Jump to content

Talk:August 2016 Western United States wildfires: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WikiProject Oregon does not assess REDIRECT pages for class or importance
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi |date=1 August 2024 |result='''redirect''' |page=August 2016 Western United States wildfires}}
{{WikiProject Nevada |class=Stub}}
{{WikiProject Wildfire|class=stub}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|1=
{{WikiProject Nevada}}
{{WPDM|class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Oregon|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Wildfire|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=Low}}
{{rqp}}
{{WikiProject Oregon}}
}}


== Contested deletion ==
== Contested deletion ==
Line 10: Line 12:
::*''' Reply '''- {{ping|27.115.113.102}}, [[WP:JFDI|Be Bold]]! --[[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677|talk]]) 04:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
::*''' Reply '''- {{ping|27.115.113.102}}, [[WP:JFDI|Be Bold]]! --[[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677|talk]]) 04:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
:::This article is not eligible for speedy deletion. It should be kept, but it should just cover Nevada, as the title suggests. Alternatively, its title should be changed to include a much wider area. There are several separate fires, not one fire that stretches across several states. [[User:Jim Michael|Jim Michael]] ([[User talk:Jim Michael|talk]]) 10:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
:::This article is not eligible for speedy deletion. It should be kept, but it should just cover Nevada, as the title suggests. Alternatively, its title should be changed to include a much wider area. There are several separate fires, not one fire that stretches across several states. [[User:Jim Michael|Jim Michael]] ([[User talk:Jim Michael|talk]]) 10:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
*{{ping|GWA88}} I've declined the speedy since there is some news coverage of this in the article, so it stands to reason that there might be more media coverage out there. This doesn't mean that this wildfire would pass overall notability guidelines, just that it passes A7, which is actually relatively easy to pass - there only needs to be an assertion of notability. Now that said, if this is something that will be kept at AfD, the article will either need to be rewritten to focus solely on Nevada or retitled to encompass the other states, since it looks like it's happening in several states at once. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[User talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style="color:#19197; background:#fff;"> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 20:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


== Contested deletion ==
== Contested deletion ==

Latest revision as of 05:21, 15 August 2024

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (wildfire in 7 states with widespread evacuations that can be redirected to List_of_wildfires#Canada_and_the_United_States) --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. With wildfires in 7 states, this article should not be titled "2016 Nevada wildfires". This article should, IMO, be expanded with ongoing information, then refractored and split to only include information about Nevada. 27.115.113.102 (talk) 04:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article is not eligible for speedy deletion. It should be kept, but it should just cover Nevada, as the title suggests. Alternatively, its title should be changed to include a much wider area. There are several separate fires, not one fire that stretches across several states. Jim Michael (talk) 10:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @GWA88: I've declined the speedy since there is some news coverage of this in the article, so it stands to reason that there might be more media coverage out there. This doesn't mean that this wildfire would pass overall notability guidelines, just that it passes A7, which is actually relatively easy to pass - there only needs to be an assertion of notability. Now that said, if this is something that will be kept at AfD, the article will either need to be rewritten to focus solely on Nevada or retitled to encompass the other states, since it looks like it's happening in several states at once. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 20:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (speedy deletion templates should not be applied twice to one single article) --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]