Jump to content

Kuthi Valley: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: 30°19′N 80°46′E / 30.31°N 80.76°E / 30.31; 80.76
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Replaced obsolete center tags and reduced Lint errors
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Infobox valley
{{Infobox valley
| name = Kuti Valley
| name = Kuti Valley
| other_name =
| other_name = Kuti
| native_name =
| native_name =
| native_name_lang =
| native_name_lang =
Line 15: Line 15:
<!-- Location -->
<!-- Location -->
| location =
| location =
| country = India
| country = India <br> Nepal
| region = [[Kumaon division|Kumaon]]
| region = [[Dharchula]]<br> [[Darchula]]
| state = [[Uttarakhand]]
| state = [[Uttrakhand]] <br> [[Sudurpashchim Province]]
| district = [[Pithoragarh district|Pithoragarh]]
| district = [[Pithoragarh]] <br> [[Darchula]]
| city =
| city =
| relief =
| relief =
Line 30: Line 30:
| elevation_ft =
| elevation_ft =
| elevation_ref =
| elevation_ref =
| length = 30
| length =
| length_mi =
| length_mi =
| length_km =
| length_km = 30
| length_orientation =
| length_orientation =
| length_note =
| length_note =
Line 57: Line 57:
}}
}}


'''Kuti Valley''' is a [[Himalaya]]n valley situated in the [[Pithoragarh District]], [[Kumaon division]] of the [[Uttarakhand]] state of [[India]]. Located in the eastern part of Uttarakhand, it is the last valley before the border with [[Tibet]]. It runs along a NW to SE axis, formed by the river '''Kuti Yankti''', which is one of the headwaters of the [[Sharda River|Kali River]] that forms the boundary between India and Nepal in this region.
'''Kuti Valley''' is a [[Himalaya]]n valley, an area administered by India and also claimed by Nepal, is situated in the Pithoragarh district of Uttrakhand state of India. It is the last valley before the border with [[Tibet]]. It runs along the Limpiyadhura Pass & [[Adi Kailash]] in northwest to [[Gunji, Uttarakhand|Gunji]] in southeast axis, formed by the river '''Kuti Yankti''', which is one of the headwaters of the [[Sharda River|Kali River]]. It is reached by the ''[[Gunji, Uttarakhand#NH|Pithoragagh-Lipulekh Pass Highway]] (PLPH)''.


This valley is mainly dominated by [[Byansi people|Byansi]]s, one of the four [[Bhotiyas of Uttarakhand|Bhotiya]] communities of Kumaon, with the others being [[Gori Ganga|Johar]], [[Darma Valley|Darmiya]] and [[Chaudansi people|Chaudansi]].{{sfnp|Bergmann, Confluent territories and overlapping sovereignties|2016|p=89}}<ref>{{harvp|Chatterjee, The Bhotias of Uttarakhand|1976|pp=8–9}}: "[...] the four Kumaon Bhotia communities, viz., the Johar, the Darma, the Chaudans and the Byans, share greater similarities among themselves"</ref> In May 2020, Nepal laid claim to the northeastern half of the valley, claiming that Kuthi Yanki represented the Kali River and it was meant to be Nepal's border by the 1816 [[Sugauli Treaty]]. India said that the claim was not based on historical facts and evidence.<ref name="Reuters">[https://in.reuters.com/article/nepal-india-map/new-nepal-map-hardens-position-over-land-disputed-with-india-idINKBN22W2SV New Nepal map hardens position over land disputed with India], Reuters, 20 May 2020.
This valley is mainly dominated by [[Byansi people|Byansi]]s, one of the four [[Bhotiyas of Uttarakhand|Bhotiya]] communities of Kumaon, with the others being [[Gori Ganga|Johar]], [[Darma Valley|Darmiya]] and [[Chaudansi people|Chaudansi]].{{sfnp|Bergmann, Confluent territories and overlapping sovereignties|2016|p=89}}<ref>{{harvp|Chatterjee, The Bhotias of Uttarakhand|1976|pp=8–9}}: "[...] the four Kumaon Bhotia communities, viz., the Johar, the Darma, the Chaudans and the Byans, share greater similarities among themselves"</ref> In May 2020, Nepal laid claim to the northeastern half of the valley, claiming that Kuthi Yanki represented the Kali River and it was meant to be Nepal's border as per the 1816 [[Sugauli Treaty]].
</ref>


== Kuthi Yankti ==
== Kuthi Yankti ==
Line 324: Line 323:


== Nepalese claims ==
== Nepalese claims ==
The Byans region was originally part of Kumaon and the whole of Kumaon was under rule of Nepal ([[Gorkha]]) for 25 years. After the [[Anglo-Nepalese War]] and the ensuing [[Treaty of Sugauli]], the Kali River was agreed as the border between Kumaon and Nepal. In 1817, the Nepal Darbar claimed the villages of Tinkar and Chhangru as per the terms of the treaty, and the [[Governor General of India|British Governor General]] acquiesced. The Nepalese then made the further claim that the Kuthi valley also belonged to them on the grounds that Kuthi Yankti was the main headwater of Kali. This claim was rejected by the British on the grounds that, by tradition and convention, the Kali River is taken to begin at the Kalapani village, where the dark-coloured springs flowing into the river give it the name "Kali". ("Kali" means black in Hindi.)<ref>{{harvp|Atkinson, Himalayan Gazetteer, Vol. 2, Part 2|1981|pp=679–680}}: "Captain Webb and others showed that the lesser stream flowing from the sacred fountain of Kalapani had always been recognised as the main branch of the Kali and had in fact given its name to the river during its course through the hills. The Government, therefore, decided to retain both Nabhi and Kunti, which have ever since remained attached to British Byans."</ref>
The Byans region was originally part of Kumaon and the whole of Kumaon was under rule of Nepal ([[Kingdom of Nepal|Gorkha]]) for 25 years. After the [[Anglo-Nepalese War]] and the ensuing [[Treaty of Sugauli]], the Kali River was agreed as the border between Kumaon and Nepal. In 1817, the Nepal Darbar claimed the villages of Tinkar and Chhangru as per the terms of the treaty, and the [[Governor General of India|British Governor General]] acquiesced. The Nepalese then made the further claim that the Kuthi valley also belonged to them on the grounds that Kuthi Yankti was the main headwater of Kali. This claim was rejected by the British on the grounds that, by tradition and convention, the Kali River is taken to begin at the Kalapani village, where the dark-coloured springs flowing into the river give it the name "Kali". ("Kali" means black in Hindi.)<ref>{{harvp|Atkinson, Himalayan Gazetteer, Vol. 2, Part 2|1981|pp=679–680}}: "Captain Webb and others showed that the lesser stream flowing from the sacred fountain of Kalapani had always been recognised as the main branch of the Kali and had in fact given its name to the river during its course through the hills. The Government, therefore, decided to retain both Nabhi and Kunti, which have ever since remained attached to British Byans."</ref>


The claim to the Kuthi Valley was revived by the Nepalese geographer [[Buddhi Narayan Shrestha]] in 1999, who, after studying old maps of the early 19th century, came to the conclusion that "the origin of Mahakali River lies almost 16 kilometres northwest of Kalapani at Limpiyadhura".<ref>{{citation |last=Śreshṭha |first=Buddhi Nārāyaṇa |chapter=Maps show Kalapani belongs to Nepal |title=Border Management of Nepal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W31uAAAAMAAJ |year=2003 |publisher=Bhumichitra |isbn=978-99933-57-42-1 |pages=126–129 |orig-year=first published in 1999 in ''Sunday Despatch'' Weekly}}</ref> In May 2020, the Nepalese government made the claim official by endorsing a new map of Nepal that shows the Kuthi Valley as part of Nepal. The Prime Minister K. P. Oli declared that the country would "reclaim" it.<ref>PTI, [https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/nepal-approves-new-map-including-lipulekh-kalapani-limpiyadhura-amidst-border-row-with-india/article31621475.ece Nepal approves new map including Lipulekh, Kalapani, Limpiyadhura amidst border row with India], The Hindu, 19 May 2020.</ref> India responded that it was a unilateral act that was "not based on historical facts and evidence".<ref>[https://english.onlinekhabar.com/india-nepal-map-is-artificial-enlargement-of-territorial-claims-wont-accept-it.html India: Nepal map is ‘artificial enlargement of territorial claims’, won’t accept it], online khabar, 21 May 2020.</ref>
The claim to the Kuthi Valley was revived by the Nepalese geographer [[Buddhi Narayan Shrestha]] in 1999, who, after studying old maps of the early 19th century, came to the conclusion that "the origin of Mahakali River lies almost 16 kilometres northwest of Kalapani at Limpiyadhura".<ref>{{citation |last=Śreshṭha |first=Buddhi Nārāyaṇa |chapter=Maps show Kalapani belongs to Nepal |title=Border Management of Nepal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W31uAAAAMAAJ |year=2003 |publisher=Bhumichitra |isbn=978-99933-57-42-1 |pages=126–129 |orig-year=first published in 1999 in ''Sunday Despatch'' Weekly}}</ref> In May 2020, the Nepalese government made the claim official by endorsing a new map of Nepal that shows the Kuthi Valley as part of Nepal. The Prime Minister K. P. Oli declared that the country would "reclaim" it.<ref>PTI, [https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/nepal-approves-new-map-including-lipulekh-kalapani-limpiyadhura-amidst-border-row-with-india/article31621475.ece Nepal approves new map including Lipulekh, Kalapani, Limpiyadhura amidst border row with India], The Hindu, 19 May 2020.</ref> India responded that it was a unilateral act that was "not based on historical facts and evidence".<ref>[https://english.onlinekhabar.com/india-nepal-map-is-artificial-enlargement-of-territorial-claims-wont-accept-it.html India: Nepal map is ‘artificial enlargement of territorial claims’, won’t accept it], online khabar, 21 May 2020.</ref>
Line 341: Line 340:
* {{citation |last=Hoon |first=Vineeta |title=Living on the Move: Bhotiyas of the Kumaon Himalaya |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yjFuAAAAMAAJ |year=1996 |publisher=Sage Publications |isbn=978-0-8039-9325-9 |ref={{sfnref|Hoon, Living on the Move|1996}}}}
* {{citation |last=Hoon |first=Vineeta |title=Living on the Move: Bhotiyas of the Kumaon Himalaya |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yjFuAAAAMAAJ |year=1996 |publisher=Sage Publications |isbn=978-0-8039-9325-9 |ref={{sfnref|Hoon, Living on the Move|1996}}}}
* {{citation |last1=Nagano |first1=Yasuhiko |last2=LaPolla |first2=Randy J. |title=New Research on Zhangzhung and Related Himalayan Languages: Bon Studies 3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sCMOAAAAYAAJ |year=2001 |publisher=National Museum of Ethnology |ref={{sfnref|Nagano & LaPolla, New Research on Zhangzhung and Related Himalayan Languages|2001}}}}
* {{citation |last1=Nagano |first1=Yasuhiko |last2=LaPolla |first2=Randy J. |title=New Research on Zhangzhung and Related Himalayan Languages: Bon Studies 3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sCMOAAAAYAAJ |year=2001 |publisher=National Museum of Ethnology |ref={{sfnref|Nagano & LaPolla, New Research on Zhangzhung and Related Himalayan Languages|2001}}}}
* {{citation |last=Rawat |first=Ajay Singh |title=Forest Management in Kumaon Himalaya: Struggle of the Marginalised People |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OeQy9ZuvA5sC&pg=PA19 |year=1999 |publisher=Indus Publishing |isbn=978-81-7387-101-6 |ref={{sfnref|Rawat, Forest Mangaement in Kumaon Himalaya|1999}}}}
* {{citation |last=Rawat |first=Ajay Singh |title=Forest Management in Kumaon Himalaya: Struggle of the Marginalised People |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OeQy9ZuvA5sC&pg=PA19 |year=1999 |publisher=Indus Publishing |isbn=978-81-7387-101-6 |ref={{sfnref|Rawat, Forest Management in Kumaon Himalaya|1999}}}}
* {{citation |last1=Varma |first1=Uma |title=Uttar Pradesh State Gazetteer |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aRBuAAAAMAAJ |year=1994 |publisher=Govt. of Uttar Pradesh, Dept. of District Gazetteers}}
* {{citation |last1=Varma |first1=Uma |title=Uttar Pradesh State Gazetteer |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aRBuAAAAMAAJ |year=1994 |publisher=Govt. of Uttar Pradesh, Dept. of District Gazetteers}}
* {{citation |editor-first=H. G. |editor-last=Walton |title=Almora: A Gazetteer |series=District Gazetteers of the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh |volume=35 |publisher=Government Press, United Provinces |year=1911 |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.181493/page/n3 |via=archive.org |ref={{sfnref|Almora: A Gazetteer|1911}}}}
* {{citation |editor-first=H. G. |editor-last=Walton |title=Almora: A Gazetteer |series=District Gazetteers of the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh |volume=35 |publisher=Government Press, United Provinces |year=1911 |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.181493/page/n3 |via=archive.org |ref={{sfnref|Almora: A Gazetteer|1911}}}}

Latest revision as of 12:00, 8 September 2024

Kuti Valley
Kuti
Length30 km (19 mi)
Geography
CountryIndia
Nepal
StateUttrakhand
Sudurpashchim Province
RegionDharchula
Darchula
DistrictPithoragarh
Darchula
Coordinates30°19′N 80°46′E / 30.31°N 80.76°E / 30.31; 80.76

Kuti Valley is a Himalayan valley, an area administered by India and also claimed by Nepal, is situated in the Pithoragarh district of Uttrakhand state of India. It is the last valley before the border with Tibet. It runs along the Limpiyadhura Pass & Adi Kailash in northwest to Gunji in southeast axis, formed by the river Kuti Yankti, which is one of the headwaters of the Kali River. It is reached by the Pithoragagh-Lipulekh Pass Highway (PLPH).

This valley is mainly dominated by Byansis, one of the four Bhotiya communities of Kumaon, with the others being Johar, Darmiya and Chaudansi.[1][2] In May 2020, Nepal laid claim to the northeastern half of the valley, claiming that Kuthi Yanki represented the Kali River and it was meant to be Nepal's border as per the 1816 Sugauli Treaty.

Kuthi Yankti

[edit]
Map
About OpenStreetMaps
Maps: terms of use
15km
10miles
TIBET
(CHINA)
Tibet
NEPAL
Nepal
KUMAON
(INDIA)
Kumaon
Kuthi Yankti
Kali
River
Kuthi Yankti
Gori Ganga
Gori
Ganga
Gori Ganga
Darma River
Darma /
Dhauli
Darma River
Lasser Yankti
Lasser
Yankti
Lasser Yankti
Darma River
Darma
Darma River
Kuthi Yankti
Kuthi
Yankti
Kuthi Yankti
Tinkar Khola
Tinkar
Khola
Kalapani River
Kalapani
Kalapani River
Kungribingri La
Kungribingri La
Kungribingri La
Unta Dhura
Unta Dhura
Unta Dhura
Milam
Milam
Milam
Munsyari
Munsyari
Munsyari
Askot
Askot
Askot
Dharchula
Dharchula
Dharchula
Jauljibi
Jauljibi
Jauljibi
Tawaghat
Tawaghat
Tawaghat
Gunji
Gunji
Gunji
Kuthi
Kuthi
Limpiyadhura Pass
Limpiyadhura
Kalapani village
Kalapani
Lipulekh Pass
Lipulekh
Pass
Lipulekh Pass

Kuthi Yankti is one of the two headwaters of the Kali River, the other being the Kalapani River that flows down from the Lipulekh Pass.[3]

Kuthi Yankti emerges from slopes near Wilsha, below the Limpiyadhura range, and passes Lake Jolingkong at an altitude of 4,630 m, to the Kuti village. It flows southeast to merge with the Kalapani River near the Gunji village to form the Kali River (or Sharada River). High Himalayan passes of Mangsha Dhura (5,490 m) and Limpiya Dhura (5,530 m) are situated along the northern border of the Kuthi valley joining it with Tibet. Shin La pass and Nama pass join Darma Valley to Kuthi valley from the south. Jolingkong and Parvati are main alpine lakes.[4] Sangthang Peak is the highest along the line of peaks forming the northern boundary of the valley with Tibet. Among the peaks forming the southern boundary of the valley, notable peaks are Brammah Parvat (6,321 m), Cheepaydang (6,220 m) and Adi Kailash (5,945 m).

Byans and Byansis

[edit]

Kuthi Yankti is part of the Byans ethnographic region, which comprises Kuthi valley as well as the Kali River valley within its vicinity and the Tinkar valley in Nepal. The people of this region are called Byansis, who speak a distinctive Byangsi language. There are five Byans villages in the Kuthi valley (Gunji, Nabi, Rongkang, Napalchu and Kuti), two along the Kali River (Budi and Garbyang) and two in the Tinkar valley (Chhangru and Tinkar). In later times, two new villages were founded in Nepal (Rapla and Sitaula).[5] Kuti is the last village in the Kuthi valley, at an elevation of 12,300 feet (3,700 m). Garbyang, at the junction of Tinkar River with Kali, is the largest.[6]

Nepalese claims

[edit]

The Byans region was originally part of Kumaon and the whole of Kumaon was under rule of Nepal (Gorkha) for 25 years. After the Anglo-Nepalese War and the ensuing Treaty of Sugauli, the Kali River was agreed as the border between Kumaon and Nepal. In 1817, the Nepal Darbar claimed the villages of Tinkar and Chhangru as per the terms of the treaty, and the British Governor General acquiesced. The Nepalese then made the further claim that the Kuthi valley also belonged to them on the grounds that Kuthi Yankti was the main headwater of Kali. This claim was rejected by the British on the grounds that, by tradition and convention, the Kali River is taken to begin at the Kalapani village, where the dark-coloured springs flowing into the river give it the name "Kali". ("Kali" means black in Hindi.)[7]

The claim to the Kuthi Valley was revived by the Nepalese geographer Buddhi Narayan Shrestha in 1999, who, after studying old maps of the early 19th century, came to the conclusion that "the origin of Mahakali River lies almost 16 kilometres northwest of Kalapani at Limpiyadhura".[8] In May 2020, the Nepalese government made the claim official by endorsing a new map of Nepal that shows the Kuthi Valley as part of Nepal. The Prime Minister K. P. Oli declared that the country would "reclaim" it.[9] India responded that it was a unilateral act that was "not based on historical facts and evidence".[10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Bergmann, Confluent territories and overlapping sovereignties (2016), p. 89.
  2. ^ Chatterjee, The Bhotias of Uttarakhand (1976), pp. 8–9: "[...] the four Kumaon Bhotia communities, viz., the Johar, the Darma, the Chaudans and the Byans, share greater similarities among themselves"
  3. ^ Hoon, Living on the Move (1996), p. 48: "The river Kaliganga forms a natural boundary between India and Nepal. It has two headwaters: the eastern one Kalapani is a collection of springs, and the western one Kutiyankti rises from the snow fields of the Himadri near Kuti, the last Bhotiya village in Vyas [Byas]."
  4. ^ Heim, Arnold; Gansser, August (1939), The Throne of the Gods: An account of the first Swiss expedition to the Himalayas (PDF), Macmillan
  5. ^ Chatterjee, The Bhotias of Uttarakhand (1976), p. 9.
  6. ^ Atkinson, Himalayan Gazetteer, Vol. 2, Part 2 (1981), pp. 679–680: "Captain Webb and others showed that the lesser stream flowing from the sacred fountain of Kalapani had always been recognised as the main branch of the Kali and had in fact given its name to the river during its course through the hills. The Government, therefore, decided to retain both Nabhi and Kunti, which have ever since remained attached to British Byans."
  7. ^ Śreshṭha, Buddhi Nārāyaṇa (2003) [first published in 1999 in Sunday Despatch Weekly], "Maps show Kalapani belongs to Nepal", Border Management of Nepal, Bhumichitra, pp. 126–129, ISBN 978-99933-57-42-1
  8. ^ PTI, Nepal approves new map including Lipulekh, Kalapani, Limpiyadhura amidst border row with India, The Hindu, 19 May 2020.
  9. ^ India: Nepal map is ‘artificial enlargement of territorial claims’, won’t accept it, online khabar, 21 May 2020.

Bibliography

[edit]