Appeal to tradition: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:04, 29 August 2024

Appeal to tradition (also known as argumentum ad antiquitatem or argumentum ad antiquitam,^[1] appeal to antiquity, or appeal to common practice) is a claim in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of correlation with past or present tradition. The appeal takes the form of "this is right because we've always done it this way", and is a logical fallacy.^[2]^[3] The opposite of an appeal to tradition is an appeal to novelty, in which one claims that an idea is superior just because it is new.

An appeal to tradition essentially makes two assumptions that may not be necessarily true:

The old way of thinking was proven correct when introduced, i.e. since the old way of thinking was prevalent, it was necessarily correct.

In reality, this may be false—the tradition might be entirely based on incorrect grounds.

The past justifications for the tradition are still valid.

In reality, the circumstances may have changed; this assumption may also therefore have become untrue.

Appeal to tradition imports the value of not needing to reinvent ways to do things for which effective ways have already been established. But, "is fallacious when it confuses a long tradition of careful testing with the mere tendency to hold on to ideas because they are old".^[2]

An appeal to tradition can be complicated by the possibility that different people might have different views, each with their own tradition to appeal to. For example, "Augustine's appeal to tradition against the Donatists is more complicated because the Donatists had appealed to tradition against the Catholics".^[4]

Notes

^ "Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate". www.csun.edu. Retrieved 29 January 2014.
^ ^a ^b "Appeal to Tradition".
^ Trufant, William (1917). Argumentation and Debating. Houghton Mifflin company. ISBN 978-1-4067-5258-8. OCLC 1154091080.
^ Ronnie J. Rombs, Alexander Y. Hwang (2010), Tradition and the Rule of Faith in the Early Church, Page 159.

This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[1] "Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate". www.csun.edu. Retrieved 29 January 2014.

[Palomar-2] "Appeal to Tradition".

[3] Trufant, William (1917). Argumentation and Debating. Houghton Mifflin company. ISBN 978-1-4067-5258-8. OCLC 1154091080.

[4] Ronnie J. Rombs, Alexander Y. Hwang (2010), Tradition and the Rule of Faith in the Early Church, Page 159.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Short description|Logical fallacy in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of tradition}}
+{{Short description|Logical fallacy in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of tradition}}
+{{POV|date=July 2024}}
+{{More citations needed|date=June 2024}}
-'''Appeal to tradition''' (also known as '''''argumentum ad antiquitatem''''' or '''''argumentum ad antiquitam''''',<ref>{{cite web | title=Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate | url=http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html|work=www.csun.edu | access-date=29 January 2014 |ref=refLogicalFal}}</ref> '''appeal to antiquity''', or '''appeal to common practice''') is a claim in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of correlation with past or present [[tradition]]. The appeal takes the form of "this is right because we've always done it this way", and is considered by some to be a logical fallacy.<ref>{{cite book | title = Argumentation and Debating | first = William | last = Trufant | publisher = Houghton Mifflin company | year = 1917 |ref=refTrufant1917 | isbn=978-1-4067-5258-8 | oclc=1154091080}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=This is an source that is over a century old. It may be outdated. |date=February 2022}} The opposite of an appeal to tradition is an [[appeal to novelty]], in which one claims that an idea is superior just because it is new.
+'''Appeal to tradition''' (also known as '''''argumentum ad antiquitatem''''' or '''''argumentum ad antiquitam''''',<ref>{{cite web | title=Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate | url=http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html|work=www.csun.edu | access-date=29 January 2014 |ref=refLogicalFal}}</ref> '''appeal to antiquity''', or '''appeal to common practice''') is a claim in which a thesis is deemed correct on the basis of correlation with past or present [[tradition]]. The appeal takes the form of "this is right because we've always done it this way", and is a logical fallacy.<ref name="Palomar"/><ref>{{cite book | title = Argumentation and Debating | first = William | last = Trufant | publisher = Houghton Mifflin company | year = 1917 |ref=refTrufant1917 | isbn=978-1-4067-5258-8 | oclc=1154091080}}</ref> The opposite of an appeal to tradition is an [[appeal to novelty]], in which one claims that an idea is superior just because it is new.
 An appeal to tradition essentially makes two assumptions that may not be [[logical truth|''necessarily'' true]]:
@@ Line 8: / Line 10: @@
 :In reality, this may be false&mdash;the tradition might be entirely based on incorrect grounds.
 * The past justifications for the tradition are still valid.
-:In reality, the circumstances may have changed; this assumption may also therefore have become untrue.{{Citation needed|date=February 2022}}
+:In reality, the circumstances may have changed; this assumption may also therefore have become untrue.
+Appeal to tradition imports the value of not needing to reinvent ways to do things for which effective ways have already been established. But, "is fallacious when it confuses a long tradition of careful testing with the mere tendency to hold on to ideas because they are old".<ref name="Palomar">{{Cite web|url=https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Appeal%20to%20Tradition.html|title=Appeal to Tradition}}</ref>
+An appeal to tradition can be complicated by the possibility that different people might have different views, each with their own tradition to appeal to. For example, "[[Augustine]]'s appeal to tradition against the [[Donatists]] is more complicated because the Donatists had appealed to tradition against the Catholics".<ref>Ronnie J. Rombs, Alexander Y. Hwang (2010), ''Tradition and the Rule of Faith in the Early Church'', Page 159.</ref>
 == See also ==