Rhynchosaur: Difference between revisions
better life restoration |
clarification about a claim |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Automatic taxobox |
{{Automatic taxobox |
||
| name = Rhynchosaurs |
| name = Rhynchosaurs |
||
| fossil_range = [[ |
| fossil_range = [[Induan]]-early [[Norian]]{{Fossil range|Induan|Norian|}} |
||
| image = Hyperodapedon |
| image = Hyperodapedon Exhibit Museum of Natural History.JPG |
||
| image_caption = |
| image_caption = Mounted skeleton model of ''[[Hyperodapedon]]'' |
||
| display_parents = 2 |
| display_parents = 2 |
||
| taxon = Rhynchosauria |
| taxon = Rhynchosauria |
||
| authority = [[Henry Fairfield Osborn|Osborn]] [[1903 in paleontology|1903]] |
| authority = [[Henry Fairfield Osborn|Osborn]] [[1903 in paleontology|1903]] |
||
| subdivision_ranks = Subgroups |
| subdivision_ranks = Subgroups |
||
| subdivision = |
| subdivision = *{{extinct}}''[[Colobops]]''? |
||
*{{extinct}}''[[Colobops]]''? |
|||
*{{extinct}}''[[Eohyosaurus]]'' |
*{{extinct}}''[[Eohyosaurus]]'' |
||
*{{extinct}}''[[Howesia]]'' |
*{{extinct}}''[[Howesia]]'' |
||
Line 31: | Line 30: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Rhynchosaurs''' are a group of extinct herbivorous [[Triassic]] [[Archosauromorpha|archosauromorph]] [[reptile]]s, belonging to the order '''Rhynchosauria'''.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ezcurra|first1=Martín D.|last2=Montefeltro|first2=Felipe|last3=Butler|first3=Richard J.|date=2016|title=The Early Evolution of Rhynchosaurs|journal=Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution|language=English|volume=3|doi=10.3389/fevo.2015.00142|issn=2296-701X|doi-access=free}}</ref> Members of the group are distinguished by their triangular skulls and elongated, beak like [[Premaxilla|premaxillary bones]]. Rhynchosaurs first appeared in the |
'''Rhynchosaurs''' are a group of extinct herbivorous [[Triassic]] [[Archosauromorpha|archosauromorph]] [[reptile]]s, belonging to the order '''Rhynchosauria'''.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ezcurra|first1=Martín D.|last2=Montefeltro|first2=Felipe|last3=Butler|first3=Richard J.|date=2016|title=The Early Evolution of Rhynchosaurs|journal=Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution|language=English|volume=3|doi=10.3389/fevo.2015.00142|issn=2296-701X|doi-access=free|hdl=11336/44040|hdl-access=free}}</ref> Members of the group are distinguished by their triangular skulls and elongated, beak like [[Premaxilla|premaxillary bones]]. Rhynchosaurs first appeared in the [[Early Triassic]], reaching their broadest abundance and a global distribution during the [[Carnian]] stage of the [[Late Triassic]]. |
||
== Description == |
== Description == |
||
[[File: |
[[File:Hyperodapedon sanjuanensis (2).png|left|thumb|Life restoration of ''[[Hyperodapedon sanjuanensis]]''.]] |
||
Rhynchosaurs were herbivores, and at times abundant (in some fossil localities accounting for 40 to 60% of specimens found), with stocky bodies and a powerful beak. Early primitive forms, like ''[[Mesosuchus]]'' and ''[[Howesia]]'', were generally small |
Rhynchosaurs were herbivores, and at times abundant (in some fossil localities accounting for 40 to 60% of specimens found), with stocky bodies and a powerful beak. Early primitive forms, like ''[[Mesosuchus]]'' and ''[[Howesia]]'', were generally small, typically lizard-like in build, and had skulls rather similar to the early diapsid ''[[Youngina]]'', except for the beak and a few other features. Later and more advanced genera grew to up to two meters in length. The skull in these forms were short, broad, and triangular, becoming much wider than long in the most advanced forms like ''[[Hyperodapedon]]'' (= ''[[Scaphonyx]]''), with a deep cheek region, and the [[premaxilla]] extending outwards and downwards to form the upper beak. The broad skull would have accommodated powerful jaw muscles. The lower jaw was also deep, and when the mouth was closed it clamped firmly into the [[maxilla]] (upper jaw), like the blade of a [[penknife]] closing into its handle. This scissors-like action would have enabled rhynchosaurs to cut up tough plant material. Rhynchosaur teeth had a unique condition known as '''ankylothecodonty''', similar to the [[acrodont]]y of modern [[tuatara]]s and some lizards but differing in the presence of deep roots.<ref>{{cite journal | url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pala.12654 | doi=10.1111/pala.12654 | title=Unique dentition of rhynchosaurs and their two‐phase success as herbivores in the Triassic | year=2023 | last1=Sethapanichsakul | first1=Thitiwoot | last2=Coram | first2=Robert A. | last3=Benton | first3=Michael J. | journal=Palaeontology | volume=66 | issue=3| doi-access=free }}</ref> |
||
The teeth were unusual; those in the maxilla and palate were modified into broad tooth plates. The hind feet were equipped with massive claws, presumably for digging up roots and [[tuber]]s by backwards scratching of the hind limbs. Similar to [[elephant]]s they had a fixed number of teeth |
The teeth were unusual; those in the maxilla and palate were modified into broad tooth plates. The hind feet were equipped with massive claws, presumably for digging up roots and [[tuber]]s by backwards scratching of the hind limbs. Similar to [[elephant]]s, they had a fixed number of teeth. Those that were further back in the jaws replaced teeth that were worn out as the animal grew in size and the teeth were worn out because of a diet of very tough plants. In the end, they likely starved to death.<ref>[https://phys.org/news/2023-06-ancient-herbivore-diet-weakened-teeth.html Ancient herbivore's diet weakened teeth and lead to eventual starvation, suggests study]</ref> |
||
Like many animals of this time, they had a worldwide distribution, being found across [[Pangea]]. These abundant animals might have died out suddenly at the end of the [[Carnian]] (Middle of the Late Triassic period), perhaps as a result of the extinction of the ''[[Dicroidium]]'' flora on which they may have fed. On the other hand, Spielmann, Lucas and Hunt (2013) described three distal ends of [[Humerus|humeri]] from early-mid [[Norian]] [[Bull Canyon Formation]] in [[New Mexico]], which they interpreted as bones of rhynchosaurs belonging to the species ''[[Otischalkia|Otischalkia elderae]]''; thus, the fossils might indicate that rhynchosaurs survived until the Norian.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Justin A. Spielmann |author2=Spencer G. Lucas |author3=Adrian P. Hunt |name-list-style=amp |year=2013 |title=The first Norian (Revueltian) rhynchosaur: Bull Canyon Formation, New Mexico, U.S.A. |journal=New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin |volume=61 |pages=562–566 |url= |
Like many animals of this time, they had a worldwide distribution, being found across [[Pangea]]. These abundant animals might have died out suddenly at the end of the [[Carnian]] (Middle of the Late Triassic period), perhaps as a result of the extinction of the ''[[Dicroidium]]'' flora on which they may have fed. On the other hand, Spielmann, Lucas and Hunt (2013) described three distal ends of [[Humerus|humeri]] from early-mid [[Norian]] [[Bull Canyon Formation]] in [[New Mexico]], which they interpreted as bones of rhynchosaurs belonging to the species ''[[Otischalkia|Otischalkia elderae]]''; thus, the fossils might indicate that rhynchosaurs survived until the Norian.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Justin A. Spielmann |author2=Spencer G. Lucas |author3=Adrian P. Hunt |name-list-style=amp |year=2013 |title=The first Norian (Revueltian) rhynchosaur: Bull Canyon Formation, New Mexico, U.S.A. |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280880846 |journal=New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin |volume=61 |pages=562–566}}</ref> These fossils were later reinterpreted as belonging to [[Malerisaurinae|malerisaurine]] [[Azendohsauridae|azendohsaurids]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Nesbitt |first=Sterling J. |last2=Stocker |first2=Michelle R. |last3=Ezcurra |first3=Martín D. |last4=Fraser |first4=Nicholas C. |last5=Heckert |first5=Andrew B. |last6=Parker |first6=William G. |last7=Mueller |first7=Bill |last8=Sengupta |first8=Saradee |last9=Bandyopadhyay |first9=Saswati |last10=Pritchard |first10=Adam C. |last11=Marsh |first11=Adam D. |date=2022 |editor-last=Field |editor-first=Daniel |title=Widespread azendohsaurids (Archosauromorpha, Allokotosauria) from the Late Triassic of western USA and India |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356929019 |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |language=en |volume=8 |issue=1 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1413 |issn=2056-2799}}</ref> |
||
==Classification== |
==Classification== |
||
=== |
===List of genera=== |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! colspan=" |
! colspan="6" align="center" |'''List of rhynchosaur genera''' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! Genus |
! Genus |
||
Line 66: | Line 65: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Moenkopi Formation]] |
[[Moenkopi Formation]] |
||
| A stenaulorhynchine. |
|||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 78: | Line 77: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Popo Agie Formation]] |
[[Popo Agie Formation]] |
||
| A hyperodapedontine previously referred to ''Hyperodapedon''. |
|||
⚫ | |||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 91: | Line 90: | ||
[[Santa Maria Formation]] |
[[Santa Maria Formation]] |
||
| |
| |
||
A stenaulorhynchine, previously known as the "Mariante Rhynchosaur". |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 103: | Line 102: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Otter Sandstone Formation]] |
[[Otter Sandstone Formation]] |
||
| A basal hyperodapedontid. |
|||
| |
|||
⚫ | |||
|''[[Elorhynchus]]'' |
|||
|''E. carrolli'' |
|||
|late [[Ladinian]]? - earliest [[Carnian]]? |
|||
⚫ | |||
|[[Chañares Formation]] (''Tarjadia'' Assemblage Zone) |
|||
|A stenaulorhynchine. |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 113: | Line 119: | ||
| |
| |
||
{{Flag|South Africa}} |
{{Flag|South Africa}} |
||
| |
| |
||
[[Burgersdorp Formation]] |
[[Burgersdorp Formation]] ([[Cynognathus Assemblage Zone|''Cynognathus'' Assemblage Zone]]) |
||
| A basal (non-rhynchosaurid) rhynchosaur. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 127: | Line 133: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Otter Sandstone Formation]] |
[[Otter Sandstone Formation]] |
||
| A basal hyperodapedontid. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 137: | Line 143: | ||
| |
| |
||
{{Flag|South Africa}} |
{{Flag|South Africa}} |
||
| |
| |
||
[[Burgersdorp Formation]] |
[[Burgersdorp Formation]] ([[Cynognathus Assemblage Zone|''Cynognathus'' Assemblage Zone]]) |
||
| A basal (non-rhynchosaurid) rhynchosaur. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| rowspan="6" | |
| rowspan="6" | |
||
Line 152: | Line 158: | ||
[[Lossiemouth Sandstone|Lossiemouth Sandstone Formation]] |
[[Lossiemouth Sandstone|Lossiemouth Sandstone Formation]] |
||
| rowspan="6" | |
| rowspan="6" | |
||
Six valid species has been named, the most of any rhynchosaur. |
A hyperodapedontine, one of the most abundant and speciose rhynchosaur genera. Six valid species has been named, the most of any rhynchosaur. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 213: | Line 219: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Makay Formation]] (Isalo II) |
[[Makay Formation]] (Isalo II) |
||
|A hyperodapedontine occasionally referred to ''Hyperodapedon''. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 225: | Line 231: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Yerrapalli Formation]] |
[[Yerrapalli Formation]] |
||
| A stenaulorhynchine. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 237: | Line 243: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Bromsgrove Sandstone Formation]] |
[[Bromsgrove Sandstone Formation]] |
||
|A basal hyperodapedontid. |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 246: | Line 253: | ||
| |
| |
||
{{Flag|South Africa}} |
{{Flag|South Africa}} |
||
| |
| |
||
[[Burgersdorp Formation]] |
[[Burgersdorp Formation]] ([[Cynognathus Assemblage Zone|''Cynognathus'' Assemblage Zone]]) |
||
| A basal (non-rhynchosaurid) rhynchosaur. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 258: | Line 265: | ||
| |
| |
||
{{Flag|South Africa}} |
{{Flag|South Africa}} |
||
| |
| |
||
[[Katberg Formation]] |
[[Katberg Formation]] ([[Lystrosaurus Assemblage Zone|''Lystrosaurus'' Assemblage Zone]]) |
||
| |
| |
||
The earliest known species, and the only [[Early Triassic]] representative.<ref name=Eohyosaurus/> |
A basal (non-rhynchosaurid) rhynchosaur. The earliest known species of rhynchosaur, and the only known [[Early Triassic]] representative.<ref name=Eohyosaurus/> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 273: | Line 280: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Wolfville Formation]] |
[[Wolfville Formation]] |
||
|A hyperodapedontine previously referred to ''Hyperodapedon''. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 285: | Line 292: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Tarporley Siltstone Formation]] |
[[Tarporley Siltstone Formation]] |
||
|A basal rhynchosaurid. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 297: | Line 304: | ||
| |
| |
||
[[Manda Formation]] |
[[Manda Formation]] |
||
|A stenaulorhynchine. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 309: | Line 316: | ||
| |
| |
||
Tunduru district |
Tunduru district |
||
|A hyperodapedontine previously referred to ''Hyperodapedon''. |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
| |
||
Line 316: | Line 323: | ||
''T. sulcognathus'' |
''T. sulcognathus'' |
||
| |
| |
||
early [[Norian]] |
late [[Carnian]] - early [[Norian]] |
||
| |
|||
⚫ | |||
| |
| |
||
{{flag|Brazil}}<br /> |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{flag|Argentina}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
[[Ischigualasto Formation]] |
|||
| |
| |
||
The latest surviving species, and the only Norian |
The latest surviving species, and the only rhynchosaur known with confidence to have survived into the Norian stage. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
||
Line 386: | Line 395: | ||
{{Wikispecies-inline|Rhynchosauria}} |
{{Wikispecies-inline|Rhynchosauria}} |
||
{{ |
{{Rhynchosauria|R.}} |
||
{{Taxonbar|from=Q131768}} |
{{Taxonbar|from=Q131768}} |
||
Latest revision as of 19:02, 3 August 2024
Rhynchosaurs | |
---|---|
Mounted skeleton model of Hyperodapedon | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Reptilia |
Clade: | Archosauromorpha |
Clade: | Crocopoda |
Order: | †Rhynchosauria Osborn 1903 |
Subgroups | |
|
Rhynchosaurs are a group of extinct herbivorous Triassic archosauromorph reptiles, belonging to the order Rhynchosauria.[1] Members of the group are distinguished by their triangular skulls and elongated, beak like premaxillary bones. Rhynchosaurs first appeared in the Early Triassic, reaching their broadest abundance and a global distribution during the Carnian stage of the Late Triassic.
Description
[edit]Rhynchosaurs were herbivores, and at times abundant (in some fossil localities accounting for 40 to 60% of specimens found), with stocky bodies and a powerful beak. Early primitive forms, like Mesosuchus and Howesia, were generally small, typically lizard-like in build, and had skulls rather similar to the early diapsid Youngina, except for the beak and a few other features. Later and more advanced genera grew to up to two meters in length. The skull in these forms were short, broad, and triangular, becoming much wider than long in the most advanced forms like Hyperodapedon (= Scaphonyx), with a deep cheek region, and the premaxilla extending outwards and downwards to form the upper beak. The broad skull would have accommodated powerful jaw muscles. The lower jaw was also deep, and when the mouth was closed it clamped firmly into the maxilla (upper jaw), like the blade of a penknife closing into its handle. This scissors-like action would have enabled rhynchosaurs to cut up tough plant material. Rhynchosaur teeth had a unique condition known as ankylothecodonty, similar to the acrodonty of modern tuataras and some lizards but differing in the presence of deep roots.[2]
The teeth were unusual; those in the maxilla and palate were modified into broad tooth plates. The hind feet were equipped with massive claws, presumably for digging up roots and tubers by backwards scratching of the hind limbs. Similar to elephants, they had a fixed number of teeth. Those that were further back in the jaws replaced teeth that were worn out as the animal grew in size and the teeth were worn out because of a diet of very tough plants. In the end, they likely starved to death.[3]
Like many animals of this time, they had a worldwide distribution, being found across Pangea. These abundant animals might have died out suddenly at the end of the Carnian (Middle of the Late Triassic period), perhaps as a result of the extinction of the Dicroidium flora on which they may have fed. On the other hand, Spielmann, Lucas and Hunt (2013) described three distal ends of humeri from early-mid Norian Bull Canyon Formation in New Mexico, which they interpreted as bones of rhynchosaurs belonging to the species Otischalkia elderae; thus, the fossils might indicate that rhynchosaurs survived until the Norian.[4] These fossils were later reinterpreted as belonging to malerisaurine azendohsaurids.[5]
Classification
[edit]List of genera
[edit]List of rhynchosaur genera | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus | Species | Age | Location | Unit | Notes |
A. navajoi |
A stenaulorhynchine. | ||||
B. cooowuse |
A hyperodapedontine previously referred to Hyperodapedon. | ||||
B. mariantensis |
A stenaulorhynchine, previously known as the "Mariante Rhynchosaur". | ||||
B. sidensis |
late Anisian |
A basal hyperodapedontid. | |||
Elorhynchus | E. carrolli | late Ladinian? - earliest Carnian? | Argentina | Chañares Formation (Tarjadia Assemblage Zone) | A stenaulorhynchine. |
E. wolvaardti |
early Anisian |
A basal (non-rhynchosaurid) rhynchosaur. | |||
F. spenceri |
late Anisian |
UK (England) |
A basal hyperodapedontid. | ||
H. browni |
A basal (non-rhynchosaurid) rhynchosaur. | ||||
H. gordoni |
A hyperodapedontine, one of the most abundant and speciose rhynchosaur genera. Six valid species has been named, the most of any rhynchosaur. | ||||
H. huenei |
|||||
H. huxleyi |
|||||
H. mariensis |
|||||
H. sanjuanensis |
|||||
H. tikiensis |
|||||
I. genovefae |
Makay Formation (Isalo II) |
A hyperodapedontine occasionally referred to Hyperodapedon. | |||
M. kuttyi |
A stenaulorhynchine. | ||||
L. brodiei |
UK (England) |
A basal hyperodapedontid. | |||
M. browni |
A basal (non-rhynchosaurid) rhynchosaur. | ||||
N. colletti |
early Induan |
A basal (non-rhynchosaurid) rhynchosaur. The earliest known species of rhynchosaur, and the only known Early Triassic representative.[7] | |||
O. bairdi |
A hyperodapedontine previously referred to Hyperodapedon. | ||||
R. articeps |
UK (England) |
A basal rhynchosaurid. | |||
S. stockleyi |
late Anisian |
A stenaulorhynchine. | |||
S. stockleyi |
Tunduru district |
A hyperodapedontine previously referred to Hyperodapedon. | |||
T. sulcognathus |
The latest surviving species, and the only rhynchosaur known with confidence to have survived into the Norian stage. |
Phylogeny
[edit]The Rhynchosauria included a single family, named Rhynchosauridae. All rhynchosaurs, apart from the four Early and Middle Triassic monospecific genera, Eohyosaurus, Mesosuchus, Howesia and Noteosuchus, are included in this family.[7] Hyperodapedontidae named by Lydekker (1885) was considered its junior synonym.[8] However, Langer et al. (2000) noted that Hyperodapedontidae was erected by Lydekker to include Hyperodapedon gordoni and H. huxleyi, clearly excluding Rhynchosaurus articeps, which was the only other rhynchosaur known at that time. Thus, they defined it as the stem-based taxon that includes all rhynchosaurs more closely related to Hyperodapedon than to Rhynchosaurus.[9]
Within Hyperodapedontidae, which is now a subgroup of Rhynchosauridae, two subfamilies have been named. Stenaulorhynchinae named by Kuhn (1933) is defined sensu Langer and Schultz (2000) to include all species more closely related to Stenaulorhynchus than to Hyperodapedon. Hyperodapedontinae named by Chatterjee (1969) was redefined by Langer et al. (2000) to include "all rhynchosaurs closer to Hyperodapedon than to "Rhynchosaurus" spenceri" (now Fodonyx).[10]
The cladogram below is based on Schultz et al. (2016) which is the most genera inclusive rhynchosaur phylogenetic analysis to date,[10] with the position of Noteosuchus taken from other recent analyses (since it was removed in Schultz et al. (2016)), all in consensus with one another.[7][11]
Rhynchosauria |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
[edit]- ^ Ezcurra, Martín D.; Montefeltro, Felipe; Butler, Richard J. (2016). "The Early Evolution of Rhynchosaurs". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 3. doi:10.3389/fevo.2015.00142. hdl:11336/44040. ISSN 2296-701X.
- ^ Sethapanichsakul, Thitiwoot; Coram, Robert A.; Benton, Michael J. (2023). "Unique dentition of rhynchosaurs and their two‐phase success as herbivores in the Triassic". Palaeontology. 66 (3). doi:10.1111/pala.12654.
- ^ Ancient herbivore's diet weakened teeth and lead to eventual starvation, suggests study
- ^ Justin A. Spielmann; Spencer G. Lucas & Adrian P. Hunt (2013). "The first Norian (Revueltian) rhynchosaur: Bull Canyon Formation, New Mexico, U.S.A." New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin. 61: 562–566.
- ^ Nesbitt, Sterling J.; Stocker, Michelle R.; Ezcurra, Martín D.; Fraser, Nicholas C.; Heckert, Andrew B.; Parker, William G.; Mueller, Bill; Sengupta, Saradee; Bandyopadhyay, Saswati; Pritchard, Adam C.; Marsh, Adam D. (2022). Field, Daniel (ed.). "Widespread azendohsaurids (Archosauromorpha, Allokotosauria) from the Late Triassic of western USA and India". Papers in Palaeontology. 8 (1). doi:10.1002/spp2.1413. ISSN 2056-2799.
- ^ Fitch, A. J.; Haas, M.; C'Hair, W.; Ridgley, E.; Ridgley, B.; Oldman, D.; Reynolds, C.; Lovelace, D. M. (2023). "A New Rhynchosaur Taxon from the Popo Agie Formation, WY: Implications for a Northern Pangean Early-Late Triassic (Carnian) Fauna". Diversity. 15 (4): 544. doi:10.3390/d15040544. hdl:10919/114487.
- ^ a b c d e f Richard J. Butler; Martín D. Ezcurra; Felipe C. Montefeltro; Adun Samathi & Gabriela Sobral (2015). "A new species of basal rhynchosaur (Diapsida: Archosauromorpha) from the early Middle Triassic of South Africa, and the early evolution of Rhynchosauria". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 174 (3): 571–588. doi:10.1111/zoj.12246. hdl:11449/167867.
- ^ Benton, M. J. (1985). "Classification and phylogeny of the diapsid reptiles". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 84 (2): 97–164. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb01796.x.
- ^ Max C. Langer & Cesar L. Schultz (2000). "A new species of the Late Triassic rhynchosaur Hyperodapedon from the Santa Maria Formation of south Brazil". Palaeontology. 43 (6): 633–652. Bibcode:2000Palgy..43..633L. doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00143. S2CID 83566087.
- ^ a b Cesar Leandro Schultz; Max Cardoso Langer & Felipe Chinaglia Montefeltro (2016). "A new rhynchosaur from south Brazil (Santa Maria Formation) and rhynchosaur diversity patterns across the Middle-Late Triassic boundary". Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 90 (3): 593–609. doi:10.1007/s12542-016-0307-7. hdl:11449/161986. S2CID 130644209.
- ^ Ezcurra MD. (2016) The phylogenetic relationships of basal archosauromorphs, with an emphasis on the systematics of proterosuchian archosauriforms. PeerJ, 4:e1778 [1]
Bibliography
[edit]- Benton, M. J. (2000), Vertebrate Paleontology, 2nd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd.
- Carroll, R. L. (1988), Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, W.H. Freeman & Co.
- Dilkes, D. W. 1998. The Early Triassic rhynchosaur Mesosuchus browni and the interrelationships of basal archosauromorph reptiles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 353:501-541.
External links
[edit]Data related to Rhynchosauria at Wikispecies