Jump to content

Talk:Construction set: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 2003:E1:E73B:607:1D43:D719:E133:59A1 - "Research by Y-Komm.: new section"
Tag: Reverted
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject Toys|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Lego|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Toys|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Lego|importance=low}}
}}
{{Copied|from=Psychological benefits of construction toys|from_diff=563169494|to=Construction set|to_diff=563169585|July 6, 2013}}
{{Copied|from=Psychological benefits of construction toys|from_diff=563169494|to=Construction set|to_diff=563169585|July 6, 2013}}
{{Vital article|topic=Life|level=5|class=Start}}



== Deletion vote in 2005 ==
== Deletion vote in 2005 ==
Line 32: Line 32:
I would add [[Bayko]], but I don't know how best to describe its connection method. [[User:Maproom|Maproom]] ([[User talk:Maproom|talk]]) 11:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
I would add [[Bayko]], but I don't know how best to describe its connection method. [[User:Maproom|Maproom]] ([[User talk:Maproom|talk]]) 11:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)


== Research by Y-Komm. ==
== First picture not a photo ==

Y-Komm is a official Naming for a discrete or conspirately operating group of intelligence Members all over the World, that verify possible Influency but yet unknown faction, founded as a kind of paranoic fear against Red Commies, and vice versa imperalistic mind screwing slavery, in moderns Times it's sub-laying to Seti, Radar Super Telescopes and "the Internet".

Block Building seems in Deep Regression Psychology, to be derived form sort of higher A.I. Block Build or Selfbuild, Subject under deep relaxing near Sleep described very extensive about giant Structure, answering almost any Question, and managing a whole lot of sphlendid daily Stuff.

Thies Superblocks seems to be inherently based on Light an sort of Crystals, an lesser but regular occuring Sound, filled with Fear of mayor breakdowns.

Some minor Group of interrogated(Back in Iron Curtain Times) described the Blocks as Entirely Hostile to human nature of a fulfilled Life in Freedom, mention supposely the Consumer dependency in Western imperalism, or some technological Dictator-Shipment in planet wide Scaling, with presumption of being the one and only God.

In Fact at beginning, all Interrogated stamp in Files as possible Non Human Origins, meaning non religious Clean earthly, what ever that means, the were and are as Lineage, observed til today.


The first image, labeled "Kiddicraft and Lego building blocks in different colors" is obviously a 3D model. I believe it should be removed or replaced by a real photograph. [[User:Leosdad|Leosdad]] ([[User talk:Leosdad|talk]]) 13:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Playing Blocks are Evil. What is not the official Statement of The Y-Komm. But oddly they seems to be, never the less, gifted beyond normal Scalings <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:E1:E73B:607:1D43:D719:E133:59A1|2003:E1:E73B:607:1D43:D719:E133:59A1]] ([[User talk:2003:E1:E73B:607:1D43:D719:E133:59A1#top|talk]]) 16:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:There isn't another commons image comparing Kiddicraft and Lego bricks. Although this one is a 3d model, it appears to accurately show the difference, so I don't see a reason to remove it. ([[User:Hohum|<b style="color: Green;">Hohum</b>]] [[User talk:Hohum|<sup style="color: Red;">@</sup>]]) 14:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:15, 1 September 2024

Deletion vote in 2005

[edit]

For the 1 July 2005 Vote for deletion resulting in move (keep), see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Constructions set. -- Jonel | Speak 03:12, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Major revision

[edit]

My major revision was prompted by my realization that I have never seen a strut system based on a D6h node. Eassin 21:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining the notation

[edit]

I think it would be worthwhile to explain what the notation in the examples means, e.g. C2v (*22) nodes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.36.192.101 (talk) 14:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Add Cleversticks

[edit]

Please consider adding Cleversticks to the list of construction toys Arlington row (talk) 12:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Split between industrial and toys

[edit]

Someone should divide the article content between "toys" and industrial components. --70.142.41.253 (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Construction Set Comparison

[edit]

Could someone please make a graph which compares:

  1. What each set does or does not have
  2. The size of each of the units it has

I want to buy the best set I can for some novice practise engineering but am not sure what is the best novice option
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.124.73.132 (talk) 05:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is useful to list sets by category like that. Most systems have components in more than one category - for example Technical Lego is listed separately from Lego, althhough it is compatible with the Lego brick-and-stud system. Similarly Fischertechnik is listed only as a brick-and-stud system, but it also has panels and struts held together by plastic twist fasteners in a similar manner to the Meccano nuts and bolts. So I agree we need a matrix to say what features each system has and doesn't have, rather than the division into (somewhat arbitrary) categories. Philbelb (talk) 15:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bayko

[edit]

I would add Bayko, but I don't know how best to describe its connection method. Maproom (talk) 11:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First picture not a photo

[edit]

The first image, labeled "Kiddicraft and Lego building blocks in different colors" is obviously a 3D model. I believe it should be removed or replaced by a real photograph. Leosdad (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't another commons image comparing Kiddicraft and Lego bricks. Although this one is a 3d model, it appears to accurately show the difference, so I don't see a reason to remove it. (Hohum @) 14:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]