Jump to content

Shark repellent: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
2,547,810 edits
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{For|the business strategy|Poison pill (disambiguation){{!}}Poison pill}}
{{For|the business strategy|Poison pill (disambiguation){{!}}Poison pill}}


A '''shark repellent''' is any method of driving [[shark]]s away from an area. Shark repellents are a category of [[animal repellent]]s. Shark repellent technologies include [[magnetic shark repellent]], [[electropositive shark repellent]]s, [[Protective Oceanic Device|electrical repellents]], and [[semiochemical]]s. Shark repellents can be used to protect people from sharks by driving the sharks away from areas where they are likely to kill human beings. In other applications, they can be used to keep sharks away from areas they may be a danger to themselves due to human activity. In this case, the shark repellent serves as a shark conservation method. There are some naturally-occurring shark repellents; modern artificial shark repellents date to at least the 1940s, with the [[United States Navy]] using them in the [[Pacific Ocean theater of World War II]].
A '''shark repellent''' is any method of driving [[shark]]s away from an area. Shark repellents are a category of [[animal repellent]]s. Shark repellent technologies include [[magnetic shark repellent]], [[electropositive shark repellent]]s, [[Protective Oceanic Device|electrical repellents]], and [[semiochemical]]s. Shark repellents can be used to protect people from sharks by driving the sharks away from areas where they are likely to harm human beings. In other applications, they can be used to keep sharks away from areas they may be a danger to themselves due to human activity. In this case, the shark repellent serves as a shark conservation method. There are some naturally occurring shark repellents; modern artificial shark repellents date to at least the 1940s, with the [[United States Navy]] using them in the [[Pacific Ocean theater of World War II]].


==Natural repellents==
==Natural repellents==
It has traditionally been believed that sharks are repelled by the smell of a dead shark;<ref name=AP2004>[http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5560773 Researchers tout shark repellent], 2004 Associated Press, "Fisherman and scientists have long noted sharks stay away if they smell a dead shark."</ref> however, modern research has had mixed results.
It has traditionally been believed that sharks are repelled by the smell of a dead shark;<ref name=AP2004>[https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5560773 Researchers tout shark repellent], 2004 Associated Press, "Fisherman and scientists have long noted sharks stay away if they smell a dead shark."</ref> however, modern research has had mixed results.


The ''[[Pardachirus marmoratus]]'' fish (finless sole, Red Sea Moses sole) repels sharks through its secretions.<ref name=Clark1979/> The best-understood factor is [[pardaxin]], acting as an irritant to the sharks' gills, but other chemicals have been identified as contributing to the repellent effect.<ref>{{cite journal
The ''[[Pardachirus marmoratus]]'' fish (finless sole, Red Sea Moses sole) repels sharks through its secretions.<ref name=Clark1979/> The best-understood factor is [[pardaxin]], acting as an irritant to the sharks' gills, but other chemicals have been identified as contributing to the repellent effect.<ref>{{cite journal
Line 18: Line 18:
|year=1984
|year=1984
|doi=10.1126/science.226.4675.703
|doi=10.1126/science.226.4675.703
|pmid=17774948 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
|pmid=17774948 |bibcode=1984Sci...226..703T |s2cid=19656976 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
|title=Shark repellent lipophilic constituents in the defense secretion of the Moses sole (Pardachirus marmoratus).
|title=Shark repellent lipophilic constituents in the defense secretion of the Moses sole (Pardachirus marmoratus).
|last1=Tachibana |first1=Kazuo
|last1=Tachibana |first1=Kazuo
Line 34: Line 34:


==History==
==History==
Some of the earliest research on shark repellents took place during the [[Second World War]] when military services sought to minimize the risk to stranded [[aviator]]s and [[sailor]]s in the water. Research has continued to the present, with notable researchers including Americans [[Eugenie Clark]], and later [[Samuel H. Gruber]], who has conducted tests at the Bimini Sharklab<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.biminisharklab.com | title=Bimini Sharklab - Shark Research & Marine Biology Internships - Understand, Educate, Conserve}}</ref> in [[Bimini]], and the Japanese scientist Kazuo Tachibana.
Some of the earliest research on shark repellents took place during the [[Second World War]], when military services sought to minimize the risk to stranded [[aviator]]s and [[sailor]]s in the water. Research has continued to the present, with notable researchers including Americans [[Eugenie Clark]], and later [[Samuel H. Gruber]], who has conducted tests at the Bimini Sharklab<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.biminisharklab.com | title=Bimini Sharklab - Shark Research & Marine Biology Internships - Understand, Educate, Conserve}}</ref> on the Caribbean island of [[Bimini]], and the Japanese scientist Kazuo Tachibana. The future celebrity chef [[Julia Child]] developed shark repellent while working for the [[Office of Strategic Services]].<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.intelligence.gov/index.php/people/barrier-breakers-in-history/451-julia-child | title=1944: JULIA CHILD}}</ref>


Initial work, which was based on historical research and studies at the time, focused on using the odor of another dead shark. Efforts were made to isolate the active components in dead shark bodies that repelled other sharks. Eventually, it was determined that certain copper compounds like [[copper acetate]],<ref name='shadows'>[https://www.amazon.com/Shadows-Sea-Sharks-Skates-Rays/dp/1558215182 Thomas B. Allen. Shadows in the Sea: The Sharks, Skates and Rays]</ref> in combination with other ingredients, could mimic a dead shark and drive live sharks away from human beings in the water. Building on this work, [[Stewart Springer]] and others patented a "shark repellent" consisting of a combination of copper acetate and a dark-colored dye to obscure the user.<ref>
Initial work, which was based on historical research and studies at the time, focused on using the odor of another dead shark. Efforts were made to isolate the active components in dead shark bodies that repelled other sharks. Eventually, it was determined that certain copper compounds like [[copper acetate]],<ref name='shadows'>[https://www.amazon.com/Shadows-Sea-Sharks-Skates-Rays/dp/1558215182 Thomas B. Allen. Shadows in the Sea: The Sharks, Skates and Rays]</ref> in combination with other ingredients, could mimic a dead shark and drive live sharks away from human beings in the water. Building on this work, [[Stewart Springer]] and others patented a "shark repellent" consisting of a combination of copper acetate and a dark-colored dye to obscure the user.<ref>
Line 50: Line 50:
| patent-number = 2458540
| patent-number = 2458540
| country-code = US }}</ref>
| country-code = US }}</ref>
This shark repellent, known as "Shark Chaser," was long supplied to sailors and aviators of the [[United States Navy]], initially packaged in cake form using a water-soluble wax binder and rigged to life vests. The Navy employed Shark Chaser extensively between 1943 and 1973. It is believed<ref name='shadows'/> that the composition does repel sharks in some situations, but not in all, with about a 70% effectiveness rating.
This shark repellent, known as "Shark Chaser", was long supplied to sailors and aviators of the [[United States Navy]], initially packaged in cake form using a water-soluble wax binder and rigged to life vests. The Navy employed Shark Chaser extensively between 1943 and 1973. It is believed<ref name='shadows'/> that the composition does repel sharks in some situations, but not in all, with about a 70% effectiveness rating.{{cn|date=January 2024}}


On the other hand, Albert Tester questioned the idea that dead shark bodies or chemicals based on them could work as shark repellent. In 1959, he prepared and tested extracts of decaying shark flesh on [[tiger shark]]s in [[Hawaii]] and [[blacktip shark]]s at [[Enewetak Atoll]]. Tester found that not only did the dead shark extracts fail to repel any sharks, but several sharks had a "weak or strong attraction" to them. Tester reported a similar failure to repel sharks by a 1959 test at Enewetak of "an alleged shark repellent, supplied by a fisherman, which contained extract of decayed shark flesh as the principal component."<ref>
On the other hand, Albert Tester questioned the idea that dead shark bodies or chemicals based on them could work as shark repellent. In 1959, he prepared and tested extracts of decaying shark flesh on [[tiger shark]]s in [[Hawaii]] and [[blacktip shark]]s at [[Enewetak Atoll]]. Tester found that not only did the dead shark extracts fail to repel any sharks, but several sharks had a "weak or strong attraction" to them. Tester reported a similar failure to repel sharks by a 1959 test at Enewetak of "an alleged shark repellent, supplied by a fisherman, which contained extract of decayed shark flesh as the principal component."<ref>
Line 68: Line 68:


==Research==
==Research==
Since the 1970s, there have been studies of how the Moses sole repels sharks, with Clark<ref name=Clark1979>{{cite journal|last1=Clark|first1=Eugenie|author-link1=Eugenie Clark|last2=Gorge|first2=Anita|title=Toxic soles, Pardachirus marmoratus from the Red Sea and P. pavoninus from Japan, with notes on other species|journal=Environmental Biology of Fishes|date=June 1979|volume=4|issue=2|pages=103–123|doi=10.1007/bf00005447}}</ref> and Gruber both studying it. {{as of|2004}} it has not found practical use, however, as the chemicals are perishable,<ref>{{cite news
Since the 1970s, there have been studies of how the Moses sole repels sharks, with Clark<ref name=Clark1979>{{cite journal|last1=Clark|first1=Eugenie|author-link1=Eugenie Clark|last2=Gorge|first2=Anita|title=Toxic soles, Pardachirus marmoratus from the Red Sea and P. pavoninus from Japan, with notes on other species|journal=Environmental Biology of Fishes|date=June 1979|volume=4|issue=2|pages=103–123|doi=10.1007/bf00005447|s2cid=11156811}}</ref> and Gruber both studying it. {{as of|2004}} it has not found practical use, however, as the chemicals are perishable,<ref>{{cite news
|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/20/science/natural-shark-repellent-is-alluring-to-scientists.html
|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/20/science/natural-shark-repellent-is-alluring-to-scientists.html
|title=Natural Shark Repellent is Alluring to Scientists
|title=Natural Shark Repellent is Alluring to Scientists
|author=Walter Sullivan
|author=Walter Sullivan
|publisher=[[The New York Times]]
|work=[[The New York Times]]
|date=January 20, 1981}}</ref> and the repellent had to be injected into the shark's mouth to be effective;<ref name=AP2004/> in nature the substance is secreted on the skin and is thus ingested by sharks when they bite the sole.
|date=January 20, 1981}}</ref> and the repellent had to be injected into the shark's mouth to be effective;<ref name=AP2004/> in nature the substance is secreted on the skin and is thus ingested by sharks when they bite the sole.


Line 87: Line 87:
|author-link2=Samuel H. Gruber
|author-link2=Samuel H. Gruber
|doi=10.1007/BF00316354
|doi=10.1007/BF00316354
|pmid=6517714
⚫
}}</ref> there is evidence that [[surfactant]]s such as [[sodium lauryl sulfate]] can act as a shark repellent at concentrations on the order of 100 parts per million. However, this does not meet the desired "cloud" deterrence level of 0.1 parts per million.<ref>
|s2cid=10478482
⚫
}}</ref> there is evidence that [[surfactant]]s such as [[sodium lauryl sulfate]] can act as a shark repellent at concentrations of the order of 100 parts per million. However, this does not meet the desired "cloud" deterrence level of 0.1 parts per million.<ref>
{{cite journal
{{cite journal
| last1=Smith | first1=Larry J.
| last1=Smith | first1=Larry J.
Line 102: Line 104:
|title=Surfactants as Chemical Shark Repellents: Past, Present, and Future
|title=Surfactants as Chemical Shark Repellents: Past, Present, and Future
|journal=Environmental Biology of Fishes
|journal=Environmental Biology of Fishes
|volume=60 |pages=117–130
|volume=60 |issue=1–3
|pages=117–130
|doi=10.1023/A:1007612002903
|doi=10.1023/A:1007612002903
|s2cid=19575107
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


There have been validated field tests and studies to confirm the effectiveness of [[semiochemical]]s as a shark repellent. From 2005-2010, an extensive study on the effectiveness of semiochemicals as a shark repellent was conducted by scientists from [[Sharkdefense|SharkDefense Technologies]] and [[Seton Hall University]]. The study's results were published in the scientific journal ''Ocean & Coastal Management'' in 2013. The study concluded that the existence of a putative chemical shark repellent has been confirmed.<ref>http://bmis.wcpfc.int/docs/references/Stroud_etal_2013_Chemical_shark_repellent_Myth_fact_necromones_effect_OpenA.pdf</ref>
There have been validated field tests and studies to confirm the effectiveness of [[semiochemical]]s as a shark repellent. From 2005-2010, an extensive study on the effectiveness of semiochemicals as a shark repellent was conducted by scientists from [[Sharkdefense|SharkDefense Technologies]] and [[Seton Hall University]]. The study's results were published in the scientific journal ''Ocean & Coastal Management'' in 2013. The study concluded that the existence of a putative chemical shark repellent has been confirmed.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://bmis.wcpfc.int/docs/references/Stroud_etal_2013_Chemical_shark_repellent_Myth_fact_necromones_effect_OpenA.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2016-02-11 |archive-date=2016-04-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160403052520/http://bmis.wcpfc.int/docs/references/Stroud_etal_2013_Chemical_shark_repellent_Myth_fact_necromones_effect_OpenA.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>


As of 2014, SharkDefense partnered with SharkTec LLC to manufacture the semiochemical in a canister as a shark repellent for consumers called Anti-Shark 100.<ref name="Shark_tec">{{cite web|title=Anti-Shark 100 Product Overview|url=https://www.sharktecdefense.com|website=SharkTec|access-date=5 June 2017}}</ref>
As of 2014, SharkDefense partnered with SharkTec LLC to manufacture the semiochemical in a canister as a shark repellent for consumers called Anti-Shark 100.<ref name="Shark_tec">{{cite web|title=Anti-Shark 100 Product Overview|url=https://www.sharktecdefense.com|website=SharkTec|access-date=5 June 2017}}</ref>


Recently{{When|date=July 2019}}, SharkDefense used the same semiochemicals found in SharkTec's product to reduce shark by-catch by 71% in a government grant initiative. The government agency [[NOAA]] released these findings in a report to Congress.<ref>{{Cite journal|url = http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/by_catch/docs/brep_2014_rice.pdf|title = Performance of a long lasting shark repellent bait for elasmobranch bycatch reduction during commercial pelagic longline fishing|last = Stroud|first = Eric|date = October 2014|journal = National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration}}</ref>
Recently{{When|date=July 2019}}, SharkDefense used the same semiochemicals found in SharkTec's product to reduce shark by-catch by 71% in a government grant initiative. The government agency [[NOAA]] released these findings in a report to Congress.<ref>{{Cite journal|url = http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/by_catch/docs/brep_2014_rice.pdf|title = Performance of a long-lasting shark repellent bait for elasmobranch bycatch reduction during commercial pelagic longline fishing|last = Stroud|first = Eric|date = October 2014|journal = National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration}}</ref>


In 2018 independent tests were carried out on five Shark Repellent technologies using [[Great white shark]]s. Only [[Shark Shield]]’s ''Ocean Guardian Freedom+ Surf'' showed measureable results, with encounters reduced from 96% to 40%. Rpela (electrical repellent technology), SharkBanz bracelet & SharkBanz surf leash ([[magnetic shark repellent]] technology) and Chillax Wax (essential oils) showed no measureable effect on reducing shark attacks. <ref name="Huveneers2">{{cite journal |last1=Huveneers |first1=Charlie |title=Effectiveness of five personal shark-bite deterrents for surfers |journal=PeerJ |date=2018 |url=https://peerj.com/articles/5554/ |access-date=23 July 2020}}</ref>
In 2018 independent tests were carried out on five Shark Repellent technologies using [[Great white shark]]s. Only [[Shark Shield]]’s ''Ocean Guardian Freedom+ Surf'' showed measurable results, with encounters reduced from 96% to 40%. Rpela (electrical repellent technology), SharkBanz bracelet & SharkBanz surf leash ([[magnetic shark repellent]] technology) and Chillax Wax (essential oils) showed no measurable effect on reducing shark attacks.<ref name="Huveneers2">{{cite journal |last1=Huveneers |first1=Charlie |title=Effectiveness of five personal shark-bite deterrents for surfers |journal=PeerJ |date=2018 |volume=6 |pages=e5554 |doi=10.7717/peerj.5554 |pmid=30186701 |pmc=6120439 |doi-access=free }}</ref>


==In popular culture==
==In popular culture==
The 1947 Robb White book ''Secret Sea'' mentions a copper acetate shark repellent developed by the U.S. Navy.<ref>White, Robb, ''Secret Sea'' (New York: Scholastic Book Services, 1968 reprint edition), p. 182.</ref>
The 1947 Robb White book ''Secret Sea'' mentions a copper acetate shark repellent developed by the U.S. Navy.<ref>White, Robb, ''Secret Sea'' (New York: Scholastic Book Services, 1968 reprint edition), p. 182.</ref>


In [[Batman (1966 film)|Batman: The Movie (1966)]] there is a scene where an exploding shark jumps from the water and grabs Batman's leg while he is hanging on the Batcopter's ladder, piloted by Robin. Batman tries to punch the shark back to the ocean, but it does not affect the shark. He's handed a canister of Oceanic Bat-Spray, making the shark open its jaw and explode.
A scene from the 1966 film ''[[Batman (1966 film)|Batman]]'' has the [[Batman|title character]] use his "Shark Repellent Bat Spray" on a shark which explodes afterward. In the years since the film's release, this scene has become a popular [[meme]], being frequently referenced in other media to highlight the campiness of the film and the 1960s [[Batman (TV series)|''Batman'' television series]].

⚫
In a 2015 [[MythBusters (2015 season)#Episode 235 .E2.80.93 .22MythBusters vs. Jaws.22|a ''MythBusters'' episode]], the hosts [[Adam Savage]] and [[Jamie Hyneman]] used an extract of dead sharks, and were able to drive away 10-20 [[Caribbean reef shark]]s and [[nurse shark]]s in only a few seconds on two occasions. The repellent used consisted of extracts from other species of shark bodies, and sharks did not return for over 5 minutes on both occasions.<ref>


⚫
In a 2015 [[MythBusters_(2015_season)#Episode_235_.E2.80.93_.22MythBusters_vs._Jaws.22|a ''MythBusters'' episode]], the hosts [[Adam Savage]] and [[Jamie Hyneman]] used an extract of dead sharks, and were able to drive away 10-20 [[Caribbean reef shark]]s and [[nurse shark]]s in only a few seconds on two separate occasions. The repellent used consisted of extracts from other species of shark bodies, and sharks did not return for over 5 minutes on both occasions.<ref>
{{cite web
{{cite web
| last1 = Hyneman
| last1 = Hyneman
Line 135: Line 140:
}}
}}
</ref>
</ref>

==See also==
*[[Chain mail]]
*[[Bear spray]]


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 20:38, 3 August 2024

For the business strategy, see Poison pill.

A shark repellent is any method of driving sharks away from an area. Shark repellents are a category of animal repellents. Shark repellent technologies include magnetic shark repellent, electropositive shark repellents, electrical repellents, and semiochemicals. Shark repellents can be used to protect people from sharks by driving the sharks away from areas where they are likely to harm human beings. In other applications, they can be used to keep sharks away from areas they may be a danger to themselves due to human activity. In this case, the shark repellent serves as a shark conservation method. There are some naturally occurring shark repellents; modern artificial shark repellents date to at least the 1940s, with the United States Navy using them in the Pacific Ocean theater of World War II.

Natural repellents

[edit]

It has traditionally been believed that sharks are repelled by the smell of a dead shark;[1] however, modern research has had mixed results.

The Pardachirus marmoratus fish (finless sole, Red Sea Moses sole) repels sharks through its secretions.[2] The best-understood factor is pardaxin, acting as an irritant to the sharks' gills, but other chemicals have been identified as contributing to the repellent effect.[3][4]

In 2017, the US Navy announced that it was developing a synthetic analog of hagfish slime with potential application as a shark repellent.[5]

History

[edit]

Some of the earliest research on shark repellents took place during the Second World War, when military services sought to minimize the risk to stranded aviators and sailors in the water. Research has continued to the present, with notable researchers including Americans Eugenie Clark, and later Samuel H. Gruber, who has conducted tests at the Bimini Sharklab[6] on the Caribbean island of Bimini, and the Japanese scientist Kazuo Tachibana. The future celebrity chef Julia Child developed shark repellent while working for the Office of Strategic Services.[7]

Initial work, which was based on historical research and studies at the time, focused on using the odor of another dead shark. Efforts were made to isolate the active components in dead shark bodies that repelled other sharks. Eventually, it was determined that certain copper compounds like copper acetate,[8] in combination with other ingredients, could mimic a dead shark and drive live sharks away from human beings in the water. Building on this work, Stewart Springer and others patented a "shark repellent" consisting of a combination of copper acetate and a dark-colored dye to obscure the user.[9] This shark repellent, known as "Shark Chaser", was long supplied to sailors and aviators of the United States Navy, initially packaged in cake form using a water-soluble wax binder and rigged to life vests. The Navy employed Shark Chaser extensively between 1943 and 1973. It is believed[8] that the composition does repel sharks in some situations, but not in all, with about a 70% effectiveness rating.[citation needed]

On the other hand, Albert Tester questioned the idea that dead shark bodies or chemicals based on them could work as shark repellent. In 1959, he prepared and tested extracts of decaying shark flesh on tiger sharks in Hawaii and blacktip sharks at Enewetak Atoll. Tester found that not only did the dead shark extracts fail to repel any sharks, but several sharks had a "weak or strong attraction" to them. Tester reported a similar failure to repel sharks by a 1959 test at Enewetak of "an alleged shark repellent, supplied by a fisherman, which contained extract of decayed shark flesh as the principal component."[10] Research has continued into the 2000s on using extracts from dead sharks or synthesizing such chemicals.[1]

Research

[edit]

Since the 1970s, there have been studies of how the Moses sole repels sharks, with Clark[2] and Gruber both studying it. As of 2004 it has not found practical use, however, as the chemicals are perishable,[11] and the repellent had to be injected into the shark's mouth to be effective;[1] in nature the substance is secreted on the skin and is thus ingested by sharks when they bite the sole.

Since the 1980s,[12] there is evidence that surfactants such as sodium lauryl sulfate can act as a shark repellent at concentrations of the order of 100 parts per million. However, this does not meet the desired "cloud" deterrence level of 0.1 parts per million.[13][14]

There have been validated field tests and studies to confirm the effectiveness of semiochemicals as a shark repellent. From 2005-2010, an extensive study on the effectiveness of semiochemicals as a shark repellent was conducted by scientists from SharkDefense Technologies and Seton Hall University. The study's results were published in the scientific journal Ocean & Coastal Management in 2013. The study concluded that the existence of a putative chemical shark repellent has been confirmed.[15]

As of 2014, SharkDefense partnered with SharkTec LLC to manufacture the semiochemical in a canister as a shark repellent for consumers called Anti-Shark 100.[16]

Recently[when?], SharkDefense used the same semiochemicals found in SharkTec's product to reduce shark by-catch by 71% in a government grant initiative. The government agency NOAA released these findings in a report to Congress.[17]

In 2018 independent tests were carried out on five Shark Repellent technologies using Great white sharks. Only Shark Shield’s Ocean Guardian Freedom+ Surf showed measurable results, with encounters reduced from 96% to 40%. Rpela (electrical repellent technology), SharkBanz bracelet & SharkBanz surf leash (magnetic shark repellent technology) and Chillax Wax (essential oils) showed no measurable effect on reducing shark attacks.[18]

[edit]

The 1947 Robb White book Secret Sea mentions a copper acetate shark repellent developed by the U.S. Navy.[19]

In Batman: The Movie (1966) there is a scene where an exploding shark jumps from the water and grabs Batman's leg while he is hanging on the Batcopter's ladder, piloted by Robin. Batman tries to punch the shark back to the ocean, but it does not affect the shark. He's handed a canister of Oceanic Bat-Spray, making the shark open its jaw and explode.

In a 2015 a MythBusters episode, the hosts Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman used an extract of dead sharks, and were able to drive away 10-20 Caribbean reef sharks and nurse sharks in only a few seconds on two occasions. The repellent used consisted of extracts from other species of shark bodies, and sharks did not return for over 5 minutes on both occasions.[20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Researchers tout shark repellent, 2004 Associated Press, "Fisherman and scientists have long noted sharks stay away if they smell a dead shark."
  2. ^ a b Clark, Eugenie; Gorge, Anita (June 1979). "Toxic soles, Pardachirus marmoratus from the Red Sea and P. pavoninus from Japan, with notes on other species". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 4 (2): 103–123. doi:10.1007/bf00005447. S2CID 11156811.
  3. ^ Tachibana, Kazuo; Sakaitanai, Masahiro; Nakanishi, Koji (1984). "Pavoninins: Shark-Repelling Ichthyotoxins from the Defense Secretion of the Pacific Sole". Science. 226 (4675): 703–705. Bibcode:1984Sci...226..703T. doi:10.1126/science.226.4675.703. PMID 17774948. S2CID 19656976.
  4. ^ Tachibana, Kazuo; Gruber, Samuel H. (1988). "Shark repellent lipophilic constituents in the defense secretion of the Moses sole (Pardachirus marmoratus)". Toxicon. 26 (9): 839–853. doi:10.1016/0041-0101(88)90325-x. PMID 3201487.
  5. ^ "The US Navy Is Synthesizing Hagfish Slime to Defend Against Torpedoes and Sharks". 2017-07-10. Retrieved 2018-09-23.
  6. ^ "Bimini Sharklab - Shark Research & Marine Biology Internships - Understand, Educate, Conserve".
  7. ^ "1944: JULIA CHILD".
  8. ^ a b Thomas B. Allen. Shadows in the Sea: The Sharks, Skates and Rays
  9. ^ US 2458540, Brinnick, Frederic E.; Fogelberg, John M. & Springer, Horace Stewart et al., "Shark repellent", issued 1949 
  10. ^ Tester, Albert L. (April 1963). "The role of olfaction in shark predation". Pacific Science. 17 (2): 145–170. hdl:10125/4935. ISSN 0030-8870.
  11. ^ Walter Sullivan (January 20, 1981). "Natural Shark Repellent is Alluring to Scientists". The New York Times.
  12. ^ Zlotkin, Eliahu; Gruber, Samuel H. (1984). "Synthetic surfactants: A new approach to the development of shark repellents". Archives of Toxicology. 56 (1): 55–58. doi:10.1007/BF00316354. PMID 6517714. S2CID 10478482.
  13. ^ Smith, Larry J. (1991). "The effectiveness of sodium lauryl sulphate as a shark repellent in a laboratory test situation". Journal of Fish Biology. 38: 105–113. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1991.tb03096.x.
  14. ^ Sisneros, Joseph A.; Nelson, Donald R. (2001). "Surfactants as Chemical Shark Repellents: Past, Present, and Future". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 60 (1–3): 117–130. doi:10.1023/A:1007612002903. S2CID 19575107.
  15. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-03. Retrieved 2016-02-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  16. ^ "Anti-Shark 100 Product Overview". SharkTec. Retrieved 5 June 2017.
  17. ^ Stroud, Eric (October 2014). "Performance of a long-lasting shark repellent bait for elasmobranch bycatch reduction during commercial pelagic longline fishing" (PDF). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  18. ^ Huveneers, Charlie (2018). "Effectiveness of five personal shark-bite deterrents for surfers". PeerJ. 6: e5554. doi:10.7717/peerj.5554. PMC 6120439. PMID 30186701.
  19. ^ White, Robb, Secret Sea (New York: Scholastic Book Services, 1968 reprint edition), p. 182.
  20. ^ Hyneman, James F.; Savage, Adam W. (August 29, 2015). "Dead Shark Repellent MiniMyth". Discovery.com. Discovery Communications. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Shark_repellent&oldid=1238427406"