Jump to content

Unordered pair: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cdc (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by Iiron munat (talk) to last version by RJHall
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[mathematics]], an '''unordered pair''' or '''pair set''' is a [[Set (mathematics)|set]] of the form {''a'', ''b''}, i.e. a set having two elements ''a'' and ''b'' with {{em|no particular relation between them}}, where {''a'', ''b''} = {''b'', ''a''}. In contrast, an [[ordered pair]] (''a'', ''b'') has ''a'' as its first element and ''b'' as its second element, which means (''a'', ''b'') ≠ (''b'', ''a'').
A '''binary set''' is a [[set]] with (exactly) two distinct elements, or, equivalently, a set whose [[cardinality]] is [[two]].


While the two elements of an ordered pair (''a'',&nbsp;''b'') need not be distinct, modern authors only call {''a'',&nbsp;''b''} an unordered pair if ''a''&nbsp;≠&nbsp;''b''.<ref>
Examples:
{{Citation | last1=Düntsch | first1=Ivo | last2=Gediga | first2=Günther | title=Sets, Relations, Functions | publisher=Methodos | series=Primers Series | isbn=978-1-903280-00-3 | year=2000}}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Fraenkel | first1=Adolf | title=Einleitung in die Mengenlehre | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | year=1928}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Roitman | first1=Judith | title=Introduction to modern set theory | publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] | location=New York | isbn=978-0-471-63519-2 | year=1990 | url-access=registration | url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontomo0000roit }}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Schimmerling | first1=Ernest | title=Undergraduate set theory | year=2008 }}
* The set {''a'',''b''} is binary.
</ref>
* The set {''a'',''a''} is not binary, since it is equivalent to the set {''a''}, which is a [[singleton (mathematics)|singleton]].
But for a few authors a [[Singleton (mathematics)|singleton]] is also considered an unordered pair, although today, most would say that {''a'',&nbsp;''a''} is a [[multiset]]. It is typical to use the term unordered pair even in the situation where the elements a and b could be equal, as long as this equality has not yet been established.


A set with precisely two elements is also called a [[finite set|2-set]] or (rarely) a '''binary set'''.
In [[axiomatic set theory]], the existence of binary sets is a consequence of the [[axiom of empty set]] and the [[axiom of pairing]]. From these two axioms can be derived the existence of the singleton <nowiki>{{}}</nowiki>. From the axiom of empty set it is known that the set <nowiki>{}</nowiki> exists. From the axiom of pairing it is then known that the set <nowiki>{{},{{}}}</nowiki> exists, which contains both <nowiki>{}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{}}</nowiki>. But the set <nowiki>{{},{{}}}</nowiki> is a binary set.


An unordered pair is a [[finite set]]; its [[cardinality]] (number of elements) is 2 or (if the two elements are not distinct)&nbsp;1.
==See also==
* [[ordered pair]]
* [[binary relation]]


In [[axiomatic set theory]], the existence of unordered pairs is required by an axiom, the [[axiom of pairing]].
[[Category:Set theory]]

More generally, an '''unordered '''''n'''''-tuple''' is a set of the form {''a''<sub>1</sub>,&nbsp;''a''<sub>2</sub>,...&nbsp;''a<sub>n</sub>''}.<ref>
{{Citation | last1=Hrbacek | first1=Karel | last2=Jech | first2=Thomas | author2-link=Thomas Jech | title=Introduction to set theory | publisher=Dekker | location=New York | edition=3rd | isbn=978-0-8247-7915-3 | year=1999}}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Rubin | first1=Jean E. |author1-link=Jean E. Rubin | title=Set theory for the mathematician | publisher=Holden-Day | year=1967}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Takeuti | first1=Gaisi | last2=Zaring | first2=Wilson M. | title=Introduction to axiomatic set theory | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics | year=1971}}</ref>

==Notes==
{{reflist}}

==References==
* {{Citation | last1=Enderton | first1=Herbert | title=Elements of set theory | publisher=[[Academic Press]] | location=Boston, MA | isbn=978-0-12-238440-0 | year=1977}}.

[[Category:Basic concepts in set theory]]

Latest revision as of 03:40, 3 September 2024

In mathematics, an unordered pair or pair set is a set of the form {ab}, i.e. a set having two elements a and b with no particular relation between them, where {ab} = {ba}. In contrast, an ordered pair (ab) has a as its first element and b as its second element, which means (ab) ≠ (ba).

While the two elements of an ordered pair (ab) need not be distinct, modern authors only call {ab} an unordered pair if a ≠ b.[1][2][3][4] But for a few authors a singleton is also considered an unordered pair, although today, most would say that {aa} is a multiset. It is typical to use the term unordered pair even in the situation where the elements a and b could be equal, as long as this equality has not yet been established.

A set with precisely two elements is also called a 2-set or (rarely) a binary set.

An unordered pair is a finite set; its cardinality (number of elements) is 2 or (if the two elements are not distinct) 1.

In axiomatic set theory, the existence of unordered pairs is required by an axiom, the axiom of pairing.

More generally, an unordered n-tuple is a set of the form {a1a2,... an}.[5][6][7]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Düntsch, Ivo; Gediga, Günther (2000), Sets, Relations, Functions, Primers Series, Methodos, ISBN 978-1-903280-00-3.
  2. ^ Fraenkel, Adolf (1928), Einleitung in die Mengenlehre, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag
  3. ^ Roitman, Judith (1990), Introduction to modern set theory, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-63519-2.
  4. ^ Schimmerling, Ernest (2008), Undergraduate set theory
  5. ^ Hrbacek, Karel; Jech, Thomas (1999), Introduction to set theory (3rd ed.), New York: Dekker, ISBN 978-0-8247-7915-3.
  6. ^ Rubin, Jean E. (1967), Set theory for the mathematician, Holden-Day
  7. ^ Takeuti, Gaisi; Zaring, Wilson M. (1971), Introduction to axiomatic set theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag

References

[edit]