Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:News articles: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}.
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|
<!-- Template:Archive box begins -->
{{WikiProject Essays|importance=low}}
{| class="infobox plainlinks" style="width: {{{box-width|238px}}}"
}}
|<div style="padding-top: 4px; text-align: center">{{{image|[[Image:Crystal Clear app file-manager.png|{{{image-width|40px}}}|Archive]]}}}'''<br/>[[Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page|Archives]]'''
{{archives|
</div>
----
* [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (news)/Archive 1|Jan-Mar 2007]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (news)/Archive 1|Jan-Mar 2007]]
}}
|}<!-- Template:Archive box ends -->

==AFDs for news stories(continued from archived list)==
==AFDs for news stories(May 10-September 19, 2007)==
Note: this list includes articles about people, things or incidents which were newsworthy and have 2 or more press or TV citations, but some do not judge to be encyclopedic. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 15:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Note: this list includes articles about people, things or incidents which were newsworthy and have 2 or more press or TV citations, but some do not judge to be encyclopedic. In a few cases, there are news articles about the subject, but no one bothered to add the news sources. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 15:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
*I no longer have the time to try to include 100% of such articles,from AFDs. Others are encouraged to add those they spot. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 16:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine McCann]] May 10, 2007. 3 year old UK child disappeared May 3 in Portugal. Article created May 5. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 22:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine McCann]] May 10, 2007. 3 year old UK child disappeared May 3 in Portugal. Article created May 5. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 22:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
**Closed as '''Keep''' (widespread news coverage continues.) [[User:Edison|Edison]] 03:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
**Closed as '''Keep''' (widespread news coverage continues.) [[User:Edison|Edison]] 03:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Meyer]] May 11, 2007. Worker entered electrical vault at Scientology premises without authorization or safety precautions and was electricuted. Anti-scientology sites [http://www.holysmoke.org/sm/stacy_moxon6.htm] called it was a suspicious death,but officially an accident. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Meyer]] May 11, 2007. Worker entered electrical vault at Scientology premises without authorization or safety precautions and was electricuted. Anti-scientology sites [http://www.holysmoke.org/sm/stacy_moxon6.htm] called it was a suspicious death,but officially an accident. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
**Closed as '''No consensus, default to Keep''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 18:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
**Closed as '''No consensus, default to Keep''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 18:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
***Deleted after second AFD, which closed 24 Dec 2010. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 18:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmie Tseng]] May 26, 2007. Minor convicted of manslaughter. '''Deleted'''. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmie Tseng]] May 26, 2007. Minor convicted of manslaughter. '''Deleted'''. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachelle Waterman]] May 27, 2007. Minor acquitted of complicity in murder of her mother, blogged about trial. 10,000 Google hits. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC) '''Deleted''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 22:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachelle Waterman]] May 27, 2007. Minor acquitted of complicity in murder of her mother, blogged about trial. 10,000 Google hits. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC) '''Deleted''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 22:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Line 23: Line 25:
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilberta Estrada]] June 4, 2007. Mother hanged her four young daughters and herself. The youngest survived. Closed as '''Delete'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilberta Estrada]] June 4, 2007. Mother hanged her four young daughters and herself. The youngest survived. Closed as '''Delete'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose (goat)]] June 5, 2007. A man allegedly caught raping a goat was made to pay a dowry. Closed as '''Keep'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 21:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose (goat)]] June 5, 2007. A man allegedly caught raping a goat was made to pay a dowry. Closed as '''Keep'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 21:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelsey Smith]] June 6, 2007. 18 year old woman abducted from mall. '''No Consensus'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelsey Smith]] June 6, 2007. 18 year old woman abducted from mall and murdered. '''No Consensus'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Anthony Walker]] June 6, 2007 17 year old British black student murdered in racial hate crime. Closed as '''Keep'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Anthony Walker]] June 6, 2007 17 year old British black student murdered in racial hate crime. Closed as '''Keep'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ann Leneghan ]] June 6, 2007. 16 year old girl raped and murdered by gang. Closed as '''Delete'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ann Leneghan ]] June 6, 2007. 16 year old girl raped and murdered by gang. Closed as '''Delete'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Line 65: Line 67:
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn-Marie Wesley]] July 9, 2007. 14 year old Canadian girl was bullied by other girls and committed suicide. Widely cited as case of "bulleycide" and was subject of documentary film. The result was '''Move''' to [[Dawn-Marie Wesley suicide]].[[User:Edison|Edison]] 00:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn-Marie Wesley]] July 9, 2007. 14 year old Canadian girl was bullied by other girls and committed suicide. Widely cited as case of "bulleycide" and was subject of documentary film. The result was '''Move''' to [[Dawn-Marie Wesley suicide]].[[User:Edison|Edison]] 00:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 French Alps coach crash]] July 10, 2007. A bus hit a rock on a road in the Alps and 4 passengers were injured. The result was '''delete'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 French Alps coach crash]] July 10, 2007. A bus hit a rock on a road in the Alps and 4 passengers were injured. The result was '''delete'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Articles for deletion/Al Gore III and Noelle Bush]] July 10, 2007. Offspring of politicians got in the news for sppeeding, and or drug problems. After lengthy debate for the two articles, the debate was closed as "no consensus" with a suggestion that in the future if [[Al Gore III]] or [[Noelle Bush]] are nominated it should be separately. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Articles for deletion/Al Gore III and Noelle Bush]] July 10, 2007. (AFD title malformed, copied it as listed) Offspring of politicians got in the news for sppeeding, and or drug problems. After lengthy debate for the two articles, the debate was closed as "no consensus" with a suggestion that in the future if [[Al Gore III]] or [[Noelle Bush]] are nominated it should be separately. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thorsby, Alabama grade crossing accident ]] July 12, 2007. Four people killed when train hit vehicle. Result was '''Merge''' into [[Thorsby, Alabama]] .[[User:Edison|Edison]] 16:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thorsby, Alabama grade crossing accident ]] July 12, 2007. Four people killed when train hit vehicle. Result was '''Merge''' into [[Thorsby, Alabama]] .[[User:Edison|Edison]] 16:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biaora level crossing accident ]] Train in India hit oxcart and killed 8 people. The result was '''delete''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 16:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biaora level crossing accident ]] Train in India hit oxcart and killed 8 people. The result was '''delete''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 16:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Line 75: Line 77:
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/July 20, 2007 Oakland Earthquake]] July 21, 2007. 4.2 magnitude earthquake in Oakland California, caused minor damage such as broken windows and merchandise falling off shelves. Result was '''Delete.'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 04:29, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/July 20, 2007 Oakland Earthquake]] July 21, 2007. 4.2 magnitude earthquake in Oakland California, caused minor damage such as broken windows and merchandise falling off shelves. Result was '''Delete.'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 04:29, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocelyne Couture-Nowak (4th nomination)]] July 24, 2007. Instructor killed in massacre at Virginia Tech. Result was '''No consensus.''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 15:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocelyne Couture-Nowak (4th nomination)]] July 24, 2007. Instructor killed in massacre at Virginia Tech. Result was '''No consensus.''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 15:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Scott ]] Aug 6, 2007. A shooting victim at Columbine High School. Her family wrote books about her and started a foundation named after her. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 02:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Scott ]] Aug 6, 2007. A shooting victim at Columbine High School. Her family wrote books about her and started a foundation named after her. Result was '''Keep''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 02:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Crowhurst]] Aug. 11, 2007. 12 year old got pregnant, gave birth at 13. Not Britains or world's youngest mother. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 18:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larisa Arapdate=2007 August 9]] Aug. 9, 2007. (AFD title malformed, copied it as listed)Russian political dissident involuntarily locked up in psychiatric hospital in what papers call a return to Soviet style psychiatric abuse.'''Keep''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Murphy Jr.]] Aug. 11, 2007. Leader of Young Republicans (born 1974) resigned "during a criminal investigation for (allegedly) sexually assaulting a sleeping 22-year-old man after a Young Republicans party on 29 July 2007." [[User:Edison|Edison]] 18:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey William Hardison]] Aug. 9, 2007. American chemist convicted of violating British drug laws. Reportedly supports use of psychotropic drugs for religious purposes. '''Userfied''' to [[User:Sambc/Casey William Hardison]]. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 18:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Crowhurst]] Aug. 11, 2007. 12 year old got pregnant, gave birth at 13. Not Britains or world's youngest mother. Result was '''Delete''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 18:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Murphy Jr.]] Aug. 11, 2007. Leader of Young Republicans (born 1974) resigned "during a criminal investigation for (allegedly) sexually assaulting a sleeping 22-year-old man after a Young Republicans party on 29 July 2007." Result was '''Keep''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 18:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Hicks]] Aug. 14, 2007. Alleged to be a suspect in a murder, other allegations of criminal conduct, zero references. '''Speedily deleted''' per [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:SNOW]]. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Atlee]] Aug. 16, 2007. Photographer and fiance of supermodel [[Petra Němcová]], he drowned in tsumnami. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 19:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Result was "Merge and redirect to Petra Němcová" [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 01:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecelia Cichan]] Aug. 16, 2007. Four year old was lone survivor of a plane crash in 1987. 20 years later her life goes on. Result was '''Merge and redirect''' to [[Northwest Airlines Flight 255]][[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Smeaton (baggage handler) (2nd nomination) ]] Aug. 18, 2007 Man assisted police in apprehending suspect at the [[2007 Glasgow International Airport attack]]. The result was '''Merge''' to [[2007 Glasgow International Airport Attack]], with no prejudice against possible future recreation. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 22:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Morel ]] Aug. 19, 2007. Marine captain killed in Iraq, received Navy Cross for heroism. Result was '''Keep'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 23:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Talbot]] Aug. 19, 2007. 6 year old girl was runner up in "Britain's Got Talent" show, got and lost record contract, had Youtube video with 8 million views. Result was '''No consensus'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 15:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bessie Cursons]] Aug. 20, 2007. Child born 1995 entered "Britain's Got Talent" and lost in finals.Result was '''Delete''' [[User:Edison|Edison]] 15:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Reid]] Aug 23, 2007. Youth sports player, 16, died during practice, and the death was covered by news media. Result was '''Delete'''[[User:Edison|Edison]] 20:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azia Kim]] Aug 26, 2007. Posed as Stanford University student for 8 moonths in 2006-2007, attending classes, staying in dorm. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 21:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC) - result was '''delete''' BLP1.
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Couey]] Aug. 24, 2007. Convicted sex offender murdered a child in the neighborhood, [[Jessica Lunsford]]. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 03:24, 29 August 2007 (UTC) result was ''Keep''
*[[Snowball (Hurricane Katrina dog)]] Aug. 29, 2007. Katrina evacuee tearfully was torn from his pet dog, leading to national indignation. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 06:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC) redirected to: [[Pets Evacuation and Transportation Standards Act]]
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Cleverley]] Sept 18, 2007. College student disappeared, last seen alive on August 30, 2007, and her body was found on September 9 at base of cliff. Presumed dead from accidental fall. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 16:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC) result was ''Delete''
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qian Xun Xue]] Sept 19, 2007. Child found abandoned in Australian railway station, Mother's body found in trunk of car, police seeking father. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 13:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC) result was '''keep''' - redirected to [[Qian Xun Xue case]]
*[[University of Florida Taser incident]] Sept 19, 2007. Student tasered at Kerry Q&A session at a college when he would not yield the microphone. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 13:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC) result was '''keep'''


==Other policies and guidelines with similar provisions==
==Other policies and guidelines with similar provisions==
Line 87: Line 105:
These policies can be used to argue for deletion or redirects for articles about someone who was in the news (however widely covered) for some unusual manner of death, for having some rare disease or medical condition, or for committing or being the victim of a crime, for some embarrassing incident, or for being an internet meme because of a photo or video. It still leaves no obvious basis for arguing to delete a story which had multiple substantial coverage in reliable independent sources, but was a "watercooler story" about some freak occurrance such as a cute animal in distress, which tends to be a ratings booster for TV news shows, but of questionable encyclopedic nature. Clearly, if a child got a pumpkin-shaped bucket stuck on his head and was an internet meme and TV show and newspaper article subject, we have a basis for deleting an article about him. We should be equally able, through a policy provision, to delete a similar story about an animal.[[User:Edison|Edison]] 18:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
These policies can be used to argue for deletion or redirects for articles about someone who was in the news (however widely covered) for some unusual manner of death, for having some rare disease or medical condition, or for committing or being the victim of a crime, for some embarrassing incident, or for being an internet meme because of a photo or video. It still leaves no obvious basis for arguing to delete a story which had multiple substantial coverage in reliable independent sources, but was a "watercooler story" about some freak occurrance such as a cute animal in distress, which tends to be a ratings booster for TV news shows, but of questionable encyclopedic nature. Clearly, if a child got a pumpkin-shaped bucket stuck on his head and was an internet meme and TV show and newspaper article subject, we have a basis for deleting an article about him. We should be equally able, through a policy provision, to delete a similar story about an animal.[[User:Edison|Edison]] 18:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


*Thank goodness some good has come out of this debate. For a time I felt as if we were discussing this in a vacuum and not achieving anything despite a large support base. Glad to see it's been implemented ''somewhere'' at least, and being cited in AfD debates. At least it shows that others agree with the line taken by the guideline when it was first proposed, and in most cases are !voting in favour of excluding one-shot events, while keeping (in some form or other) those with potential significance. '''<font color="red">[[User:Zunaid|Zun]]</font><font color="green">[[User Talk:Zunaid|aid]]</font><font color="blue">[[Special:Contributions/Zunaid|©]]</font><font color="orange">[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Zunaid|®]]</font>''' 10:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
*Thank goodness some good has come out of this debate. For a time I felt as if we were discussing this in a vacuum and not achieving anything despite a large support base. Glad to see it's been implemented ''somewhere'' at least, and being cited in AfD debates. At least it shows that others agree with the line taken by the guideline when it was first proposed, and in most cases are !voting in favour of excluding one-shot events, while keeping (in some form or other) those with potential significance. '''[[User:Zunaid|<span style="color:red;">Zun</span>]][[User Talk:Zunaid|<span style="color:green;">aid</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Zunaid|<span style="color:blue;">©</span>]][[Wikipedia:Editor review/Zunaid|<span style="color:orange;">®</span>]]''' 10:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


**In recent AFDs such as [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obama Girl]], the argument and shortcut [[WP:NOT#NEWS]] or[[WP:NOT#NEWS|Wikipedia is not a tabloid newspaper]] has been used by [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] to lead to [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]] and specifically the section about "Not an indiscriminate list of information" and the section 10 about newspaper reports. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 17:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
**In recent AFDs such as [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obama Girl]], the argument and shortcut [[WP:NOT#NEWS]] or[[WP:NOT#NEWS|Wikipedia is not a tabloid newspaper]] has been used by [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] to lead to [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]] and specifically the section about "Not an indiscriminate list of information" and the section 10 about newspaper reports. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 17:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

*Interesting deletion and closure of an AFD about an apparently non-notable Rabbi who got arrested for tax fraud and a bio article was created rather than an article about the alleged crime: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naftali Tzvi Weisz]]. [[WP:NOT#NEWS]] was cited to delete a story with 8 sources over a 2 day period. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 14:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


== Consensus? ==
== Consensus? ==


Looking at the above results, and more importantly at some of the arguments put forward at AfD discussions, it is clear there is no consensus amongst editors about where (if at all) the threshold lies between "newsworthy" and "encyclopedia worthy". Thus some of the results reflect not the strength of the argument, but the strength of the numbers that pitch up. This is worrying. How do we reach a happy medium? '''<font color="red">[[User:Zunaid|Zun]]</font><font color="green">[[User Talk:Zunaid|aid]]</font><font color="blue">[[Special:Contributions/Zunaid|©]]</font><font color="orange">[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Zunaid|®]]</font>''' 10:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Looking at the above results, and more importantly at some of the arguments put forward at AfD discussions, it is clear there is no consensus amongst editors about where (if at all) the threshold lies between "newsworthy" and "encyclopedia worthy". Thus some of the results reflect not the strength of the argument, but the strength of the numbers that pitch up. This is worrying. How do we reach a happy medium? '''[[User:Zunaid|<span style="color:red;">Zun</span>]][[User Talk:Zunaid|<span style="color:green;">aid</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Zunaid|<span style="color:blue;">©</span>]][[Wikipedia:Editor review/Zunaid|<span style="color:orange;">®</span>]]''' 10:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


:The results show that in the collective judgement of editors who participate in AFDs, there are some articles based on news stories which appear to satisfy [[WP:N]] and [[WP:A]], with multiple independent reliable sources having substantial coverage, which may be newsworthy but are not encyclopedic. Murders are highly newsworthy. Any murder gets coverage in all local news media. If the victim is a child, it is likely to get national news coverage. If a child is kidnapped, and especially if the child is white and from a middle or upper class family, the coverage is likely to be international, such as [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine McCann]]. Missing white females are especially likely to get extensive news coverage. If the case leads to a "Megan's law" the creation of "Amber Alerts" or other corrective measures then the case had an enduring effect on society and seems likely to get kept in the AFD process. The new policy [[WP:NOT#NEWS]] has been cited in numerous cases where a newsworthy story was deleted on the grounds that it was not encyclopedic. The article are likely to be reoriented as the "case" or the "murder" or the "kidnapping" or the "suicide" rather than a memorial article about the person, whoc like most of us has typically not led a notable life prior to the crime. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 14:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:The results show that in the collective judgement of editors who participate in AFDs, there are some articles based on news stories which appear to satisfy [[WP:N]] and [[WP:A]], with multiple independent reliable sources having substantial coverage, which may be newsworthy but are not encyclopedic. Murders are highly newsworthy. Any murder gets coverage in all local news media. If the victim is a child, it is likely to get national news coverage. If a child is kidnapped, and especially if the child is white and from a middle or upper class family, the coverage is likely to be international, such as [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine McCann]]. Missing white females are especially likely to get extensive news coverage. If the case leads to a "Megan's law" the creation of "Amber Alerts" or other corrective measures then the case had an enduring effect on society and seems likely to get kept in the AFD process. The new policy [[WP:NOT#NEWS]] has been cited in numerous cases where a newsworthy story was deleted on the grounds that it was not encyclopedic. The article are likely to be reoriented as the "case" or the "murder" or the "kidnapping" or the "suicide" rather than a memorial article about the person, whoc like most of us has typically not led a notable life prior to the crime. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 14:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
::The policy [[WP:N#TEMP]] says "A short burst of present news coverage about a topic does not necessarily constitute objective evidence of long-term notability." This undercuts claims that a subject is notable because there were lots of news stories about it in a short period after the story broke. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 04:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

== NOTNEWS vs NOT#NEWS shortcut confusion ==

As evidenced in [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_March_4#YouTube_cat_abuse_incident]], the [[WP:NOTNEWS]] '''''essay''''' and [[WP:NOT#NEWS]] '''''policy''''' are the source of significant confusion. [[WP:NOTNEWS]] should definitely be a link to the policy and the essay should be moved to another obviously-not-policy shortcut like [[WP:NOTNEWSESSAY]], perhaps with a disambiguation link so as not to break existing links intended for the essay. Are there any other suggestions for a better shortcut name? [[User:WikiScrubber|WikiScrubber]] ([[User talk:WikiScrubber|talk]]) 19:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
*It's worth mentioning it doesn't help that the [[WP:NOTNEWS]] essay sets a ''significantly higher'' standard than the [[WP:NOT#NEWS]] policy. [[User:WikiScrubber|WikiScrubber]] ([[User talk:WikiScrubber|talk]]) 20:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
*I would like to second that this is a real issue (and one I've seen and been at fault for well before the linked debate above). While WikiScrubber's suggested name doesn't sound ideal to me, it is better than what we have now IMO. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 20:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
:* Sorry, I haven't been able to come up with anything better. You're more than welcome to! [[User:WikiScrubber|WikiScrubber]] ([[User talk:WikiScrubber|talk]]) 20:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
*I'm not convinced this page needs a shortcut at all. [[WP:News articles]] is fine. Meanwhile, the NOTNEWS shortcut is definitely causing confusion with NOT#NEWS. I'm just going to be bold and redirect WP:NOTNEWS to the appropriate section of WP:NOT. I have nothing against essays (or even {{tl|failed}} proposals subsequently labeled as essays, which is what this page is), but we want to avoid presenting them in a way that causes them to be confused with "official" guidance.--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] ([[User talk:Father Goose|talk]]) 22:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
:* Did not even consider that option. Thanks. [[User:WikiScrubber|WikiScrubber]] ([[User talk:WikiScrubber|talk]]) 23:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
:* I agree with Father Goose: confusions like that should be avoid, especially when it's easy to do so. [[User:Xasodfuih|Xasodfuih]] ([[User talk:Xasodfuih|talk]]) 13:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:03, 3 September 2024

AFDs for news stories(May 10-September 19, 2007)

[edit]

Note: this list includes articles about people, things or incidents which were newsworthy and have 2 or more press or TV citations, but some do not judge to be encyclopedic. In a few cases, there are news articles about the subject, but no one bothered to add the news sources. Edison 15:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edison 16:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other policies and guidelines with similar provisions

[edit]

Since the discussions on this guideline proposal occurred, two official policy pages have had certain provision added similar to ideas expressed here, and have been cited in AFDs, as has this (now) essay: WP:NOT#IINFO In WP:NOT says 10:News reports. Wikipedia properly considers the long-term historical notability of persons and events, keeping in mind the harm our work might cause. The fact that someone or something has been in the news for a brief period of time does not automatically justify an encyclopedia article. While Wikipedia strives to be comprehensive, the policies on biographies of living persons and neutral point of view should lead us to appropriately contextualize events. The briefer the appearance of a subject in the news the less likely it is to create an acceptably comprehensive encyclopedic biography. Even when news events themselves merit an encyclopedia article of their own, additional biographies of person(s) involved may not be necessary as they could largely duplicate relevant information. Timely news articles, however, are welcome on our sister project Wikinews." This provision was added on May 28, 2007 [2] by User:Jimbo Wales tp Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.

This agrees with the WP:BLP section "Articles about living people notable only for one event" which says "Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be memorialized forever with an encyclopedia entry. Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but remains of essentially low profile themselves, we should generally avoid having an article on them. If the reliable sources only cover the person in the context of something else, then a separate biography is probably unwarranted. Court cases, crimes, and natural disasters, for examples, should be presented as unified articles that involve all sides, based on reliable secondary sources, and not primary-source material interpreted only by Wikipedians. Marginal biographies on people with no independent notability can give undue weight to the events in the context of the individual, and create redundancy and additional maintenance overhead. In such cases, a redirect is often the best option." This was added there by User:Kusma [3]on May 28, 2007, based on earlier discussions.

These policies can be used to argue for deletion or redirects for articles about someone who was in the news (however widely covered) for some unusual manner of death, for having some rare disease or medical condition, or for committing or being the victim of a crime, for some embarrassing incident, or for being an internet meme because of a photo or video. It still leaves no obvious basis for arguing to delete a story which had multiple substantial coverage in reliable independent sources, but was a "watercooler story" about some freak occurrance such as a cute animal in distress, which tends to be a ratings booster for TV news shows, but of questionable encyclopedic nature. Clearly, if a child got a pumpkin-shaped bucket stuck on his head and was an internet meme and TV show and newspaper article subject, we have a basis for deleting an article about him. We should be equally able, through a policy provision, to delete a similar story about an animal.Edison 18:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank goodness some good has come out of this debate. For a time I felt as if we were discussing this in a vacuum and not achieving anything despite a large support base. Glad to see it's been implemented somewhere at least, and being cited in AfD debates. At least it shows that others agree with the line taken by the guideline when it was first proposed, and in most cases are !voting in favour of excluding one-shot events, while keeping (in some form or other) those with potential significance. Zunaid©® 10:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus?

[edit]

Looking at the above results, and more importantly at some of the arguments put forward at AfD discussions, it is clear there is no consensus amongst editors about where (if at all) the threshold lies between "newsworthy" and "encyclopedia worthy". Thus some of the results reflect not the strength of the argument, but the strength of the numbers that pitch up. This is worrying. How do we reach a happy medium? Zunaid©® 10:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The results show that in the collective judgement of editors who participate in AFDs, there are some articles based on news stories which appear to satisfy WP:N and WP:A, with multiple independent reliable sources having substantial coverage, which may be newsworthy but are not encyclopedic. Murders are highly newsworthy. Any murder gets coverage in all local news media. If the victim is a child, it is likely to get national news coverage. If a child is kidnapped, and especially if the child is white and from a middle or upper class family, the coverage is likely to be international, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleine McCann. Missing white females are especially likely to get extensive news coverage. If the case leads to a "Megan's law" the creation of "Amber Alerts" or other corrective measures then the case had an enduring effect on society and seems likely to get kept in the AFD process. The new policy WP:NOT#NEWS has been cited in numerous cases where a newsworthy story was deleted on the grounds that it was not encyclopedic. The article are likely to be reoriented as the "case" or the "murder" or the "kidnapping" or the "suicide" rather than a memorial article about the person, whoc like most of us has typically not led a notable life prior to the crime. Edison 14:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The policy WP:N#TEMP says "A short burst of present news coverage about a topic does not necessarily constitute objective evidence of long-term notability." This undercuts claims that a subject is notable because there were lots of news stories about it in a short period after the story broke. Edison (talk) 04:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NOTNEWS vs NOT#NEWS shortcut confusion

[edit]

As evidenced in Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_March_4#YouTube_cat_abuse_incident, the WP:NOTNEWS essay and WP:NOT#NEWS policy are the source of significant confusion. WP:NOTNEWS should definitely be a link to the policy and the essay should be moved to another obviously-not-policy shortcut like WP:NOTNEWSESSAY, perhaps with a disambiguation link so as not to break existing links intended for the essay. Are there any other suggestions for a better shortcut name? WikiScrubber (talk) 19:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not convinced this page needs a shortcut at all. WP:News articles is fine. Meanwhile, the NOTNEWS shortcut is definitely causing confusion with NOT#NEWS. I'm just going to be bold and redirect WP:NOTNEWS to the appropriate section of WP:NOT. I have nothing against essays (or even {{failed}} proposals subsequently labeled as essays, which is what this page is), but we want to avoid presenting them in a way that causes them to be confused with "official" guidance.--Father Goose (talk) 22:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]