Talk:Raspberry Pi: Difference between revisions
Assessment (B): banner shell, Computing, +United Kingdom (Low) (Rater) |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Raspberry Pi/Archive 6) (bot |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{not a forum}} |
{{not a forum}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell |1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=B|vital=yes|1= |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Vital article|class=B|level=5|topic=Technology|link=Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Technology|anchor=Specific devices (39 articles)}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Introductions }} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject United Kingdom |importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Technology }} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Connected contributor|Trevj|editedhere=yes|declared=yes}} |
{{Connected contributor|Trevj|editedhere=yes|declared=yes}} |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archives|bot=MiszaBot I|age=31|search=yes}} |
{{archives|bot=MiszaBot I|age=31|search=yes}} |
||
{{Broken anchors|links= |
|||
* <nowiki>[[Consumer Electronics Control#CEC|CEC]]</nowiki> |
|||
}} |
|||
== GFLOPs in Simplified Model B Changelog == |
== GFLOPs in Simplified Model B Changelog == |
||
What is the source of the GFLOP values in the Simplified Model B Changelog table? I would suggest that this should be cited. |
What is the source of the GFLOP values in the Simplified Model B Changelog table? I would suggest that this should be cited. |
||
== Block diagram - "which" == |
|||
{{reply|A Shortfall Of Gravitas}} In March 2021 you added a "which" comment to the "Hardware" section regarding the block diagram, noting an issue with where the diagram appears on 4k diaplays. ({{oldid|Raspberry Pi|1009887169#Hardware}}) I've recently attempted to resolve that, but I don't have a 4k display to check if my solution works. Does the edit I've made work for you? – [[User:Scyrme|Scyrme]] ([[User talk:Scyrme|talk]]) 23:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Raspberry Pi Pico in the Comparison Chart == |
== Raspberry Pi Pico in the Comparison Chart == |
||
Line 35: | Line 34: | ||
The Raspberry Pi Pico is really different from the rest of the Raspberry Pis, and is much more like a microcontroller than the others. I'm not sure if comparing them in the same chart makes sense (and I believe that chart is already too long). [[User:Stevenruidigao|Stevenruidigao]] ([[User talk:Stevenruidigao|talk]]) 03:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC) |
The Raspberry Pi Pico is really different from the rest of the Raspberry Pis, and is much more like a microcontroller than the others. I'm not sure if comparing them in the same chart makes sense (and I believe that chart is already too long). [[User:Stevenruidigao|Stevenruidigao]] ([[User talk:Stevenruidigao|talk]]) 03:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Although I feel similarly, unfortunately the people running the Raspberry Pi foundation decided to confusingly name the Pico as a "Raspberry Pi", even though the RP2040 is more technically a microcontroller, while the rest of the Raspberries are more technically general purpose computers. [[User:Em3rgent0rdr|Em3rgent0rdr]] ([[User talk:Em3rgent0rdr|talk]]) 03:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Separate articles for Raspberry Pi models == |
|||
:I actually like having it in the list because occasionally I want to decide if a PICO is good enough or even better (because benefits from programmed IO state machines) for a simple task or a ZERO is needed or better (for ethernet and full unix). Was actually signing up today because all Raspi Pi versions table was incomplete for PICO not showing any IO beyond "a UART" - no mentioning of 2nd UART, I2C, SPI, PWM, ADC, PIO and USB1.1 (however dedicated USB2 and USB3 columns exist). Although RP2040 page shows all details, being able to side-by-side compare PICO, ZERO and perhaps even compute module under Raspberry PI would be nice to have. [[User:Andre Postoluck|Andre Postoluck]] ([[User talk:Andre Postoluck|talk]]) 00:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Raspberry Pi Pico 2 announced August 8, 2024 == |
|||
I'm not a HTML editor, anyone want to take this on? https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-pico-2/ |
|||
[[User:Jzoch2|Jzoch2]] ([[User talk:Jzoch2|talk]]) 17:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Too confusing to read on mobile == |
|||
Having the (growing) list of models summerized in one giant table is really inaccessible especially on mobile. Horizontal scrolling to reference a particular cell relies upon remembering the vertical and horizontal headers which are out of view once you reach the cell. |
|||
I think having separate articles for different Pi models such as Raspberry Pi 3, 4 and 5 make sense, just like how [[IBM PC]] models have different pages such as [[IBM PC XT]] and [[IBM PC AT]]. [[User:VectorVoyager|VectorVoyager]] ([[User talk:VectorVoyager|talk]]) 13:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
there’s probably enough material for each generation (if not model) to have its own wiki article: not just specs but history, press, noteable deployments, reception, etc [[Special:Contributions/146.199.169.199|146.199.169.199]] ([[User talk:146.199.169.199|talk]]) 07:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I've started working this, now the [[Raspberry Pi 4]] has its own article (though the article doesn't have everything I want in it yet). [[User:Jayanky|Jayanky]] ([[User talk:Jayanky|talk]]) 13:58, 4 October 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:23, 31 August 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raspberry Pi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Raspberry Pi. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Raspberry Pi at the Reference desk. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
GFLOPs in Simplified Model B Changelog
[edit]What is the source of the GFLOP values in the Simplified Model B Changelog table? I would suggest that this should be cited.
Raspberry Pi Pico in the Comparison Chart
[edit]Should the Raspberry Pi Pico really be compared with the other Raspberry Pis?
The Raspberry Pi Pico is really different from the rest of the Raspberry Pis, and is much more like a microcontroller than the others. I'm not sure if comparing them in the same chart makes sense (and I believe that chart is already too long). Stevenruidigao (talk) 03:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Although I feel similarly, unfortunately the people running the Raspberry Pi foundation decided to confusingly name the Pico as a "Raspberry Pi", even though the RP2040 is more technically a microcontroller, while the rest of the Raspberries are more technically general purpose computers. Em3rgent0rdr (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- I actually like having it in the list because occasionally I want to decide if a PICO is good enough or even better (because benefits from programmed IO state machines) for a simple task or a ZERO is needed or better (for ethernet and full unix). Was actually signing up today because all Raspi Pi versions table was incomplete for PICO not showing any IO beyond "a UART" - no mentioning of 2nd UART, I2C, SPI, PWM, ADC, PIO and USB1.1 (however dedicated USB2 and USB3 columns exist). Although RP2040 page shows all details, being able to side-by-side compare PICO, ZERO and perhaps even compute module under Raspberry PI would be nice to have. Andre Postoluck (talk) 00:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Raspberry Pi Pico 2 announced August 8, 2024
[edit]I'm not a HTML editor, anyone want to take this on? https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-pico-2/
Jzoch2 (talk) 17:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Too confusing to read on mobile
[edit]Having the (growing) list of models summerized in one giant table is really inaccessible especially on mobile. Horizontal scrolling to reference a particular cell relies upon remembering the vertical and horizontal headers which are out of view once you reach the cell.
there’s probably enough material for each generation (if not model) to have its own wiki article: not just specs but history, press, noteable deployments, reception, etc 146.199.169.199 (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Technology
- B-Class vital articles in Technology
- B-Class Computing articles
- High-importance Computing articles
- B-Class Computer hardware articles
- Mid-importance Computer hardware articles
- B-Class Computer hardware articles of Mid-importance
- All Computing articles
- B-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- B-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors