Eligible bachelor: Difference between revisions
Snowman304 (talk | contribs) Reverted good faith edits by 203.212.131.251 (talk): Unconstructive edit |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Added chapter-url. Removed or converted URL. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Maintenance/Miscapitalisations | #UCB_webform_linked 1362/2411 |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Sociology== |
==Sociology== |
||
[[Robin Lakoff]] argues that the term indicates an inequality between men and women, as an "eligible bachelor" chooses to be a bachelor, whereas an "eligible spinster" does not have a choice. Lakoff believes this use of language fosters, and grows from, [[sexual discrimination]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Grad |first=Julia |date=Summer 2006 |title=Words and Women. An eligible bachelor vs. an eligible spinster |url=https://www.jsri.ro/new/?download=jsri_14_articol_09_iulia_grad.pdf |journal=JSRI |volume=14 |pages=95–101 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201031655/https://www.jsri.ro/new/?download=jsri_14_articol_09_iulia_grad.pdf |archive-date=2017-12-01}}</ref> Lakoff states "women are given their identity in our society by virtue of their relationship with men, and not vice versa."<ref>{{Cite book |editor-last1=Paulston |editor-first1=Christina Bratt |url=https://archive.org/details/sociolinguistics0000unse_c1n0/page/206/mode/2up |page=207 |title=Sociolinguistics:The Essential Readings |editor-last2=Tucker |editor-first2=G. Richard |date=February 14, 2003 |publisher=Wiley |isbn=9780631227175 |last=Lakoff |first=Robin |chapter=Selections from ''Language and the Woman's Place''}}</ref> |
[[Robin Lakoff]] argues that the term indicates an inequality between men and women, as an "eligible bachelor" chooses to be a bachelor, whereas an "eligible spinster" does not have a choice. Lakoff believes this use of language fosters, and grows from, [[sexual discrimination]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Grad |first=Julia |date=Summer 2006 |title=Words and Women. An eligible bachelor vs. an eligible spinster |url=https://www.jsri.ro/new/?download=jsri_14_articol_09_iulia_grad.pdf |journal=JSRI |volume=14 |pages=95–101 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201031655/https://www.jsri.ro/new/?download=jsri_14_articol_09_iulia_grad.pdf |archive-date=2017-12-01}}</ref> Lakoff states "women are given their identity in our society by virtue of their relationship with men, and not vice versa."<ref>{{Cite book |editor-last1=Paulston |editor-first1=Christina Bratt |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/sociolinguistics0000unse_c1n0/page/206/mode/2up |page=207 |title=Sociolinguistics:The Essential Readings |editor-last2=Tucker |editor-first2=G. Richard |date=February 14, 2003 |publisher=Wiley |isbn=9780631227175 |last=Lakoff |first=Robin |chapter=Selections from ''Language and the Woman's Place''}}</ref> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 28 August 2024
An eligible bachelor is a bachelor considered to be a particularly desirable potential husband, usually due to wealth, social status or other specific personal qualities.
In the United Kingdom, the heir to the throne or someone close in succession is often considered to be the nation's, or the world's most eligible bachelor, due to their social status, as has happened with Prince Charles[1] and Prince William.
Jane Austen's novels are often concerned with the heroine's relationship with an eligible bachelor. Jane Austen's Emma particularly concerns a woman's attempt to obtain a husband for her friend by embellishing the truth. The gentleman in that case sees it as an example of the matchmaker's creativity and falls in love with her.[2]
Homosexuals as apparent eligible bachelors
[edit]During the 1950s and 1960s, Rock Hudson was hailed as an eligible bachelor.[3] In the past, if a man chose to remain an eligible bachelor for long, he may have been suspected of being homosexual.[4] The euphemism "confirmed bachelor" has fallen from common usage, as past life patterns involving marriage, divorce, and prolonged bachelorhood have been altered for men since the advent of the sexual revolution.
Sociology
[edit]Robin Lakoff argues that the term indicates an inequality between men and women, as an "eligible bachelor" chooses to be a bachelor, whereas an "eligible spinster" does not have a choice. Lakoff believes this use of language fosters, and grows from, sexual discrimination.[5] Lakoff states "women are given their identity in our society by virtue of their relationship with men, and not vice versa."[6]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ McDowell, Colin (August 21, 2007). Diana Style. Macmillan. ISBN 9780312375379.
- ^ Steiner, Wendy (1987). "Postmodernist Portraits". Art Journal. 46 (3): 173–177. doi:10.2307/777029. JSTOR 777029.
- ^ Decrescenzo, Teresa (1997). Gay and Lesbian Professionals in the Closet: Who's In, Who's Out, and why. Psychology Press. ISBN 9780789003317.
- ^ Nokes, Kathleen Mary (1996). HIV/AIDS and the Older Adult. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781560324294.
- ^ Grad, Julia (Summer 2006). "Words and Women. An eligible bachelor vs. an eligible spinster" (PDF). JSRI. 14: 95–101. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 1, 2017.
- ^ Lakoff, Robin (February 14, 2003). "Selections from Language and the Woman's Place". In Paulston, Christina Bratt; Tucker, G. Richard (eds.). Sociolinguistics:The Essential Readings. Wiley. p. 207. ISBN 9780631227175.