Matthew Dryer: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
PROD |
m Dating maintenance tags: {{When}} |
||
(43 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|American linguist}} |
|||
{{dated prod|concern = Maybe there are some scientific articles significant enough to be the topic of an encyclopedia article, but this isn't one of them.|month = March|day = 4|year = 2009|time = 15:37|timestamp = 20090304153721}} |
|||
{{Infobox scientist |
|||
<!-- Do not use the "dated prod" template directly; the above line is generated by "subst:prod|reason" --> |
|||
| name = Matthew Dryer |
|||
{{Orphan|date=February 2009}} |
|||
| fields = [[Linguistics]] |
|||
'''Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order''' is a paper by Matthew Dryer, published in 1995 within the compilation ''Word Order in Discourse'', analyzing various definitions of [[markedness]] as it might apply to word order. It advanced a definition of [[pragmatic markedness]] in which unmarkedness was only possible if all markedness cases could be enumerated (establishing the unmarked situation as the default case). |
|||
| workplaces = [[State University of New York at Buffalo]] |
|||
}} |
|||
'''Matthew S. Dryer''' is a professor of [[linguistics]] at the [[University at Buffalo, The State University of New York|State University of New York at Buffalo]] who has worked in typology, syntax, and language documentation.<ref>{{Cite web |
|||
== Dryer's comparisons of Markedness vs. Frequency == |
|||
| title = Matthew S. Dryer |
|||
“Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order“ argues against the idea of markedness which was established in [[Greenberg 1966]], equating markedness with rarity. It does so by analyzing cases in which specific languages had word orders whichm while considered [[markedness|unmarked]], were not actually the most frequent. |
|||
| work = Florida Linguistics Association |
|||
| access-date = 2013-09-19 |
|||
| url = http://floridalinguistics.com/?page_id=477 |
|||
}}</ref> He is best known for his research on word order correlations, which has been widely cited.<ref>Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. 'The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations', Language 68: 81-138</ref> He is one of the editors of the [[World Atlas of Language Structures]]. His research has also analyzed various definitions of [[markedness]] as they may apply to word order.<ref>[https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_sauthors=%22Matthew+S.+Dryer%22 Google Scholar citations of Dr. Dryer's publications]</ref> He has done original research on [[Kutenai language|Kutenai]] and is currently{{when|date=August 2024}} doing research (in conjunction with Lea Brown) on a number of languages of Papua New Guinea, among them [[Valman language|Walman]]. |
|||
⚫ | |||
== The proposed definition of markedness == |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
The definition of pragmatic markedness proposed in “Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order“ focuses upon the role of a given construction as being the 'default' construction. This is contrasted against definitions of markedness proposed by [[Greenberg]] (who equated it with frequency), [[Talmy Givon]] (who equated it with cognitive complexity to the hearer), and [[Doris Payne]] (who defined it as 'counterexpectation'). While the empirical evidence provided in the paper focuses breaking the assumed connection between markedness and frequency<ref>Reid-Heimerdinger, J. 200. The Bezan Text of Acts: A Contribution of Discourse Analysis to Textual Criticism </ref>, the definitions of markedness proposed by Givon and Payne are treated as being possibly valid, yet irrelevant to the analysis of [[constructions]]. Dryer in this sense makes a distinction between markedness of constructions as a whole (which, Dryer proposes, must be independent of context) and markedness as found in specific situations (towards which the definitions of Givon and Payne might apply). |
|||
==External links== |
|||
==The Studies Mentioned in Dryer 1995== |
|||
*[http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~dryer/ Dryer's web site at Buffalo] |
|||
=== An analysis of [[Tojolabal]] === |
|||
*[http://wals.info/ Online version of World Atlas of Language Structures] |
|||
The analysis presented in [[Brody 1984]] - which establishes that the more common [[Subject Verb Object|SVO]] word order is marked because it involves [[topicalization]] of the subject - is criticized by Dryer as being unspecific. Topicalization is hard to define, and Dryer proposes that the word order that Brody considered unmarked (VSO) might just as equally be prominent because it contains exceptionally non-topical terms. |
|||
{{authority control}} |
|||
=== An analysis of Ojibwa === |
|||
The second word order analyzed is that of [[Ojibwa]], an order which both Dryer, the original paper of Tomlin and Rhodes(1979), and later studies<ref>Christianson, Kiel 2002. Sentence Processing in a "nonconfigurational" Language, p.47</ref> agree as being [[VOS]]. The proposed justification for this, modified slightly to fit into Dryer's framework, is that VOS order is used when the subject and object in a phrase are very predictable, while other orders are utilized when they are not. |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dryer, Matthew}} |
|||
=== An analysis of Yagua === |
|||
[[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)]] |
|||
Looks at data provided by Payne (1990) on Yagua. This data both provided a table recounting the pragmatic functions utilized in various instances of preverbal constituents, accounting for 81% of them with definitive pragmatic functions. While Payne and Dryer both come to the conclusion, using that data, that preverbal constituents are therefore marked, and postverbal constituents unmarked, Payne uses her own data to establish the idea of counterexpectation, while Dryer points out that since all the situations calling for preverbal constituents may be enumerated, then the postverbal functions must be of the 'else', or default case. |
|||
[[Category:Living people]] |
|||
[[Category:Linguists from the United States]] |
|||
=== An analysis of Macushi === |
|||
Like the approach of Payne in the analysis of Yagua, Abbott (1991) makes an analysis of Macushi which is defined around pragmatic functions - that SV functions are used to 'highlight a change of topic" or in fronting a subject for particular effect - while VS is considered to be used when the subject is not particularly highlighted. Dryer again claims that this conclusion fits with his own definition of unmarkedness as being the 'default' situation. |
|||
== References to (Dryer 1995) == |
|||
“Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order“ is treated, most recently, in Haspellmath's 2006 paper "Against markedness (and what to replace it with)". |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{Reflist}}<!--added above categories/infobox footers by script-assisted edit--> |
|||
{{US-linguist-stub}} |
|||
[[Category:Linguistics publications]] |
Latest revision as of 11:23, 29 August 2024
Matthew Dryer | |
---|---|
Scientific career | |
Fields | Linguistics |
Institutions | State University of New York at Buffalo |
Matthew S. Dryer is a professor of linguistics at the State University of New York at Buffalo who has worked in typology, syntax, and language documentation.[1] He is best known for his research on word order correlations, which has been widely cited.[2] He is one of the editors of the World Atlas of Language Structures. His research has also analyzed various definitions of markedness as they may apply to word order.[3] He has done original research on Kutenai and is currently[when?] doing research (in conjunction with Lea Brown) on a number of languages of Papua New Guinea, among them Walman.
References
[edit]- ^ "Matthew S. Dryer". Florida Linguistics Association. Retrieved 2013-09-19.
- ^ Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. 'The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations', Language 68: 81-138
- ^ Google Scholar citations of Dr. Dryer's publications
External links
[edit]