Menger curvature: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: journal. Add: s2cid. Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 788/3485 |
ce |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Using the well-known formula relating the side lengths of a [[triangle]] to its area, it follows that |
Using the well-known formula relating the side lengths of a [[triangle]] to its area, it follows that |
||
:<math>c (x, y, z) = \frac1{R} = \frac{4 A}{| |
:<math>c (x, y, z) = \frac1{R} = \frac{4 A}{|x - y ||y - z ||z - x |},</math> |
||
where ''A'' denotes the area of the triangle spanned by ''x'', ''y'' and ''z''. |
where ''A'' denotes the area of the triangle spanned by ''x'', ''y'' and ''z''. |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
: <math> c^{p}(\mu)=\int\int\int c(x,y,z)^{p}d\mu(x)d\mu(y)d\mu(z).</math> |
: <math> c^{p}(\mu)=\int\int\int c(x,y,z)^{p}d\mu(x)d\mu(y)d\mu(z).</math> |
||
* A Borel set <math> E\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n} </math> is rectifiable if <math> c^{2}(H^{1}|_{E})<\infty</math>, where <math> H^{1}|_{E} </math> denotes one-dimensional [[Hausdorff measure]] restricted to the set <math> E</math>.<ref>{{cite journal |
* A Borel set <math> E\subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n} </math> is rectifiable if <math> c^{2}(H^{1}|_{E})<\infty</math>, where <math> H^{1}|_{E} </math> denotes one-dimensional [[Hausdorff measure]] restricted to the set <math> E</math>.<ref> |
||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last=Leger |first=J. |
|||
|year=1999 |
|||
|title=Menger curvature and rectifiability |
|||
|journal=[[Annals of Mathematics]] |
|||
|volume=149 |issue=3 |pages=831–869 |
|||
|url=http://www.emis.de/journals/Annals/149_3/leger.pdf |
|||
|arxiv=math/9905212 |
|||
| issue = 3 |
|||
|doi=10.2307/121074 |
|||
|jstor=121074 |
|||
|s2cid=216176 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
The basic intuition behind the result is that Menger curvature measures how straight a given triple of points are (the smaller <math> c(x,y,z)\max\{|x-y|,|y-z|,|z-y|\}</math> is, the closer x,y, and z are to being collinear), and this integral quantity being finite is saying that the set E is flat on most small scales. In particular, if the power in the integral is larger, our set is smoother than just being rectifiable<ref>{{cite journal |
The basic intuition behind the result is that Menger curvature measures how straight a given triple of points are (the smaller <math> c(x,y,z)\max\{|x-y|,|y-z|,|z-y|\}</math> is, the closer x,y, and z are to being collinear), and this integral quantity being finite is saying that the set E is flat on most small scales. In particular, if the power in the integral is larger, our set is smoother than just being rectifiable<ref> |
||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1=Strzelecki |first1=Paweł |
|||
⚫ | |||
|last2=Szumańska |first2=Marta |
|||
| journal = Institut F¨ur Mathematik }}</ref> |
|||
|last3=von der Mosel |first3=Heiko |
|||
|date=2010 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|url=http://www.numdam.org/item/ASNSP_2010_5_9_1_145_0/ |
|||
|journal=[[Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di Scienze]] |
|||
|volume=9 |issue=1 |pages=145–187 |
|||
}}</ref> |
|||
* Let <math> p>3</math>, <math> f:S^{1}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n}</math> be a homeomorphism and <math>\Gamma=f(S^{1})</math>. Then <math> f\in C^{1,1-\frac{3}{p}}(S^{1})</math> if <math> c^{p}(H^{1}|_{\Gamma})<\infty</math>. |
* Let <math> p>3</math>, <math> f:S^{1}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n}</math> be a homeomorphism and <math>\Gamma=f(S^{1})</math>. Then <math> f\in C^{1,1-\frac{3}{p}}(S^{1})</math> if <math> c^{p}(H^{1}|_{\Gamma})<\infty</math>. |
||
* If <math> 0<H^{s}(E)<\infty</math> where <math> 0<s\leq\frac{1}{2}</math>, and <math> c^{2s}(H^{s}|_{E})<\infty</math>, then <math> E</math> is rectifiable in the sense that there are countably many <math>C^{1}</math> curves <math>\Gamma_{i}</math> such that <math> H^{s}(E\backslash \bigcup\Gamma_{i})=0</math>. The result is not true for <math> \frac{1}{2}<s<1</math>, and <math> c^{2s}(H^{s}|_{E})=\infty</math> for <math> 1<s\leq n</math>.:<ref>{{cite journal |
* If <math> 0<H^{s}(E)<\infty</math> where <math> 0<s\leq\frac{1}{2}</math>, and <math> c^{2s}(H^{s}|_{E})<\infty</math>, then <math> E</math> is rectifiable in the sense that there are countably many <math>C^{1}</math> curves <math>\Gamma_{i}</math> such that <math> H^{s}(E\backslash \bigcup\Gamma_{i})=0</math>. The result is not true for <math> \frac{1}{2}<s<1</math>, and <math> c^{2s}(H^{s}|_{E})=\infty</math> for <math> 1<s\leq n</math>.:<ref> |
||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last1=Lin |first1=Yong |
|||
⚫ | |||
|last2=Mattila |first2=Pertti |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|volume=129 |issue=6 |pages=1755–1762 |
|||
⚫ | |||
}}</ref> |
|||
In the opposite direction, there is a result of Peter Jones:<ref>{{cite book |
In the opposite direction, there is a result of Peter Jones:<ref> |
||
{{cite book |
|||
|last=Pajot |first=H. |
|||
|year=2000 |
|||
|title=Analytic Capacity, Rectifiability, Menger Curvature and the Cauchy Integral |
|||
|publisher=Springer |
|||
|isbn=3-540-00001-1 |
|||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
* If <math>E\subseteq\Gamma\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{2}</math>, <math> H^{1}(E)>0</math>, and <math>\Gamma</math> is rectifiable. Then there is a positive Radon measure <math>\mu</math> supported on <math>E</math> satisfying <math> \mu B(x,r)\leq r</math> for all <math>x\in E</math> and <math>r>0</math> such that <math>c^{2}(\mu)<\infty</math> (in particular, this measure is the [[Frostman's lemma|Frostman measure]] associated to E). Moreover, if <math>H^{1}(B(x,r)\cap\Gamma)\leq Cr</math> for some constant ''C'' and all <math> x\in \Gamma</math> and ''r>0'', then <math> c^{2}(H^{1}|_{E})<\infty</math>. This last result follows from the [[Analyst's Traveling Salesman Theorem]]. |
* If <math>E\subseteq\Gamma\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{2}</math>, <math> H^{1}(E)>0</math>, and <math>\Gamma</math> is rectifiable. Then there is a positive Radon measure <math>\mu</math> supported on <math>E</math> satisfying <math> \mu B(x,r)\leq r</math> for all <math>x\in E</math> and <math>r>0</math> such that <math>c^{2}(\mu)<\infty</math> (in particular, this measure is the [[Frostman's lemma|Frostman measure]] associated to E). Moreover, if <math>H^{1}(B(x,r)\cap\Gamma)\leq Cr</math> for some constant ''C'' and all <math> x\in \Gamma</math> and ''r>0'', then <math> c^{2}(H^{1}|_{E})<\infty</math>. This last result follows from the [[Analyst's Traveling Salesman Theorem]]. |
||
Analogous results hold in general metric spaces:<ref>{{cite journal |
Analogous results hold in general metric spaces:<ref> |
||
{{cite journal |
|||
|last=Schul |first=Raanan |
|||
|year=2007 |
|||
|title=Ahlfors-regular curves in metric spaces |
|||
⚫ | |||
| journal = Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ | volume = 32 | pages = 437–460 | year = 2007 |
|||
|journal=[[Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
|volume=32 |pages=437–460 |
|||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
Line 72: | Line 97: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* {{cite web |
* {{cite web |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|url=http://www.lems.brown.edu/vision/people/leymarie/Notes/CurvSurf/MengerCurv/index.html |
|url=http://www.lems.brown.edu/vision/people/leymarie/Notes/CurvSurf/MengerCurv/index.html |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
|first=F. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
Line 86: | Line 110: | ||
<references/> |
<references/> |
||
* |
*{{cite journal |
||
| |
|last=Tolsa|first=Xavier |
||
|year=2000 |
|||
| first = Xavier |
|||
| |
|title=Principal values for the Cauchy integral and rectifiability |
||
| |
|journal=[[Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society]] |
||
| |
|volume=128 |issue=7 |pages=2111–2119 |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
| pages = 2111–2119 |
|||
⚫ | |||
| issue = 7 |
|||
| doi-access = free |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 9 August 2024
In mathematics, the Menger curvature of a triple of points in n-dimensional Euclidean space Rn is the reciprocal of the radius of the circle that passes through the three points. It is named after the Austrian-American mathematician Karl Menger.
Definition
[edit]Let x, y and z be three points in Rn; for simplicity, assume for the moment that all three points are distinct and do not lie on a single straight line. Let Π ⊆ Rn be the Euclidean plane spanned by x, y and z and let C ⊆ Π be the unique Euclidean circle in Π that passes through x, y and z (the circumcircle of x, y and z). Let R be the radius of C. Then the Menger curvature c(x, y, z) of x, y and z is defined by
If the three points are collinear, R can be informally considered to be +∞, and it makes rigorous sense to define c(x, y, z) = 0. If any of the points x, y and z are coincident, again define c(x, y, z) = 0.
Using the well-known formula relating the side lengths of a triangle to its area, it follows that
where A denotes the area of the triangle spanned by x, y and z.
Another way of computing Menger curvature is the identity
where is the angle made at the y-corner of the triangle spanned by x,y,z.
Menger curvature may also be defined on a general metric space. If X is a metric space and x,y, and z are distinct points, let f be an isometry from into . Define the Menger curvature of these points to be
Note that f need not be defined on all of X, just on {x,y,z}, and the value cX (x,y,z) is independent of the choice of f.
Integral Curvature Rectifiability
[edit]Menger curvature can be used to give quantitative conditions for when sets in may be rectifiable. For a Borel measure on a Euclidean space define
- A Borel set is rectifiable if , where denotes one-dimensional Hausdorff measure restricted to the set .[1]
The basic intuition behind the result is that Menger curvature measures how straight a given triple of points are (the smaller is, the closer x,y, and z are to being collinear), and this integral quantity being finite is saying that the set E is flat on most small scales. In particular, if the power in the integral is larger, our set is smoother than just being rectifiable[2]
- Let , be a homeomorphism and . Then if .
- If where , and , then is rectifiable in the sense that there are countably many curves such that . The result is not true for , and for .:[3]
In the opposite direction, there is a result of Peter Jones:[4]
- If , , and is rectifiable. Then there is a positive Radon measure supported on satisfying for all and such that (in particular, this measure is the Frostman measure associated to E). Moreover, if for some constant C and all and r>0, then . This last result follows from the Analyst's Traveling Salesman Theorem.
Analogous results hold in general metric spaces:[5]
See also
[edit]External links
[edit]- Leymarie, F. (September 2003). "Notes on Menger Curvature". Archived from the original on 2007-08-21. Retrieved 2007-11-19.
References
[edit]- ^ Leger, J. (1999). "Menger curvature and rectifiability" (PDF). Annals of Mathematics. 149 (3): 831–869. arXiv:math/9905212. doi:10.2307/121074. JSTOR 121074. S2CID 216176.
- ^ Strzelecki, Paweł; Szumańska, Marta; von der Mosel, Heiko (2010). "Regularizing and self-avoidance effects of integral Menger curvature". Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di Scienze. 9 (1): 145–187.
- ^ Lin, Yong; Mattila, Pertti (2000). "Menger curvature and C1 regularity of fractals" (PDF). Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 129 (6): 1755–1762. doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-00-05814-7.
- ^ Pajot, H. (2000). Analytic Capacity, Rectifiability, Menger Curvature and the Cauchy Integral. Springer. ISBN 3-540-00001-1.
- ^ Schul, Raanan (2007). "Ahlfors-regular curves in metric spaces" (PDF). Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae. 32: 437–460.
- Tolsa, Xavier (2000). "Principal values for the Cauchy integral and rectifiability". Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 128 (7): 2111–2119. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05264-3.