Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland/Assessment: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Tag: |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|||
{{WikiProject Poland}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==GA- and A-class rules== |
==GA- and A-class rules== |
||
I would strongly suggest that we adhere to high quality standards as seen at [[WP:MILHIST]]. Particulary: 1) no article which has not been GA-reviewed by a neutral editor from [[WP:GA]] shall be classified as GA (and this requires a GA review to be listed on article's talk page, or article positivly assed at [[WP:GAR]]) and 2) no article which has not been reviewed by a WikiProject shall receive an A rating. In order to satisfy A-class requirements, I'd like to consider starting a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Review]] section, akin to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Review]], and implementing the current review/past review functinality in our template (the appopriate code can be seen at [[:Template:WPMILHIST]] and instructions at MILHIST review page). A GA-status should be a requirement before proceeding to A review.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus| Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|< |
I would strongly suggest that we adhere to high quality standards as seen at [[WP:MILHIST]]. Particulary: 1) no article which has not been GA-reviewed by a neutral editor from [[WP:GA]] shall be classified as GA (and this requires a GA review to be listed on article's talk page, or article positivly assed at [[WP:GAR]]) and 2) no article which has not been reviewed by a WikiProject shall receive an A rating. In order to satisfy A-class requirements, I'd like to consider starting a [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Review]] section, akin to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Review]], and implementing the current review/past review functinality in our template (the appopriate code can be seen at [[:Template:WPMILHIST]] and instructions at MILHIST review page). A GA-status should be a requirement before proceeding to A review.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus| Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </span>]]</span></sub> 23:29, 1 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Silesia == |
|||
The Silesia project uses this project's banner. Might it be a good idea to add a "supported by" option to the template for them? [[User:Warlordjohncarter|John Carter]] 17:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Just to let you know == |
|||
Dear All: I have added the [[Template:WikiProject Poland]] to the following articles: [[Amnesty for Polish citizens in the Soviet Union]], [[Gestapo-NKVD Conferences]], [[Józef Beck]], [[List of Soviet Union prison sites that detained Poles]], [[Michał Karaszewicz-Tokarzewski]], [[Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact]] and [[World War II crimes in Poland]]. As it’s my first time I thought I would report it here and hence if another editor has time they could check to see if I done them right. [[User:Jniech|Jniech]] ([[User talk:Jniech|talk]]) 14:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 21:51, 5 August 2024
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
GA- and A-class rules
[edit]I would strongly suggest that we adhere to high quality standards as seen at WP:MILHIST. Particulary: 1) no article which has not been GA-reviewed by a neutral editor from WP:GA shall be classified as GA (and this requires a GA review to be listed on article's talk page, or article positivly assed at WP:GAR) and 2) no article which has not been reviewed by a WikiProject shall receive an A rating. In order to satisfy A-class requirements, I'd like to consider starting a Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Review section, akin to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Review, and implementing the current review/past review functinality in our template (the appopriate code can be seen at Template:WPMILHIST and instructions at MILHIST review page). A GA-status should be a requirement before proceeding to A review.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 23:29, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Silesia
[edit]The Silesia project uses this project's banner. Might it be a good idea to add a "supported by" option to the template for them? John Carter 17:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Just to let you know
[edit]Dear All: I have added the Template:WikiProject Poland to the following articles: Amnesty for Polish citizens in the Soviet Union, Gestapo-NKVD Conferences, Józef Beck, List of Soviet Union prison sites that detained Poles, Michał Karaszewicz-Tokarzewski, Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact and World War II crimes in Poland. As it’s my first time I thought I would report it here and hence if another editor has time they could check to see if I done them right. Jniech (talk) 14:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)