Path space fibration: Difference between revisions
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) m →top |
RowanElder (talk | contribs) Copyediting for clarification, remains unclear (what is \chi?) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[algebraic topology]], the '''path space fibration''' over a [[ |
In [[algebraic topology]], the '''path space fibration''' over a [[pointed space]] <math>(X, *)</math><ref>Throughout the article, spaces are objects of the category of "reasonable" spaces; e.g., the category of compactly generated weak [[Hausdorff space]]s.</ref> is a [[fibration]] of the form<ref>{{harvnb|Davis|Kirk|2001|loc=Theorem 6.15. 2.}}</ref> |
||
:<math>\Omega X \hookrightarrow PX \overset{\chi \mapsto \chi(1)}\to X</math> |
:<math>\Omega X \hookrightarrow PX \overset{\chi \mapsto \chi(1)}\to X</math> |
||
where |
where |
||
*<math>PX</math> is the [[path space (algebraic topology)|path space]] of |
*<math>PX</math> is the ''based'' [[path space (algebraic topology)|path space]] of the pointed space <math>(X, *)</math>; that is, <math>PX = \{ f\colon I \to X \mid f \ \text{continuous}, f(0) = * \}</math> equipped with the [[compact-open topology]]. |
||
*<math>\Omega X</math> is the fiber of <math>\chi \mapsto \chi(1)</math> over the base point of |
*<math>\Omega X</math> is the fiber of <math>\chi \mapsto \chi(1)</math> over the base point of <math>(X, *)</math>; thus it is the [[loop space]] of <math>(X, *)</math>. |
||
The space <math>X^I</math> consists of all maps from ''I'' to ''X'' that |
The ''free'' path space of ''X'', that is, <math>\operatorname{Map}(I, X) = X^I</math>, consists of all maps from ''I'' to ''X'' that do not necessarily begin at a base point, and the fibration <math>X^I \to X</math> given by, say, <math>\chi \mapsto \chi(1)</math>, is called the '''free path space fibration'''. |
||
The path space fibration can be understood to be dual to the [[mapping cone (topology)|mapping cone]].{{clarify|more precise meaning}} The |
The path space fibration can be understood to be dual to the [[mapping cone (topology)|mapping cone]].{{clarify|more precise meaning|date=August 2022}} The fiber of the based fibration is called the mapping fiber or, equivalently, the [[homotopy fiber]]. |
||
== Mapping path space == |
== Mapping path space == |
Latest revision as of 00:12, 17 August 2024
In algebraic topology, the path space fibration over a pointed space [1] is a fibration of the form[2]
where
- is the based path space of the pointed space ; that is, equipped with the compact-open topology.
- is the fiber of over the base point of ; thus it is the loop space of .
The free path space of X, that is, , consists of all maps from I to X that do not necessarily begin at a base point, and the fibration given by, say, , is called the free path space fibration.
The path space fibration can be understood to be dual to the mapping cone.[clarification needed] The fiber of the based fibration is called the mapping fiber or, equivalently, the homotopy fiber.
Mapping path space
[edit]If is any map, then the mapping path space of is the pullback of the fibration along . (A mapping path space satisfies the universal property that is dual to that of a mapping cylinder, which is a push-out. Because of this, a mapping path space is also called a mapping cocylinder.[3])
Since a fibration pulls back to a fibration, if Y is based, one has the fibration
where and is the homotopy fiber, the pullback of the fibration along .
Note also is the composition
where the first map sends x to ; here denotes the constant path with value . Clearly, is a homotopy equivalence; thus, the above decomposition says that any map is a fibration up to homotopy equivalence.
If is a fibration to begin with, then the map is a fiber-homotopy equivalence and, consequently,[4] the fibers of over the path-component of the base point are homotopy equivalent to the homotopy fiber of .
Moore's path space
[edit]By definition, a path in a space X is a map from the unit interval I to X. Again by definition, the product of two paths such that is the path given by:
- .
This product, in general, fails to be associative on the nose: , as seen directly. One solution to this failure is to pass to homotopy classes: one has . Another solution is to work with paths of arbitrary lengths, leading to the notions of Moore's path space and Moore's path space fibration, described below.[5] (A more sophisticated solution is to rethink composition: work with an arbitrary family of compositions; see the introduction of Lurie's paper,[6] leading to the notion of an operad.)
Given a based space , we let
An element f of this set has a unique extension to the interval such that . Thus, the set can be identified as a subspace of . The resulting space is called the Moore path space of X, after John Coleman Moore, who introduced the concept. Then, just as before, there is a fibration, Moore's path space fibration:
where p sends each to and is the fiber. It turns out that and are homotopy equivalent.
Now, we define the product map
by: for and ,
- .
This product is manifestly associative. In particular, with μ restricted to Ω'X × Ω'X, we have that Ω'X is a topological monoid (in the category of all spaces). Moreover, this monoid Ω'X acts on P'X through the original μ. In fact, is an Ω'X-fibration.[7]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Throughout the article, spaces are objects of the category of "reasonable" spaces; e.g., the category of compactly generated weak Hausdorff spaces.
- ^ Davis & Kirk 2001, Theorem 6.15. 2.
- ^ Davis & Kirk 2001, § 6.8.
- ^ using the change of fiber
- ^ Whitehead 1978, Ch. III, § 2.
- ^ Lurie, Jacob (October 30, 2009). "Derived Algebraic Geometry VI: E[k]-Algebras" (PDF).
- ^ Let G = Ω'X and P = P'X. That G preserves the fibers is clear. To see, for each γ in P, the map is a weak equivalence, we can use the following lemma:
Lemma — Let p: D → B, q: E → B be fibrations over an unbased space B, f: D → E a map over B. If B is path-connected, then the following are equivalent:
- f is a weak equivalence.
- is a weak equivalence for some b in B.
- is a weak equivalence for every b in B.
We apply the lemma with where α is a path in P and I → X is t → the end-point of α(t). Since if γ is the constant path, the claim follows from the lemma. (In a nutshell, the lemma follows from the long exact homotopy sequence and the five lemma.)
References
[edit]- Davis, James F.; Kirk, Paul (2001). Lecture Notes in Algebraic Topology (PDF). Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 35. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. pp. xvi+367. doi:10.1090/gsm/035. ISBN 0-8218-2160-1. MR 1841974.
- May, J. Peter (1999). A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology (PDF). Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. x+243. ISBN 0-226-51182-0. MR 1702278.
- Whitehead, George W. (1978). Elements of homotopy theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 61 (3rd ed.). New York-Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. xxi+744. ISBN 978-0-387-90336-1. MR 0516508.