Jump to content

Talk:Contingent work: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lapaz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=y|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Business|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Economics|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Organized Labour|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health|importance=Top}}
}}
{{merged-from|Contingent workforce|30 November 2016}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=Talk:Contingent work/Archive
|format= %%i
|age=2160|<!--90 days-->
|header={{automatic archive navigator}}
|maxarchsize=100000
|minkeepthreads=4
|numberstart=1
}}


== casual work ==
==Untitled==
This entry does not offer a complete, balanced picture of "contingent work." It opens with a link to what looks like a blog and a small online survey to support the claim that contingent work generally pays more than permanent work. Other sources (ones that strike me as reliable) paint a different picture. See, for example:

Karen Kosanovich. A Look at Contingent Workers. Sept. 2018 at https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2018/contingent-workers/home.htm
I am considering moving this article to [[casual work]]. Although I've had major input into this article, with hindsight I think that the term ''casual work'' is more widespread, and arguably more NPOV than ''contingent work'' - since ''casual work'' is more likely to be used by employment agencies and in classified listings - and the meaning of the two phrases is very similar.
More at: https://www.bls.gov/cps/lfcharacteristics.htm#contingent

or
That said - casual work perhaps isn't ''quite'' the same thing as contingent work. In particular, [[part time]] jobs are often considered contingent work, but aren't necessarily casual. And [[full time]] jobs in organisations that have an unusually high staff turnover might be considered contingent work, even if they're not casual.
2002

Nicole Skalski. Explaining the Wage Gap Between Contingent and Non-Contingent Workers. 2002 at https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1170&context=parkplace
Also - the term [[contingent work]] seems to be used more commonly by those who consider it a social issue. Although such an opinion wouldn't be NPOV in itself, I still believe that it's legitimate to have an encyclopædia article covering those viewpoints. And I feel as though it would be more appropriate in an article about [[contingent work]] than in one about [[casual work]].
[[User:Jk180|Jk180]] ([[User talk:Jk180|talk]]) 15:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

At the moment, I don't think there's enough scope to justify [[casual work]] and [[contingent work]] being two separate articles, though that might change in the future. If there ''is'' scope to have articles on both subjects, they should definitely link to each other - and if there isn't, then one should redirect to the other.

So I'm undecided, and would like opinions. Thanks. [[User:Squashy|Squashy]] 23:59, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

== merge [[precarity]] here ==

Someone created the "precarity" article, which apparently has now entered the English language. It comes from the French "précarité", and for all I can see, is the exact synonym of contingent work and other [[McJobs]]. So maybe we should simplify things, as WIkipedia is not a dictionnary, and have arguments and analyzes unified in the same article, shouldn't we? [[User:Lapaz|Lapaz]] 23:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:57, 31 August 2024


Untitled

[edit]

This entry does not offer a complete, balanced picture of "contingent work." It opens with a link to what looks like a blog and a small online survey to support the claim that contingent work generally pays more than permanent work. Other sources (ones that strike me as reliable) paint a different picture. See, for example: Karen Kosanovich. A Look at Contingent Workers. Sept. 2018 at https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2018/contingent-workers/home.htm More at: https://www.bls.gov/cps/lfcharacteristics.htm#contingent or 2002 Nicole Skalski. Explaining the Wage Gap Between Contingent and Non-Contingent Workers. 2002 at https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1170&context=parkplace Jk180 (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]