Architectural management: Difference between revisions
wikilink |
m Reverting editing from an IP range which has made enormous numbers of vandalism and other disruptive edits, and very few others. If this is one of the very few good edits then please restore it, giving your reason in an edit summary. |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{multiple issues| |
|||
{{Underlinked|date=October 2013}} |
|||
{{no footnotes|date=March 2013}} |
{{no footnotes|date=March 2013}} |
||
}} |
|||
'''Architectural management''' falls into two distinct parts, [[office management]] and [[project management]] (Brunton et al., 1964; Emmitt, 1999a & 1999b). Office management provides an overall framework within which individual projects are commissioned, designed and completed. Both parts have the same objectives but are typically addressed by separate [[management systems]]. Office management involves the allocation and [[Financial management|financing]] of resources, principally premises, trained staff and [[computer systems]], and on establishing and charging appropriate fees for the services rendered. Project management focuses on timescales, developing a design from initial concept to working drawings, and managing the construction process (see for example Emmitt, 2014). |
'''Architectural management''' falls into two distinct parts, [[office management]] and [[project management]] (Brunton et al., 1964; Emmitt, 1999a & 1999b). Office management provides an overall framework within which individual projects are commissioned, designed and completed. Both parts have the same objectives but are typically addressed by separate [[management systems]]. Office management involves the allocation and [[Financial management|financing]] of resources, principally premises, trained staff and [[computer systems]], and on establishing and charging appropriate fees for the services rendered. Project management focuses on timescales, developing a [[design]] from initial concept to working drawings, and managing the [[construction]] process (see for example Emmitt, 2014). |
||
The essence of |
The essence of architectural management is to ensure that work on a project is cost-effective, to achieve a balance between profitability and design quality. |
||
== Development == |
== Development == |
||
Standard management techniques and tools, borrowed mainly from repetitive industrial processes, have not always fitted comfortably with the image of the [[architect]] as a creative individual, rather than a professional member of a business team. The term ‘architectural management’ has been in use since the 1960s as building construction became more complex, because of a shift from standard traditional construction details, to innovation and experimentation. [[Architectural practice]]s generally employ an office manager who may have at their disposal an administration assistant or team of assistants. Project management is increasingly a role played by an independent consultant, especially during the construction phase. Project managers are typically from one of the [[surveying]] disciplines, leaving only the architectural elements to be managed in-house by the architects. |
Standard management techniques and tools, borrowed mainly from repetitive industrial processes, have not always fitted comfortably with the image of the [[architect]] as a creative individual, rather than a professional member of a business team. The term ‘architectural management’ has been in use since the 1960s as building construction became more complex, because of a shift from standard traditional construction details, to innovation and experimentation. [[Architectural practice]]s generally employ an office manager who may have at their disposal an [[Administrative Assistant|administration assistant]] or team of assistants. Project management is increasingly a role played by an independent consultant, especially during the construction phase. Project managers are typically from one of the [[surveying]] disciplines, leaving only the architectural elements to be managed in-house by the architects. |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
* [[Building management]] |
* [[Building management]] |
||
* [[Facility management]] |
|||
<!-- |
|||
== References == |
|||
{{Reflist}}--> |
|||
== |
==Sources== |
||
* {{cite journal|last1=Brunton|first1=J.|last2=Baden Hellard|first2=R.|last3=Boobyer|first3=E.H.|title=Management Applied to Architectural Practice|journal=The Builder|date=1964|location=London}} |
|||
* {{cite journal|last1=Emmitt|first1=Stephen|title=Architectural management: an evolving field|journal=Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management|date=1999a|volume=6|issue=2|pages=188–196}}# |
|||
* {{cite book|last1=Emmitt|first1=Stephen|title=Architectural Management in Practice: a competitive approach|date=1999b|publisher=Longman|location=Harlow}} |
|||
* {{cite journal |
|||
|first=Stephen |
|first=Stephen |
||
|last=Emmitt |
|last=Emmitt |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |
|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |
||
}} |
}} |
||
* {{cite book |
|||
|first=Stephen |
|first=Stephen |
||
|last=Emmitt |author2=Matthijs Prins |author3=Ad den Otter |
|last=Emmitt |author2=Matthijs Prins |author3=Ad den Otter |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |
|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |
||
}} |
}} |
||
* {{cite book |
|||
|first=Stephen |
|first=Stephen |
||
|last=Emmit |
|last=Emmit |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|publisher=Blackwell Publishing |
|publisher=Blackwell Publishing |
||
}} |
}} |
||
* {{cite journal |
|||
|first=Gustaaf W.O. |
|first=Gustaaf W.O. |
||
|last=Boissevain |
|last=Boissevain |
Latest revision as of 20:36, 24 August 2024
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (March 2013) |
Architectural management falls into two distinct parts, office management and project management (Brunton et al., 1964; Emmitt, 1999a & 1999b). Office management provides an overall framework within which individual projects are commissioned, designed and completed. Both parts have the same objectives but are typically addressed by separate management systems. Office management involves the allocation and financing of resources, principally premises, trained staff and computer systems, and on establishing and charging appropriate fees for the services rendered. Project management focuses on timescales, developing a design from initial concept to working drawings, and managing the construction process (see for example Emmitt, 2014).
The essence of architectural management is to ensure that work on a project is cost-effective, to achieve a balance between profitability and design quality.
Development
[edit]Standard management techniques and tools, borrowed mainly from repetitive industrial processes, have not always fitted comfortably with the image of the architect as a creative individual, rather than a professional member of a business team. The term ‘architectural management’ has been in use since the 1960s as building construction became more complex, because of a shift from standard traditional construction details, to innovation and experimentation. Architectural practices generally employ an office manager who may have at their disposal an administration assistant or team of assistants. Project management is increasingly a role played by an independent consultant, especially during the construction phase. Project managers are typically from one of the surveying disciplines, leaving only the architectural elements to be managed in-house by the architects.
See also
[edit]Sources
[edit]- Brunton, J.; Baden Hellard, R.; Boobyer, E.H. (1964). "Management Applied to Architectural Practice". The Builder. London.
- Emmitt, Stephen (1999a). "Architectural management: an evolving field". Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 6 (2): 188–196.#
- Emmitt, Stephen (1999b). Architectural Management in Practice: a competitive approach. Harlow: Longman.
- Emmitt, Stephen (2014). "Design Management for Architects, Second Edition". Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - Emmitt, Stephen; Matthijs Prins; Ad den Otter (2009). Architectural management: International research and practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Emmit, Stephen (2007). Design Management for Architects. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Boissevain, Gustaaf W.O.; Matthijs Prins (1995). "Architectural management and design management - the state of the art in Netherlands and ideas for research". International Journal of Architectural Management, Practice and Research. 9.