Copyright abolition: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Movement advocating to abolish copyright}} |
{{Short description|Movement advocating to abolish copyright}} |
||
{{More citations needed|date=September 2023}} |
{{More citations needed|date=September 2023}} |
||
'''Copyright abolition''' is a movement to abolish [[copyright]] and all subsequent laws made in its support. The notion of anti-copyright combines a group of ideas and ideologies that advocate changing the current copyright law. It often focuses on the negative philosophical, economic, or social consequences of copyright, and that it has never been a benefit to society, but instead serves to enrich a few at the expense of creativity. Some groups may question the logic of copyright on economic and cultural grounds. The members of this movement are in favor of a |
'''Copyright abolition''' is a movement to abolish [[copyright]] and all subsequent laws made in its support. The notion of anti-copyright combines a group of ideas and ideologies that advocate changing the current copyright law. It often focuses on the negative philosophical, economic, or social consequences of copyright, and that it has never been a benefit to society, but instead serves to enrich a few at the expense of creativity. Some groups may question the logic of copyright on economic and cultural grounds. The members of this movement are in favor of either a significant overhaul or repeal of current copyright law. |
||
[[Michele Boldrin]] and [[David K. Levine]], economists at [[Washington University in St. Louis]], have suggested that copyrights and [[patent]]s are a net loss for the economy because of the way they reduce [[competition]] in the [[free market]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newswise.com/articles/economists-say-copyright-and-patent-laws-are-killing-innovation-hurting-economy|title=Economists Say Copyright and Patent Laws Are Killing Innovation; Hurting Economy|website=www.newswise.com}}</ref> They refer to copyrights and patents as intellectual monopolies, akin to industrial monopolies, and they advocate phasing out and eventually abolishing them.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm|title=Against Intellectual Monopoly|website=www.dklevine.com}}</ref> |
[[Michele Boldrin]] and [[David K. Levine]], economists at [[Washington University in St. Louis]], have suggested that copyrights and [[patent]]s are a net loss for the economy because of the way they reduce [[competition]] in the [[free market]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newswise.com/articles/economists-say-copyright-and-patent-laws-are-killing-innovation-hurting-economy|title=Economists Say Copyright and Patent Laws Are Killing Innovation; Hurting Economy|website=www.newswise.com}}</ref> They refer to copyrights and patents as intellectual monopolies, akin to industrial monopolies, and they advocate phasing out and eventually abolishing them.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm|title=Against Intellectual Monopoly|website=www.dklevine.com}}</ref> |
||
The classic argument in defense of copyright is the view that giving the developers a temporary monopoly over their works encourages further development and creativity, giving the developer a source of income, and thus encourages them to continue their creative work; usually copyright is secured under the [[Berne Convention]], established by [[Victor Hugo]] and first adopted in 1886. Every country in the world has copyright laws and private information ownership has not been repealed anywhere officially. Numerous international agreements on copyright have been concluded since then, but copyright law still varies from country to country. |
The classic argument in defense of copyright is the view that giving the developers a temporary monopoly over their works encourages further development and creativity, giving the developer a source of income, and thus encourages them to continue their creative work; usually copyright is secured under the [[Berne Convention]], established by [[Victor Hugo]] and first adopted in 1886. Every country in the world has copyright laws and private information ownership has not been repealed anywhere officially. Numerous international agreements on copyright have been concluded since then, but copyright law still varies from country to country. |
||
Copyright is also massively rejected by those partaking in [[online piracy]] and other participants of [[peer-to-peer]] networks, who put copyrighted materials into public access. In addition, in the context of the Internet, Web 2.0, and other newer technologies, it has been argued that copyright laws need to be adapted to modern information technology. |
Copyright is also massively rejected by those partaking in [[online piracy]] and other participants of [[peer-to-peer]] networks, who put copyrighted materials into public access. In addition, in the context of the Internet, Web 2.0, and other newer technologies, it has been argued that copyright laws need to be adapted to modern information technology. |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
[[Category:Political movements]] |
[[Category:Political movements]] |
||
[[Category:Criticism of intellectual property]] |
[[Category:Criticism of intellectual property]] |
||
[[Category:Copyright law]] |
[[Category:Copyright law|abolition]] |
||
Latest revision as of 20:47, 2 September 2024
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2023) |
Copyright abolition is a movement to abolish copyright and all subsequent laws made in its support. The notion of anti-copyright combines a group of ideas and ideologies that advocate changing the current copyright law. It often focuses on the negative philosophical, economic, or social consequences of copyright, and that it has never been a benefit to society, but instead serves to enrich a few at the expense of creativity. Some groups may question the logic of copyright on economic and cultural grounds. The members of this movement are in favor of either a significant overhaul or repeal of current copyright law.
Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine, economists at Washington University in St. Louis, have suggested that copyrights and patents are a net loss for the economy because of the way they reduce competition in the free market.[1] They refer to copyrights and patents as intellectual monopolies, akin to industrial monopolies, and they advocate phasing out and eventually abolishing them.[2]
The classic argument in defense of copyright is the view that giving the developers a temporary monopoly over their works encourages further development and creativity, giving the developer a source of income, and thus encourages them to continue their creative work; usually copyright is secured under the Berne Convention, established by Victor Hugo and first adopted in 1886. Every country in the world has copyright laws and private information ownership has not been repealed anywhere officially. Numerous international agreements on copyright have been concluded since then, but copyright law still varies from country to country.
Copyright is also massively rejected by those partaking in online piracy and other participants of peer-to-peer networks, who put copyrighted materials into public access. In addition, in the context of the Internet, Web 2.0, and other newer technologies, it has been argued that copyright laws need to be adapted to modern information technology.
See also
[edit]
- Business ethics § Intellectual property
- Copyright alternatives
- Copyright misuse
- Copyfraud
- Cory Doctorow
- Creative Commons
- Criticism of copyright
- Culture vs. Copyright
- Cyber-utopianism
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
- Fair use
- File sharing
- Free-culture movement
- Freedom of information
- Information wants to be free
- Intellectual property § Criticisms
- Patent troll
- Permissive software licence
- Pirate Party
- Public domain
- Steal This Film
References
[edit]- ^ "Economists Say Copyright and Patent Laws Are Killing Innovation; Hurting Economy". www.newswise.com.
- ^ "Against Intellectual Monopoly". www.dklevine.com.
 | This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |