User talk:Hateglitter: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Hateglitter (talk | contribs) →Multiple accounts: Reply |
{{Checkuserblock-account}} |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retired}} |
|||
== Multiple accounts == |
== Multiple accounts == |
||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
::::::::::It is not resolved. I want it to be resolved. I do not want to be here asking these questions. You have not disclosed your other account here. --[[User:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b76e79">'''A'''</span><span style="color:#be4f60">'''Rose'''</span>]][[User talk:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b87333">'''Wolf'''</span>]] 14:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
::::::::::It is not resolved. I want it to be resolved. I do not want to be here asking these questions. You have not disclosed your other account here. --[[User:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b76e79">'''A'''</span><span style="color:#be4f60">'''Rose'''</span>]][[User talk:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b87333">'''Wolf'''</span>]] 14:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::::::::I am not taking about this conversation. I am talking about the one in the pages talk page that one was about the editing of the article. That matter is now resolved among us. [[User:Hateglitter|Hateglitter]] ([[User talk:Hateglitter#top|talk]]) 14:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
:::::::::::I am not taking about this conversation. I am talking about the one in the pages talk page that one was about the editing of the article. That matter is now resolved among us. [[User:Hateglitter|Hateglitter]] ([[User talk:Hateglitter#top|talk]]) 14:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::::::::::That discussion will stay on the talk page to give other editors reference. It will be archived by bot later. Discussions are not allowed to be deleted on article talk pages without good reason. The potential for "trolls" writing you is not good enough. --[[User:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b76e79">'''A'''</span><span style="color:#be4f60">'''Rose'''</span>]][[User talk:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b87333">'''Wolf'''</span>]] 14:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::::::I am not asking you to delete it. There is a green tick that is made at the end of conversation that ends discussion [[User:Hateglitter|Hateglitter]] ([[User talk:Hateglitter#top|talk]]) 14:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::::::The discussion can just be left to archive if it is concluded. That is not required as no action within the article needed to be taken and there was none requested. We both agreed to walk away from it and carry on here with the account issues. --[[User:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b76e79">'''A'''</span><span style="color:#be4f60">'''Rose'''</span>]][[User talk:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b87333">'''Wolf'''</span>]] 14:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::::::::but will another user be able to join in our conversation on the articles talk page [[User:Hateglitter|Hateglitter]] ([[User talk:Hateglitter#top|talk]]) 14:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::::::::If they so desire, they should be allowed to. We might have resolved our content issues but others may have further issue with either your edits or mine, even things we said in the discussion. We should accept scrutiny and address it. This project operates on civil collaboration through discussion. --[[User:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b76e79">'''A'''</span><span style="color:#be4f60">'''Rose'''</span>]][[User talk:ARoseWolf|<span style="color:#b87333">'''Wolf'''</span>]] 15:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::::::::::Ok--[[User:Hateglitter|Hateglitter]] ([[User talk:Hateglitter#top|talk]]) 15:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::::::::::{{Tmbox |
|||
| style = background: #f8eaba |
|||
| image = [[File:Sock block.svg|55px]] |
|||
| text = '''''This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' as a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet]] of {{user21|Knightknight12345}} that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|''illegitimate'']] reasons '''is not''', and that all edits made while evading a block or ban [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]]. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> below. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 12:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 12:16, 9 September 2024
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
Multiple accounts
[edit]Please disclose all accounts you have edited under. You have mentioned that you have used one other account to edit Wikipedia. There are legitimate reasons for having multiple accounts but you are not allowed to do do so in order to avoid scrutiny. Disclosing your accounts will allow other editors to verify you are doing so within policy. It is required to protect the integrity of the encyclopedia. --ARoseWolf 14:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Accounts can not be deleted. --ARoseWolf 14:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok I will do it. But can you delete our conversation front the talk page. Trolls might send me messages Hateglitter (talk) 14:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will not delete our conversation. Why would trolls send you messages? And if they do they will be blocked by an administrator. Again, please disclose your previous account you are now going to use to edit. We can have an administrator block this account so it is not used in the future but it can not be deleted. --ARoseWolf 14:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- then block it Hateglitter (talk) 14:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- by the way I have deleted a Wikipedia count before Hateglitter (talk) 14:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Do you refuse to disclose your previous account? --ARoseWolf 14:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- should I disclose it here? Hateglitter (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Create a user page stating the username of the account you plan to edit with going forward. It should be the previous one you stated you lost but found the password for. Include all other accounts, including the one you claim you deleted if you remember the user name you used. The username policy clearly states
"It is not possible to delete user accounts, as all contributions must be assigned to some identifier, either a username or an IP address."
No accounts on Wikipedia were deleted. --ARoseWolf 14:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)- Ok. Now that our conversation is resolved can you write the resolved icon on our conversation on the talk page. Hateglitter (talk) 14:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- its done by users to show that the conversation has ended. Hateglitter (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is not resolved. I want it to be resolved. I do not want to be here asking these questions. You have not disclosed your other account here. --ARoseWolf 14:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am not taking about this conversation. I am talking about the one in the pages talk page that one was about the editing of the article. That matter is now resolved among us. Hateglitter (talk) 14:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- That discussion will stay on the talk page to give other editors reference. It will be archived by bot later. Discussions are not allowed to be deleted on article talk pages without good reason. The potential for "trolls" writing you is not good enough. --ARoseWolf 14:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am not asking you to delete it. There is a green tick that is made at the end of conversation that ends discussion Hateglitter (talk) 14:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion can just be left to archive if it is concluded. That is not required as no action within the article needed to be taken and there was none requested. We both agreed to walk away from it and carry on here with the account issues. --ARoseWolf 14:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- but will another user be able to join in our conversation on the articles talk page Hateglitter (talk) 14:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- If they so desire, they should be allowed to. We might have resolved our content issues but others may have further issue with either your edits or mine, even things we said in the discussion. We should accept scrutiny and address it. This project operates on civil collaboration through discussion. --ARoseWolf 15:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok--Hateglitter (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Knightknight12345 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- If they so desire, they should be allowed to. We might have resolved our content issues but others may have further issue with either your edits or mine, even things we said in the discussion. We should accept scrutiny and address it. This project operates on civil collaboration through discussion. --ARoseWolf 15:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- but will another user be able to join in our conversation on the articles talk page Hateglitter (talk) 14:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion can just be left to archive if it is concluded. That is not required as no action within the article needed to be taken and there was none requested. We both agreed to walk away from it and carry on here with the account issues. --ARoseWolf 14:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am not asking you to delete it. There is a green tick that is made at the end of conversation that ends discussion Hateglitter (talk) 14:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- That discussion will stay on the talk page to give other editors reference. It will be archived by bot later. Discussions are not allowed to be deleted on article talk pages without good reason. The potential for "trolls" writing you is not good enough. --ARoseWolf 14:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am not taking about this conversation. I am talking about the one in the pages talk page that one was about the editing of the article. That matter is now resolved among us. Hateglitter (talk) 14:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is not resolved. I want it to be resolved. I do not want to be here asking these questions. You have not disclosed your other account here. --ARoseWolf 14:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- its done by users to show that the conversation has ended. Hateglitter (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Now that our conversation is resolved can you write the resolved icon on our conversation on the talk page. Hateglitter (talk) 14:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Create a user page stating the username of the account you plan to edit with going forward. It should be the previous one you stated you lost but found the password for. Include all other accounts, including the one you claim you deleted if you remember the user name you used. The username policy clearly states
- should I disclose it here? Hateglitter (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Do you refuse to disclose your previous account? --ARoseWolf 14:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- by the way I have deleted a Wikipedia count before Hateglitter (talk) 14:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- then block it Hateglitter (talk) 14:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will not delete our conversation. Why would trolls send you messages? And if they do they will be blocked by an administrator. Again, please disclose your previous account you are now going to use to edit. We can have an administrator block this account so it is not used in the future but it can not be deleted. --ARoseWolf 14:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
