.


From 1923, the Presidents of the Court were:
From 1923, the Presidents of the Court were:


* [[Walter Gibson Pringle Cassels]], 1920{{endash}}1923
* [[Walter Cassels|Sir Walter Gibson Pringle Cassels]], 1920{{endash}}1923
* [[Alexander Kenneth Maclean]], 1923{{endash}}1942
* [[Alexander Kenneth Maclean]], 1923{{endash}}1942
* [[Joseph Thorarinn Thorson]], 1942{{endash}}1964
* [[Joseph Thorarinn Thorson]], 1942{{endash}}1964
Line 77: Line 80:


==Judges==
==Judges==
===Current Judges===
===Current judges===


{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Name<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Bio |title=Archived copy |access-date=2018-02-11 |archive-date=2018-02-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180212083244/http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Bio |url-status=dead }}</ref>
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
! Name<ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Bio]</ref>
! Appointed
! Appointed
! Nominated By
! Nominated By
! class="unsortable"|Prior Position(s)
|-
|-
|Chief Justice Paul Crampton <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Crampton]</ref> || || ||
|Chief Justice Paul Crampton || 2011 (CJ) <br /> 2009 || Harper
|-
|-
|Associate Chief Justice Jocelyne Gagné || 2018 (ACJ) <br /> 2012 || Trudeau (ACJ) <br /> Harper
|Justice Elizabeth Heneghan <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Heneghan]</ref>|| 1999 || Jean Chretien ||
|-
|-
|Associate Chief Justice A. Kristian Kennedy || 2022 (ACJ) <br /> 2013 || Trudeau (ACJ) <br /> Harper
|Justice Luc Martineau <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Martineau]</ref>|| 2002 || ||
|-
|-
|Justice James O'Reilly|| || ||
|Justice Sandra Simpson || 1993 || Mulroney
|-
|-
|Justice Richard Mosley|| || ||
|Justice Elizabeth Heneghan || 1999 || Chretien
|-
|-
|Justice Michel M.J. Shore || || ||
|Justice Luc Martineau || 2002 || Chretien
|-
|-
|Justice Anne L. Mactavish|| || ||
|Justice Simon Noël || 2002 || Chretien
|-
|-
|Justice James O'Reilly || 2002 || Chretien
|Justice Robert L. Barnes <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Barnes]</ref>||November 22, 2005 || ||
|-
|-
|Justice Richard Mosley || 2003 || Chretien
|Justice Russel W. Zinn <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Zinn]</ref>||February 20, 2008 || Stephen Harper||
|-
|-
|Justice Jocelyne Gagné|| || ||
|Justice Michel M.J. Shore || 2003 || Chretien
|-
|-
|Justice Catherine M. Kane|| || ||
|Justice Michael Phelan || 2003 || Chretien
|-
|-
|Justice Michael D. Manson|| || ||
|Justice Robert L. Barnes || 2005 || Martin
|-
|-
|Justice Yvan Roy|| || ||
|Justice Russel W. Zinn || 2008 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Cecily Y. Strickland|| || ||
|Justice Catherine M. Kane || 2012 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Peter B. Annis|| || ||
|Justice Michael D. Manson || 2012 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Glennys L. McVeigh|| || ||
|Justice [[Yvan Roy (justice)|Yvan Roy]] || 2012 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice René LeBlanc|| || ||
|Justice [[Cecily Strickland|Cecily Y. Strickland]] || 2012 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Martine St-Louis|| || ||
|Justice Peter B. Annis || 2013 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice George R. Locke|| || ||
|Justice Glennys L. McVeigh || 2013 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Henry S. Brown|| || ||
|Justice Martine St-Louis || 2014 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Alan Diner|| || ||
|Justice Henry S. Brown || 2014 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Keith M. Boswell|| || ||
|Justice Alan Diner || 2014 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Simon Fothergill|| || ||
|Justice Simon Fothergill || 2014 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice B. Richard Bell|| || ||
|Justice B. Richard Bell|| 2015 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Denis Gascon <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Bio/Gascon]</ref>|| February 26, 2015 || Stephen Harper ||
|Justice Denis Gascon || 2015 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Richard F. Southcott|| || ||
|Justice Richard F. Southcott || 2015 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice Patrick K. Gleeson|| || ||
|Justice Patrick K. Gleeson|| 2015 || Harper
|-
|-
|Justice E. Susan Elliott || 2015 || Harper
|Justice E. Susan Elliott <ref>{{cite news |title=Federal Court Judicial Appointments Announced |url=https://www.canada.ca/en/news/archive/2015/06/federal-court-judicial-appointments-announced.html#wb-cont |accessdate=18 July 2018}}</ref>||June 26, 2015 || Stephen Harper|| Good Elliott Hawkins LLP [Kingston] (1981 to 2015)
|-
|-
|Justice Sylvie E. Roussel || 2015 || Harper
|Justice Sylvie E. Roussel <ref>{{cite news |title=Federal Court Judicial Appointments Announced |url=https://www.canada.ca/en/news/archive/2015/06/federal-court-judicial-appointments-announced.html#wb-cont |accessdate=18 July 2018}}</ref>|| June 26, 2015 ||Stephen Harper || Intelligence Review Committee (2007 to 2015)<br>Noël & Associés (1987 to 2007)
|-
|-
|Justice Ann Marie McDonald || 2015 || Harper
|Justice Ann Marie McDonald <ref>{{cite news |title=Federal Court Judicial Appointments Announced |url=https://www.canada.ca/en/news/archive/2015/06/federal-court-judicial-appointments-announced.html#wb-cont |accessdate=18 July 2018}}</ref>|| June 26, 2015 || Stephen Harper || McInnes Cooper (Fredericton) (2000 to 2015)<br>Allen Dixon Bell (1995 to 2000)
|-
|-
|Justice Roger Lafrenière|| || ||
|Justice Roger Lafrenière || 2016 || Trudeau
|-
|-
|Justice William F. Pentney|| || ||
|Justice William F. Pentney || 2017 || Trudeau
|-
|-
|Justice Shirzad S. Ahmed|| || ||
|Justice Shirzad S. Ahmed || 2017 || Trudeau
|-
|-
|Justice Sébastien Grammond|| || ||
|Justice Sébastien Grammond || 2017 || Trudeau
|-
|-
|Justice Paul Favel|| || ||
|Justice Paul Favel || 2017 || Trudeau
|}
|-
|Justice Elizabeth Walker || 2018 || Trudeau

|-
'''Supernumerary'''
|Justice John Norris || 2018 || Trudeau
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|- bgcolor="#CCCCCC"
|Justice Peter Pamel || 2019 || Trudeau
! Name
|-
! Appointed
|Justice Nicholas McHaffie || 2019 || Trudeau
! Nominated By
|-
! class="unsortable"|Prior Position(s)
|Justice Janet Fuhrer || 2019 || Trudeau
|-
|-
|Justice Christine Pallotta || 2020 || Trudeau
|Justice Douglas R. Campbell <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Campbell]</ref> || || ||
|-
|-
|Justice Sean J. Harrington || || ||
|Justice Andrew Little || 2020 || Trudeau
|-
|-
|Justice Leonard S. Mandamin || || ||
|Justice Angela Furlanetto || 2021 || Trudeau
|-
|-
|Justice Lobat Sadrehashemi || 2021 || Trudeau
|Justice Simon Noël <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/SNoel]</ref> ||August 8, 2002 || || Noël & Associates (1977–79)<br> Noël, Décary, Aubry & Associés (1979–90)<br> Noël, Berthiaume, Aubry (1990–93)<br> Noël, Berthiaume (1994–98)<Br> Noël & Associates (1998–2002)<br>
|-
|-
|Justice Michael L. Phelan || || ||
|Justice Avvy Yao-Yao Go || 2021 || Trudeau
|-
|-
|Justice Mandy Aylen || 2021 || Trudeau
|Justice James Russell <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Russell]</ref> ||December 11, 2002 || ||
|-
|-
|Justice Vanessa Rochester || 2021 || Trudeau
|Justice Sandra J. Simpson <ref>[http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Simpson]</ref> || 1993 || || Fraser Milner Casgrain (1975 to 1993)
|-
|}
|}


===Previous Judges===
===Prior judges===
The judges of this court are listed below.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Former_Judges_Protho |publisher=Federal Court (Canada) |title=Former Judges and Prothonotaries |accessdate=February 1, 2012}}</ref>
The judges of this court are listed below.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Former_Judges_Protho |publisher=Federal Court (Canada) |title=Former Judges and Prothonotaries |access-date=February 1, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120209085207/http://cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/portal/page/portal/fc_cf_en/Former_Judges_Protho |archive-date=February 9, 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


:{{Color box|lightblue|border=darkgray}} = former judge of the Exchequer Court of Canada
:{{Color box|lightblue|border=darkgray}} = former judge of the Exchequer Court of Canada
Line 204: Line 207:
|Camilien Noël || || ||style="background:lightblue;"|June 1, 1971 || ||July 4, 1975 || ||
|Camilien Noël || || ||style="background:lightblue;"|June 1, 1971 || ||July 4, 1975 || ||
|-
|-
|Jacques Dumoulin || ||style="background:lightblue;"|June 1, 1971 || || ||December 1, 1972 || ||
|[[Jacques Dumoulin]]|| ||style="background:lightblue;"|June 1, 1971 || || ||December 1, 1972 || ||
|-
|-
|[[Arthur L. Thurlow]] || ||style="background:lightblue;"|June 1, 1971 ||December 4, 1975 ||January 4, 1980 ||May 5, 1988 || ||
|[[Arthur L. Thurlow]] || ||style="background:lightblue;"|June 1, 1971 ||December 4, 1975 ||January 4, 1980 ||May 5, 1988 || ||
Line 232: Line 235:
|William F. Ryan || ||April 11, 1974 || || ||August 1, 1986 || ||
|William F. Ryan || ||April 11, 1974 || || ||August 1, 1986 || ||
|-
|-
|Jean-Eudes Dubé ||April 9, 1975 || || || ||November 6, 2001 || ||
|[[Jean-Eudes Dubé]]||April 9, 1975 || || || ||November 6, 2001 || ||
|-
|-
|[[Gerald Le Dain]] || ||September 1, 1975 || || ||May 28, 1984<ref name="ReferenceA">Elevated to the Supreme Court of Canada</ref> || ||
|[[Gerald Le Dain]] || ||September 1, 1975 || || ||May 28, 1984<ref name="ReferenceA">Elevated to the Supreme Court of Canada</ref> || ||
Line 266: Line 269:
|Leonard Martin ||October 29, 1985 || || || ||October 24, 1991 || ||
|Leonard Martin ||October 29, 1985 || || || ||October 24, 1991 || ||
|-
|-
|Max M. Teitlebaum ||October 29, 1985 || || || || ||{{Y&}}<ref>Served until January 27, 2007.</ref> ||
|[[Max M. Teitelbaum]]||October 29, 1985 || || || || ||{{Y&}}<ref>Served until January 27, 2007.</ref> ||
|-
|-
|[[Alice Desjardins]] || ||June 29, 1987 || || || || ||{{Y&}}<ref>Served until August 11, 2009.</ref>
|Alice Desjardins || ||June 29, 1987 || || || || ||{{Y&}}<ref>Served until August 11, 2009.</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Frank Iacobucci]] || || || ||September 2, 1988 ||January 6, 1991<ref name="ReferenceA"/> || ||
|[[Frank Iacobucci]] || || || ||September 2, 1988 ||January 6, 1991<ref name="ReferenceA"/> || ||
Line 274: Line 277:
|[[William Andrew MacKay|W. Andrew MacKay]] ||September 2, 1988 || || || || ||{{Y&}}<ref>Served until March 20, 2004.</ref> ||
|[[William Andrew MacKay|W. Andrew MacKay]] ||September 2, 1988 || || || || ||{{Y&}}<ref>Served until March 20, 2004.</ref> ||
|-
|-
|[[Robert Décary]] || || March 14, 1990 || || ||July 1, 2001 || ||
|Robert Décary || || March 14, 1990 || || ||July 1, 2001 || ||
|-
|-
|[[Allen Linden|Allen M. Linden]] || ||July 5, 1990 || || ||October 7, 2009 || ||
|[[Allen Linden|Allen M. Linden]] || ||July 5, 1990 || || ||October 7, 2009 || ||
Line 322: Line 325:
|[[Johanne Gauthier]] ||December 11, 2002 || || || || ||{{Y&}}<ref>Served until October 21, 2011, before being elevated to the Federal Court of Appeal.</ref> ||
|[[Johanne Gauthier]] ||December 11, 2002 || || || || ||{{Y&}}<ref>Served until October 21, 2011, before being elevated to the Federal Court of Appeal.</ref> ||
|-
|-
| Robin Camp <ref>[https://www.canada.ca/en/news/archive/2015/06/federal-court-judicial-appointments-announced.html]</ref> || || || || || || ||
| Robin Camp <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.canada.ca/en/news/archive/2015/06/federal-court-judicial-appointments-announced.html|title=Federal Court Judicial Appointments Announced|last=Service Canada|date=June 26, 2015|website=gcnws}}</ref> || || || || || || ||
|}
|}


Line 330: Line 333:


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{Reflist|2}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* {{cite journal |last1= Stone|first1= Arthur J.|date= |title= Canada's Admiralty Court in the Twentieth Century|url= http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/userfiles/other/2324371-47.3.Stone.pdf|journal= [[McGill Law Journal]]|volume= 47|issue= 3|pages= 511-558}}
* {{cite journal|last1= Stone|first1= Arthur J.|title= Canada's Admiralty Court in the Twentieth Century|url= http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/userfiles/other/2324371-47.3.Stone.pdf|journal= [[McGill Law Journal]]|volume= 47|issue= 3|pages= 511–558|access-date= 2019-01-25|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171020094833/http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/userfiles/other/2324371-47.3.Stone.pdf|archive-date= 2017-10-20|url-status= dead}}
* {{cite book |author= Ian Bushnell|authorlink= |title= The Federal Court of Canada: A History, 1875-1992|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=b5nYZTnI5MwC&lpg=PA346&ots=kjRmCB5VuF&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false|accessdate= 2013-01-06|year= 1997|publisher= [[University of Toronto Press]]|location= Toronto|isbn= 0-8020-4207-4}}
* {{cite book |author= Ian Bushnell|title= The Federal Court of Canada: A History, 1875-1992|url= https://archive.org/details/federalcourtofca0000bush|url-access= registration|page= [https://archive.org/details/federalcourtofca0000bush/page/346 346]|access-date= 2013-01-06|year= 1997|publisher= [[University of Toronto Press]]|location= Toronto|isbn= 0-8020-4207-4}}
*Louis Arthur Audette. The Practice of the Exchequer Court of Canada. Printed at the office of Thoburn. 1895. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=LlYiAAAAYAAJ Google Books]. Second Edition. Copeland-Chatterson-Crain. 1909. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=oFQ1AQAAMAAJ Google Books]
*Louis Arthur Audette. The Practice of the Exchequer Court of Canada. Printed at the office of Thoburn. 1895. [https://books.google.com/books?id=LlYiAAAAYAAJ Google Books]. Second Edition. Copeland-Chatterson-Crain. 1909. [https://books.google.com/books?id=oFQ1AQAAMAAJ Google Books]
*Robert Cassels. Manual of Procedure in the Supreme and Exchequer Courts of Canada. R Carswell. Toronto. 1877. [https://archive.org/details/cihm_10548 Internet Archive]
*Robert Cassels. Manual of Procedure in the Supreme and Exchequer Courts of Canada. R Carswell. Toronto. 1877. [https://archive.org/details/cihm_10548 Internet Archive]


==External links==
==External links==
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20021017084814/http://www.fct-cf.gc.ca/index_e.html Official web site as of October 2002] (via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine)
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20021017084814/http://www.fct-cf.gc.ca/index_e.html Official web site as of October 2002] (via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine)
*[http://laws.justice.gc.ca/PDF/Annual/2/2002_8.pdf Courts Administration Service Act, S.C. 2002, c. 8] (restructuring the Court, effective July 2, 2003) (as originally enacted)
*[http://laws.justice.gc.ca/PDF/Annual/2/2002_8.pdf Courts Administration Service Act, S.C. 2002, c. 8]{{Dead link|date=November 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} (restructuring the Court, effective July 2, 2003) (as originally enacted)


[[Category:Federal Court of Canada| ]]
[[Category:Defunct courts]]
[[Category:Defunct courts]]
[[Category:Federal Court of Canada]]
[[Category:Canadian appellate courts|Federal Court of Canada (now defunct)]]
[[Category:Canadian appellate courts|Federal Court of Canada (now defunct)]]
[[Category:Legal history of Canada]]
[[Category:Legal history of Canada]]
[[Category:1971 establishments in Canada]]
[[Category:1971 establishments in Canada]]
[[Category:2003 disestablishments in Canada]]
[[Category:2003 disestablishments in Canada]]
[[Category:Courts and tribunals established in 1971]]
[[Category:Courts and tribunals disestablished in 2005]]

Latest revision as of 18:24, 1 August 2024

The Federal Court of Canada, which succeeded the Exchequer Court of Canada in 1971, was a national court of Canada that had limited jurisdiction to hear certain types of disputes arising under the federal government's legislative jurisdiction. Originally composed of two divisions, the Appellate Division and the Trial Division, in 2003 the Court was split into two separate Courts, the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal. The court used facilities as the Supreme Court of Canada Building as well as Thomas D'Arcy McGee Building and registry office at 90 Elgin Street.

History

[edit]

Pre-Confederation to Confederation

[edit]

Prior to Confederation, the predominantly English-speaking Canada West (which succeeded Upper Canada) and the predominantly French-speaking Canada East (which succeeded Lower Canada) each had a separate system of courts. During pre-Confederation negotiations, the creation of a national court had been contemplated to deal with matters relating to federal law.[1] The Constitution Act, 1867 thus provided under s. 101 that:

The Parliament of Canada may, notwithstanding anything in this Act, from Time to Time provide for the Constitution, Maintenance, and Organization of a General Court of Appeal for Canada, and for the Establishment of any additional Courts for the better Administration of the Laws of Canada.[2]

Despite the language in the constitution, a national court was not established until 1875.[1] Prime Minister John A. Macdonald made several attempts between 1869 and 1873 to create a national court under the powers granted to Parliament under s. 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867.[1] However, these early attempts were rebuffed due to concerns over jurisdiction, particularly because the early proposals would have established a federal Supreme Court exercising both original (trial) jurisdiction and concurrent appellate jurisdiction potentially in conflict with existing courts administered by Ontario and Quebec.[1]

While no court per se was created, provision was made for the appointment of Official Arbitrators,[3] whose decisions soon became subject to a final appeal to a Board of Arbitrators,[4] until a further right of appeal to the new Exchequer Court was created in 1879.[5]

Exchequer Court

[edit]

In 1875, the Liberal government of Prime Minister Alexander Mackenzie passed The Supreme and Exchequer Court Act[6] (introduced by Minister of Justice Telesphore Fournier), which was based on Macdonald's earlier unsuccessful bill of 1870. This act created both the Supreme Court of Canada and the Exchequer Court. The jurisdiction of the Exchequer Court was provided under sections 58 and 59 of the Act:

58. The Exchequer Court shall have and possess concurrent original jurisdiction in the Dominion of Canada, in all cases in which it shall be sought to enforce any law of the Dominion of Canada relating to the revenue, including actions, suits, and proceedings, by way of information, to enforce penalties and proceedings by way of information in rem, and as well in qui tam suits for penalties or forfeitures as where the suit is on behalf of the Crown alone; and the said Court shall have exclusive original jurisdiction in all cases in which demand shall be made or relief sought in respect of any matter which might in England by the subject of a suit or action in the Court of Exchequer on its revenue side against the Crown, or any officer of the Crown. 59. The Exchequer Court shall also have concurrent original jurisdiction with the Courts of the several Provinces in all other suits of a civil nature at common law or equity in which the Crown in the interest of the Dominion of Canada is plaintiff or petitioner.[6]

The Supreme and Exchequer Court Act made it clear that the Exchequer Court of Canada was inspired by the Court of Exchequer in England, both in name and in jurisdiction, focusing as it did on matters of revenue.[7] In the same year, however, England abolished the Court of Exchequer, merging its jurisdiction into the High Court of Justice.[1] Nonetheless, the jurisdiction provided to the Exchequer Court of Canada initially consisted of:

  • concurrent original jurisdiction over all cases relating to the enforcement of the revenue laws;
  • exclusive original jurisdiction over any demand or relief sought in like manner as the English Court of Exchequer in its revenue side; and
  • concurrent original jurisdiction over all civil cases where the Crown is the plaintiff or petitioner.

The independence of the Exchequer Court was not immediately established. Indeed, justices of the Supreme Court also sat as justices of the Exchequer Court in the early years.[7] The two Courts were not separated until 1887, at which time the functions of the Official Arbitrators were subsumed into the Exchequer Court.[8] George W. Burbidge, a lawyer from New Brunswick, was the first Exchequer Court judge appointed under this new arrangement.[7] At the same time, the Court's jurisdiction was expanded to include exclusive original jurisdiction over all claims against the Crown.[9]

Jurisdiction over railway insolvency

[edit]

Beginning in 1901, railways gained the ability under the Railway Act to apply to the Court to secure a scheme of arrangement in the event of insolvency.[10]

Acquisition of admiralty jurisdiction

[edit]

While s. 96 of the BNA Act, 1867 constituted the superior courts in the provinces, admiralty law jurisdiction was not conferred on them, which continued to be vested in the vice-admiralty courts under the British Vice Admiralty Courts Act 1863 (26 & 27 Vict. c. 24 (UK)).[11] Separate courts existed in British Columbia, Lower Canada, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.[12] The absence of such a court for Ontario led to the Parliament of Canada, exercising its power under s. 101, to create the Maritime Court of Ontario through the passage of the Maritime Jurisdiction Act 1877.[13] This was held to be a valid exercise of federal jurisdiction by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1879.[14]

This mix of courts was rationalized after the British Parliament passed the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890,[15] where British possessions were authorized to create their own courts of admiralty jurisdiction.[16] This was followed shortly with the passage of the Admiralty Act 1891,[17] which consolidated such jurisdiction throughout Canada in the Exchequeur Court of Canada, which under the British Act could "exercise such jurisdiction in like manner and to as full an extent as the High Court in England, and shall have the same regard as that Court to international law and the comity of nations."[18]

The extent of this jurisdiction was held to be only that which existed on 1 July 1891, in an appeal decided in 1927 by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.[19] This situation only changed after the Statute of Westminster 1931 came into force, after which Canada passed the Admiralty Act 1934,[20] which broadened Canadian admiralty jurisdiction to match that of the High Court of England at that time:

18(1) The jurisdiction of the Court on its Admiralty side shall extend to and be exercised in respect of all navigable waters, tidal and non-tidal, whether naturally navigable or artificially made so, and although such waters be within the body of a county or other judicial district, and, generally, such jurisdiction shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, be over the like places, persons, matters and things as the Admiralty jurisdiction now possessed by the High Court of Justice in England, whether existing by virtue of any statute or otherwise, and be exercised by the Court in like manner and to as full an extent as by such High Court.[21]

Federal Court of Canada

[edit]

In 1971, the Federal Court of Canada was established, consisting of two divisions (the "Federal Court – Trial Division" and the "Federal Court – Appeal Division"), inheriting much of the jurisdiction of the Exchequer Court.[22] The Federal Court of Canada gained the jurisdiction to hear judicial reviews from federal agencies and tribunals.[23] With respect to maritime jurisdiction, the Trial Division was declared to have:

concurrent original jurisdiction ... in all cases in which a claim for relief is made or a remedy is sought under or by virtue of Canadian maritime law or any other law of Canada relating to any matter coming within the class of subject of navigation and shipping except to the extent that jurisdiction has been otherwise specially assigned.[24]

On July 2, 2003, the Court was split into two separate Courts, with the "Trial Division" continued as the Federal Court and the "Appeal Division" continued as the Federal Court of Appeal.[25]

Until 1976, there was substantial judicial support[26][27] for the view that Parliament could give a federal court jurisdiction over any matter (even a matter not regulated by federal statute law), on the basis that "the Laws of Canada" meant not only federal statutes, but provincial ones as well. However, in Quebec North Shore Paper Co. v. Canadian Pacific,[28] the Supreme Court of Canada rejected this notion, as:

  • provincial law is not pro tanto federal law, nor can it be transposed into federal law for the purposes of giving jurisdiction to the Federal Court.
  • judicial jurisdiction of the Federal Court is not co-extensive with legislative jurisdiction of Parliament, as "the Laws of Canada" carries the requirement that there be applicable and existing federal law

Organization

[edit]

The Court consisted of a first-level trial court, known as the Federal Court of Canada – Trial Division, and an appellate Court, known as the Federal Court of Canada – Appeal Division (more commonly referred to as the Federal Court of Appeal).

The Trial Division had jurisdiction to hear judicial review of decisions of federal boards and tribunals, including most immigration matters, as well as jurisdiction in admiralty, intellectual property, and disputes involving the federal government.

The Appeal Division had jurisdiction to hear appeals of decisions of the Trial Division, as well as to determine applications for judicial review of decisions made by specific boards and tribunals, set out in section 28 of the Federal Court Act. Decisions of the Appeal Division could be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, but only if leave (permission) was granted by either court.

The court did not use juries so all matters were decided by judge alone: a single judge in the Trial Division and a panel of three judges at the appeal level. Some pre-trial steps such as motions were decided by prothonotaries, a role similar to a master in other courts. The judges and prothonotaries were appointed by the Cabinet of the federal government.

Jurisdiction

[edit]

Unlike the general courts set up by each province, matters could not be brought before the Federal Court of Canada unless a law explicitly allowed the proceeding. The docket of the court primarily consisted of judicial reviews of immigration, intellectual property, and federal employment disputes. The court could also deal with incidental aspects of a dispute that fell outside its jurisdiction if the primary dispute was within its jurisdiction.

The court was a national court so trials and hearings occurred throughout Canada. Any orders rendered by the court were enforceable in all the provinces and territories. This contrasts with the provincial superior courts which are organized by each province and require additional steps to enforce decisions in other provinces.

Presidents of the Exchequer Court of Canada

[edit]

The position of President of the Court was not created until 1923. Before that time, justices of the Supreme Court of Canada sat as judges of the Exchequer Court from 1875 to 1887, at which time George Wheelock Burbidge was appointed as the first full-time judge of the Court. He served until 1908. when Walter Cassels was appointed. In 1912, authority was given to appoint an associate judge to the Court, and Louis Arthur Audette was appointed to that position. In 1945, authority was given to appoint more judges to the Court.

From 1923, the Presidents of the Court were:

Judges

[edit]

Current judges

[edit]
Name[29] Appointed Nominated By
Chief Justice Paul Crampton 2011 (CJ)
2009
Harper
Associate Chief Justice Jocelyne Gagné 2018 (ACJ)
2012
Trudeau (ACJ)
Harper
Associate Chief Justice A. Kristian Kennedy 2022 (ACJ)
2013
Trudeau (ACJ)
Harper
Justice Sandra Simpson 1993 Mulroney
Justice Elizabeth Heneghan 1999 Chretien
Justice Luc Martineau 2002 Chretien
Justice Simon Noël 2002 Chretien
Justice James O'Reilly 2002 Chretien
Justice Richard Mosley 2003 Chretien
Justice Michel M.J. Shore 2003 Chretien
Justice Michael Phelan 2003 Chretien
Justice Robert L. Barnes 2005 Martin
Justice Russel W. Zinn 2008 Harper
Justice Catherine M. Kane 2012 Harper
Justice Michael D. Manson 2012 Harper
Justice Yvan Roy 2012 Harper
Justice Cecily Y. Strickland 2012 Harper
Justice Peter B. Annis 2013 Harper
Justice Glennys L. McVeigh 2013 Harper
Justice Martine St-Louis 2014 Harper
Justice Henry S. Brown 2014 Harper
Justice Alan Diner 2014 Harper
Justice Simon Fothergill 2014 Harper
Justice B. Richard Bell 2015 Harper
Justice Denis Gascon 2015 Harper
Justice Richard F. Southcott 2015 Harper
Justice Patrick K. Gleeson 2015 Harper
Justice E. Susan Elliott 2015 Harper
Justice Sylvie E. Roussel 2015 Harper
Justice Ann Marie McDonald 2015 Harper
Justice Roger Lafrenière 2016 Trudeau
Justice William F. Pentney 2017 Trudeau
Justice Shirzad S. Ahmed 2017 Trudeau
Justice Sébastien Grammond 2017 Trudeau
Justice Paul Favel 2017 Trudeau
Justice Elizabeth Walker 2018 Trudeau
Justice John Norris 2018 Trudeau
Justice Peter Pamel 2019 Trudeau
Justice Nicholas McHaffie 2019 Trudeau
Justice Janet Fuhrer 2019 Trudeau
Justice Christine Pallotta 2020 Trudeau
Justice Andrew Little 2020 Trudeau
Justice Angela Furlanetto 2021 Trudeau
Justice Lobat Sadrehashemi 2021 Trudeau
Justice Avvy Yao-Yao Go 2021 Trudeau
Justice Mandy Aylen 2021 Trudeau
Justice Vanessa Rochester 2021 Trudeau

Prior judges

[edit]

The judges of this court are listed below.[30]

  = former judge of the Exchequer Court of Canada
  = stepped down from original appointment
† = died in office
Judges of the Federal Court of Canada, June 1, 1971 – July 2, 2003
Name Trial Division Appeal Division Associate Chief Justice Chief Justice Left office Transferred to
Federal Court Federal Court of Appeal
Wilbur R. Jackett June 1, 1971 October 1, 1979
Camilien Noël June 1, 1971 July 4, 1975
Jacques Dumoulin June 1, 1971 December 1, 1972
Arthur L. Thurlow June 1, 1971 December 4, 1975 January 4, 1980 May 5, 1988
Alexander Cattanach June 1, 1971 July 26, 1984
Hugh F. Gibson June 1, 1971 December 14, 1981
Allison Walsh June 1, 1971 June 30, 1986
Roderick Kerr June 1, 1971 September 1, 1975
Louis Pratte June 10, 1971 January 25, 1973 January 1, 1999
Darrel V. Heald June 30, 1971 December 4, 1975 August 27, 1994
Frank U. Collier September 15, 1971 December 31, 1992
John J. Urie April 19, 1973 December 15, 1990
Raymond G. Décary September 13, 1973 January 31, 1984
Patrick M. Mahoney September 13, 1973 July 18, 1983 October 31, 1994
George A. Addy September 17, 1973 September 28, 1990
William F. Ryan April 11, 1974 August 1, 1986
Jean-Eudes Dubé April 9, 1975 November 6, 2001
Gerald Le Dain September 1, 1975 May 28, 1984[31]
Louis Marceau December 23, 1975 July 18, 1983 May 1, 2000
James Alexander Jerome February 18, 1980 March 4, 1998
Paul U.C. Rouleau August 5, 1982 [32]
James K. Hugessen June 23, 1998 July 18, 1983 [33]
Arthur J. Stone July 18, 1983 [34]
John McNair July 18, 1983 August 31, 1990
Francis C. Muldoon July 18, 1983 September 4, 2001
Barry L. Strayer July 18, 1983 August 30, 1994 [35]
Barbara Reed November 17, 1983 July 22, 2000
Mark R. MacGuigan June 29, 1984 †January 12, 1998
Pierre Denault June 29, 1984 November 1, 2001
Louis-Marcel Joyal June 29, 1984 December 31, 1998
Bud Cullen July 26, 1984 August 31, 2000
Bertrand Lacombe October 29, 1985 December 7, 1989
Leonard Martin October 29, 1985 October 24, 1991
Max M. Teitelbaum October 29, 1985 [36]
Alice Desjardins June 29, 1987 [37]
Frank Iacobucci September 2, 1988 January 6, 1991[31]
W. Andrew MacKay September 2, 1988 [38]
Robert Décary March 14, 1990 July 1, 2001
Allen M. Linden July 5, 1990 October 7, 2009
Julius A. Isaac September 1, 1999 December 24, 1991 [39]
Gilles Létourneau May 13, 1992
Joseph Robertson May 13, 1992 July 27, 2000
Donna McGillis May 13, 1992 May 15, 2003
Marc Noël June 24, 1992 June 23, 1998
Marshall E. Rothstein June 24, 1992 January 22, 1999 [40]
Francis J. McDonald April 1, 1993 September 6, 2001
Frederick E. Gibson April 1, 1993 [41]
William P. McKeown April 1, 1993 September 1, 2002
Marc Nadon June 10, 1993 December 14, 2001
Howard Wetston June 16, 1993 January 11, 1999
John D. Richard June 23, 1998 November 4, 1999 [42]
J. Edgar Sexton June 23, 1998 [43]
Pierre Blais June 23, 1998 [44]
John Maxwell Evans June 26, 1998 December 30, 1999
Karen Sharlow January 21, 1999 November 4, 1999
J.D. Denis Pelletier February 16, 1999 December 14, 2001
Brian D. Malone November 4, 1999 [45]
Allan Lutfy December 8, 1999 [46]
Eleanor Dawson December 8, 1999 [47]
Carolyn Layden-Stevenson January 25, 2002 [48]
Johanne Gauthier December 11, 2002 [49]
Robin Camp [50]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e Ian Bushnell (1997). The Federal Court of Canada: A History, 1875-1992. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 0-8020-4207-4. Retrieved 2013-01-06.
  2. ^ Constitution Act, 1867, s 101.
  3. ^ An Act respecting the Public Works of Canada, S.C. 1867, c. 12, s. 31-48
  4. ^ An Act to extend the powers of the Official Arbitrators, to certain cases therein mentioned, S.C. 1870, c. 23
  5. ^ An Act respecting the Official Arbitrators, S.C. 1879, c. 8
  6. ^ a b The Supreme and Exchequer Court Act, S.C. 1875, c. 11
  7. ^ a b c Frank Iacobucci (1990). "The Federal Court of Canada: Some Comments on its Origin, Traditions and Evolution". Advocates Quarterly. 11: 318. – via HeinOnline (subscription required)
  8. ^ An Act to amend "The Supreme and Exchequer Courts Act," and to make better provision for the Trial of Claims against the Crown, S.C. 1887, c. 16
  9. ^ 1887 Act, ss. 15-17
  10. ^ An Act to amend the Railway Act, S.C. 1901, c. 31 , later consolidated as The Railway Act, 1903, S.C. 1903, c. 58, Part XIII
  11. ^ Vice-Admiralty Courts Act 1863, 1863, c. 24
  12. ^ 1863 Act, Schedule A
  13. ^ The Maritime Jurisdiction Act, 1877, S.C. 1877, c. 21
  14. ^ The Picton, 1879 CanLII 42, 4 SCR 648 (13 December 1879)
  15. ^ Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890, 1890, c. 27
  16. ^ 1890 Act, s. 3
  17. ^ The Admiralty Act, 1891, S.C. 1891, c. 29
  18. ^ 1890 Act, s. 2(2)
  19. ^ The Yuri Maru [1927] UKPC 69, [1927] AC 906, (1927) 28 Ll L Rep 221 (5 July 1927) (on appeal from Canada)
  20. ^ The Admiralty Act, 1934, S.C. 1934, c. 31
  21. ^ 1934 Act, s. 18
  22. ^ Federal Court Act, S.C. 1970-72, c. 1
  23. ^ 1970-72 Act, s. 18
  24. ^ 1970-72 Act, s. 22(1)
  25. ^ Courts Administration Service Act, S.C. 2002, c. 8, s. 13-58
  26. ^ Stephen A. Scott (1982). "Canadian Federal Courts and the Constitutional Limits of Their Jurisdiction" (PDF). McGill Law Journal. 27 (2). McGill Law School: 137–195. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-01-26. Retrieved 2019-01-25.
  27. ^ Consolidated Distilleries, Limited, and another v The King [1933] UKPC 34, [1933] AC 508 (10 April 1933), P.C. (on appeal from Canada)
  28. ^ Quebec North Shore Paper v. C.P. Ltd., 1976 CanLII 10, [1977] 2 SCR 1054 (29 June 1976)
  29. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2018-02-12. Retrieved 2018-02-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  30. ^ "Former Judges and Prothonotaries". Federal Court (Canada). Archived from the original on February 9, 2012. Retrieved February 1, 2012.
  31. ^ a b Elevated to the Supreme Court of Canada
  32. ^ Served until July 25, 2007.
  33. ^ Served until July 26, 2008.
  34. ^ Served until November 19, 2004.
  35. ^ Served until May 1, 2004.
  36. ^ Served until January 27, 2007.
  37. ^ Served until August 11, 2009.
  38. ^ Served until March 20, 2004.
  39. ^ Served until July 18, 2003.
  40. ^ Served until March 9, 2006, before being elevated to the Supreme Court of Canada.
  41. ^ Served until August 30, 2008.
  42. ^ Became Chief Justice of the new Federal Court of Appeal on July 3, 2003, in which post he served until July 30, 2009.
  43. ^ Served until October 28, 2011.
  44. ^ Served until February 19, 2008, before being elevated to the Federal Court of Appeal.
  45. ^ Served until September 27, 2007.
  46. ^ Became Chief Justice of the Federal Court on July 3, 2003, in which post he served until September 30, 2011.
  47. ^ Served until November 26, 2009, before being elevated to the Federal Court of Appeal.
  48. ^ Served until December 12, 2008.
  49. ^ Served until October 21, 2011, before being elevated to the Federal Court of Appeal.
  50. ^ Service Canada (June 26, 2015). "Federal Court Judicial Appointments Announced". gcnws.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]