Path space fibration: Difference between revisions
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) |
RowanElder (talk | contribs) Copyediting for clarification, remains unclear (what is \chi?) |
||
(39 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In algebraic topology, the '''path space fibration''' over a |
In [[algebraic topology]], the '''path space fibration''' over a [[pointed space]] <math>(X, *)</math><ref>Throughout the article, spaces are objects of the category of "reasonable" spaces; e.g., the category of compactly generated weak [[Hausdorff space]]s.</ref> is a [[fibration]] of the form<ref>{{harvnb|Davis|Kirk|2001|loc=Theorem 6.15. 2.}}</ref> |
||
:<math>\Omega X \hookrightarrow PX \overset{\chi \mapsto \chi(1)}\to X</math> |
:<math>\Omega X \hookrightarrow PX \overset{\chi \mapsto \chi(1)}\to X</math> |
||
where |
where |
||
*<math>PX |
*<math>PX</math> is the ''based'' [[path space (algebraic topology)|path space]] of the pointed space <math>(X, *)</math>; that is, <math>PX = \{ f\colon I \to X \mid f \ \text{continuous}, f(0) = * \}</math> equipped with the [[compact-open topology]]. |
||
*<math>\Omega X</math> is the fiber of <math>\chi \mapsto \chi(1)</math> over the base point of |
*<math>\Omega X</math> is the fiber of <math>\chi \mapsto \chi(1)</math> over the base point of <math>(X, *)</math>; thus it is the [[loop space]] of <math>(X, *)</math>. |
||
The space <math>X^I</math> consists of all maps from ''I'' to ''X'' that |
The ''free'' path space of ''X'', that is, <math>\operatorname{Map}(I, X) = X^I</math>, consists of all maps from ''I'' to ''X'' that do not necessarily begin at a base point, and the fibration <math>X^I \to X</math> given by, say, <math>\chi \mapsto \chi(1)</math>, is called the '''free path space fibration'''. |
||
The path space fibration can be understood to be dual to the [[mapping cone (topology)|mapping cone]].{{clarify|more precise meaning|date=August 2022}} The fiber of the based fibration is called the mapping fiber or, equivalently, the [[homotopy fiber]]. |
|||
== Mapping path space == |
== Mapping path space == |
||
If |
If <math>f\colon X\to Y</math> is any map, then the '''mapping path space''' <math>P_f</math> of <math>f</math> is the pullback of the fibration <math>Y^I \to Y, \, \chi \mapsto \chi(1)</math> along <math>f</math>. (A mapping path space satisfies the universal property that is dual to that of a mapping cylinder, which is a push-out. Because of this, a mapping path space is also called a '''mapping cocylinder'''.<ref>{{harvnb|Davis|Kirk|2001|loc=§ 6.8.}}</ref>) |
||
Since a fibration pulls back to a fibration, if ''Y'' is based, one has the fibration |
|||
:<math>F_f \hookrightarrow P_f \overset{p}\to Y</math> |
:<math>F_f \hookrightarrow P_f \overset{p}\to Y</math> |
||
where <math>p(x, \chi) = \chi(0)</math> and <math>F_f</math> is the [[homotopy fiber]], the pullback of <math>PY \overset{\chi \mapsto \chi(1)}\ |
where <math>p(x, \chi) = \chi(0)</math> and <math>F_f</math> is the [[homotopy fiber]], the pullback of the fibration <math>PY \overset{\chi \mapsto \chi(1)}{\longrightarrow} Y</math> along <math>f</math>. |
||
Note also |
Note also <math>f</math> is the composition |
||
:<math>X \overset{\phi}\to P_f \overset{p}\to Y</math> |
:<math>X \overset{\phi}\to P_f \overset{p}\to Y</math> |
||
where the first map |
where the first map <math>\phi</math> sends ''x'' to <math>(x, c_{f(x)})</math>; here <math>c_{f(x)}</math> denotes the constant path with value <math>f(x)</math>. Clearly, <math>\phi</math> is a [[homotopy equivalence]]; thus, the above decomposition says that any map is a fibration up to homotopy equivalence. |
||
If |
If <math>f</math> is a fibration to begin with, then the map <math>\phi\colon X \to P_f</math> is a [[fiber-homotopy equivalence]] and, consequently,<ref>using the [[change of fiber]]</ref> the fibers of <math>f</math> over the path-component of the base point are homotopy equivalent to the homotopy fiber <math>F_f</math> of <math>f</math>. |
||
== Moore's path space == |
== Moore's path space == |
||
By definition, a path in a space ''X'' is a map from the unit interval ''I'' to ''X''. Again by definition, the product of two paths |
By definition, a path in a space ''X'' is a map from the [[unit interval]] ''I'' to ''X''. Again by definition, the product of two paths <math>\alpha, \beta</math> such that <math>\alpha(1) = \beta(0)</math> is the path <math>\beta \cdot \alpha\colon I \to X</math> given by: |
||
:<math>(\beta \cdot \alpha)(t)= |
:<math>(\beta \cdot \alpha)(t)= |
||
\begin{cases} |
\begin{cases} |
||
Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
\beta(2t-1) & \text{if } 1/2 \le t \le 1 \\ |
\beta(2t-1) & \text{if } 1/2 \le t \le 1 \\ |
||
\end{cases}</math>. |
\end{cases}</math>. |
||
This product, in general, fails to be associative on the nose: ( |
This product, in general, fails to be [[associative]] on the nose: <math>(\gamma \cdot \beta) \cdot \alpha \ne \gamma \cdot (\beta \cdot \alpha)</math>, as seen directly. One solution to this failure is to pass to [[homotopy]] classes: one has <math>[(\gamma \cdot \beta) \cdot \alpha] = [\gamma \cdot (\beta \cdot \alpha)]</math>. Another solution is to work with paths of arbitrary lengths, leading to the notions of Moore's path space and Moore's path space fibration, described below.<ref>{{harvnb|Whitehead|1978|loc=Ch. III, § 2.}}</ref> (A more sophisticated solution is to ''rethink'' composition: work with an arbitrary family of compositions; see the introduction of Lurie's paper,<ref>{{cite web|first=Jacob|last=Lurie|authorlink=Jacob Lurie|url=http://www.math.harvard.edu/~lurie/papers/DAG-VI.pdf|title=Derived Algebraic Geometry VI: E[k]-Algebras|date=October 30, 2009}}</ref> leading to the notion of an [[operad]].) |
||
Given a based space ( |
Given a based space <math>(X, *)</math>, we let |
||
:<math>P' X = \{ f |
:<math>P' X = \{ f\colon [0, r] \to X \mid r \ge 0, f(0) = * \}.</math> |
||
An element ''f'' of this set has |
An element ''f'' of this set has a unique extension <math>\widetilde{f}</math> to the [[interval (mathematics)|interval]] <math>[0, \infty)</math> such that <math>\widetilde{f}(t) = f(r),\, t \ge r</math>. Thus, the set can be identified as a subspace of <math>\operatorname{Map}([0, \infty), X)</math>. The resulting space is called the '''Moore path space''' of ''X'', after [[John Coleman Moore]], who introduced the concept. Then, just as before, there is a fibration, '''Moore's path space fibration''': |
||
:<math>\Omega' X \hookrightarrow P'X \overset{p}\to X</math> |
:<math>\Omega' X \hookrightarrow P'X \overset{p}\to X</math> |
||
where ''p'' sends each |
where ''p'' sends each <math>f: [0, r] \to X</math> to <math>f(r)</math> and <math>\Omega' X = p^{-1}(*)</math> is the fiber. It turns out that <math>\Omega X</math> and <math>\Omega' X</math> are homotopy equivalent. |
||
Now, we define the product map |
Now, we define the product map |
||
:<math>\mu: P' X \times \Omega' X \to P' X</math> |
:<math>\mu: P' X \times \Omega' X \to P' X</math> |
||
by: for <math>f |
by: for <math>f\colon [0, r] \to X</math> and <math>g\colon [0, s] \to X</math>, |
||
:<math>\mu(g, f)(t)= |
:<math>\mu(g, f)(t)= |
||
\begin{cases} |
\begin{cases} |
||
Line 41: | Line 45: | ||
g(t-r) & \text{if } r \le t \le s + r \\ |
g(t-r) & \text{if } r \le t \le s + r \\ |
||
\end{cases}</math>. |
\end{cases}</math>. |
||
This product is manifestly associative. In particular, with ''μ'' restricted to Ω{{'}}''X'' × Ω{{'}}''X'', we have that Ω{{'}}''X'' is a [[topological monoid]] (in the category of all spaces). Moreover, this monoid Ω{{'}}''X'' |
This product is manifestly associative. In particular, with ''μ'' restricted to Ω{{'}}''X'' × Ω{{'}}''X'', we have that Ω{{'}}''X'' is a [[topological monoid]] (in the [[category (mathematics)|category]] of all spaces). Moreover, this monoid Ω{{'}}''X'' [[monoid action|act]]s on ''P''{{'}}''X'' through the original ''μ''. In fact, <math>p: P'X \to X</math> is an [[G-fibration|Ω<nowiki>'</nowiki>''X''-fibration]].<ref>Let ''G'' = Ω{{'}}''X'' and ''P'' = ''P''{{'}}''X''. That ''G'' preserves the fibers is clear. To see, for each ''γ'' in ''P'', the map <math>G \to p^{-1}(p(\gamma)),\, g \mapsto \gamma g</math> is a weak equivalence, we can use the following lemma: |
||
{{math_theorem|name=Lemma|math_statement=Let ''p'': ''D'' → ''B'', ''q'': ''E'' → ''B'' be fibrations over an unbased space ''B'', ''f'': ''D'' → ''E'' a map over ''B''. If ''B'' is path-connected, then the following are equivalent: |
|||
*''f'' is a weak equivalence. |
|||
*<math>f: p^{-1}(b) \to q^{-1}(b)</math> is a weak equivalence for some ''b'' in ''B''. |
|||
*<math>f: p^{-1}(b) \to q^{-1}(b)</math> is a weak equivalence for every ''b'' in ''B''.}} |
|||
We apply the lemma with <math>B = I, D = I \times G, E = I \times_X P, f(t, g) = (t, \alpha(t) g)</math> where ''α'' is a path in ''P'' and ''I'' → ''X'' is ''t'' → the end-point of ''α''(''t''). Since <math>p^{-1}(p(\gamma)) = G</math> if ''γ'' is the constant path, the claim follows from the lemma. (In a nutshell, the lemma follows from the [[long exact homotopy sequence]] and the five lemma.)</ref> |
|||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
||
Line 47: | Line 56: | ||
== References == |
== References == |
||
*James F. Davis |
*{{cite book|first1=James F. |last1=Davis|first2= Paul|last2= Kirk|url=http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~aar/papers/davkir.pdf|title= Lecture Notes in Algebraic Topology|series=Graduate Studies in Mathematics|volume= 35|publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]]|location= Providence, RI|year= 2001|pages= xvi+367|isbn=0-8218-2160-1 |mr=1841974|doi=10.1090/gsm/035}} |
||
*May |
*{{cite book|last=May|first=J. Peter|authorlink=J. Peter May| url=http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/CONCISE/ConciseRevised.pdf |title=A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology|series=Chicago Lectures in Mathematics|publisher= [[University of Chicago Press]]|location= Chicago, IL|year= 1999|pages= x+243|isbn=0-226-51182-0|mr=1702278}} |
||
*{{cite book| |
*{{cite book|first=George W.|last= Whitehead|authorlink=George W. Whitehead|title=Elements of homotopy theory|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wlrvAAAAMAAJ|edition=3rd|series=[[Graduate Texts in Mathematics]]|volume=61|year=1978|publisher=[[Springer Science+Business Media|Springer-Verlag]]|location=New York-Berlin|isbn=978-0-387-90336-1|pages=xxi+744|mr=0516508 }} |
||
[[Category:Algebraic topology]] |
|||
[[Category:Homotopy theory]] |
Latest revision as of 00:12, 17 August 2024
In algebraic topology, the path space fibration over a pointed space [1] is a fibration of the form[2]
where
- is the based path space of the pointed space ; that is, equipped with the compact-open topology.
- is the fiber of over the base point of ; thus it is the loop space of .
The free path space of X, that is, , consists of all maps from I to X that do not necessarily begin at a base point, and the fibration given by, say, , is called the free path space fibration.
The path space fibration can be understood to be dual to the mapping cone.[clarification needed] The fiber of the based fibration is called the mapping fiber or, equivalently, the homotopy fiber.
Mapping path space
[edit]If is any map, then the mapping path space of is the pullback of the fibration along . (A mapping path space satisfies the universal property that is dual to that of a mapping cylinder, which is a push-out. Because of this, a mapping path space is also called a mapping cocylinder.[3])
Since a fibration pulls back to a fibration, if Y is based, one has the fibration
where and is the homotopy fiber, the pullback of the fibration along .
Note also is the composition
where the first map sends x to ; here denotes the constant path with value . Clearly, is a homotopy equivalence; thus, the above decomposition says that any map is a fibration up to homotopy equivalence.
If is a fibration to begin with, then the map is a fiber-homotopy equivalence and, consequently,[4] the fibers of over the path-component of the base point are homotopy equivalent to the homotopy fiber of .
Moore's path space
[edit]By definition, a path in a space X is a map from the unit interval I to X. Again by definition, the product of two paths such that is the path given by:
- .
This product, in general, fails to be associative on the nose: , as seen directly. One solution to this failure is to pass to homotopy classes: one has . Another solution is to work with paths of arbitrary lengths, leading to the notions of Moore's path space and Moore's path space fibration, described below.[5] (A more sophisticated solution is to rethink composition: work with an arbitrary family of compositions; see the introduction of Lurie's paper,[6] leading to the notion of an operad.)
Given a based space , we let
An element f of this set has a unique extension to the interval such that . Thus, the set can be identified as a subspace of . The resulting space is called the Moore path space of X, after John Coleman Moore, who introduced the concept. Then, just as before, there is a fibration, Moore's path space fibration:
where p sends each to and is the fiber. It turns out that and are homotopy equivalent.
Now, we define the product map
by: for and ,
- .
This product is manifestly associative. In particular, with μ restricted to Ω'X × Ω'X, we have that Ω'X is a topological monoid (in the category of all spaces). Moreover, this monoid Ω'X acts on P'X through the original μ. In fact, is an Ω'X-fibration.[7]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Throughout the article, spaces are objects of the category of "reasonable" spaces; e.g., the category of compactly generated weak Hausdorff spaces.
- ^ Davis & Kirk 2001, Theorem 6.15. 2.
- ^ Davis & Kirk 2001, § 6.8.
- ^ using the change of fiber
- ^ Whitehead 1978, Ch. III, § 2.
- ^ Lurie, Jacob (October 30, 2009). "Derived Algebraic Geometry VI: E[k]-Algebras" (PDF).
- ^ Let G = Ω'X and P = P'X. That G preserves the fibers is clear. To see, for each γ in P, the map is a weak equivalence, we can use the following lemma:
Lemma — Let p: D → B, q: E → B be fibrations over an unbased space B, f: D → E a map over B. If B is path-connected, then the following are equivalent:
- f is a weak equivalence.
- is a weak equivalence for some b in B.
- is a weak equivalence for every b in B.
We apply the lemma with where α is a path in P and I → X is t → the end-point of α(t). Since if γ is the constant path, the claim follows from the lemma. (In a nutshell, the lemma follows from the long exact homotopy sequence and the five lemma.)
References
[edit]- Davis, James F.; Kirk, Paul (2001). Lecture Notes in Algebraic Topology (PDF). Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 35. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. pp. xvi+367. doi:10.1090/gsm/035. ISBN 0-8218-2160-1. MR 1841974.
- May, J. Peter (1999). A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology (PDF). Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. pp. x+243. ISBN 0-226-51182-0. MR 1702278.
- Whitehead, George W. (1978). Elements of homotopy theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 61 (3rd ed.). New York-Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. xxi+744. ISBN 978-0-387-90336-1. MR 0516508.