Minerva Building: Difference between revisions
Convert tags |
"Occurred" instead of "has occurred", Adding "the" before "development", "Was" instead of "were", Comma after "mid-2006", "Suggest" instead of "make", The preposition "on" is typically used with specific dates to improve grammatical correctness. Using "had been" ensures correct verb tense agreement Adding "that was". |
||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}} |
|||
The '''Minerva Building''' was a [[skyscraper]] once planned for the eastern edge of [[London|London's]] main financial district, the [[City of London]]. If built, it would have been the first building in the City of London to contain more than {{convert|1000000|sqft| |
The '''Minerva Building''' was a [[skyscraper]] that was once planned for the eastern edge of [[London|London's]] main financial district, the [[City of London]]. If it had been built, it would have been the first building in the City of London to contain more than {{convert|1000000|sqft|m2|-5|abbr=on}} of office space. |
||
==History== |
|||
| ⚫ | A revised planning application by developers [[Minerva plc]] for the 53-storey version was submitted during the week ending |
||
| ⚫ | A revised planning application by developers [[Minerva plc]] for the 53-storey version was submitted during the week ending on 12 July 2002. The original proposal for the site, known as the [[St. Botolph's House]], was a 14-storey office block. In 2001, this was revised to a 36-storey, {{convert|159|m|ft|0}} tall office tower. A post-[[September 11, 2001 attacks|September 11]] revision brought structural and design changes and a further increase in height, to 53 floors and {{convert|217|m|ft|0}}. |
||
| ⚫ | Its location marks the Eastern gateway to the |
||
| ⚫ | Its location marks the Eastern gateway to the city, and the building might have acted as a focus for the regeneration of the eastern City fringe. The site is outside the strategic views of St. Paul's, and does not contain listed buildings, although it does infringe upon a conservation area. It also lies within one of the three proposed viewing cones for the Tower of London, as do [[30 St Mary Axe]], [[Heron Tower]] and [[Tower 42]]. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | Although the official height was 219m,<ref>''[https://books.google.com/books?id=x-FUAAAAMAAJ Planning: For the Natural and Built Environment]''. Planning Publications.; 2004. p. 9.</ref> the building was claimed to have planning permission for an antenna, which might have seen its pinnacle height rise to {{convert|247|m|ft|0}}. The developers claimed that a restaurant would have been open to the public on the highest floor. |
||
| ⚫ | In March 2006, amidst the [[Cash for Peerages]] political scandal, it emerged that the [[Office of the Deputy Prime Minister]] had not called in the application for the Minerva Building (nor Minerva's [[Park Place (Croydon)|Park Place]] proposals in [[Croydon]]) shortly after two of Minerva's senior figures had made major donations and loans to the [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]]. This led some commentators to |
||
| ⚫ | In March 2006, amidst the [[Cash for Peerages]] political scandal, it emerged that the [[Office of the Deputy Prime Minister]] had not called in the application for the Minerva Building (nor Minerva's [[Park Place (Croydon)|Park Place]] proposals in [[Croydon]]) shortly after two of Minerva's senior figures had made major donations and loans to the [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]]. This led some commentators to suggest a connection between the loans and the decision.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article353512.ece |title=Developer's tower block approved after £200,000 donation to Labour |author=Colin Brown |publisher=The Independent |location=London |date=2006-03-25 |accessdate=2010-05-12 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090204093935/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/developers-tower-block-approved-after-163200000-donation-to-labour-471358.html |archivedate=2009-02-04 }}</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
==References== |
==References== |
||
| Line 15: | Line 18: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* |
*[http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=50 Minerva Building on SkyscraperNews] |
||
*[http://www.minervaplc.co.uk/developments/?id=388 Minerva official site] |
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060218013254/http://www.minervaplc.co.uk/developments/?id=388 Minerva official site] |
||
{{coord|51.5146|-0.0770|type:landmark_region:GB|display=title}} |
|||
[[Category:Skyscrapers in London]] |
[[Category:Skyscrapers in the City of London]] |
||
[[Category:Former buildings and structures of the City of London]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 07:03, 15 August 2024
The Minerva Building was a skyscraper that was once planned for the eastern edge of London's main financial district, the City of London. If it had been built, it would have been the first building in the City of London to contain more than 1,000,000 sq ft (100,000 m2) of office space.
History
[edit]A revised planning application by developers Minerva plc for the 53-storey version was submitted during the week ending on 12 July 2002. The original proposal for the site, known as the St. Botolph's House, was a 14-storey office block. In 2001, this was revised to a 36-storey, 159 metres (522 ft) tall office tower. A post-September 11 revision brought structural and design changes and a further increase in height, to 53 floors and 217 metres (712 ft).
Its location marks the Eastern gateway to the city, and the building might have acted as a focus for the regeneration of the eastern City fringe. The site is outside the strategic views of St. Paul's, and does not contain listed buildings, although it does infringe upon a conservation area. It also lies within one of the three proposed viewing cones for the Tower of London, as do 30 St Mary Axe, Heron Tower and Tower 42.
Although the official height was 219m,[1] the building was claimed to have planning permission for an antenna, which might have seen its pinnacle height rise to 247 metres (810 ft). The developers claimed that a restaurant would have been open to the public on the highest floor.
In March 2006, amidst the Cash for Peerages political scandal, it emerged that the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister had not called in the application for the Minerva Building (nor Minerva's Park Place proposals in Croydon) shortly after two of Minerva's senior figures had made major donations and loans to the Labour Party. This led some commentators to suggest a connection between the loans and the decision.[2]
In mid-2006, it was announced that Minerva, deep within a period of financial consolidation, was no longer actively pursuing the development of the site. A mid-rise commercial development occurred instead on the site.
References
[edit]- ^ Planning: For the Natural and Built Environment. Planning Publications.; 2004. p. 9.
- ^ Colin Brown (25 March 2006). "Developer's tower block approved after £200,000 donation to Labour". London: The Independent. Archived from the original on 4 February 2009. Retrieved 12 May 2010.