Talk:University of Bristol: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 19:15, 14 August 2024

Policy Press was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 6 April 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into University of Bristol. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the University of Bristol article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 months

University of Bristol has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 24, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
July 4, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bristol High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article
	This article does not require a map
	This article has an infobox

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Independent

'It is the largest independent employer in Bristol.' What does that mean? Independent of what? 109.158.6.129 (talk) 12:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Junior doctorate

What is a junior doctorate? 109.158.6.129 (talk) 12:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Donaldson in alumni (writers)

Julia Donaldson https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Donaldson 91.168.47.32 (talk) 21:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cluttered

This page feels cluttered. There is a lot about disparate stories from the University's recent history. The University's history has its own dedicated page. I think some elements from the history section would be better merged into there. Brizzle95 (talk) 00:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still think the page is cluttered, and want to move some individual stories from the history subheading to the history page. I would like to hear opinions from other editors first, as this could be a significant change. Brizzle95 (talk) 10:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

I propose merging the Controversy section into the History of the University of Bristol. It would be more in line with standard practice to have these stories in the detailed history page. It would also help clean up the main page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brizzle95 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{afd-merged-from|Policy Press|Policy Press|6 April 2022}}
-{{Talk header|archive_age=60|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
+{{Talk header}}
 {{Article history|action1=GAN
 |action1date=December 24, 2007
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 {{WikiProject Higher education}}
 {{WikiProject Neuroscience|importance=Low}}
-{{WikiProject Bristol|photo=yes|ibox=yes|stats=yes|map=na|importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Bristol|photo=yes|ibox=yes|map=na|importance=high}}
 {{WikiProject England|importance=high}}
 }}
@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 :I still think the page is cluttered, and want to move some individual stories from the history subheading to the history page. I would like to hear opinions from other editors first, as this could be a significant change. [[User:Brizzle95|Brizzle95]] ([[User talk:Brizzle95|talk]]) 10:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
+== Merge Proposal ==
+I propose merging the Controversy section into the [[History of the University of Bristol]]. It would be more in line with standard practice to have these stories in the detailed history page. It would also help clean up the main page.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Brizzle95|Brizzle95]] ([[User talk:Brizzle95#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Brizzle95|contribs]]) 19:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->