Talk:Justice League (film): Difference between revisions
(20 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{American English}} |
|||
{{GA|18:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)|subtopic=Film|page=1|oldid=859372584}} |
{{GA|18:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)|subtopic=Film|page=1|oldid=859372584}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Film |
{{WikiProject Film|American=yes|Comics=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Comics |
{{WikiProject Comics|importance=low|DC=yes|film=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject United States |
{{WikiProject United States |importance=Low |USfilm=yes|USfilm-importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject 2010s|importance=low}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Annual report|[[Wikipedia:2017 Top 50 Report|2017]]|12,048,341}} |
|||
{{Top 25 Report|Jul 24 2016 (25th)|Nov 5 2017 (24th)|Nov 12 2017 (1st)|Nov 19 2017 (3rd)|Nov 26 2017 (5th)|Dec 3 2017 (12th)|Mar 14 2021 (5th)|Mar 21 2021 (11th)}} |
|||
{{refideas |
{{refideas |
||
|1=https://screenrant.com/justice-league-2-zack-snyder-darkseid-final-crisis/ |
|1=https://screenrant.com/justice-league-2-zack-snyder-darkseid-final-crisis/ |
||
|2=https://variety.com/2017/film/news/justice-league-review-roundup-1202615747/ |
|||
|3=https://slate.com/culture/2017/11/justice-league-review-roundup-critics-on-the-latest-dc-comics-movie.html |
|||
|4=https://www.gamespot.com/articles/justice-league-movie-review-roundup-what-are-the-c/1100-6454981/ |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
Line 17: | Line 25: | ||
|archive = Talk:Justice League (film)/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Talk:Justice League (film)/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Archives|auto=short|collapsible=yes|search=yes|age=180}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
So, is Julian Lewis Jones actually confirmed to be playing the Green Lantern, Abin Sur, or did somebody just put that on here as a wild guess? -[[User:DCTrinity|DCTrinity]] ([[User talk:DCTrinity|talk]]) 1:38, 2 February 2017 |
|||
== Deadline predicts a $110-120M opening weekend for Justice League == |
|||
While Box Office Pro is saying JL will open to $150M in it's opening weekend, Deadline is saying JL will open to $110-120M in it's opening weekend: http://deadline.com/2017/10/ben-affleck-justice-league-gal-gadot-box-office-projection-1202195005/ |
|||
== Snyder Cut == |
|||
{{atop|Nothing actionable will come of this.--[[User:Jorm|Jorm]] ([[User talk:Jorm|talk]]) 15:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC) }} |
|||
Snyder cut section has som serious bias issues. One the video he released isn't proof of a cut, anyone could have dressed that up. Two everyone else on the production says there is no cut, who would be in the know to say so. But that isn't covered in the section. Like https://www.geekfeed.com/justice-league-vfx-artist-says-no-snyder-cut/ That this troll campaign has spread to wikileaks and wikileaks has allowed it is really sad. [[Special:Contributions/96.31.190.97|96.31.190.97]] ([[User talk:96.31.190.97|talk]]) 23:41, 20 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:First, generally we would trust a director saying there is a cut versus a random particular production person that worked on 1 aspect of the film (not the whole thing like a director). Secondly, people's understanding of "cut" can be different. What many of them are referring to when they say "no cut" is that there isn't a useable cut because the SFX were not completed, not that it wasn't filmed. I'm not sure I see where the "bias" is that you're referring to. That section is a summary section, not the entire thing. It includes language like: "In the belief that Snyder had shot enough material for a finished film". There could probably be some word swapping in some of the later stages, but we don't cover everything here. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:#800000;color:#FFD700"> BIGNOLE </span>'''</small>]] [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 16:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
::Except it isn't one random person, it is several that is one of several articles of people who worked on the film, besides studio and others with knowledge saying the same, so the random jab seems a personal attack there. So you can take that language elsewhere. There is no cause for them to be any less trustworthy a source than the director so again that points to bias. [[Special:Contributions/96.31.190.97|96.31.190.97]] ([[User talk:96.31.190.97|talk]]) 01:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:::It depends on how you define "cut"... he did an edit of the film.. his first assembly of the material as it was shot... that exists... it is not by any real definition a finished edit with sound and effects. [[User:Spanneraol|Spanneraol]] ([[User talk:Spanneraol|talk]]) 06:26, 22 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Which has what to do with the bias of the section, in not fairly covering it given there are plenty of other reliable sources saying otherwise? No one is arguing the definition of a cut. My point is there are more than one equally reliable sources and points of view on the topic that the article isn't showing... hence biased. Those working on the project and studio are just as credible a source as Snyder, and dispute him. That should be included. This is one of the key principles of wikipedia articles being ignored. [[Special:Contributions/96.31.190.97|96.31.190.97]] ([[User talk:96.31.190.97|talk]]) 22:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I'm not sure what "personal jab" you are referring to, as I made no such personal attack against you. I don't know that I would say that Danny Elfman is an "equally reliable" party compared to the guy that filmed the movie. It was well documented that the movie was in post production when Snyder left. That means there was a cut of the film before Whedon refilmed and recut the movie. So, multiple people saying there's "no cut" cannot be referring to the idea that Snyder didn't finish filming, because we know he did based on when he left the production. Deductive logic means they are referring to a finished product, which I don't think the section implies exists. There are differences of opinion on how much post work was completed. Junkie XL has said he actually did complete the score. The [https://screenrant.com/justice-league-vfx-supervisors-say-many-snyder-cut-shots-are-complete/ VFX supervisors have said] they did quite a bit of the work. The people that claim there isn't a cut only saw the pieces they needed to see. Which is normal for any film. The link you originally posted says: "“1000% bulls**t. As I’ve said, of course, there is an assembly cut Zack had gone before he left, but that was 9 months ago. He himself said he hasn’t touched or interfered or been a part of the process since March. There is no cut. People like this guy (who spread the rumor) are the worst, perpetuating rumors of processes they don’t understand.”" --- The key part of that statement is "there is an assembly cut Zack had gone before he left." -- He isn't saying that a cut doesn't exist, only that a finished product doesn't exist. I'm not sure of what bias exists on the page, because this page just really talks about the movement associated with the Snyder Cut. There is an entirely different page for all the details. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:#800000;color:#FFD700"> BIGNOLE </span>'''</small>]] [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 17:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:::::: calling him some random as if I was just grabbing just anyone out of desperation is a job. Two, "because this page just really talks about the movement associated with the Snyder Cut" Then it should be its own page or not here. And those calling to question the cut is absolutely relevant to the movement, so yes is bias. You aren't covering all sides without prejudice. That is bias. That is the core of wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/96.31.190.97|96.31.190.97]] ([[User talk:96.31.190.97|talk]]) 09:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Referring to a random production person as a random production person isn't a personal attack. it's a description of what they are. [[WP:NPA|Feel free to check out personal attacks]]. The point was the people that know the state of the movie are more likely to be Snyder and Warner Bros. No one else, unless they've seen something first hand. A "random" VFX person only knows what they've seen. I'd trust the VFX Supervisor over a random VFX person who only works on what shots they give them. None of that is a personal attack on them, just merely pointing out that putting [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]] on the opinion of people that do not determine the "state" of a finished film seems a little....odd to me. |
|||
:::::::As for "Then it should be its own page or not here"....I'm thinking you didn't actually thoroughly vet that section because there's a link to the full page in that section. When pages are split you leave behind a brief summary, you don't simply create a section that contains only a link to another page. That's what we did here. Again, this section is about the community reaction and the movement of the "Snyder Cut"....that's why it's called "Community reaction and the 'Snyder Cut'". It isn't a section about whether or not the cut exist. It's a section about the fact that a very vocal and well documented group of people (include people that worked on the film) believe it to exist and have called for its release. The full page is the place that would outline different opinions about whether it exists or not. It doesn't matter if a cut DOES or DOES NOT exist, because the movement to have a cut released still exists. So I go back to the fact that I don't see a "bias" as you claim, because the section isn't about taking a side, it's about the movement. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:#800000;color:#FFD700"> BIGNOLE </span>'''</small>]] [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 16:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::: You referred to it as me just pulling out some random person trying to DISHONESTLY discredit me, and someone with relevance to the production. That absolutely is a personal attack. And irrelevant to you opposing RELEVANT FACTS to the topic. Part of community reaction and Snyder cut is ALL relevant claims about it. With holding details because it doesn't support the 'synder cut' view absolutely is bias. And it is clear you are part of that Snyder crowd protecting that bias. Everything you've said has continued to prove that bias with the objections of relevant material that fits the wiki criteria of additional information. You are part of the bias. [[Special:Contributions/96.31.190.97|96.31.190.97]] ([[User talk:96.31.190.97|talk]]) 01:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::I think you're a little mixed up. I didn't refer to you about anything. I merely pointed out that a random production person (I know they exist, I read the articles when they first came out) doesn't trump the director. So no, I'm sorry, but you are mistaken in that being a personal attack. A personal attack would be calling you an insulting name, or at least insinuating it. I did no such thing. I attacked nothing about you but the argument itself. It's clear that there is no rational argument that can be made to you regarding the section. Anyone that argues differently is just going to be called "bias" by you. I'm bowing out. Have a good day. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:#800000;color:#FFD700"> BIGNOLE </span>'''</small>]] [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 14:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC) |
|||
{{abot}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | A discussion is taking place to address the redirect [[ |
||
== Charles Roven quote in post-production section == |
== Charles Roven quote in post-production section == |
||
Line 60: | Line 40: | ||
:: Fisher says he is prevented from saying more by a NDA.[https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a33243707/justice-league-ray-fisher-joss-whedon-claims/] It seems increasingly unlikely that we will get any more information specifically relevant to this film, but maybe more disclosures about Whedon. |
:: Fisher says he is prevented from saying more by a NDA.[https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a33243707/justice-league-ray-fisher-joss-whedon-claims/] It seems increasingly unlikely that we will get any more information specifically relevant to this film, but maybe more disclosures about Whedon. |
||
:: Kevin Smith did say he was told that Whedon had been bad mouthing Snyder,[https://uproxx.com/movies/kevin-smith-ray-fisher-joss-whedon-abusive-on-set-justice-league/] which sounds unprofessional and insecure but again not notable enough. I think we're done, but people can always restart discussion if better sources become available. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.78.220.223|109.78.220.223]] ([[User talk:109.78.220.223|talk]]) 16:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC) |
:: Kevin Smith did say he was told that Whedon had been bad mouthing Snyder,[https://uproxx.com/movies/kevin-smith-ray-fisher-joss-whedon-abusive-on-set-justice-league/] which sounds unprofessional and insecure but again not notable enough. I think we're done, but people can always restart discussion if better sources become available. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.78.220.223|109.78.220.223]] ([[User talk:109.78.220.223|talk]]) 16:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | A discussion is taking place to address the redirect [[:Josstice League]]. The discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 19#Josstice League]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:*Treker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:*Treker|talk]]) 03:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
@[[User:InfiniteNexus|InfiniteNexus]] Sorry, but don’t we have to use the name used in the credits? Like, in the MoS article we have “Kal-El / Clark Kent”. [[User:Redjedi23|Redjedi23]] ([[User talk:Redjedi23|talk]]) 16:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:[[WP:FILMCAST]] allows for the use of {{tq|common name[s] supported by a reliable source}}. [[User:InfiniteNexus|InfiniteNexus]] ([[User talk:InfiniteNexus|talk]]) 16:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::This statement--"'''''All names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source.'''''"--does not mean you can add something that isn't used in the film. It means if there is a more common usage in the film, even though that isn't the credit then you can list that name, not commonly known outside of the film. The "Kal-El/Clark Kent" example is the best one actually, because he isn't credited as "Superman", and he isn't even commonly called Superman in the film. It's used once (twice, since Swanwick repeats), near the start of the third act. Another good example is the ''Wonder Woman'' film. She's never called Wonder Woman, she isn't credited as Wonder Woman, and you only hear "Prince" used once as well. Other than that, she is only called Diana and solely credited as "Diana". Just because we "commonly" know Clark Kent as "Superman" in the real world, or Diana Prince as Wonder Woman, doesn't mean we can rename a character in a film. That's why the credits are first and foremost based on the actual listing in the film, and in special circumstances something also used but not credited. |
|||
::That said, it doesn't mean you wouldn't explain who they were in prose format after the credit though. Was there a particular name in question here? It seems mostly to be a revert based on putting the "real" name first and the superhero name second, which is the proper way to list aliases. [[User:Bignole|<small>'''<span style="background:#800000;color:#FFD700"> BIGNOLE </span>'''</small>]] [[User talk:Bignole|<small>(Contact me)</small>]] 17:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:46, 30 August 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Justice League (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Justice League (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 13, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2017, when it received 12,048,341 views. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 8 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Charles Roven quote in post-production section
[edit]I think it's a bad source of information for two reasons: 1) it's grammatically incorrect (probably a typo by the article writer) and 2) Roven was putting spin on a bad situation. Since the movie's release, numerous people involved with the production have gone on record stating how much Whedon's footage deviated from Snyder's script. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.229.80 (talk) 21:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- As the one who added it back, I think it should be kept. It is grammatically correct, but most importantly I think it's sort of a testimony to how WB brazenly lied about the theatrical cut IMO. JOEBRO64 22:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's not grammatically correct: "There's only so much you can do with other 15, 20 percent of the movie." There should be a "the" between "with" and "15, 20 percent". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.229.80 (talk) 23:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Joss Whedon
[edit]Allegations that Joss Whedon behaved unprofessionally on set were removed from the article[1] with an edit summary awaiting better sources. Starting a discussion, so far we have Twitter messages from actor Ray Fisher which have been widely reported.[2] Variety magazine has an article.[3] No comment from Whedon. No comment from Warners. Producer Jon Berg categorically denied the accusation that he enabled any unprofessional behavior. Probably still best to wait-and-see if anything else happens before including it in the article. -- 109.78.215.215 (talk) 02:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- I would wait to see how it unfolds. The idea that directors are assholes on sets isn't new. If the story becomes something, then we can make note of it. Right now, it doesn't appear to be anything worthy of note. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Fisher says he is prevented from saying more by a NDA.[4] It seems increasingly unlikely that we will get any more information specifically relevant to this film, but maybe more disclosures about Whedon.
- Kevin Smith did say he was told that Whedon had been bad mouthing Snyder,[5] which sounds unprofessional and insecure but again not notable enough. I think we're done, but people can always restart discussion if better sources become available. -- 109.78.220.223 (talk) 16:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
"Josstice League" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Josstice League. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 19#Josstice League until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ★Trekker (talk) 03:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Cast
[edit]@InfiniteNexus Sorry, but don’t we have to use the name used in the credits? Like, in the MoS article we have “Kal-El / Clark Kent”. Redjedi23 (talk) 16:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- WP:FILMCAST allows for the use of
common name[s] supported by a reliable source
. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)- This statement--"All names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source."--does not mean you can add something that isn't used in the film. It means if there is a more common usage in the film, even though that isn't the credit then you can list that name, not commonly known outside of the film. The "Kal-El/Clark Kent" example is the best one actually, because he isn't credited as "Superman", and he isn't even commonly called Superman in the film. It's used once (twice, since Swanwick repeats), near the start of the third act. Another good example is the Wonder Woman film. She's never called Wonder Woman, she isn't credited as Wonder Woman, and you only hear "Prince" used once as well. Other than that, she is only called Diana and solely credited as "Diana". Just because we "commonly" know Clark Kent as "Superman" in the real world, or Diana Prince as Wonder Woman, doesn't mean we can rename a character in a film. That's why the credits are first and foremost based on the actual listing in the film, and in special circumstances something also used but not credited.
- That said, it doesn't mean you wouldn't explain who they were in prose format after the credit though. Was there a particular name in question here? It seems mostly to be a revert based on putting the "real" name first and the superhero name second, which is the proper way to list aliases. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class comic book films articles
- Comic book films task force articles
- GA-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class Comics articles
- Low-importance Comics articles
- GA-Class Comics articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class DC Comics articles
- DC Comics work group articles
- WikiProject Comics articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class 2010s articles
- Low-importance 2010s articles
- WikiProject 2010s articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report