Jump to content

Talk:Raspberry Pi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment (B): banner shell, Computing, +United Kingdom (Low) (Rater)
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Raspberry Pi/Archive 6) (bot
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


{{not a forum}}
{{not a forum}}
{{WikiProject banner shell |1=
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=High |hardware=yes |hardware-importance=Mid}}
{{Vital article|class=B|level=5|topic=Technology|link=Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Technology|anchor=Specific devices (39 articles)}}
{{WikiProject Introductions }}
{{WikiProject Computing |class=B |importance=High |hardware=yes |hardware-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Introductions |class=B}}
{{WikiProject United Kingdom |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United Kingdom |class=B |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Technology }}
}}
}}
{{Connected contributor|Trevj|editedhere=yes|declared=yes}}
{{Connected contributor|Trevj|editedhere=yes|declared=yes}}
Line 20: Line 20:
}}
}}
{{archives|bot=MiszaBot I|age=31|search=yes}}
{{archives|bot=MiszaBot I|age=31|search=yes}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>[[Consumer Electronics Control#CEC|CEC]]</nowiki>
}}


== GFLOPs in Simplified Model B Changelog ==
== GFLOPs in Simplified Model B Changelog ==


What is the source of the GFLOP values in the Simplified Model B Changelog table? I would suggest that this should be cited.
What is the source of the GFLOP values in the Simplified Model B Changelog table? I would suggest that this should be cited.

== Block diagram - "which" ==

{{reply|A Shortfall Of Gravitas}} In March 2021 you added a "which" comment to the "Hardware" section regarding the block diagram, noting an issue with where the diagram appears on 4k diaplays. ({{oldid|Raspberry Pi|1009887169#Hardware}}) I've recently attempted to resolve that, but I don't have a 4k display to check if my solution works. Does the edit I've made work for you? – [[User:Scyrme|Scyrme]] ([[User talk:Scyrme|talk]]) 23:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


== Raspberry Pi Pico in the Comparison Chart ==
== Raspberry Pi Pico in the Comparison Chart ==
Line 35: Line 34:
The Raspberry Pi Pico is really different from the rest of the Raspberry Pis, and is much more like a microcontroller than the others. I'm not sure if comparing them in the same chart makes sense (and I believe that chart is already too long). [[User:Stevenruidigao|Stevenruidigao]] ([[User talk:Stevenruidigao|talk]]) 03:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The Raspberry Pi Pico is really different from the rest of the Raspberry Pis, and is much more like a microcontroller than the others. I'm not sure if comparing them in the same chart makes sense (and I believe that chart is already too long). [[User:Stevenruidigao|Stevenruidigao]] ([[User talk:Stevenruidigao|talk]]) 03:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


:Although I feel similarly, unfortunately the people running the Raspberry Pi foundation decided to confusingly name the Pico as a "Raspberry Pi", even though the RP2040 is more technically a microcontroller, while the rest of the Raspberries are more technically general purpose computers. [[User:Em3rgent0rdr|Em3rgent0rdr]] ([[User talk:Em3rgent0rdr|talk]]) 03:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
== Separate articles for Raspberry Pi models ==
:I actually like having it in the list because occasionally I want to decide if a PICO is good enough or even better (because benefits from programmed IO state machines) for a simple task or a ZERO is needed or better (for ethernet and full unix). Was actually signing up today because all Raspi Pi versions table was incomplete for PICO not showing any IO beyond "a UART" - no mentioning of 2nd UART, I2C, SPI, PWM, ADC, PIO and USB1.1 (however dedicated USB2 and USB3 columns exist). Although RP2040 page shows all details, being able to side-by-side compare PICO, ZERO and perhaps even compute module under Raspberry PI would be nice to have. [[User:Andre Postoluck|Andre Postoluck]] ([[User talk:Andre Postoluck|talk]]) 00:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

== Raspberry Pi Pico 2 announced August 8, 2024 ==

I'm not a HTML editor, anyone want to take this on? https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-pico-2/

[[User:Jzoch2|Jzoch2]] ([[User talk:Jzoch2|talk]]) 17:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

== Too confusing to read on mobile ==


Having the (growing) list of models summerized in one giant table is really inaccessible especially on mobile. Horizontal scrolling to reference a particular cell relies upon remembering the vertical and horizontal headers which are out of view once you reach the cell.
I think having separate articles for different Pi models such as Raspberry Pi 3, 4 and 5 make sense, just like how [[IBM PC]] models have different pages such as [[IBM PC XT]] and [[IBM PC AT]]. [[User:VectorVoyager|VectorVoyager]] ([[User talk:VectorVoyager|talk]]) 13:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)


:I absolutely agree with this idea. For me the article in its current form is way too bloated, and it really should just be an overview of the company and its products. [[User:Jayanky|Jayanky]] ([[User talk:Jayanky|talk]]) 12:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
there’s probably enough material for each generation (if not model) to have its own wiki article: not just specs but history, press, noteable deployments, reception, etc [[Special:Contributions/146.199.169.199|146.199.169.199]] ([[User talk:146.199.169.199|talk]]) 07:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
:I've started working this, now the [[Raspberry Pi 4]] has its own article (though the article doesn't have everything I want in it yet). [[User:Jayanky|Jayanky]] ([[User talk:Jayanky|talk]]) 13:58, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:23, 31 August 2024

GFLOPs in Simplified Model B Changelog

[edit]

What is the source of the GFLOP values in the Simplified Model B Changelog table? I would suggest that this should be cited.

Raspberry Pi Pico in the Comparison Chart

[edit]

Should the Raspberry Pi Pico really be compared with the other Raspberry Pis?

The Raspberry Pi Pico is really different from the rest of the Raspberry Pis, and is much more like a microcontroller than the others. I'm not sure if comparing them in the same chart makes sense (and I believe that chart is already too long). Stevenruidigao (talk) 03:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although I feel similarly, unfortunately the people running the Raspberry Pi foundation decided to confusingly name the Pico as a "Raspberry Pi", even though the RP2040 is more technically a microcontroller, while the rest of the Raspberries are more technically general purpose computers. Em3rgent0rdr (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I actually like having it in the list because occasionally I want to decide if a PICO is good enough or even better (because benefits from programmed IO state machines) for a simple task or a ZERO is needed or better (for ethernet and full unix). Was actually signing up today because all Raspi Pi versions table was incomplete for PICO not showing any IO beyond "a UART" - no mentioning of 2nd UART, I2C, SPI, PWM, ADC, PIO and USB1.1 (however dedicated USB2 and USB3 columns exist). Although RP2040 page shows all details, being able to side-by-side compare PICO, ZERO and perhaps even compute module under Raspberry PI would be nice to have. Andre Postoluck (talk) 00:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raspberry Pi Pico 2 announced August 8, 2024

[edit]

I'm not a HTML editor, anyone want to take this on? https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-pico-2/

Jzoch2 (talk) 17:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too confusing to read on mobile

[edit]

Having the (growing) list of models summerized in one giant table is really inaccessible especially on mobile. Horizontal scrolling to reference a particular cell relies upon remembering the vertical and horizontal headers which are out of view once you reach the cell.

there’s probably enough material for each generation (if not model) to have its own wiki article: not just specs but history, press, noteable deployments, reception, etc 146.199.169.199 (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]