Jump to content

Talk:Quintus Pompeius: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rating for G&R
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Substing templates: {{WikiProject Dacia}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject Dacia| class=| importance =}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|blp=n|listas=Pompeius, Quintus|
{{Classical greece and rome|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject History|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Biography|military-work-group=y|military-priority=Low|politician-work-group=y|politician-priority=Low|royalty-work-group=y|royalty-priority=Low|needs-infobox=y|needs-photo=y}}
{{WikiProject Military history |class=Start|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=no|Biography=y |Roman=y |Classical=y}}
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Low}}
}}


== ??? ==
== ??? ==

I was reading Plutarch's Life of Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, and a note to chapter 14 says that the opponent of Tiberius Gracchus was consul 141 and censor 131. The article on the consul 141 doesn't say he was censor 131, which throws the whole thing into question (though if the opponent of Tiberius was in fact the son of the consul, it is highly unlikely - certainly not the case, I would say - that the son would have been censor without being consul). My reference was the first one cited for this page, so based off of that I would assume the note to a published book (included in Oxford World's Classics series, at that) is more likely to be correct. I don't have any more information than the endnote though [[User:Foxhunt king|JW]] ([[User talk:Foxhunt king|talk]]) 07:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
I was reading Plutarch's Life of Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, and a note to chapter 14 says that the opponent of Tiberius Gracchus was consul 141 and censor 131. The article on the consul 141 doesn't say he was censor 131, which throws the whole thing into question (though if the opponent of Tiberius was in fact the son of the consul, it is highly unlikely - certainly not the case, I would say - that the son would have been censor without being consul). My reference was the first one cited for this page, so based off of that I would assume the note to a published book (included in Oxford World's Classics series, at that) is more likely to be correct. I don't have any more information than the endnote though [[User:Foxhunt king|JW]] ([[User talk:Foxhunt king|talk]]) 07:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:4|one external link|4 external links}} on [[Quintus Pompeius]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=730884359 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070406022116/http://www.ancientlibrary.com:80/smith-bio/0499.html to http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/0499.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071007064009/http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/2807.html to http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/2807.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101202052050/http://www.ancientlibrary.com:80/smith-bio/2808.html to http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/2808.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100129210302/http://www.ancientlibrary.com:80/smith-bio/2809.html to http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/2809.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 15:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:54, 22 August 2024

???

[edit]

I was reading Plutarch's Life of Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, and a note to chapter 14 says that the opponent of Tiberius Gracchus was consul 141 and censor 131. The article on the consul 141 doesn't say he was censor 131, which throws the whole thing into question (though if the opponent of Tiberius was in fact the son of the consul, it is highly unlikely - certainly not the case, I would say - that the son would have been censor without being consul). My reference was the first one cited for this page, so based off of that I would assume the note to a published book (included in Oxford World's Classics series, at that) is more likely to be correct. I don't have any more information than the endnote though JW (talk) 07:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Quintus Pompeius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]