Jump to content

American Petroleum Institute: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: date, title. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Grimes2 | #UCB_webform 44/49
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


{{Infobox organization
{{Infobox organization
| name = American Petroleum Institute
| name = American Petroleum Institute
| image =
| image =
| image_size =
| image_size =
| alt =
| alt =
| caption =
| caption =
| logo = American Petroleum Institute (2020).svg
| logo = American Petroleum Institute (2020).svg
| logo_size =
| logo_size =
| logo_alt =
| logo_alt =
| logo_caption =
| logo_caption =
| map =
| map =
| map_size =
| map_size =
| map_alt =
| map_alt =
| map_caption =
| map_caption =
| map2 =
| map2 =
| map2_size =
| map2_size =
| map2_alt =
| map2_alt =
| map2_caption =
| map2_caption =
| abbreviation =
| abbreviation =
| motto =
| motto =
| predecessor =
| predecessor =
| merged =
| merged =
| successor =
| successor =
| formation = {{Start date and age|1919|03|20|df=yes}}<ref name=history/>
| formation = {{Start date and age|1919|03|20|df=yes}}<ref name=history/>
| founder =
| founder =
| founding_location =
| founding_location =
| extinction = <!-- use {{end date and age|YYYY|MM|DD|df=yes}} -->
| extinction = <!-- use {{end date and age|YYYY|MM|DD|df=yes}} -->
| merger =
| merger =
| type =
| type =
| tax_id = 13-0433430
| tax_id = 13-0433430
| status = [[501(c) organization#501(c)(6)|501(c)(6)]]
| status = [[501(c) organization#501(c)(6)|501(c)(6)]]
| purpose =
| purpose =
| headquarters = [[Washington, D.C.]] (since 1969)<ref name=history/>
| headquarters = [[Washington, D.C.]] (since 1969)<ref name=history/>
| location =
| location =
| coords = <!-- {{coord|LAT|LON|display=inline, title}} -->
| coords = <!-- {{coord|LAT|LON|display=inline, title}} -->
| region =
| region =
| services =
| services =
| products =
| products =
| methods =
| methods =
| fields =
| fields =
| membership = Nearly 600 companies in petroleum industry
| membership = Nearly 600 companies in petroleum industry
| membership_year =
| membership_year =
| language =
| language =
| owner = <!-- or | owners = -->
| owner = <!-- or | owners = -->
| sec_gen =
| sec_gen =
| leader_title = President and CEO
| leader_title = President and CEO
| leader_name = Mike Sommers<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.api.org/about/president-and-ceo |title=Mike Sommers - President and Chief Executive Officer, American Petroleum Institute - Biography |publisher=[[Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute]] |access-date=October 18, 2018 }}</ref>
| leader_name = Mike Sommers<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.api.org/about/president-and-ceo |title=Mike Sommers President and Chief Executive Officer, American Petroleum Institute Biography |publisher=[[Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute]] |access-date=October 18, 2018 }}</ref>
| leader_title2 =
| leader_title2 =
| leader_name2 =
| leader_name2 =
| leader_title3 =
| leader_title3 =
| leader_name3 =
| leader_name3 =
| leader_title4 =
| leader_title4 =
| leader_name4 =
| leader_name4 =
| board_of_directors =
| board_of_directors =
| key_people =
| key_people =
| main_organ =
| main_organ =
| parent_organization =
| parent_organization =
| subsidiaries =
| subsidiaries =
| secessions =
| secessions =
| affiliations =
| affiliations =
| budget =
| budget =
| budget_year =
| budget_year =
| revenue = $238,520,840<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/130433430|title=American Petroleum Institute - Nonprofit Explorer|date=9 May 2013}}</ref>
| revenue = $239,392,392<ref name="auto">{{Cite web |last=Roberts |first=Andrea Suozzo, Alec Glassford, Ash Ngu, Brandon |date=2013-05-09 |title=American Petroleum Institute - Nonprofit Explorer |url=https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/130433430 |access-date=2024-04-26 |website=ProPublica |language=en}}</ref>
| revenue_year = 2019
| revenue_year = 2022
| disbursements =
| disbursements =
| expenses =
| expenses = $241,637,261<ref name="auto"/>
| expenses_year =
| expenses_year = 2022
| endowment =
| endowment =
| endowment_year =
| endowment_year =
| staff =
| staff =
| staff_year =
| staff_year =
| volunteers =
| volunteers =
| volunteers_year =
| volunteers_year =
| slogan =
| slogan =
| mission =
| mission =
| website = https://www.api.org/
| website = {{URL|https://www.api.org/}}
| remarks =
| remarks =
| formerly =
| formerly =
| footnotes =
| footnotes =
}}
}}


The '''American Petroleum Institute''' ('''API''') is the largest U.S. [[trade association]] for the oil and natural gas industry. It claims to represent nearly 600 corporations involved in [[extraction of petroleum|production]], [[oil refinery|refinement]], [[pipeline transport|distribution]], and many other aspects of the [[petroleum industry]]. Much of its work has been dedicated to the advancement of [[climate change denial]] and blocking of [[climate change mitigation|climate legislation]] to defend the interests of its [[fossil fuels lobby|constituent organizations]].<ref>
The '''American Petroleum Institute''' ('''API''') is the largest U.S. [[trade association]] for the oil and natural gas industry. It claims to represent nearly 600 corporations involved in [[extraction of petroleum|production]], [[oil refinery|refinement]], [[pipeline transport|distribution]], and many other aspects of the [[petroleum industry]].
It has advanced [[climate change denial]] and blocking of [[climate change mitigation|climate legislation]] to defend the interests of its [[fossil fuels lobby|constituent organizations]].<ref>*{{Cite news|date=2020-06-24|title=Minnesota sues Exxon, Koch and API for being 'deceptive' on climate change|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-climatechange-oil-idUSKBN23V2XY|access-date=2021-10-17}}
* {{Cite news|date=2020-06-24|title=Minnesota sues Exxon, Koch and API for being 'deceptive' on climate change|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-climatechange-oil-idUSKBN23V2XY|access-date=2021-10-17}}
*{{Cite web|date=2021-06-30|title=Big oil and gas kept a dirty secret for decades. Now they may pay the price|url=http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jun/30/climate-crimes-oil-and-gas-environment|access-date=2021-10-17|website=the Guardian|language=en}}
* {{Cite web|date=2021-06-30|title=Big oil and gas kept a dirty secret for decades. Now they may pay the price|url=http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jun/30/climate-crimes-oil-and-gas-environment|access-date=2021-10-17|website=the Guardian|language=en}}
*{{Cite web|last=Subramanian|first=Samanth|title=Big oil's industry lobby is starting to lose its grip on big oil itself|url=https://qz.com/1962079/oil-companies-are-dropping-oil-lobbies-over-climate-change/|access-date=2021-10-17|website=Quartz|date=27 January 2021 |language=en}}
*{{Cite web|last=Meyer|first=Robinson|date=2020-02-20|title=The Oil Industry Is Quietly Winning Local Climate Fights|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2020/02/oil-industry-fighting-climate-policy-states/606640/|access-date=2021-10-14|website=The Atlantic|language=en}}</ref><ref>*{{Cite web|date=2021-06-30|title=ExxonMobil lobbyists filmed saying oil giant's support for carbon tax a PR ploy|url=http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/30/exxonmobil-lobbyists-oil-giant-carbon-tax-pr-ploy|access-date=2021-10-17|website=the Guardian|language=en}}
* {{Cite web|last=Subramanian|first=Samanth|title=Big oil's industry lobby is starting to lose its grip on big oil itself|url=https://qz.com/1962079/oil-companies-are-dropping-oil-lobbies-over-climate-change/|access-date=2021-10-17|website=Quartz|language=en}}
* {{Cite web|last=Meyer|first=Robinson|date=2020-02-20|title=The Oil Industry Is Quietly Winning Local Climate Fights|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2020/02/oil-industry-fighting-climate-policy-states/606640/|access-date=2021-10-14|website=The Atlantic|language=en}}</ref><ref>
*{{Cite web|date=2021-07-19|title=How a powerful US lobby group helps big oil to block climate action|url=http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jul/19/big-oil-climate-crisis-lobby-group-api|access-date=2021-10-14|website=the Guardian|language=en}}
* {{Cite web|date=2021-06-30|title=ExxonMobil lobbyists filmed saying oil giant's support for carbon tax a PR ploy|url=http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/30/exxonmobil-lobbyists-oil-giant-carbon-tax-pr-ploy|access-date=2021-10-17|website=the Guardian|language=en}}
*{{Cite web|date=2021-01-15|title=After 40 years of climate denial, American Petroleum Institute (API) offers... more denial!|url=http://redgreenandblue.org/2021/01/15/40-years-climate-denial-american-petroleum-institute-api-offers-denial/|access-date=2021-10-14|website=Red, Green, and Blue|language=en-US}}
* {{Cite web|date=2021-07-19|title=How a powerful US lobby group helps big oil to block climate action|url=http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jul/19/big-oil-climate-crisis-lobby-group-api|access-date=2021-10-14|website=the Guardian|language=en}}
*{{Cite web|last=Brown|first=Alleen|date=2021-01-16|title=Oil Industry Reconsiders Donations to Election Deniers but Has Its Own Big Lie|url=https://theintercept.com/2021/01/16/oil-industry-election-climate-denial-stop-steal/|access-date=2021-10-14|website=The Intercept|language=en-US}}
* {{Cite web|date=2021-01-15|title=After 40 years of climate denial, American Petroleum Institute (API) offers... more denial!|url=http://redgreenandblue.org/2021/01/15/40-years-climate-denial-american-petroleum-institute-api-offers-denial/|access-date=2021-10-14|website=Red, Green, and Blue|language=en-US}}
* {{Cite web|last=Brown|first=Alleen|date=2021-01-16|title=Oil Industry Reconsiders Donations to Election Deniers — but Has Its Own Big Lie|url=https://theintercept.com/2021/01/16/oil-industry-election-climate-denial-stop-steal/|access-date=2021-10-14|website=The Intercept|language=en-US}}
</ref>
</ref>


Line 109: Line 109:
{{More citations needed section|date=November 2015}}
{{More citations needed section|date=November 2015}}


API Standards Committees are made up of subcommittees and task groups that works and maintain these standards.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://mycommittees.api.org/standards/cre/some/default.aspx|title=Home - SOME|website=mycommittees.api.org|access-date=2020-04-07}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title = Committee Information|url = http://www.api.org/Publications-Standards-and-Statistics/Standards/Committee-Information|website = www.api.org|access-date = 2016-01-24}}</ref>
API Standards Committees are made up of subcommittees and task groups that works and maintain these standards.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://mycommittees.api.org/standards/cre/some/default.aspx|title=Home SOME|website=mycommittees.api.org|access-date=2020-04-07}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title = Committee Information|url = http://www.api.org/Publications-Standards-and-Statistics/Standards/Committee-Information|website = www.api.org|access-date = 2016-01-24}}</ref>


API also defines the industry standard for the energy conservation of [[motor oil]]. '''API SN''' is the latest specification to which motor oils intended for spark-ignited engines should adhere since 2010. It supersedes '''API SM'''.<ref name="sm">{{cite web|title=Engine Oil Guide|url=http://www.api.org/~/media/files/certification/engine-oil-diesel/publications/mom_guide_english_2013.pdf|publisher=American Petroleum Institute|date=March 2010}}</ref>
API also defines the industry standard for the energy conservation of [[motor oil]]. As of 2020 '''API SP''' is the latest specification. It supersedes '''API SN'''. SP specifies more stringent engine oil performance requirements for spark-ignited internal combustion engines. These include a chain wear test and a test for very low-viscosity engine oils. The standards also include a test designed to protect against a phenomenon experienced by some gasoline engines known as [[Low-Speed Pre-Ignition]] (LSPI).<ref>{{cite web | url=https://kendallmotoroil.com/news/your-quick-guide-to-the-ilsac-gf-6-and-api-sp-motor-oil-standards/#:~:text=SP%20is%20the%20API%27s%20newest,%2C%20SM%2C%20SL%20or%20SJ. | title=Your Quick Guide to the ILSAC GF-6 and API SP Motor Oil Standards | date=May 2020 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.api.org/products-and-services/engine-oil/eolcs-categories-and-classifications/latest-oil-categories|title=Latest Oil Categories|website=www.api.org}}</ref>


API also defines and drafts standards for measurement for manufactured products.
API also defines and drafts standards for measurement for manufactured products.
Line 140: Line 140:
API lobbies and organizes its member employees' attendance at public events to communicate the industry's position on issues. A leaked summer 2009 memo from then API President [[Jack Gerard]] asked its member companies to urge their employees to participate in planned protests (designed to appear independently organized) against the [[cap-and-trade]] legislation the [[United States House of Representatives|House]] passed that same summer. "The objective of these rallies is to put a human face on the impacts of unsound energy policy and to aim a loud message at [20 different] states," including Florida, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. Gerard went on to assure recipients of the memo that API will cover all organizational costs and handling of logistics. In response to the memo, an API spokesman told media that participants will be there (at protests) because of their own concerns, and that API is just helping them assemble.<ref>{{cite web|first=Daniel |last=Stone |url=http://www.newsweek.com/id/212934?from=rss |title=The Browning of Grassroots |publisher=Newsweek |date=August 20, 2009 |access-date=March 29, 2012}}</ref>
API lobbies and organizes its member employees' attendance at public events to communicate the industry's position on issues. A leaked summer 2009 memo from then API President [[Jack Gerard]] asked its member companies to urge their employees to participate in planned protests (designed to appear independently organized) against the [[cap-and-trade]] legislation the [[United States House of Representatives|House]] passed that same summer. "The objective of these rallies is to put a human face on the impacts of unsound energy policy and to aim a loud message at [20 different] states," including Florida, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. Gerard went on to assure recipients of the memo that API will cover all organizational costs and handling of logistics. In response to the memo, an API spokesman told media that participants will be there (at protests) because of their own concerns, and that API is just helping them assemble.<ref>{{cite web|first=Daniel |last=Stone |url=http://www.newsweek.com/id/212934?from=rss |title=The Browning of Grassroots |publisher=Newsweek |date=August 20, 2009 |access-date=March 29, 2012}}</ref>


To help fight [[climate change policy of the United States|climate control legislation]] that has been approved by the U.S. House, API supports the Energy Citizens group, which is holding public events.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/business/energy-environment/19climate.html|title=Oil Companies Back Public Protests of Greenhouse Gas Bill|first1=Clifford|last1=Krauss|first2=Jad|last2=Mouawad|newspaper=The New York Times|date=August 18, 2009|access-date=August 2, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=McNulty |first=Sheila |url=http://blogs.ft.com/energy-source/2009/08/20/big-oil-backlash/ |title=The big oil backlash? |publisher=Financial Times |date=August 20, 2009 |access-date=March 29, 2012}}</ref> API encouraged energy company employees to attend one of its first Energy Citizen events held in Houston in August 2009, but turned away Texas residents who were not employed by the energy industry. ''[[Fast Company (magazine)|Fast Company]]'' reported that some attendees had no idea of the purpose of the event.<ref>{{cite web|last=Schwartz |first=Ariel |url=http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/ariel-schwartz/sustainability/american-petroleum-institute-demonstrates-how-screw-grassroots-ev |title=American Petroleum Institute Demonstrates How to Screw Up a Grassroots Event |publisher=Fast Company |date=August 21, 2009 |access-date=March 29, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/08/11/lobby-groups-to-use-town-hall-tactics-to-oppose-climate-bill | work=The Wall Street Journal | first=Ian | last=Talley | title=Lobby Groups to Use Town Hall Tactics to Oppose Climate Bill | date=August 11, 2009}}</ref> In December 2009, ''[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]]'' magazine said API and Energy Citizens were promulgating climate disinformation.<ref name=motherjones20091204>{{cite news |first=Josh |last=Harkinson |url=https://www.motherjones.com/special-reports/2009/12/dirty-dozen-climate-change-denial |title=The Dirty Dozen of Climate Change Denial |magazine=[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]] |date=December 4, 2009 |access-date=August 17, 2015 |quote=Here's a guide to the dozen loudest components of the climate disinformation machine...Meet the 12 loudest members of the chorus claiming that global warming is a joke and that CO2 emissions are actually good for you.}}</ref>
{{Anchor|EnergyCitizens}}To help fight [[climate change policy of the United States|climate control legislation]] that has been approved by the U.S. House, API supports the Energy Citizens group, which is holding public events.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/business/energy-environment/19climate.html|title=Oil Companies Back Public Protests of Greenhouse Gas Bill|first1=Clifford|last1=Krauss|first2=Jad|last2=Mouawad|newspaper=The New York Times|date=August 18, 2009|access-date=August 2, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=McNulty |first=Sheila |url=http://blogs.ft.com/energy-source/2009/08/20/big-oil-backlash/ |title=The big oil backlash? |publisher=Financial Times |date=August 20, 2009 |access-date=March 29, 2012}}</ref> API encouraged energy company employees to attend one of its first Energy Citizen events held in Houston in August 2009, but turned away Texas residents who were not employed by the energy industry. ''[[Fast Company (magazine)|Fast Company]]'' reported that some attendees had no idea of the purpose of the event.<ref>{{cite web|last=Schwartz |first=Ariel |url=http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/ariel-schwartz/sustainability/american-petroleum-institute-demonstrates-how-screw-grassroots-ev |title=American Petroleum Institute Demonstrates How to Screw Up a Grassroots Event |publisher=Fast Company |date=August 21, 2009 |access-date=March 29, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=https://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/08/11/lobby-groups-to-use-town-hall-tactics-to-oppose-climate-bill | work=The Wall Street Journal | first=Ian | last=Talley | title=Lobby Groups to Use Town Hall Tactics to Oppose Climate Bill | date=August 11, 2009}}</ref> In December 2009, ''[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]]'' magazine said API and Energy Citizens were promulgating climate disinformation.<ref name=motherjones20091204>{{cite news |first=Josh |last=Harkinson |url=https://www.motherjones.com/special-reports/2009/12/dirty-dozen-climate-change-denial |title=The Dirty Dozen of Climate Change Denial |magazine=[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]] |date=December 4, 2009 |access-date=August 17, 2015 |quote=Here's a guide to the dozen loudest components of the climate disinformation machine...Meet the 12 loudest members of the chorus claiming that global warming is a joke and that CO2 emissions are actually good for you.}}</ref>


In the second half of 2008, as the [[2008 United States presidential election|U.S. presidential election]] neared, API began airing a series of television ads where spokeswoman [[Brooke Alexander]] encourages people to visit their new website, EnergyTomorrow.org. {{Third-party inline|date=December 2016}}
In the second half of 2008, as the [[2008 United States presidential election|U.S. presidential election]] neared, API began airing a series of television ads where spokeswoman [[Brooke Alexander]] encourages people to visit their new website, EnergyTomorrow.org. {{Third-party inline|date=December 2016}}


In January 2012, the American Petroleum Institute launched the voter education campaign - Vote 4 Energy. The campaign says that increased domestic energy production can create jobs, increase government revenue, and provide U.S. energy security. The Vote 4 Energy campaign does not promote any specific candidate or party, but rather provides voters with energy information to equip them to evaluate candidates on the federal and local levels and make decisions in favor of domestic energy on Election Day. The main components of the Vote 4 Energy campaign include the website - Vote4Energy.org - and social media communities, along with a series of advertisements and events around the country. The Vote 4 Energy campaign was criticized for presenting misleading arguments about the relationship between oil production and jobs whilst ignoring the potentially catastrophic consequences of increased fossil fuel consumption on the Earth's climate.<ref>{{cite web|last1=DaMelle|first1=Brendan|title=API's New 'Vote 4 Energy' Ad Campaign Is Thinly Veiled Election Year Bullying|url=http://www.desmogblog.com/api-s-new-vote-4-energy-ad-campaign-thinly-veiled-election-year-bullying|website=desmogblog.com|date=4 January 2012|publisher=DeSmog Blog|access-date=22 January 2016}}</ref>
In January 2012, the American Petroleum Institute launched the voter education campaign Vote 4 Energy. The campaign says that increased domestic energy production can create jobs, increase government revenue, and provide U.S. energy security. The Vote 4 Energy campaign does not promote any specific candidate or party, but rather provides voters with energy information to equip them to evaluate candidates on the federal and local levels and make decisions in favor of domestic energy on Election Day. The main components of the Vote 4 Energy campaign include the website Vote4Energy.org and social media communities, along with a series of advertisements and events around the country. The Vote 4 Energy campaign was criticized for presenting misleading arguments about the relationship between oil production and jobs whilst ignoring the potentially catastrophic consequences of increased fossil fuel consumption on the Earth's climate.<ref>{{cite web|last1=DaMelle|first1=Brendan|title=API's New 'Vote 4 Energy' Ad Campaign Is Thinly Veiled Election Year Bullying|url=http://www.desmogblog.com/api-s-new-vote-4-energy-ad-campaign-thinly-veiled-election-year-bullying|website=desmogblog.com|date=4 January 2012|publisher=DeSmog Blog|access-date=22 January 2016}}</ref>


The API successfully pushed for an end to a ban on American oil exports on the grounds that the ban increased demand for Russian and Iranian oil, thereby benefiting the unfriendly regimes in these countries. Critics noted that many of its member companies continued to maintain ongoing business in these countries whilst the lobbying campaign was in progress, leading to accusations of hypocrisy.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Horn|first1=Steve|title=Big Oil Argued for U.S. Crude Exports to Fend Off Iran, But First Exporter Vitol Group Also Exported Iran's Oil|url=http://www.desmogblog.com/2015/12/29/crude-oil-exports-iran-russia-vitol-group|website=DeSmog Blog|date=29 December 2015|access-date=22 January 2016}}</ref> Furthermore, the API's campaigns have been criticized for advocating policies that are likely to exacerbate [[global warming]] and its associated problems.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Readfearn|first1=Graham|title=What happened to the lobbyists who tried to reshape the US view of climate change?|url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/27/what-happened-to-lobbyists-who-tried-reshape-us-view-climate-change|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=27 February 2015|access-date=22 January 2016}}</ref> The API has repeatedly funded conservative groups that deny the reality of anthropogenic global warming<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Dunlap|first1=Riley|last2=Jacques|first2=Peter|title=Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection|journal=American Behavioral Scientist|date=2013|volume=57|issue=6|pages=699–731|doi=10.1177/0002764213477096|pmid=24098056|pmc=3787818}}</ref> in spite of the overwhelming scientific consensus that it presents a serious problem for the planet.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Cook|first1=John|title=Reply to 'Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature: A re-analysis'.|journal=Energy Policy|date=2014|volume=73|pages=706–708|doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.002}}</ref>
The API successfully pushed for an end to a ban on American oil exports on the grounds that the ban increased demand for Russian and Iranian oil, thereby benefiting the unfriendly regimes in these countries. Critics noted that many of its member companies continued to maintain ongoing business in these countries whilst the lobbying campaign was in progress, leading to accusations of hypocrisy.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Horn|first1=Steve|title=Big Oil Argued for U.S. Crude Exports to Fend Off Iran, But First Exporter Vitol Group Also Exported Iran's Oil|url=http://www.desmogblog.com/2015/12/29/crude-oil-exports-iran-russia-vitol-group|website=DeSmog Blog|date=29 December 2015|access-date=22 January 2016}}</ref> Furthermore, the API's campaigns have been criticized for advocating policies that are likely to exacerbate [[global warming]] and its associated problems.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Readfearn|first1=Graham|title=What happened to the lobbyists who tried to reshape the US view of climate change?|url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/27/what-happened-to-lobbyists-who-tried-reshape-us-view-climate-change|website=[[The Guardian]]|date=27 February 2015|access-date=22 January 2016}}</ref> The API has repeatedly funded conservative groups that deny the reality of anthropogenic global warming<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Dunlap|first1=Riley|last2=Jacques|first2=Peter|title=Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection|journal=American Behavioral Scientist|date=2013|volume=57|issue=6|pages=699–731|doi=10.1177/0002764213477096|pmid=24098056|pmc=3787818}}</ref> in spite of the overwhelming scientific consensus that it presents a serious problem for the planet.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Cook|first1=John|title=Reply to 'Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature: A re-analysis'.|journal=Energy Policy|date=2014|volume=73|pages=706–708|doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.002}}</ref>


It has many [[front group]]s, including the NH Energy Forum that in August 2011 hosted a [[New Hampshire]] event for [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] presidential candidate [[Rick Perry]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Johnson |first=Brad |url=http://thinkprogress.org/green/2011/08/15/295811/rick-perrys-first-stop-in-new-hampshire-is-funded-by-big-oil/ |title=Rick Perry's First Stop In New Hampshire Is Funded By Big Oil |publisher=ThinkProgress |date=August 15, 2011 |access-date=March 29, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120330112511/http://thinkprogress.org/green/2011/08/15/295811/rick-perrys-first-stop-in-new-hampshire-is-funded-by-big-oil/ |archive-date=2012-03-30 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>[http://www.nhpr.org/rick-perry-stumps-manchester-next-stop-iowa "Rick Perry stumps Manchester - next stop Iowa"]{{dead link|date=July 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, [[New Hampshire Public Radio]], 14 August 2011.</ref>
It has many [[front group]]s, including the NH Energy Forum that in August 2011 hosted a [[New Hampshire]] event for [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] presidential candidate [[Rick Perry]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Johnson |first=Brad |url=http://thinkprogress.org/green/2011/08/15/295811/rick-perrys-first-stop-in-new-hampshire-is-funded-by-big-oil/ |title=Rick Perry's First Stop In New Hampshire Is Funded By Big Oil |publisher=ThinkProgress |date=August 15, 2011 |access-date=March 29, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120330112511/http://thinkprogress.org/green/2011/08/15/295811/rick-perrys-first-stop-in-new-hampshire-is-funded-by-big-oil/ |archive-date=2012-03-30 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>[http://www.nhpr.org/rick-perry-stumps-manchester-next-stop-iowa "Rick Perry stumps Manchester next stop Iowa"]{{dead link|date=July 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, [[New Hampshire Public Radio]], 14 August 2011.</ref>


In March 2022, the Climate Committee of the API reportedly approved a draft proposal urging Congress to pass a [[carbon tax]] on fossil fuels. The draft proposal is subject to further approval by the API Executive Committee. The proposal calls for gasoline wholesalers, power plants and others to pay a tax of $35 to $50 per ton of carbon dioxide generated by the fossil fuel they sell or use. The proposal drew criticism amid coincident high prices at the pump and elsewhere.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/RCdlVcFDrrbmNpXqDOjU-WSJNewsPaper-4-22-2022.pdf|publisher=The Wall Street Journal|date=April 22, 2022|access-date=April 22, 2022|title=Oil Group Drafts Proposal For Carbon Tax on Fossil Fuels|page=A-4|last1=Puko|first1=Timothy|last2=Mann|first2=Ted}}</ref> In June 2021, in a sting operation carried out by [[Unearthed (publication)|Unearthed]], Keith McCoy, senior lobbyist for [[ExxonMobil]], revealed that the company was 'for a carbon tax' because 'it gives us a talking point'. In reality, McCoy stated, a carbon tax 'is not gonna happen'.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-06-30 |title=Revealed: ExxonMobil's lobbying war on climate change legislation |url=https://www.channel4.com/news/revealed-exxonmobils-lobbying-war-on-climate-change-legislation |access-date=2022-05-02 |website=Channel 4 News |language=en-GB}}</ref>
In March 2022, the Climate Committee of the API reportedly approved a draft proposal urging Congress to pass a [[carbon tax]] on fossil fuels. The draft proposal is subject to further approval by the API Executive Committee. The proposal calls for gasoline wholesalers, power plants and others to pay a tax of $35 to $50 per ton of carbon dioxide generated by the fossil fuel they sell or use. The proposal drew criticism amid coincident high prices at the pump and elsewhere.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/RCdlVcFDrrbmNpXqDOjU-WSJNewsPaper-4-22-2022.pdf|publisher=The Wall Street Journal|date=April 22, 2022|access-date=April 22, 2022|title=Oil Group Drafts Proposal For Carbon Tax on Fossil Fuels|page=A-4|last1=Puko|first1=Timothy|last2=Mann|first2=Ted}}</ref> In June 2021, in a sting operation carried out by [[Unearthed (publication)|Unearthed]], Keith McCoy, senior lobbyist for [[ExxonMobil]], revealed that the company was 'for a carbon tax' because 'it gives us a talking point'. In reality, McCoy stated, a carbon tax 'is not gonna happen'.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-06-30 |title=Revealed: ExxonMobil's lobbying war on climate change legislation |url=https://www.channel4.com/news/revealed-exxonmobils-lobbying-war-on-climate-change-legislation |access-date=2022-05-02 |website=Channel 4 News |language=en-GB}}</ref>


=== Willie Soon ===
=== Willie Soon ===
In February 2015, it was revealed that [[Climate change denial|climate skeptic]] [[Willie Soon]] had been paid by several fossil fuel interest groups.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Gillis |first1=Justin |last2=Schwartz |first2=John |date=2015-02-21 |title=Deeper Ties to Corporate Cash for Doubtful Climate Researcher |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html |access-date=2022-03-13 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Over the course of 14 years, he had received a total of $1.25m from [[ExxonMobil|Exxon Mobil]], [[Southern Company]], the American Petroleum Institute (API) and a foundation run by the ultra-conservative [[Koch family|Koch brothers]], the documents obtained by [[Greenpeace]] show.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-02-21 |title=Work of prominent climate change denier was funded by energy industry |url=http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/21/climate-change-denier-willie-soon-funded-energy-industry |access-date=2022-03-13 |website=the Guardian |language=en}}</ref> The scientist described his studies to fossil fuel executives as "deliverables", and permitted anonymous pre-publication reviews.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |last=Hasemyer |first=David |date=2015-02-21 |title=Documents Reveal Fossil Fuel Fingerprints on Contrarian Climate Research |url=https://insideclimatenews.org/news/21022015/documents-reveal-fossil-fuel-fingerprints-contrarian-climate-research-willie-soon-harvard-smithsonian-koch-exxon-southern-company/ |access-date=2022-03-13 |website=Inside Climate News |language=en-US}}</ref> Soon advanced the widely discredited theory that changes in solar activity are to blame for climate change, and called into question the severity and extent of climate change in all his studies, never revealing his backers.<ref name=":3" />
In February 2015, it was revealed that [[Climate change denial|climate denier]] [[Willie Soon]] had been paid by several fossil fuel interest groups.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Gillis |first1=Justin |last2=Schwartz |first2=John |date=2015-02-21 |title=Deeper Ties to Corporate Cash for Doubtful Climate Researcher |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html |access-date=2022-03-13 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Over the course of 14 years, he had received a total of $1.25m from [[ExxonMobil|Exxon Mobil]], [[Southern Company]], the American Petroleum Institute (API) and a foundation run by the ultra-conservative [[Koch family|Koch brothers]], the documents obtained by [[Greenpeace]] show.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-02-21 |title=Work of prominent climate change denier was funded by energy industry |url=http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/21/climate-change-denier-willie-soon-funded-energy-industry |access-date=2022-03-13 |website=the Guardian |language=en}}</ref> The scientist described his studies to fossil fuel executives as "deliverables", and permitted anonymous pre-publication reviews.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |last=Hasemyer |first=David |date=2015-02-21 |title=Documents Reveal Fossil Fuel Fingerprints on Contrarian Climate Research |url=https://insideclimatenews.org/news/21022015/documents-reveal-fossil-fuel-fingerprints-contrarian-climate-research-willie-soon-harvard-smithsonian-koch-exxon-southern-company/ |access-date=2022-03-13 |website=Inside Climate News |language=en-US}}</ref> Soon advanced the widely discredited theory that changes in solar activity are to blame for climate change, and called into question the severity and extent of climate change in all his studies, never revealing his backers.<ref name=":3" />


==Inventory reports==
==Inventory reports==
Every Tuesday (unless Monday is a holiday) at 4:30 PM the API releases a report on US inventories of [[Petroleum|crude oil]], gasoline and distillates, to paid subscribers.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.api.org/products-and-services/statistics|title=API Statistics Web page}}</ref> As this information predates the report on the same inventory levels by the [[Energy Information Administration]] (EIA), it gives investors an early look at the information that may be coming from the EIA, although there is frequently some disparity between the two sets of figures.
Every Tuesday (unless Monday is a holiday) at 4:30 PM the API releases a report on US inventories of [[Petroleum|crude oil]], gasoline and distillates, to paid subscribers.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.api.org/products-and-services/statistics|title=Statistics|website=www.api.org}}</ref> As this information predates the report on the same inventory levels by the [[Energy Information Administration]] (EIA), it gives investors an early look at the information that may be coming from the EIA, although there is frequently some disparity between the two sets of figures.


==See also==
==See also==
Line 162: Line 162:


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{Reflist}}
* Vassiliou, Marius S. and Miryusif Mirbabayev. US and Azerbaijani oil in the Nineteenth Century: Two Titans (Lexington Books Publisher, November, 2022). – 182 p.


==External links==
==External links==
Line 177: Line 178:


{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Vassiliou, Marius S. and Miryusif Mirbabayev. US and Azerbaijani oil in the Nineteenth Century: Two Titans (Lexington Books Publisher, November, 2022). - 182 p.]]


[[Category:American Petroleum Institute| ]]
[[Category:American Petroleum Institute| ]]

Latest revision as of 14:10, 19 August 2024

American Petroleum Institute
Formation20 March 1919; 105 years ago (1919-03-20)[1]
13-0433430
Legal status501(c)(6)
HeadquartersWashington, D.C. (since 1969)[1]
Membership
Nearly 600 companies in petroleum industry
President and CEO
Mike Sommers[2]
Revenue (2022)
$239,392,392[3]
Expenses (2022)$241,637,261[3]
Websitewww.api.org

The American Petroleum Institute (API) is the largest U.S. trade association for the oil and natural gas industry. It claims to represent nearly 600 corporations involved in production, refinement, distribution, and many other aspects of the petroleum industry.

It has advanced climate change denial and blocking of climate legislation to defend the interests of its constituent organizations.[4][5]

The association describes its mission as "to promote safety across the industry globally and influence public policy in support of a strong, viable U.S. oil and natural gas industry".[6] API's chief functions on behalf of the industry include advocacy, negotiation and lobbying with governmental, legal, and regulatory agencies; research into economic, toxicological, and environmental effects; establishment and certification of industry standards; and education outreach.[7] API both funds and conducts research related to many aspects of the petroleum industry.[7][8]

History

[edit]
Previous logo

Although some oil was produced commercially before 1859 as a byproduct from salt brine wells, the American oil industry started on a major scale with the discovery of oil at the Drake Well in western Pennsylvania in 1859.

The American Petroleum Institute was founded on 20 March 1919 and based in New York City.[1]

In 1959, at a symposium organized by the American Petroleum Institute and the Columbia Graduate School of Business for the centennial of the American oil industry, the physicist Edward Teller warned then of the danger of global climate change.[9] Edward Teller explained that carbon dioxide "in the atmosphere causes a greenhouse effect" and that burning more fossil fuels could "melt the icecap and submerge New York".[9]

In 1969, the API decided to move its offices to Washington, DC.[1]

Standards and certification

[edit]

API Standards Committees are made up of subcommittees and task groups that works and maintain these standards.[10][11]

API also defines the industry standard for the energy conservation of motor oil. As of 2020 API SP is the latest specification. It supersedes API SN. SP specifies more stringent engine oil performance requirements for spark-ignited internal combustion engines. These include a chain wear test and a test for very low-viscosity engine oils. The standards also include a test designed to protect against a phenomenon experienced by some gasoline engines known as Low-Speed Pre-Ignition (LSPI).[12][13]

API also defines and drafts standards for measurement for manufactured products.

Crude Oil Data Exchange (CODE) is the electronic business standard as of 1978.

API RP 500 and RP 505 classify the locations for electrical equipment in hazardous areas.[14][15]

API has entered petroleum industry nomenclature in a number of areas:

  • API gravity, a measure of the density of petroleum.
  • API number, a unique identifier applied to each petroleum exploration or production well drilled in the United States.
  • API unit, a standard measure of natural gamma radiation measured in a borehole.[16]
  • "Non-API", an item (e.g., tubular connector) not conforming to API standards
  • "Non-API", (informal) slang term for anything out of the norm.

Educator information

[edit]

In addition to training industry workers and conducting seminars, workshops, and conferences on public policy, API develops and distributes materials and curricula for schoolchildren and educators. The association also maintains a website, Classroom Energy.[17]

Public relations and lobbying

[edit]

API spent more than $3 million annually during the period 2005 to 2009 on lobbying; $3.6 million in 2009.[18] As of 2009, according to API’s quarterly “Lobbying Report” submitted to the U.S. Senate, the organization had 16 lobbyists lobbying Congress.[19] According to an investigation conducted by the International Business Times, API lobbied the Department of State for all of 2009 on "legislative efforts concerning oil sands" and "Canadian Oil Sands."[20]

The American Petroleum Institute also lobbied the State Department every quarter in 2009. In three of four quarters, the group listed “legislative efforts concerning oil sands” as one of the areas it was focusing on in its lobbying, and in the final quarter, it listed “Canadian Oil Sands.” Among API’s members are ExxonMobil, which has invested in Canadian oil sands.

API lobbies and organizes its member employees' attendance at public events to communicate the industry's position on issues. A leaked summer 2009 memo from then API President Jack Gerard asked its member companies to urge their employees to participate in planned protests (designed to appear independently organized) against the cap-and-trade legislation the House passed that same summer. "The objective of these rallies is to put a human face on the impacts of unsound energy policy and to aim a loud message at [20 different] states," including Florida, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. Gerard went on to assure recipients of the memo that API will cover all organizational costs and handling of logistics. In response to the memo, an API spokesman told media that participants will be there (at protests) because of their own concerns, and that API is just helping them assemble.[21]

To help fight climate control legislation that has been approved by the U.S. House, API supports the Energy Citizens group, which is holding public events.[22][23] API encouraged energy company employees to attend one of its first Energy Citizen events held in Houston in August 2009, but turned away Texas residents who were not employed by the energy industry. Fast Company reported that some attendees had no idea of the purpose of the event.[24][25] In December 2009, Mother Jones magazine said API and Energy Citizens were promulgating climate disinformation.[26]

In the second half of 2008, as the U.S. presidential election neared, API began airing a series of television ads where spokeswoman Brooke Alexander encourages people to visit their new website, EnergyTomorrow.org. [third-party source needed]

In January 2012, the American Petroleum Institute launched the voter education campaign – Vote 4 Energy. The campaign says that increased domestic energy production can create jobs, increase government revenue, and provide U.S. energy security. The Vote 4 Energy campaign does not promote any specific candidate or party, but rather provides voters with energy information to equip them to evaluate candidates on the federal and local levels and make decisions in favor of domestic energy on Election Day. The main components of the Vote 4 Energy campaign include the website – Vote4Energy.org – and social media communities, along with a series of advertisements and events around the country. The Vote 4 Energy campaign was criticized for presenting misleading arguments about the relationship between oil production and jobs whilst ignoring the potentially catastrophic consequences of increased fossil fuel consumption on the Earth's climate.[27]

The API successfully pushed for an end to a ban on American oil exports on the grounds that the ban increased demand for Russian and Iranian oil, thereby benefiting the unfriendly regimes in these countries. Critics noted that many of its member companies continued to maintain ongoing business in these countries whilst the lobbying campaign was in progress, leading to accusations of hypocrisy.[28] Furthermore, the API's campaigns have been criticized for advocating policies that are likely to exacerbate global warming and its associated problems.[29] The API has repeatedly funded conservative groups that deny the reality of anthropogenic global warming[30] in spite of the overwhelming scientific consensus that it presents a serious problem for the planet.[31]

It has many front groups, including the NH Energy Forum that in August 2011 hosted a New Hampshire event for Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry.[32][33]

In March 2022, the Climate Committee of the API reportedly approved a draft proposal urging Congress to pass a carbon tax on fossil fuels. The draft proposal is subject to further approval by the API Executive Committee. The proposal calls for gasoline wholesalers, power plants and others to pay a tax of $35 to $50 per ton of carbon dioxide generated by the fossil fuel they sell or use. The proposal drew criticism amid coincident high prices at the pump and elsewhere.[34] In June 2021, in a sting operation carried out by Unearthed, Keith McCoy, senior lobbyist for ExxonMobil, revealed that the company was 'for a carbon tax' because 'it gives us a talking point'. In reality, McCoy stated, a carbon tax 'is not gonna happen'.[35]

Willie Soon

[edit]

In February 2015, it was revealed that climate denier Willie Soon had been paid by several fossil fuel interest groups.[36] Over the course of 14 years, he had received a total of $1.25m from Exxon Mobil, Southern Company, the American Petroleum Institute (API) and a foundation run by the ultra-conservative Koch brothers, the documents obtained by Greenpeace show.[37] The scientist described his studies to fossil fuel executives as "deliverables", and permitted anonymous pre-publication reviews.[38] Soon advanced the widely discredited theory that changes in solar activity are to blame for climate change, and called into question the severity and extent of climate change in all his studies, never revealing his backers.[38]

Inventory reports

[edit]

Every Tuesday (unless Monday is a holiday) at 4:30 PM the API releases a report on US inventories of crude oil, gasoline and distillates, to paid subscribers.[39] As this information predates the report on the same inventory levels by the Energy Information Administration (EIA), it gives investors an early look at the information that may be coming from the EIA, although there is frequently some disparity between the two sets of figures.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d "API history", American Petroleum Institute (page visited on 2 January 2018).
  2. ^ "Mike Sommers – President and Chief Executive Officer, American Petroleum Institute – Biography". Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute. Retrieved October 18, 2018.
  3. ^ a b Roberts, Andrea Suozzo, Alec Glassford, Ash Ngu, Brandon (2013-05-09). "American Petroleum Institute - Nonprofit Explorer". ProPublica. Retrieved 2024-04-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ *"Minnesota sues Exxon, Koch and API for being 'deceptive' on climate change". Reuters. 2020-06-24. Retrieved 2021-10-17.
  5. ^ *"ExxonMobil lobbyists filmed saying oil giant's support for carbon tax a PR ploy". the Guardian. 2021-06-30. Retrieved 2021-10-17.
  6. ^ "Industry Mission". www.api.org. Retrieved 2020-07-01.
  7. ^ a b "About API". American Petroleum Institute. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
  8. ^ "API President and CEO". www.api.org. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  9. ^ a b Benjamin Franta, "On its 100th birthday in 1959, Edward Teller warned the oil industry about global warming", The Guardian, 1 January 2018 (page visited on 2 January 2018).
  10. ^ "Home – SOME". mycommittees.api.org. Retrieved 2020-04-07.
  11. ^ "Committee Information". www.api.org. Retrieved 2016-01-24.
  12. ^ "Your Quick Guide to the ILSAC GF-6 and API SP Motor Oil Standards". May 2020.
  13. ^ "Latest Oil Categories". www.api.org.
  14. ^ API RP 505 Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for Electrical Installation at Petroleum Facilities Classified as Class I, Zone 0, Zone 1 and Zone 2 (2002).
  15. ^ API RP 500 Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for electrical Installation at Petroleum Facilities Classified as Class I, Division 1 and Division 2.
  16. ^ API Unit, Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary, accessed 11 Nov. 2015.
  17. ^ "2009 Awards". Education World. Retrieved 16 Jan 2021.
  18. ^ "Lobbying: American Petroleum Institute". OpenSecrets.
  19. ^ "Second Quarter Lobbying Form, 2009, Secretary of the Senate". Retrieved March 29, 2012.
  20. ^ Sirota, David (5 April 2016). "Oil Companies Donated to Clinton Foundation While Lobbying State Department". International Business Times. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
  21. ^ Stone, Daniel (August 20, 2009). "The Browning of Grassroots". Newsweek. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
  22. ^ Krauss, Clifford; Mouawad, Jad (August 18, 2009). "Oil Companies Back Public Protests of Greenhouse Gas Bill". The New York Times. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  23. ^ McNulty, Sheila (August 20, 2009). "The big oil backlash?". Financial Times. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
  24. ^ Schwartz, Ariel (August 21, 2009). "American Petroleum Institute Demonstrates How to Screw Up a Grassroots Event". Fast Company. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
  25. ^ Talley, Ian (August 11, 2009). "Lobby Groups to Use Town Hall Tactics to Oppose Climate Bill". The Wall Street Journal.
  26. ^ Harkinson, Josh (December 4, 2009). "The Dirty Dozen of Climate Change Denial". Mother Jones. Retrieved August 17, 2015. Here's a guide to the dozen loudest components of the climate disinformation machine...Meet the 12 loudest members of the chorus claiming that global warming is a joke and that CO2 emissions are actually good for you.
  27. ^ DaMelle, Brendan (4 January 2012). "API's New 'Vote 4 Energy' Ad Campaign Is Thinly Veiled Election Year Bullying". desmogblog.com. DeSmog Blog. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  28. ^ Horn, Steve (29 December 2015). "Big Oil Argued for U.S. Crude Exports to Fend Off Iran, But First Exporter Vitol Group Also Exported Iran's Oil". DeSmog Blog. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  29. ^ Readfearn, Graham (27 February 2015). "What happened to the lobbyists who tried to reshape the US view of climate change?". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  30. ^ Dunlap, Riley; Jacques, Peter (2013). "Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection". American Behavioral Scientist. 57 (6): 699–731. doi:10.1177/0002764213477096. PMC 3787818. PMID 24098056.
  31. ^ Cook, John (2014). "Reply to 'Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature: A re-analysis'". Energy Policy. 73: 706–708. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.002.
  32. ^ Johnson, Brad (August 15, 2011). "Rick Perry's First Stop In New Hampshire Is Funded By Big Oil". ThinkProgress. Archived from the original on 2012-03-30. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
  33. ^ "Rick Perry stumps Manchester – next stop Iowa"[permanent dead link], New Hampshire Public Radio, 14 August 2011.
  34. ^ Puko, Timothy; Mann, Ted (April 22, 2022). "Oil Group Drafts Proposal For Carbon Tax on Fossil Fuels" (PDF). The Wall Street Journal. p. A-4. Retrieved April 22, 2022.
  35. ^ "Revealed: ExxonMobil's lobbying war on climate change legislation". Channel 4 News. 2021-06-30. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  36. ^ Gillis, Justin; Schwartz, John (2015-02-21). "Deeper Ties to Corporate Cash for Doubtful Climate Researcher". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-03-13.
  37. ^ "Work of prominent climate change denier was funded by energy industry". the Guardian. 2015-02-21. Retrieved 2022-03-13.
  38. ^ a b Hasemyer, David (2015-02-21). "Documents Reveal Fossil Fuel Fingerprints on Contrarian Climate Research". Inside Climate News. Retrieved 2022-03-13.
  39. ^ "Statistics". www.api.org.
  • Vassiliou, Marius S. and Miryusif Mirbabayev. US and Azerbaijani oil in the Nineteenth Century: Two Titans (Lexington Books Publisher, November, 2022). – 182 p.
[edit]

Media related to American Petroleum Institute at Wikimedia Commons

Vassiliou, Marius S. and Miryusif Mirbabayev. US and Azerbaijani oil in the Nineteenth Century: Two Titans (Lexington Books Publisher, November, 2022). - 182 p.