Jump to content

Edie Ochiltree: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Script-assisted fixes per WP:TIES, MOS:NUM, MOS:LINK, MOS:ITALICS and CS1
m Disambiguating links to Critical Review (link changed to The Critical Review (newspaper)) using DisamAssist.
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
== His character ==
== His character ==


Jonathan Oldbuck, the antiquary of the novel's title, says that Ochiltree "has been soldier, ballad-singer, travelling tinker, and is now a beggar…a sort of privileged nuisance – one of the last specimens of the old-fashioned Scottish [[mendicant]], who kept his rounds within a particular space, and was the news-carrier, the minstrel, and sometimes the historian of the district".{{sfn|Scott|1897|p=44}} Ochiltree's great love and knowledge of the old ballads and traditions echoes Oldbuck's more scholarly antiquarian lore. They have a mutual respect and liking for each other, and between them they solve the other characters' problems and bring the novel to a happy resolution, but on the way they sometimes clash comically, Oldbuck's antiquarian fantasy and self-delusion being punctured by Ochiltree's realism and good sense.{{sfn|Mayhead|1973|p=145}}{{sfn|Johnson|1970|p=537}}{{sfn|Millgate|1987|pp=93–94}} Both characters are presented as being sticklers for exactness, Ochiltree being remarkable for the accuracy of the local news he brings and for his insistence on old traditions being remembered correctly. In the first half of the novel the two are differentiated by Ochiltree's greater practical effectiveness in the help he brings to others.{{sfn|Millgate|1987|pp=94, 95}} He could be described as a [[Cynicism (philosophy)|Cynic]] in the tradition of [[Diogenes of Sinope|Diogenes]],<ref>{{cite book |last1=Brown |first1=David |year=1979 |title=Walter Scott and the Historical Imagination |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=StM9AAAAIAAJ |location=London |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |page=55 |isbn=0710003013 }}</ref> and he is at odds with modern commercial society in his traditional reliance on the support of the community at large rather than on any single patron.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Baker |first=Samuel |year=2009 |title=Scott's Stoic Characters: Ethics, Sentiment, and Irony in ''The Antiquary'', ''Guy Mannering'', and “the Author of ''Waverley'' |journal=Modern Language Quarterly |volume=70 |page=448 }}</ref> His overall function in the Fairport community is to bind it together.{{sfn|Millgate|1987|p=102}}
Jonathan Oldbuck, the antiquary of the novel's title, says that Ochiltree "has been soldier, ballad-singer, travelling tinker, and is now a beggar…a sort of privileged nuisance – one of the last specimens of the old-fashioned Scottish [[mendicant]], who kept his rounds within a particular space, and was the news-carrier, the minstrel, and sometimes the historian of the district".{{sfn|Scott|1897|p=44}} Ochiltree's great love and knowledge of the old ballads and traditions echoes Oldbuck's more scholarly antiquarian lore. They have a mutual respect and liking for each other, and between them they solve the other characters' problems and bring the novel to a happy resolution, but on the way they sometimes clash comically, Oldbuck's antiquarian fantasy and self-delusion being punctured by Ochiltree's realism and good sense.{{sfn|Mayhead|1973|p=145}}{{sfn|Johnson|1970|p=537}}{{sfn|Millgate|1987|pp=93–94}} Both characters are presented as being sticklers for exactness, Ochiltree being remarkable for the accuracy of the local news he brings and for his insistence on old traditions being remembered correctly. In the first half of the novel the two are differentiated by Ochiltree's greater practical effectiveness in the help he brings to others.{{sfn|Millgate|1987|pp=94, 95}} He could be described as a [[Cynicism (philosophy)|Cynic]] in the tradition of [[Diogenes of Sinope|Diogenes]],<ref>{{cite book |last1=Brown |first1=David |year=1979 |title=Walter Scott and the Historical Imagination |url=https://archive.org/details/walterscotthisto0000brow |url-access=registration |location=London |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |page=[https://archive.org/details/walterscotthisto0000brow/page/55 55] |isbn=0710003013 }}</ref> and he is at odds with modern commercial society in his traditional reliance on the support of the community at large rather than on any single patron.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Baker |first=Samuel |year=2009 |title=Scott's Stoic Characters: Ethics, Sentiment, and Irony in ''The Antiquary'', ''Guy Mannering'', and "the Author of ''Waverley''" |journal=Modern Language Quarterly |volume=70 |issue=4 |page=448 |doi=10.1215/00267929-2009-011 |url=https://hcommons.org/deposits/download/hc:38028/CONTENT/baker_2009_mlq_scott_stoicism.pdf/ }}</ref> His overall function in the Fairport community is to bind it together.{{sfn|Millgate|1987|p=102}}


== The originals of Ochiltree ==
== The originals of Ochiltree ==


[[File:The gravestone of the Gentleman Beggar - geograph.org.uk - 1012853.jpg|thumb|The gravestone of Andrew Gemmels]]
[[File:The gravestone of the Gentleman Beggar - geograph.org.uk - 1012853.jpg|thumb|The gravestone of Andrew Gemmels]]
The writer W. S. Crockett considered Edie Ochiltree to be more firmly based on a real-life model than any other of Scott's characters, Jonathan Oldbuck alone excepted. His original was one Andrew Gemmels, a beggar whom Scott, then a boy in [[Kelso, Scottish Borders|Kelso]], had often met. Gemmels came from the parish of [[Cumnock|Old Cumnock]] in Ayrshire, and he was, like Ochiltree, an army veteran who had fought at the [[battle of Fontenoy]].{{sfn|Crockett|1912| pp=120, 133, 135–136}} Scott described him in his introduction to the 1829 edition of ''The Antiquary'' as "a remarkably fine old figure, very tall, and maintaining a soldierlike or military manner and address. His features were intelligent, with a powerful expression of sarcasm…It was some fear of Andrew's satire, as much as a feeling of kindness or charity, which secured him the general good reception which he enjoyed everywhere."{{sfn|Scott|1897|p=7}} He prospered better than most beggars, and died, by his own reckoning, at the age of 105, leaving a small fortune to a nephew.{{sfn|Crockett|1912| p=137}}<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/scott/walter/antiquary/introduction2.html |title=Editor's Introduction to ''The Antiquary'' |last1=Lang |first1=Andrew |website=eBooks@Adelaide |publisher=University of Adelaide |access-date=23 March 2016}}</ref>
The writer W. S. Crockett considered Edie Ochiltree to be more firmly based on a real-life model than any other of Scott's characters, Jonathan Oldbuck alone excepted. His original was one Andrew Gemmels, a beggar whom Scott, then a boy in [[Kelso, Scottish Borders|Kelso]], had often met. Gemmels came from the parish of [[Cumnock|Old Cumnock]] in Ayrshire, and he was, like Ochiltree, an army veteran who had fought at the [[battle of Fontenoy]].{{sfn|Crockett|1912| pp=120, 133, 135–136}} Scott described him in his introduction to the 1829 edition of ''The Antiquary'' as "a remarkably fine old figure, very tall, and maintaining a soldierlike or military manner and address. His features were intelligent, with a powerful expression of sarcasm…It was some fear of Andrew's satire, as much as a feeling of kindness or charity, which secured him the general good reception which he enjoyed everywhere."{{sfn|Scott|1897|p=7}} He prospered better than most beggars, and died, by his own reckoning, at the age of 105, leaving a small fortune to a nephew.{{sfn|Crockett|1912| p=137}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/scott/walter/antiquary/introduction2.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080813062524/http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/scott/walter/antiquary/introduction2.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=13 August 2008 |title=Editor's Introduction to ''The Antiquary'' |last1=Lang |first1=Andrew |website=eBooks@Adelaide |publisher=University of Adelaide |access-date=23 March 2016}}</ref>


Scott's son-in-law and biographer [[John Gibson Lockhart|J. G. Lockhart]] pointed out another model for Ochiltree in an anecdote concerning [[Sir John Clerk, 1st Baronet|Sir John Clerk, 1st Bt.]], which was certainly the inspiration for an episode in chapter 4 of ''The Antiquary'':
Scott's son-in-law and biographer [[John Gibson Lockhart|J. G. Lockhart]] pointed out another model for Ochiltree in an anecdote concerning [[Sir John Clerk, 1st Baronet|Sir John Clerk, 1st Bt.]], which was certainly the inspiration for an episode in chapter 4 of ''The Antiquary'':


<blockquote>[T]he old Baronet carried some English [[Virtuoso]]s to see a supposed [[Castra|Roman camp]]; and on his exclaiming at a particular spot, "This I take to have been the [[Praetorium]]", a herdsman, who stood by, answered, "Praetorium here, Praetorium there, I made it wi' a [[wikt:flaughter|flaughter-spade]]."<ref>{{cite book |last=Lockhart |first=J. G. |date=1845 |title=Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart. |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bDs6AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA41 |location=Edinburgh |publisher=Robert Cadell |page=41}}</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>[T]he old Baronet carried some English [[Virtuoso]]s to see a supposed [[Castra|Roman camp]]; and on his exclaiming at a particular spot, "This I take to have been the [[Praetorium]]", a herdsman, who stood by, answered, "Praetorium here, Praetorium there, I made it wi' a [[wikt:flaughter|flaughter-spade]]."<ref>{{cite book |last=Lockhart |first=J. G. |date=1845 |title=Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bDs6AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA41 |location=Edinburgh |publisher=Robert Cadell |page=41}}</ref></blockquote>


Some critics have claimed that Scott's own character can be discerned in Ochiltree, particularly in the capacity to stoically accept personal misfortunes which supported Scott in his later years.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pope-Hennessy |first1=Una |author-link1=Una Pope-Hennessy |year=1948 |title=Sir Walter Scott |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=AyxongEACAAJ |location=London |publisher=Home & Van Thal |page=97 |access-date=13 March 2016}}</ref>{{sfn|Mayhead|1973|p=145}}
Some critics have claimed that Scott's own character can be discerned in Ochiltree, particularly in the capacity to stoically accept personal misfortunes which supported Scott in his later years.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pope-Hennessy |first1=Una |author-link1=Una Pope-Hennessy |year=1948 |title=Sir Walter Scott |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.504471 |location=London |publisher=Home & Van Thal |page=[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.504471/page/n99 97] |access-date=13 March 2016}}</ref>{{sfn|Mayhead|1973|p=145}}


== Critical assessment ==
== Critical assessment ==


At least five reviews of ''The Antiquary'', in the ''[[Quarterly Review]]'', the ''[[Edinburgh Review]]'', the ''[[Monthly Review (London)|Monthly Review]]'', the ''[[The Critical Review|Critical Review]]'', and the ''British Lady's Magazine'', agreed in considering Ochiltree a male version of Scott's eldritch gypsy Meg Merrilies in his previous novel ''[[Guy Mannering]]''. The ''Quarterly '''s reviewer, [[John Wilson Croker]], thought the imitation improved on the original, while the ''Monthly'' thought him unforgettable and sometimes sublime, but [[Francis Jeffrey, Lord Jeffrey|Francis Jeffrey]] in the ''Edinburgh'' could give him only qualified approval.<ref>{{cite journal |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=[Review of ''The Antiquary''] |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=h8YPAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA500 |journal=Critical Review |series=5th Ser. |volume=3 |page=500 |year=1816 |access-date=28 March 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |year=1817 |title=[Review of ''The Antiquary''] |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=eqnQAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA46 |journal=Monthly Review |volume=82 |pages=46, 48, 51 |access-date=28 March 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1= Tippkötter |first1=Horst |year=1971 |title=Walter Scott, Geschichte als Unterhaltung |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1pMPAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Old+Edie+is+of+the+family%22&dq=%22Old+Edie+is+of+the+family%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwitiOvFosbLAhUHfRoKHesqAww4ChDoAQhEMAg |location=Frankfurt am Main |publisher=Klostermann |page=50 |access-date=16 March 2016 }}</ref>{{sfn|Hayden|1970|pp=101, 105}}{{sfn|Hillhouse|1970|p=42}} The ''Augustan Review'' could not accept the idea of a mere beggar expressing moral eloquence and poetic feeling, and it detected in this the influence of [[William Wordsworth|Wordsworth]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=[Review of ''The Antiquary''] |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=XvkEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA176 |journal=Augustan Review |volume=3 |pages=176–177 |year=1816 |access-date=8 April 2016 }}</ref> [[William H. Prescott]] in the ''[[North American Review]]'' believed that such characters as Edie Ochiltree showed Scott to have a "worldly, good-natured shrewdness" surpassing that of [[William Shakespeare|Shakespeare]] himself.{{sfn|Hillhouse|1970|p=89}} Later in the century a critic in the ''London Quarterly'' thought he ranked among "the most complete and remarkable characters created by Scott or any other
At least five reviews of ''The Antiquary'', in the ''[[Quarterly Review]]'', the ''[[Edinburgh Review]]'', the ''[[Monthly Review (London)|Monthly Review]]'', the ''[[The Critical Review (newspaper)|Critical Review]]'', and the ''British Lady's Magazine'', agreed in considering Ochiltree a male version of Scott's eldritch gypsy Meg Merrilies in his previous novel ''[[Guy Mannering]]''. The ''Quarterly '''s reviewer, [[John Wilson Croker]], thought the imitation improved on the original, while the ''Monthly'' thought him unforgettable and sometimes sublime, but [[Francis Jeffrey, Lord Jeffrey|Francis Jeffrey]] in the ''Edinburgh'' could give him only qualified approval.<ref>{{cite journal |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=[Review of ''The Antiquary''] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=h8YPAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA500 |journal=Critical Review |series=5th Ser. |volume=3 |page=500 |year=1816 |access-date=28 March 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |year=1817 |title=[Review of ''The Antiquary''] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eqnQAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA46 |journal=Monthly Review |volume=82 |pages=46, 48, 51 |access-date=28 March 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1= Tippkötter |first1=Horst |year=1971 |title=Walter Scott, Geschichte als Unterhaltung |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1pMPAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Old+Edie+is+of+the+family%22 |location=Frankfurt am Main |publisher=Klostermann |page=50 |isbn=9783465008712 |access-date=16 March 2016 }}</ref>{{sfn|Hayden|1970|pp=101, 105}}{{sfn|Hillhouse|1970|p=42}} The ''Augustan Review'' could not accept the idea of a mere beggar expressing moral eloquence and poetic feeling, and it detected in this the influence of [[William Wordsworth|Wordsworth]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=[Review of ''The Antiquary''] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XvkEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA176 |journal=Augustan Review |volume=3 |pages=176–177 |year=1816 |access-date=8 April 2016 }}</ref> [[William H. Prescott]] in the ''[[North American Review]]'' believed that such characters as Edie Ochiltree showed Scott to have a "worldly, good-natured shrewdness" surpassing that of [[William Shakespeare|Shakespeare]] himself.{{sfn|Hillhouse|1970|p=89}} Later in the century a critic in the ''London Quarterly'' thought he ranked among "the most complete and remarkable characters created by Scott or any other
man",{{sfn|Hayden|1970|pp=472–473}} and this opinion was echoed by many 20th-century commentators.{{sfn|Hillhouse|1970|p=42}} [[Andrew Lang]] considered the treatment of the character of Ochiltree was an example of Scott's art at its very best.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lang |first1=Andrew |year=1906 |title=Sir Walter Scott |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=QiVxNFl3hPoC&pg=PT65&dq=%22examples+of+Scott+at%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwji86GE0b7LAhUBSJoKHU6RC8UQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=%22examples%20of%20Scott%20at%22&f=false |location=London |publisher=Hodder and Stoughton |page=143 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> For [[Charles Harold Herford]] he was a great creation drawn from the heart of Scottish life.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Herford |first1=C. H. |year=2003 |title=The Age of Wordsworth |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lDy_sAuBAo0C&pg=PA94 |location=New Delhi |publisher=Atlantic |page=94 |isbn=8126902922 |access-date=31 March 2016 }}</ref> The scholar Aubrey Bell cited Ochiltree in support of his and [[Georg Brandes]]' view
man",{{sfn|Hayden|1970|pp=472–473}} and this opinion was echoed by many 20th-century commentators.{{sfn|Hillhouse|1970|p=42}} [[Andrew Lang]] considered the treatment of the character of Ochiltree was an example of Scott's art at its very best.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lang |first1=Andrew |year=1906 |title=Sir Walter Scott |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QiVxNFl3hPoC&q=%22examples+of+Scott+at%22&pg=PT65 |location=London |publisher=Hodder and Stoughton |page=143 |isbn=9783849607456 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> For [[Charles Harold Herford]] he was a great creation drawn from the heart of Scottish life.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Herford |first1=C. H. |year=2003 |title=The Age of Wordsworth |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lDy_sAuBAo0C&pg=PA94 |location=New Delhi |publisher=Atlantic |page=94 |isbn=8126902922 |access-date=31 March 2016 }}</ref> The scholar Aubrey Bell cited Ochiltree in support of his and [[Georg Brandes]]' view
that Scott was one of the finest drawers of character ever to have lived.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bell |first1=Aubrey |year=1932 |chapter=Scott and Cervantes |editor1-last=Grierson |editor1-first=H. J. C. |editor1-link=H. J. C. Grierson |title=Sir Walter Scott To-Day |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=69VHPgAACAAJ |location=London |publisher=Constable |page=83 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> [[John Sutherland (author)|John Sutherland]] was unconvinced by Ochiltree's readiness to put the welfare of his betters before his own, and interpreted this as a symptom of Scott's nostalgia for the national
that Scott was one of the finest drawers of character ever to have lived.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bell |first1=Aubrey |year=1932 |chapter=Scott and Cervantes |editor1-last=Grierson |editor1-first=H. J. C. |editor1-link=H. J. C. Grierson |title=Sir Walter Scott To-Day |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=69VHPgAACAAJ |location=London |publisher=Constable |page=83 |isbn=9780849209215 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> [[John Sutherland (author)|John Sutherland]] was unconvinced by Ochiltree's readiness to put the welfare of his betters before his own, and interpreted this as a symptom of Scott's nostalgia for the national
solidarity of Britain in the 1790s, when men of all classes felt threatened by Revolutionary France.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sutherland |first1=John |year=1997 |orig-year=1995 |title=The Life of Walter Scott: A Critical Biography |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=E4mdQgAACAAJ |location=Oxford |publisher=Blackwell |page=193 |isbn=0631203176 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> Scott's biographer Edgar Johnson acknowledged that some readers find the scenes between Ochiltree and the fraudster Herman Dousterswivel too redolent of low comedy. He himself doubted if Ochiltree's eloquence was entirely realistic in a beggar, and he also noted his tendency to be conveniently present whenever the plot needs to be moved forward.{{sfn|Johnson|1970|pp=540–542}} The academic Robin Mayhead however disagreed, arguing that ''The Antiquary'' does not have the conventions of the realist school; for him Ochiltree functions as an embodiment of dependability, necessary to offset the faults and fallibilities of other characters in the novel. This, rather than the attraction of Ochiltree's "racy vernacular", led Mayhead to declare himself as great an admirer as any of this character.{{sfn|Mayhead|1973|pp=144–145}} [[A. N. Wilson]] wrote about Ochiltree's "strangely moving (though so stagey) wisdom".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wilson |first1=A. N. |year=1980 |title=The Laird of Abbotsford |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=D3o8AAAAIAAJ&q=%22wisdom+of+Edie%22&dq=%22wisdom+of+Edie%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj3hKDL2b7LAhXrB5oKHUfFA7kQ6AEILDAB |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=66 |isbn=0192117564 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> [[John Buchan]] noted that he was depicted with "minute realism" as a typical Scottish beggar, and yet was sometimes able "to speak words which, though wholly in character, are yet part of the world's poetry". He approvingly quoted another critic as saying that Ochiltree is the most Shakespearean figure outside Shakespeare.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Buchan |first1=John |year=1961 |orig-year=1932 |title=Sir Walter Scott |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=abUZTl-ZGG0C&dq=%22fisherman+sturdy%22&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22outside+Shakespeare%22 |location=London |publisher=Cassell |pages=150–151 |access-date=7 April 2016 }}</ref> [[Hesketh Pearson]] also compared Ochiltree with Shakespeare's creations, and found him more realistic than any of them, and more humorous than all but [[Falstaff]]. He was, for Pearson, Scott's first great character.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pearson |first1=Hesketh |year=1954 |title=Sir Walter Scott: His Life and Personality |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WGsGAQAAIAAJ&q=%22contains+his+first+great+character%22&dq=%22contains+his+first+great+character%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjqnMGa3L7LAhXJIJoKHY69CwsQ6AEIIDAB |location=London |publisher=Methuen |pages=129, 197 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> [[Henry Augustin Beers|Henry A. Beers]] likewise numbered him among Scott's greatest creations, one of those who "brought into play his knowledge of men, his humour, observation of life, and insight into Scotch human nature".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Beers |first1=Henry A. |year=2014 |orig-year=1926 |title=A History of English Romanticism in the Nineteenth Century |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YgZXCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA33 |location=New York |publisher=Routledge |page=33 |isbn=9780415749732 |access-date=19 April 2016 }}</ref>
solidarity of Britain in the 1790s, when men of all classes felt threatened by Revolutionary France.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sutherland |first1=John |year=1997 |orig-year=1995 |title=The Life of Walter Scott: A Critical Biography |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E4mdQgAACAAJ |location=Oxford |publisher=Blackwell |page=193 |isbn=0631203176 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> Scott's biographer Edgar Johnson acknowledged that some readers find the scenes between Ochiltree and the fraudster Herman Dousterswivel too redolent of low comedy. He himself doubted if Ochiltree's eloquence was entirely realistic in a beggar, and he also noted his tendency to be conveniently present whenever the plot needs to be moved forward.{{sfn|Johnson|1970|pp=540–542}} The academic Robin Mayhead however disagreed, arguing that ''The Antiquary'' does not have the conventions of the realist school; for him Ochiltree functions as an embodiment of dependability, necessary to offset the faults and fallibilities of other characters in the novel. This, rather than the attraction of Ochiltree's "racy vernacular", led Mayhead to declare himself as great an admirer as any of this character.{{sfn|Mayhead|1973|pp=144–145}} [[A. N. Wilson]] wrote about Ochiltree's "strangely moving (though so stagey) wisdom".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wilson |first1=A. N. |year=1980 |title=The Laird of Abbotsford |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D3o8AAAAIAAJ&q=%22wisdom+of+Edie%22 |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=66 |isbn=0192117564 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> [[John Buchan]] noted that he was depicted with "minute realism" as a typical Scottish beggar, and yet was sometimes able "to speak words which, though wholly in character, are yet part of the world's poetry". He approvingly quoted another critic as saying that Ochiltree is the most Shakespearean figure outside Shakespeare.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Buchan |first1=John |year=1961 |orig-year=1932 |title=Sir Walter Scott |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=abUZTl-ZGG0C&q=%22outside+Shakespeare%22 |location=London |publisher=Cassell |pages=150–151 |access-date=7 April 2016 }}</ref> [[Hesketh Pearson]] also compared Ochiltree with Shakespeare's creations, and found him more realistic than any of them, and more humorous than all but [[Falstaff]]. He was, for Pearson, Scott's first great character.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pearson |first1=Hesketh |year=1954 |title=Sir Walter Scott: His Life and Personality |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WGsGAQAAIAAJ&q=%22contains+his+first+great+character%22 |location=London |publisher=Methuen |pages=129, 197 |isbn=9780899848549 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}</ref> [[Henry Augustin Beers|Henry A. Beers]] likewise numbered him among Scott's greatest creations, one of those who "brought into play his knowledge of men, his humour, observation of life, and insight into Scotch human nature".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Beers |first1=Henry A. |year=2014 |orig-year=1926 |title=A History of English Romanticism in the Nineteenth Century |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YgZXCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA33 |location=New York |publisher=Routledge |page=33 |isbn=9780415749732 |access-date=19 April 2016 }}</ref>

== Legacy ==

When the [[Scott Monument]] was erected in Edinburgh in the 1840s, its many figurative statues included one of Edie Ochiltree, executed by [[George Anderson Lawson]]. It shows Ochiltree with a straggly beard, a broad-brimmed hat, and a badge on his shoulder identifying him as a licensed beggar.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://sites.scran.ac.uk/scottmon/pages/hisnovels/statues/edie_ochiltree.htm |title=The Character Statues: Edie Ochiltree |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=n.d. |website=The Scott Monument |publisher=Scran |access-date=20 May 2018 }}</ref>

The [[GCR Class 11F]] steam locomotive ''Edie Ochiltree'' was built for the [[London and North Eastern Railway]] in September 1924, and remained in service on the LNER and on its successor [[British Rail]]ways until August 1959.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lner.info/locos/D/d11.php |title=The Robinson Class D11 (GCR Class 11F) 'Improved Director' 4-4-0 Locomotives |last=Marsden |first=Richard |date=2001–2018 |website=LNER Encyclopedia |access-date=20 May 2018 }}</ref>


== Footnotes ==
== Footnotes ==
Line 42: Line 48:
== References ==
== References ==


* {{cite book |last1=Hillhouse |first1=James T. |year=1970 |orig-year=1936 |title=The Waverley Novels and Their Critics |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-mNUMgEACAAJ |location=New York |publisher=Octagon |access-date=27 April 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Hillhouse |first1=James T. |year=1970 |orig-year=1936 |title=The Waverley Novels and Their Critics |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-mNUMgEACAAJ |location=New York |publisher=Octagon |access-date=27 April 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Crockett |first1=W. S. |year=1912 |title=The Scott Originals |url=https://archive.org/stream/cu31924013546266#page/n10/mode/1up |location=London |publisher=T. N. Foulis |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Crockett |first1=W. S. |year=1912 |title=The Scott Originals |url=https://archive.org/stream/cu31924013546266#page/n10/mode/1up |location=London |publisher=[[T. N. Foulis]] |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |year=1970 |editor1-last=Hayden |editor1-first=John O. |title=Scott: The Critical Heritage |url= https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zIOGAgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false |location=London |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |isbn=0710067240 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |year=1970 |editor1-last=Hayden |editor1-first=John O. |title=Scott: The Critical Heritage |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=zIOGAgAAQBAJ |location=London |publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul |isbn=0710067240 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Johnson |first1=Edgar |year=1970 |title=Sir Walter Scott: The Great Unknown. Volume 1: 1771–1821 |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=5qNBAAAAIAAJ |location=London |publisher=Hamish Hamilton |isbn=0241017610 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Johnson |first1=Edgar |year=1970 |title=Sir Walter Scott: The Great Unknown. Volume 1: 1771–1821 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5qNBAAAAIAAJ |location=London |publisher=Hamish Hamilton |isbn=0241017610 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Mayhead |first1=Robin |year=1973 |chapter=The Problem of Coherence in ''The Antiquary'' |editor1-last=Bell |editor1-first=Alan |title=Scott Bicentenary Essays |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=XTtbAAAAMAAJ&q=%22The+problem+of+coherence+in+The+Antiquary%22&dq=%22The+problem+of+coherence+in+The+Antiquary%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiG38PFv77LAhWDuBQKHSDPDqoQ6AEIKjAB |location=Edinburgh |publisher=Scottish Academic Press |pages=134–146 |isbn=070111987X |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Mayhead |first1=Robin |year=1973 |chapter=The Problem of Coherence in ''The Antiquary'' |editor1-last=Bell |editor1-first=Alan |title=Scott Bicentenary Essays |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XTtbAAAAMAAJ&q=%22The+problem+of+coherence+in+The+Antiquary%22 |location=Edinburgh |publisher=Scottish Academic Press |pages=134–146 |isbn=070111987X |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Millgate |first1=Jane |year=1987 |orig-year=1984 |title=Walter Scott: The Making of the Novelist |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=QCgiLT4JmjAC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false |location=Toronto |publisher=University of Toronto Press |isbn=0802066925 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book|authorlink1=Jane Millgate |last1=Millgate |first1=Jane |year=1987 |orig-year=1984 |title=Walter Scott: The Making of the Novelist |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QCgiLT4JmjAC |location=Toronto |publisher=University of Toronto Press |isbn=0802066925 |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Scott |first1=Walter |year=1897 |orig-year=1816 |title=The Antiquary |url=https://archive.org/stream/antiquary00scot_0#page/n8/mode/1up |location=London |publisher=Adam & Charles Black |access-date=13 March 2016 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Scott |first1=Walter |year=1897 |orig-year=1816 |title=The Antiquary |url=https://archive.org/stream/antiquary00scot_0#page/n8/mode/1up |location=London |publisher=Adam & Charles Black |access-date=13 March 2016 }}



{{Walter Scott}}
{{Walter Scott}}
Line 56: Line 61:
[[Category:Fictional beggars]]
[[Category:Fictional beggars]]
[[Category:Fictional characters based on real people]]
[[Category:Fictional characters based on real people]]
[[Category:Fictional characters introduced in 1816]]
[[Category:Literary characters introduced in 1816]]
[[Category:Fictional Scottish people]]
[[Category:Fictional Scottish people]]
[[Category:Sir Walter Scott characters]]
[[Category:Sir Walter Scott characters]]

Latest revision as of 08:02, 27 August 2024

Edie Ochiltree
Edie Ochiltree in an 1844 graphite drawing by Mary E. Sealy
First appearanceThe Antiquary (1816)
Created byWalter Scott
In-universe information
GenderMale
TitleRoyal Bedesman
OccupationBeggar
ReligionPresbyterian
NationalityScottish

Edie Ochiltree is a character in Sir Walter Scott's 1816 novel The Antiquary, a licensed beggar of the legally protected class known as Blue-gowns or bedesmen, who follows a regular beat around the fictional Scottish town of Fairport.[1] Scott based his character on Andrew Gemmels, a real beggar he had known in his childhood. Along with Jonathan Oldbuck, the novel's title-character, Ochiltree is widely seen as one of Scott's finest creations.

His character

[edit]

Jonathan Oldbuck, the antiquary of the novel's title, says that Ochiltree "has been soldier, ballad-singer, travelling tinker, and is now a beggar…a sort of privileged nuisance – one of the last specimens of the old-fashioned Scottish mendicant, who kept his rounds within a particular space, and was the news-carrier, the minstrel, and sometimes the historian of the district".[2] Ochiltree's great love and knowledge of the old ballads and traditions echoes Oldbuck's more scholarly antiquarian lore. They have a mutual respect and liking for each other, and between them they solve the other characters' problems and bring the novel to a happy resolution, but on the way they sometimes clash comically, Oldbuck's antiquarian fantasy and self-delusion being punctured by Ochiltree's realism and good sense.[3][4][5] Both characters are presented as being sticklers for exactness, Ochiltree being remarkable for the accuracy of the local news he brings and for his insistence on old traditions being remembered correctly. In the first half of the novel the two are differentiated by Ochiltree's greater practical effectiveness in the help he brings to others.[6] He could be described as a Cynic in the tradition of Diogenes,[7] and he is at odds with modern commercial society in his traditional reliance on the support of the community at large rather than on any single patron.[8] His overall function in the Fairport community is to bind it together.[9]

The originals of Ochiltree

[edit]
The gravestone of Andrew Gemmels

The writer W. S. Crockett considered Edie Ochiltree to be more firmly based on a real-life model than any other of Scott's characters, Jonathan Oldbuck alone excepted. His original was one Andrew Gemmels, a beggar whom Scott, then a boy in Kelso, had often met. Gemmels came from the parish of Old Cumnock in Ayrshire, and he was, like Ochiltree, an army veteran who had fought at the battle of Fontenoy.[10] Scott described him in his introduction to the 1829 edition of The Antiquary as "a remarkably fine old figure, very tall, and maintaining a soldierlike or military manner and address. His features were intelligent, with a powerful expression of sarcasm…It was some fear of Andrew's satire, as much as a feeling of kindness or charity, which secured him the general good reception which he enjoyed everywhere."[11] He prospered better than most beggars, and died, by his own reckoning, at the age of 105, leaving a small fortune to a nephew.[12][13]

Scott's son-in-law and biographer J. G. Lockhart pointed out another model for Ochiltree in an anecdote concerning Sir John Clerk, 1st Bt., which was certainly the inspiration for an episode in chapter 4 of The Antiquary:

[T]he old Baronet carried some English Virtuosos to see a supposed Roman camp; and on his exclaiming at a particular spot, "This I take to have been the Praetorium", a herdsman, who stood by, answered, "Praetorium here, Praetorium there, I made it wi' a flaughter-spade."[14]

Some critics have claimed that Scott's own character can be discerned in Ochiltree, particularly in the capacity to stoically accept personal misfortunes which supported Scott in his later years.[15][3]

Critical assessment

[edit]

At least five reviews of The Antiquary, in the Quarterly Review, the Edinburgh Review, the Monthly Review, the Critical Review, and the British Lady's Magazine, agreed in considering Ochiltree a male version of Scott's eldritch gypsy Meg Merrilies in his previous novel Guy Mannering. The Quarterly 's reviewer, John Wilson Croker, thought the imitation improved on the original, while the Monthly thought him unforgettable and sometimes sublime, but Francis Jeffrey in the Edinburgh could give him only qualified approval.[16][17][18][19][20] The Augustan Review could not accept the idea of a mere beggar expressing moral eloquence and poetic feeling, and it detected in this the influence of Wordsworth.[21] William H. Prescott in the North American Review believed that such characters as Edie Ochiltree showed Scott to have a "worldly, good-natured shrewdness" surpassing that of Shakespeare himself.[22] Later in the century a critic in the London Quarterly thought he ranked among "the most complete and remarkable characters created by Scott or any other man",[23] and this opinion was echoed by many 20th-century commentators.[20] Andrew Lang considered the treatment of the character of Ochiltree was an example of Scott's art at its very best.[24] For Charles Harold Herford he was a great creation drawn from the heart of Scottish life.[25] The scholar Aubrey Bell cited Ochiltree in support of his and Georg Brandes' view that Scott was one of the finest drawers of character ever to have lived.[26] John Sutherland was unconvinced by Ochiltree's readiness to put the welfare of his betters before his own, and interpreted this as a symptom of Scott's nostalgia for the national solidarity of Britain in the 1790s, when men of all classes felt threatened by Revolutionary France.[27] Scott's biographer Edgar Johnson acknowledged that some readers find the scenes between Ochiltree and the fraudster Herman Dousterswivel too redolent of low comedy. He himself doubted if Ochiltree's eloquence was entirely realistic in a beggar, and he also noted his tendency to be conveniently present whenever the plot needs to be moved forward.[28] The academic Robin Mayhead however disagreed, arguing that The Antiquary does not have the conventions of the realist school; for him Ochiltree functions as an embodiment of dependability, necessary to offset the faults and fallibilities of other characters in the novel. This, rather than the attraction of Ochiltree's "racy vernacular", led Mayhead to declare himself as great an admirer as any of this character.[29] A. N. Wilson wrote about Ochiltree's "strangely moving (though so stagey) wisdom".[30] John Buchan noted that he was depicted with "minute realism" as a typical Scottish beggar, and yet was sometimes able "to speak words which, though wholly in character, are yet part of the world's poetry". He approvingly quoted another critic as saying that Ochiltree is the most Shakespearean figure outside Shakespeare.[31] Hesketh Pearson also compared Ochiltree with Shakespeare's creations, and found him more realistic than any of them, and more humorous than all but Falstaff. He was, for Pearson, Scott's first great character.[32] Henry A. Beers likewise numbered him among Scott's greatest creations, one of those who "brought into play his knowledge of men, his humour, observation of life, and insight into Scotch human nature".[33]

Legacy

[edit]

When the Scott Monument was erected in Edinburgh in the 1840s, its many figurative statues included one of Edie Ochiltree, executed by George Anderson Lawson. It shows Ochiltree with a straggly beard, a broad-brimmed hat, and a badge on his shoulder identifying him as a licensed beggar.[34]

The GCR Class 11F steam locomotive Edie Ochiltree was built for the London and North Eastern Railway in September 1924, and remained in service on the LNER and on its successor British Railways until August 1959.[35]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ Crockett 1912, p. 133.
  2. ^ Scott 1897, p. 44.
  3. ^ a b Mayhead 1973, p. 145.
  4. ^ Johnson 1970, p. 537.
  5. ^ Millgate 1987, pp. 93–94.
  6. ^ Millgate 1987, pp. 94, 95.
  7. ^ Brown, David (1979). Walter Scott and the Historical Imagination. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. p. 55. ISBN 0710003013.
  8. ^ Baker, Samuel (2009). "Scott's Stoic Characters: Ethics, Sentiment, and Irony in The Antiquary, Guy Mannering, and "the Author of Waverley"". Modern Language Quarterly. 70 (4): 448. doi:10.1215/00267929-2009-011.
  9. ^ Millgate 1987, p. 102.
  10. ^ Crockett 1912, pp. 120, 133, 135–136.
  11. ^ Scott 1897, p. 7.
  12. ^ Crockett 1912, p. 137.
  13. ^ Lang, Andrew. "Editor's Introduction to The Antiquary". eBooks@Adelaide. University of Adelaide. Archived from the original on 13 August 2008. Retrieved 23 March 2016.
  14. ^ Lockhart, J. G. (1845). Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart. Edinburgh: Robert Cadell. p. 41.
  15. ^ Pope-Hennessy, Una (1948). Sir Walter Scott. London: Home & Van Thal. p. 97. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  16. ^ "[Review of The Antiquary]". Critical Review. 5th Ser. 3: 500. 1816. Retrieved 28 March 2016.
  17. ^ "[Review of The Antiquary]". Monthly Review. 82: 46, 48, 51. 1817. Retrieved 28 March 2016.
  18. ^ Tippkötter, Horst (1971). Walter Scott, Geschichte als Unterhaltung. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. p. 50. ISBN 9783465008712. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
  19. ^ Hayden 1970, pp. 101, 105.
  20. ^ a b Hillhouse 1970, p. 42.
  21. ^ "[Review of The Antiquary]". Augustan Review. 3: 176–177. 1816. Retrieved 8 April 2016.
  22. ^ Hillhouse 1970, p. 89.
  23. ^ Hayden 1970, pp. 472–473.
  24. ^ Lang, Andrew (1906). Sir Walter Scott. London: Hodder and Stoughton. p. 143. ISBN 9783849607456. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  25. ^ Herford, C. H. (2003). The Age of Wordsworth. New Delhi: Atlantic. p. 94. ISBN 8126902922. Retrieved 31 March 2016.
  26. ^ Bell, Aubrey (1932). "Scott and Cervantes". In Grierson, H. J. C. (ed.). Sir Walter Scott To-Day. London: Constable. p. 83. ISBN 9780849209215. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  27. ^ Sutherland, John (1997) [1995]. The Life of Walter Scott: A Critical Biography. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 193. ISBN 0631203176. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  28. ^ Johnson 1970, pp. 540–542.
  29. ^ Mayhead 1973, pp. 144–145.
  30. ^ Wilson, A. N. (1980). The Laird of Abbotsford. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 66. ISBN 0192117564. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  31. ^ Buchan, John (1961) [1932]. Sir Walter Scott. London: Cassell. pp. 150–151. Retrieved 7 April 2016.
  32. ^ Pearson, Hesketh (1954). Sir Walter Scott: His Life and Personality. London: Methuen. pp. 129, 197. ISBN 9780899848549. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
  33. ^ Beers, Henry A. (2014) [1926]. A History of English Romanticism in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Routledge. p. 33. ISBN 9780415749732. Retrieved 19 April 2016.
  34. ^ "The Character Statues: Edie Ochiltree". The Scott Monument. Scran. n.d. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
  35. ^ Marsden, Richard (2001–2018). "The Robinson Class D11 (GCR Class 11F) 'Improved Director' 4-4-0 Locomotives". LNER Encyclopedia. Retrieved 20 May 2018.

References

[edit]