Linearized gravity: Difference between revisions
doing the math i notice in the ricci scalar a factor 1/2 is missing, to be honest im not 100% sure. Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
rm inconsistent reference to natural units; some language ce |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Linear perturbations to solutions of nonlinear Einstein field equations}} |
|||
{{General relativity sidebar |equations}} |
{{General relativity sidebar |equations}} |
||
In the theory of [[general relativity]], '''linearized gravity''' is the application of [[perturbation theory]] to the [[Metric tensor (general relativity)|metric tensor]] that describes the geometry of [[spacetime]]. As a consequence, linearized gravity is an effective method for modeling the effects of gravity when the [[gravitational field]] is weak. The usage of linearized gravity is integral to the study of [[gravitational waves]] and weak-field [[gravitational lensing]]. |
In the theory of [[general relativity]], '''linearized gravity''' is the application of [[perturbation theory]] to the [[Metric tensor (general relativity)|metric tensor]] that describes the geometry of [[spacetime]]. As a consequence, linearized gravity is an effective method for modeling the effects of gravity when the [[gravitational field]] is weak. The usage of linearized gravity is integral to the study of [[gravitational waves]] and weak-field [[gravitational lensing]]. |
||
==Weak-field approximation== |
== Weak-field approximation == |
||
The [[Einstein field equation]] (EFE) describing the geometry of [[spacetime]] is given as |
The [[Einstein field equation]] (EFE) describing the geometry of [[spacetime]] is given as |
||
:<math>R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu} = |
: <math>R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu} = \kappa T_{\mu\nu}</math> |
||
where <math>R_{\mu\nu}</math> is the [[Ricci tensor]], <math>R</math> is the [[Ricci scalar]], <math>T_{\mu\nu}</math> is the [[energy–momentum tensor]], and <math>g_{\mu\nu}</math> is the [[spacetime]] [[metric tensor]] that |
where <math>R_{\mu\nu}</math> is the [[Ricci tensor]], <math>R</math> is the [[Ricci scalar]], <math>T_{\mu\nu}</math> is the [[energy–momentum tensor]], <math>\kappa = 8 \pi G / c^4</math> is the [[Einstein gravitational constant]], and <math>g_{\mu\nu}</math> is the [[spacetime]] [[metric tensor]] that represents the solutions of the equation. |
||
Although succinct when written out using [[Einstein notation]], hidden within the Ricci tensor and Ricci scalar are exceptionally nonlinear dependencies on the metric |
Although succinct when written out using [[Einstein notation]], hidden within the Ricci tensor and Ricci scalar are exceptionally nonlinear dependencies on the metric tensor that render the prospect of finding [[Exact solutions in general relativity|exact solutions]] impractical in most systems. However, when describing systems for which the [[curvature]] of spacetime is small (meaning that terms in the EFE that are [[Quadratic function|quadratic]] in <math>g_{\mu\nu}</math> do not significantly contribute to the equations of motion), one can model the solution of the field equations as being the [[Minkowski metric]]<ref group="note">This assumes that the background spacetime is flat. Perturbation theory applied in a spacetime that is already curved can work just as well when this term is replaced with the metric representing the curved background.</ref> <math>\eta_{\mu\nu}</math> plus a small perturbation term <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math>. In other words: |
||
:<math>g_{\mu\nu} = \eta_{\mu\nu} + h_{\mu\nu},\qquad |h_{\mu\nu}| \ll 1.</math> |
: <math>g_{\mu\nu} = \eta_{\mu\nu} + h_{\mu\nu},\qquad |h_{\mu\nu}| \ll 1.</math> |
||
In this regime, substituting the general metric <math>g_{\mu\nu}</math> for this perturbative approximation results in a simplified expression for the Ricci tensor: |
In this regime, substituting the general metric <math>g_{\mu\nu}</math> for this perturbative approximation results in a simplified expression for the Ricci tensor: |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | where <math>h = \eta^{\mu\nu}h_{\mu\nu}</math> is the [[Trace (linear algebra)|trace]] of the perturbation, <math>\partial_\mu</math> denotes the partial derivative with respect to the <math>x^\mu</math> coordinate of spacetime, and <math>\square = \eta^{\mu\nu} \partial_\mu \partial_\nu</math> is the [[d'Alembert operator]]. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | where <math>h = \eta^{\mu\nu}h_{\mu\nu}</math> is the [[Trace (linear algebra)|trace]] of the perturbation, <math>\partial_\mu</math> denotes the partial derivative with respect to the <math>x^\mu</math> coordinate of spacetime, and <math>\square = \eta^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\partial_\nu</math> is the [[d'Alembert operator]]. |
||
Together with the Ricci scalar, |
Together with the Ricci scalar, |
||
:<math>R = \eta_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu} = |
: <math>R = \eta_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu\partial_\nu h^{\mu\nu} - \square h,</math> |
||
the left side of the field equation reduces to |
the left side of the field equation reduces to |
||
:<math>R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma\partial_\mu h^\sigma_\nu + \partial_\sigma\partial_\nu h^\sigma_\mu - \partial_\mu\partial_\nu h - \square h_{\mu\nu} - \eta_{\mu\nu}\partial_\rho\partial_\lambda h^{\rho\lambda} + \eta_{\mu\nu}\square h).</math> |
: <math>R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\sigma\partial_\mu h^\sigma_\nu + \partial_\sigma\partial_\nu h^\sigma_\mu - \partial_\mu\partial_\nu h - \square h_{\mu\nu} - \eta_{\mu\nu}\partial_\rho\partial_\lambda h^{\rho\lambda} + \eta_{\mu\nu}\square h).</math> |
||
and thus the EFE is reduced to a linear |
and thus the EFE is reduced to a linear second order [[partial differential equation]] in terms of <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math>. |
||
===Gauge invariance=== |
=== Gauge invariance === |
||
The process of decomposing the general spacetime <math>g_{\mu\nu}</math> into the Minkowski metric plus a perturbation term is not unique. This is due to |
The process of decomposing the general spacetime <math>g_{\mu\nu}</math> into the Minkowski metric plus a perturbation term is not unique. This is due to that different choices for coordinates may give different forms for <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math>. In order to capture this phenomenon, the application of [[Gauge theory|gauge symmetry]] is introduced. |
||
Gauge symmetries are a mathematical device for describing a system that does not change when the underlying coordinate system is "shifted" by an infinitesimal amount. So although the perturbation metric <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math> is not consistently defined between different coordinate systems, the overall system which it describes ''is''. |
Gauge symmetries are a mathematical device for describing a system that does not change when the underlying coordinate system is "shifted" by an infinitesimal amount. So although the perturbation metric <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math> is not consistently defined between different coordinate systems, the overall system which it describes ''is''. |
||
To capture this formally, the non-uniqueness of the perturbation <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math> is represented as being a consequence of the diverse collection of [[diffeomorphisms]] on spacetime that leave <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math> sufficiently small. Therefore |
To capture this formally, the non-uniqueness of the perturbation <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math> is represented as being a consequence of the diverse collection of [[diffeomorphisms]] on spacetime that leave <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math> sufficiently small. Therefore, it is required that <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math> be defined in terms of a general set of diffeomorphisms, then select the subset of these that preserve the small scale that is required by the weak-field approximation. One may thus define <math>\phi</math> to denote an arbitrary diffeomorphism that maps the flat Minkowski spacetime to the more general spacetime represented by the metric <math>g_{\mu\nu}</math>. With this, the perturbation metric may be defined as the difference between the [[Pullback (differential geometry)|pullback]] of <math>g_{\mu\nu}</math> and the Minkowski metric: |
||
:<math>h_{\mu\nu} = (\phi^*g)_{\mu\nu} - \eta_{\mu\nu}.</math> |
: <math>h_{\mu\nu} = (\phi^*g)_{\mu\nu} - \eta_{\mu\nu}.</math> |
||
The diffeomorphisms <math>\phi</math> may thus be chosen such that <math>|h_{\mu\nu}| \ll 1</math>. |
The diffeomorphisms <math>\phi</math> may thus be chosen such that <math>|h_{\mu\nu}| \ll 1</math>. |
||
Given then a vector field <math>\xi^\mu</math> defined on the flat |
Given then a vector field <math>\xi^\mu</math> defined on the flat background spacetime, an additional family of diffeomorphisms <math>\psi_\epsilon</math> may be defined as those generated by <math>\xi^\mu</math> and parameterized by <math>\epsilon > 0</math>. These new diffeomorphisms will be used to represent the coordinate transformations for "infinitesimal shifts" as discussed above. Together with <math>\phi</math>, a family of perturbations is given by |
||
:<math>\begin{align} |
: <math>\begin{align} |
||
h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} &= [(\phi\circ\psi_\epsilon)^*g]_{\mu\nu} - \eta_{\mu\nu} \\ |
h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} &= [(\phi\circ\psi_\epsilon)^*g]_{\mu\nu} - \eta_{\mu\nu} \\ |
||
&= [\psi^*_\epsilon(\phi^*g)]_{\mu\nu} - \eta_{\mu\nu} \\ |
&= [\psi^*_\epsilon(\phi^*g)]_{\mu\nu} - \eta_{\mu\nu} \\ |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
\end{align}</math> |
\end{align}</math> |
||
Therefore, in the limit <math>\epsilon\rightarrow 0</math>, |
Therefore, in the limit <math>\epsilon\rightarrow 0</math>, |
||
:<math>h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} = h_{\mu\nu} + \epsilon\mathcal{L}_\xi\eta_{\mu\nu}</math> |
: <math>h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} = h_{\mu\nu} + \epsilon\mathcal{L}_\xi\eta_{\mu\nu}</math> |
||
where <math>\mathcal{L}_\xi</math> is the [[Lie derivative]] along the vector field <math>\xi_\mu</math>. |
where <math>\mathcal{L}_\xi</math> is the [[Lie derivative]] along the vector field <math>\xi_\mu</math>. |
||
The Lie derivative works out to yield the final ''gauge transformation'' of the perturbation metric <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math>: |
The Lie derivative works out to yield the final ''gauge transformation'' of the perturbation metric <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math>: |
||
:<math>h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} = h_{\mu\nu} + \epsilon(\partial_\mu\xi_\nu + \partial_\nu\xi_\mu),</math> |
: <math>h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} = h_{\mu\nu} + \epsilon(\partial_\mu\xi_\nu + \partial_\nu\xi_\mu),</math> |
||
which precisely define the set of perturbation metrics that describe the same physical system. In other words, it characterizes the gauge symmetry of the linearized field equations. |
which precisely define the set of perturbation metrics that describe the same physical system. In other words, it characterizes the gauge symmetry of the linearized field equations. |
||
===Choice of gauge=== |
=== Choice of gauge === |
||
By exploiting gauge invariance, certain properties of the perturbation metric can be guaranteed by choosing a suitable vector field <math>\xi^\mu</math>. |
By exploiting gauge invariance, certain properties of the perturbation metric can be guaranteed by choosing a suitable vector field <math>\xi^\mu</math>. |
||
====Transverse gauge==== |
==== Transverse gauge ==== |
||
To study how the perturbation <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math> distorts measurements of length, it is useful to define the following spatial tensor: |
To study how the perturbation <math>h_{\mu\nu}</math> distorts measurements of length, it is useful to define the following spatial tensor: |
||
:<math>s_{ij} = h_{ij} - \frac{1}{3}\delta^{kl}h_{kl}\delta_{ij}</math> |
: <math>s_{ij} = h_{ij} - \frac{1}{3}\delta^{kl}h_{kl}\delta_{ij}</math> |
||
(Note that the indices span only spatial components: <math>i,j\in\{1,2,3\}</math>). Thus, by using <math>s_{ij}</math>, the spatial components of the perturbation can be decomposed as |
(Note that the indices span only spatial components: <math>i,j\in\{1,2,3\}</math>). Thus, by using <math>s_{ij}</math>, the spatial components of the perturbation can be decomposed as |
||
:<math>h_{ij} = s_{ij} - \Psi\delta_{ij}</math> |
: <math>h_{ij} = s_{ij} - \Psi\delta_{ij}</math> |
||
where <math>\Psi = \frac{1}{3}\delta^{kl}h_{kl}</math>. |
where <math>\Psi = \frac{1}{3}\delta^{kl}h_{kl}</math>. |
||
The tensor <math>s_{ij}</math> is, by construction, [[trace (linear algebra)|trace]]less and is referred to as the ''strain'' since it represents the amount by which the perturbation [[Gravitational wave#Effects of passing|stretches and contracts measurements of space]]. In the context of studying [[gravitational waves|gravitational radiation]], the strain is particularly useful when utilized with the ''transverse gauge.'' This gauge is defined by choosing the spatial components of <math>\xi^\mu</math> to satisfy the relation |
The tensor <math>s_{ij}</math> is, by construction, [[trace (linear algebra)|trace]]less and is referred to as the ''strain'' since it represents the amount by which the perturbation [[Gravitational wave#Effects of passing|stretches and contracts measurements of space]]. In the context of studying [[gravitational waves|gravitational radiation]], the strain is particularly useful when utilized with the ''transverse gauge.'' This gauge is defined by choosing the spatial components of <math>\xi^\mu</math> to satisfy the relation |
||
:<math>\nabla^2\xi^j + \frac{1}{3}\partial_j\partial_i\xi^i = -\partial_i s^{ij},</math> |
: <math>\nabla^2\xi^j + \frac{1}{3}\partial_j\partial_i\xi^i = -\partial_i s^{ij},</math> |
||
then choosing the time component <math>\xi^0</math> to satisfy |
then choosing the time component <math>\xi^0</math> to satisfy |
||
:<math>\nabla^2\xi^0 = \partial_i h_{0i} + \partial_0\partial_i\xi^i.</math> |
: <math>\nabla^2\xi^0 = \partial_i h_{0i} + \partial_0\partial_i\xi^i.</math> |
||
After performing the gauge transformation using the formula in the previous section, the strain becomes spatially transverse: |
After performing the gauge transformation using the formula in the previous section, the strain becomes spatially transverse: |
||
:<math>\partial_i s^{ij}_{(\epsilon)} = 0,</math> |
: <math>\partial_i s^{ij}_{(\epsilon)} = 0,</math> |
||
with the additional property: |
with the additional property: |
||
:<math>\partial_i h^{0i}_{(\epsilon)} = 0.</math> |
: <math>\partial_i h^{0i}_{(\epsilon)} = 0.</math> |
||
====Synchronous gauge==== |
==== Synchronous gauge ==== |
||
The ''synchronous gauge'' simplifies the perturbation metric by requiring that the metric not distort measurements of time. More precisely, the synchronous gauge is chosen such that the non-spatial components of <math>h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu}</math> are zero, namely |
The ''synchronous gauge'' simplifies the perturbation metric by requiring that the metric not distort measurements of time. More precisely, the synchronous gauge is chosen such that the non-spatial components of <math>h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu}</math> are zero, namely |
||
:<math>h^{(\epsilon)}_{0\nu} = 0.</math> |
: <math>h^{(\epsilon)}_{0\nu} = 0.</math> |
||
This can be achieved by requiring the time component of <math>\xi^\mu</math> to satisfy |
This can be achieved by requiring the time component of <math>\xi^\mu</math> to satisfy |
||
:<math>\partial_0\xi^0 = -h_{00}</math> |
: <math>\partial_0\xi^0 = -h_{00}</math> |
||
and requiring the spatial components to satisfy |
and requiring the spatial components to satisfy |
||
:<math>\partial_0\xi^i = \partial_i\xi^0 - h_{0i}.</math> |
: <math>\partial_0\xi^i = \partial_i\xi^0 - h_{0i}.</math> |
||
====Harmonic gauge==== |
==== Harmonic gauge ==== |
||
The ''[[Harmonic coordinate condition|harmonic gauge]]'' (also referred to as the ''Lorenz gauge''<ref group="note">Not to be confused with Lorentz.</ref>) is selected whenever it is necessary to reduce the linearized field equations as much as possible. This can be done if the condition |
The ''[[Harmonic coordinate condition|harmonic gauge]]'' (also referred to as the ''Lorenz gauge''<ref group="note">Not to be confused with Lorentz.</ref>) is selected whenever it is necessary to reduce the linearized field equations as much as possible. This can be done if the condition |
||
:<math>\partial_\mu h^\mu_\nu = \frac{1}{2}\partial_\nu h</math> |
: <math>\partial_\mu h^\mu_\nu = \frac{1}{2}\partial_\nu h</math> |
||
is true. To achieve this, <math>\xi_\mu</math> is required to satisfy the relation |
is true. To achieve this, <math>\xi_\mu</math> is required to satisfy the relation |
||
:<math>\square\xi_\mu = -\partial_\nu h^\nu_\mu + \frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu h.</math> |
: <math>\square\xi_\mu = -\partial_\nu h^\nu_\mu + \frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu h.</math> |
||
Consequently, by using the harmonic gauge, the Einstein tensor <math>G_{\mu\nu} = R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu}</math> reduces to |
Consequently, by using the harmonic gauge, the [[Einstein tensor]] <math>G_{\mu\nu} = R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu}</math> reduces to |
||
:<math>G_{\mu\nu} = -\frac{1}{2}\square\left(h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}h^{(\epsilon)}\eta_{\mu\nu}\right).</math> |
: <math>G_{\mu\nu} = -\frac{1}{2}\square\left(h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}h^{(\epsilon)}\eta_{\mu\nu}\right).</math> |
||
Therefore, by writing it in terms of a "trace-reversed" metric, <math>\bar{h}^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} = h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}h^{(\epsilon)}\eta_{\mu\nu}</math>, the linearized field equations reduce to |
Therefore, by writing it in terms of a "trace-reversed" metric, <math>\bar{h}^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} = h^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}h^{(\epsilon)}\eta_{\mu\nu}</math>, the linearized field equations reduce to |
||
:<math>\square \bar{h}^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} = - |
: <math>\square \bar{h}^{(\epsilon)}_{\mu\nu} = -2\kappa T_{\mu\nu}.</math> |
||
This can be solved exactly, to produce the [[wave equation|wave solutions]] that define [[gravitational wave|gravitational radiation]]. |
|||
==See also== |
== See also == |
||
{{cols}} |
{{cols}} |
||
*[[Correspondence principle]] |
* [[Correspondence principle]] |
||
*[[Gravitoelectromagnetism]] |
* [[Gravitoelectromagnetism]] |
||
*[[Lanczos tensor]] |
* [[Lanczos tensor]] |
||
*[[Parameterized post-Newtonian formalism]] |
* [[Parameterized post-Newtonian formalism]] |
||
*[[Post-Newtonian expansion]] |
* [[Post-Newtonian expansion]] |
||
*[[Quasinormal mode]] |
* [[Quasinormal mode]] |
||
{{colend}} |
{{colend}} |
||
==Notes== |
== Notes == |
||
{{reflist|group="note"|2}} |
|||
==Further reading== |
== Further reading == |
||
* {{cite book | author = Sean M. Carroll | title = Spacetime and Geometry, an Introduction to General Relativity | year = 2003 | publisher = Pearson | isbn = 978-0805387322}} |
* {{cite book | author = Sean M. Carroll | title = Spacetime and Geometry, an Introduction to General Relativity | year = 2003 | publisher = Pearson | isbn = 978-0805387322}} |
||
== External links == |
|||
* {{wikiquote-inline}} |
|||
{{Theories of gravitation}} |
{{Theories of gravitation}} |
Latest revision as of 12:52, 26 August 2024
General relativity |
---|
In the theory of general relativity, linearized gravity is the application of perturbation theory to the metric tensor that describes the geometry of spacetime. As a consequence, linearized gravity is an effective method for modeling the effects of gravity when the gravitational field is weak. The usage of linearized gravity is integral to the study of gravitational waves and weak-field gravitational lensing.
Weak-field approximation
[edit]The Einstein field equation (EFE) describing the geometry of spacetime is given as
where is the Ricci tensor, is the Ricci scalar, is the energy–momentum tensor, is the Einstein gravitational constant, and is the spacetime metric tensor that represents the solutions of the equation.
Although succinct when written out using Einstein notation, hidden within the Ricci tensor and Ricci scalar are exceptionally nonlinear dependencies on the metric tensor that render the prospect of finding exact solutions impractical in most systems. However, when describing systems for which the curvature of spacetime is small (meaning that terms in the EFE that are quadratic in do not significantly contribute to the equations of motion), one can model the solution of the field equations as being the Minkowski metric[note 1] plus a small perturbation term . In other words:
In this regime, substituting the general metric for this perturbative approximation results in a simplified expression for the Ricci tensor:
where is the trace of the perturbation, denotes the partial derivative with respect to the coordinate of spacetime, and is the d'Alembert operator.
Together with the Ricci scalar,
the left side of the field equation reduces to
and thus the EFE is reduced to a linear second order partial differential equation in terms of .
Gauge invariance
[edit]The process of decomposing the general spacetime into the Minkowski metric plus a perturbation term is not unique. This is due to that different choices for coordinates may give different forms for . In order to capture this phenomenon, the application of gauge symmetry is introduced.
Gauge symmetries are a mathematical device for describing a system that does not change when the underlying coordinate system is "shifted" by an infinitesimal amount. So although the perturbation metric is not consistently defined between different coordinate systems, the overall system which it describes is.
To capture this formally, the non-uniqueness of the perturbation is represented as being a consequence of the diverse collection of diffeomorphisms on spacetime that leave sufficiently small. Therefore, it is required that be defined in terms of a general set of diffeomorphisms, then select the subset of these that preserve the small scale that is required by the weak-field approximation. One may thus define to denote an arbitrary diffeomorphism that maps the flat Minkowski spacetime to the more general spacetime represented by the metric . With this, the perturbation metric may be defined as the difference between the pullback of and the Minkowski metric:
The diffeomorphisms may thus be chosen such that .
Given then a vector field defined on the flat background spacetime, an additional family of diffeomorphisms may be defined as those generated by and parameterized by . These new diffeomorphisms will be used to represent the coordinate transformations for "infinitesimal shifts" as discussed above. Together with , a family of perturbations is given by
Therefore, in the limit ,
where is the Lie derivative along the vector field .
The Lie derivative works out to yield the final gauge transformation of the perturbation metric :
which precisely define the set of perturbation metrics that describe the same physical system. In other words, it characterizes the gauge symmetry of the linearized field equations.
Choice of gauge
[edit]By exploiting gauge invariance, certain properties of the perturbation metric can be guaranteed by choosing a suitable vector field .
Transverse gauge
[edit]To study how the perturbation distorts measurements of length, it is useful to define the following spatial tensor:
(Note that the indices span only spatial components: ). Thus, by using , the spatial components of the perturbation can be decomposed as
where .
The tensor is, by construction, traceless and is referred to as the strain since it represents the amount by which the perturbation stretches and contracts measurements of space. In the context of studying gravitational radiation, the strain is particularly useful when utilized with the transverse gauge. This gauge is defined by choosing the spatial components of to satisfy the relation
then choosing the time component to satisfy
After performing the gauge transformation using the formula in the previous section, the strain becomes spatially transverse:
with the additional property:
Synchronous gauge
[edit]The synchronous gauge simplifies the perturbation metric by requiring that the metric not distort measurements of time. More precisely, the synchronous gauge is chosen such that the non-spatial components of are zero, namely
This can be achieved by requiring the time component of to satisfy
and requiring the spatial components to satisfy
Harmonic gauge
[edit]The harmonic gauge (also referred to as the Lorenz gauge[note 2]) is selected whenever it is necessary to reduce the linearized field equations as much as possible. This can be done if the condition
is true. To achieve this, is required to satisfy the relation
Consequently, by using the harmonic gauge, the Einstein tensor reduces to
Therefore, by writing it in terms of a "trace-reversed" metric, , the linearized field equations reduce to
This can be solved exactly, to produce the wave solutions that define gravitational radiation.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]Further reading
[edit]- Sean M. Carroll (2003). Spacetime and Geometry, an Introduction to General Relativity. Pearson. ISBN 978-0805387322.
External links
[edit]- Quotations related to Linearized gravity at Wikiquote