Jump to content

Talk:Neurodevelopmental disorder: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m rm double colons in wikilinks to remove Lint errors: Multi colon escape
m Archiving 15 discussion(s) to Talk:Neurodevelopmental disorder/Archive 1) (bot
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Psychology|class=|importance=}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Disability|class=B|auto=inherit|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Psychology|importance=Mid|needs-infobox=no}}
{{WikiProject Disability}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|class=C|importance|importance=Mid|neurology=yes|neurology-imp=High}}
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Mid|neurology=yes|neurology-imp=top|needs-infobox=no|needs-photo=yes|psychiatry=yes|psychiatry-imp=top}}
{{WikiProject Autism|class=|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Autism|importance=High}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 2
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(60d)
|archive = Talk:Neurodevelopmental disorder/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}


== No basis for this article ==
==Comments==
Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD) is a subset of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (ND). PDD (or Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)) is not the same as a Neurodevelopmental Disorder (ND) which also includes genetic-based disorders (such as Down Syndrome or Williams Syndrome), learning/cognitive disorders (such as Learning Disorders (LD) or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)), as well as environmentally induced disorders (such as Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) or Lead Poisoning). Please do <not> lump ND as a kind of PDD. ND is the superorderinate category underwhich PDD is typically placed.

Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Theguyinblue|Theguyinblue]] ([[User talk:Theguyinblue|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Theguyinblue|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

I agree. mixing PDD and other neurodevolopmental disorders is like saying schizophrenia is the same as depression.
In both case, we have no clear idea of the causes of the disorders, a battle raging between experts as to know wether it's genetic or environmental, or both and to what degree. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Supernova 6969|Supernova 6969]] ([[User talk:Supernova 6969|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Supernova 6969|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

==Broken link==
:''...physical and emotional burdens to individuals, families, and society. Therefore, research into the pathogenesis and treatment of these disorders, aimed at the cure and amelioration of their effects on individuals, families, and society, is of considerable importance." University of North Carolina. [http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~ndrc/structure.htm]''

There is a quote at the end of the text here with no opening quote I can see. Further, the link is dead, so I am going to zap it for now. --[[User:DanielCD|DanielCD]] 19:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

==Substantial changes to the article==
I consider this article too important to languish as a stub. As far as I can tell it is a good start class article. Editors may compare my edit today to previous version and will see that I tried to save verifiable material. I tried to address the concerns expressed in the first comment above, by User:Theguyinblue This article needs better external resources, more instances of causative agents, and better readability. I believe it needs to be put in more categories as well but I don't normally edit similar articles so don't have a clue as to which would be appropriate. Regards.[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 22:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
:I'll get down to proof-reading, [[WP:COPYEDIT|copy-editing]] and the like tomorrow. I'm not too good at spotting ideas/flaws with content, you may wish to find someone else like that. I know that [[User:Delldot|Delldot]] seems to be interested in this sort of thing, maybe give her a call on this? Kind regards —<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2px">'''[[User:Cyclonenim|''CycloneNimrod'']]'''</font><sup><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="1">[[User_talk:Cyclonenim|T@lk?]]</font></sup> 20:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
::Thanks! I have to watch carefully as to not [[WP:SYN]] such articles so I prefer editing articles about plants. But this one REALLY needed expansion.[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 20:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

===To do===
Sorry about the nasty edit conflict, I think it's fixed now. I think we're in more of an expanding than copy editing stage right now, so I'll let up with that. Here are some of my thoughts on the article so far:
*Trilobite is right, more citations are needed. We should be able to reliably cite the definition (I took out the ref to wiktionary per [[WP:RS]]) and all other non-obvious claims in the article.
*Possibly a '''Definition''' or '''Classification''' section?
*Define difficult terms in the text (in parentheses if need be): multifactoral syndrome, behavioral retardation.
*'''Genetic disorders''': get info on disorders other than Downs.
*Mention autism and other not completely understood conditions under '''Common causative factors'''?
*In its current state, I'd say the '''Cultural and historical information''' section should be ditched. Controversies about autism should be kept on the autism-related pages, this is too much detail for this general of an article. Also, discussing this one facet of the debate would probably be giving [[WP:undue weight|undue weight]] to one side; I'm sure the scientific consensus is that autism is a disorder. Certainly a section such as '''Cultural and historical context''' could be added, but I don't think any of this info is worth keeping.
*It looks like there might be some fringe views overrepresented here. Since this is such a general article, we should be sticking to summaries here, probably leaving the fringe views to be discussed in the pertinent articles. At the very least, these statements should all be impeccably sourced to highly reliable, secondary or tertiary sources. [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small>
It's a good start! I think adding references to [[WP:reliable sources|reliable sources]] is the most important thing. Good work so far. [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 20:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

:I looked at the article again today and must say you two are really cleaning it up well. I'm learning a lot by going through the edit summaries. My personal plans were to avoid touching it until you had time to finish what you wanted to do this week.
:Then I was planning to gather some more references for specific syndromes, causes, and [[comorbid]] conditions such as [[neural tube defects]], [[Williams Syndrome]], [[Rett syndrome]], [[Schizophrenia]], [[Rickets]], [[Scurvy]], [[Premature birth]] et cetera, look into possibly making a separate '''Comorbid conditions''' section, delete the '''Cultural and historical information''' section. (That particular section was one of the holdovers from the original stub article that I tried to salvage but I agree it won't work. If you look at the edit history you'll see the stub article was very minimalistic at best, but someone had made an honest effort at starting it and I didn't want to just throw it out without consensus.) '''Common causative factors''' might be less descriptive than '''Multifactoral conditions''' or '''Poorly defined causation'''. Off the top of my head, the best example I can think of a well understood and well defined complex multifactoral condition is [[PANDAS]] which is a combination of genetic, autoimmune, infectious, behavioral, mood, movement, learning disorder. Compared to it, the autistic disorders are much less well defined.
:'''Trauma''' is a separate issue, mostly a sorting and winnowing problem. I could write a book about '''[[Child abuse]]''', but at what point does it stop causing ''neuro''developmental problems and start causing ''psycho''developmental problems or ''socio''developmental problems? And at what point should it be reclassified as deprivation or multifactoral?
:Autism? I'm much more interested in adding information about [[Pervasive developmental disorder|PDD]]. I wonder about just writing a descriptive paragraph in the '''"As yet unnamed"''' section, adding <nowiki>{{main|Autism}}</nowiki> and working on the other parts.[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 01:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

::I'm basically done with this batch of copyediting, go ahead and add your content (the article will probably be different after you're done adding anyway, so a waste of time to copyedit now. At least that's the way I write--everything gets changed around).

::Do we have a source saying that trauma counts as a disorder? Or does it cause one? I think we should have sources for each thing listed saying it's actually under this rubric. We've got so much to cover here, we're probably going to end up with summaries of everything, in some cases no more than a sentence each.

::I agree that psychological problems should be covered elsewhere.

::Gimme a poke when you're done with the next round of additions! I'll have another look. [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 02:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
:::Does [[WP:MED]] have any structuring criteria for this type of article? It's not disease classification, so I don't have much experience with the structuring here. —<font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2px">'''[[User:Cyclonenim|''Cyclonenim'']]'''</font><sup><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="1">[[User_talk:Cyclonenim|T@lk?]]</font></sup> 11:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

===Feedback for initial bullet points===
I'm having trouble coming up with a suitably referenced definition/classification scheme, otherwise I've made a start on the other points. I've tried to winnow out more of the fringe stuff but probably need another viewpoint at this time. (Article is roughly twice the length as when you put up these points). I thought about a section on diagnosis and evaluation, but that would drift more toward neuropsychological evaluation technobabble. There is enough of that already.[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 03:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

==Section deletion note==
The section deletion of '''Cultural and historical information:''' was by me, done at work on an office computer which sometimes kicks me off the Wikipedia logon. I think that this section needs expansion and re-inclusion once it can be made to not violate [[WP:DUE]] but that is for another day.[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 17:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

== More suggestions ==

Coming along very well! Excellent progress. Some suggestions:
*I would definitely keep working on hammering down the definition. The first two sentences seem to offer two different definitions.
*''caregivers can ameliorate blindness-related sensory deprivation,[15] leading to positive neurodevelopmental outcomes, as in the cases of author Helen Keller[16] and musicians Arthel "Doc" Watson[17] and Ray Charles.'' - What did the parents do in these cases? What happened with these people?
*''In the child juvenile diabetes can produce neurodevelopmental damage by the effects of excessive glucose. The problems continue and may worsen throughout childhood if the diabetes is not well controlled.'' - What does the glucose do? What types of symptoms does it cause?
*Short (one- or two-sentence) paragraphs are discouraged. Check out [[User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a]]].
*I would discuss Inborn error of metabolism further under Metabolic disorders.
*References should have publisher, author, date, title, (and accessdate if it's a website, but journal sites don't need accessdates). PDFs should have format=pdf in the cite template. See [[Template:cite journal]] for example.
*Article titles are not in caps (Except for the first letter, letters after periods or colons, and proper nouns).
*I'm not sure this is a reliable source: http://www.uniquekidssurvey.com/index.html The best sources are textbooks from reliable, well-known publishers and journal articles (see [[WP:MEDRS]]). Wiki articles cannot be used as sources. Most sources look good.
*Does fetal alcohol syndrome belong under Nutrition? Maybe a separate section for, uh, insults during pregnancy?
*I don't think obstruction of the [[trachea]] is the right definition for [[asphyxia]] -- I think it has to do with an extreme deficiency in O2.
*The trauma section is covering more than just trauma--''trauma'' is used to mean mechanical forces usually (e.g. TBI only refers to injury by mechanical force). The umbrella term is [[acquired brain injury]], which covers hypoxia, stroke, etc. Maybe "Brain injury" as a title for this subheading?
*I think the trauma section goes into too much detail about epidemiology and not enough about the effects of brain trauma on youngsters. It's not clear that these stats are specific to kids (do neurodevelopmental disorders occur in adults too?) and they're US-specific stats, which don't give a worldwide view (but believe me, I'm familiar with the difficulty in getting epidemiology info for countries that aren't the US).
*Citation needed: ''Arguably the most well known environmental toxic cause of neurodevelopmental disorders is heavy metal poisoning; the classic 20th century example is Minamata disease. ''

Overall, it's coming along great, it's certainly a lot farther along than when I last looked at it! I think the biggest thing to focus on would be nailing down that definition; the reader gets a good idea of the variety of things that can cause the disorders, but only a fuzzy idea of what they ''are''. A classification section would be good if possible, and also sections that cover common features of each (e.g. "Diagnosis", "Treatment"). These would have to be vague, but they could cover common techniques and give a better idea of what these disorders have in common with one another. Other suggestions are in [[WP:MEDMOS]]. [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">talk</font>]]</small> 00:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

== picture of Temple Grandin ==

I wonder whether a more representative picture could be found? As far as I know, it isn't clear that Asperger's syndrome (high-functioning autism) should be classified as a developmental disorder (the neural basis is unknown). [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 20:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

:What would you like to post instead? Be [[WP:BOLD|bold]] and find a picture you like better. Also if you're interested you might look at adding to the article as you think it needs.
:(I didn't put up her picture to advertise her having [[Asperger syndrome]], but rather out of respect for her efforts to create popular awareness of autism.[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 01:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

<nowiki>[[Image:IMGP2147.JPG|thumb|300px|right|A person with microcephaly]]</nowiki>moved photo[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 00:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

What do you think of this image, from Wikipedia commons? It shows a person with microcephaly (small brain), which is clearly a neurodevelopmental disorder. Anyway, this isn't really my area, but I'll give the article a once-over to see if anything pops out at me. [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 02:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
:If you put this picture up, I'd recommend to add the link [[microcephaly]] to its caption. This picture (and the fact that I've not found a good way of implementing [[User:Delldot|Delldot's]] recommendation to add to the introduction and have a classification section without creating unpublished research. (See [[WP:SYN]])[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 17:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

<nowiki>[[Image:Fasbabyface.jpg|thumb|300px|right|Fetal alcohol syndrome]]</nowiki>moved photo[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 00:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

I recommend this image for fetal alcohol syndrome. —[[:User:Cyclonenim|Cyclonenim]]&nbsp;([[:User talk:Cyclonenim|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[:Special:Contributions/Cyclonenim|contribs]]) 02:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
:Yes, that's better in some ways, but the labels are unfortunate, because they don't have anything to do with ''neuro''development. Even so, FAS does clearly belong in this topic. [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 02:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
::Such photos are fairly popular in beginning level textbooks as they provide a quick reference for the student who's memorizing dozens of syndromes for their weekly quiz. If this is posted to the article I'd recommend changing the caption to something like: Typical facial features which may aid in the clinical recognition of [[Fetal alcohol syndrome]].[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 17:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

==Autism spectrum page==
What happened to the autism spectrum page? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.232.93.212|71.232.93.212]] ([[User talk:71.232.93.212|talk]]) 16:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
It looks to me like [[User:Eubulides ]] made it into a redirect page. You might want to discuss it with him/her.[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 17:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


thnak you

where did he get the ability to do such? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Matsuiny2004|Matsuiny2004]] ([[User talk:Matsuiny2004|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Matsuiny2004|contribs]]) 21:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:It looks to me like he made the comment that he would like to change the article then when no one spoke up for a few days he changed it. I'm planning on doing the same thing elsewhere (see [[Talk:Not-for-profit corporation]]) after I've allowed my warning to sit for a few more weeks. But the place for such discussion is on [[Talk:Autism spectrum]], don't you think?[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 23:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

== Infobox with ICD index?==
Does this article cover the [[ICD-10_Chapter_XVII:_Congenital_malformations,_deformations_and_chromosomal_abnormalities#.28Q00-Q07.29_nervous_system|ICD Q00-Q07]]? And if yes, maybe some infobox should be added, or it should be otherwise somehow mentioned? --<font color="000066">[[User:CopperKettle|<b>C</b><font color="CC3300">opper</font><b>K</b><font color="CC0000">ettle</font>]]</font> 09:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
:I'm completely unfamiliar with ICD, but yes, following your link, that's the range of things this article covers. [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 17:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


I agree, there is no real medical or scientific research to support this article. Autism and ADHD has nothing to do neurodevelopment disorders. Simply put this article should be scrubbed as it has the potential to misinform an enormous public and new generation of wellness advisors to the abilities or disabilities of at least 20% of the worlds population.
==Is anybody watching?==
It also misinforms to what actual neurodevelopment disorders are and the potential people with these disorders truly have.
I've been building a page loosely organized on Smith's Recognizable Patterns of Malformation (It's roughed out on my Talk page) and was wondering how I could "interface" with this article. This is a very nicely written article, but my strengths are in list-building, especially with regards to developmental medicine. Any ideas?[[User:Doctorwolfie|doctorwolfie]] ([[User talk:Doctorwolfie|talk]]) 12:55, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
There has got to be a better system in place for actual facts verses public opinion on Wikipedia as the sad fact is you now carry a greater responsibility of the real well researched encyclopedias of yore. [[Special:Contributions/86.31.122.93|86.31.122.93]] ([[User talk:86.31.122.93|talk]]) 03:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
==File:Kokuvi with microcephaly at the Volta School for the Mentally Challenged.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
{|
|-
| [[File:Image-x-generic.svg|100px]]
| An image used in this article, [[commons:File:Kokuvi with microcephaly at the Volta School for the Mentally Challenged.jpg|File:Kokuvi with microcephaly at the Volta School for the Mentally Challenged.jpg]], has been nominated for deletion at [[Wikimedia Commons]] in the following category: ''Deletion requests January 2012''
;What should I do?
''Don't panic''; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is [[WP:NFCC|non-free]] then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no [[WP:FUR|fair use rationale]] then it cannot be uploaded or used.


''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --[[User:CommonsNotificationBot|CommonsNotificationBot]] ([[User talk:CommonsNotificationBot|talk]]) 20:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
:Every reliable source classifies Autism and ADHD as a neurodevelopmental disorder, what are you talking about?--[[User:Megaman en m|Megaman en m]] ([[User talk:Megaman en m|talk]]) 06:37, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
|}


== Types at present ==
== Nerodevelopmental disorder versus condition? ==


Currently the "Types" section states that "According to the DSM V, the neurodevelopmental disorders include the following:"
So why do I find this article moved from [[Neurodevelopmental disorder]] to [[Neurodevelopmental condition]] with no warning, no discussion and no consensus? [[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 18:18, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Firstly, it should be DSM-5 by convention (we use Roman numerals for the first through fourth editions, Arabic numerals from the fifth edition onwards).
:At this point another editor has moved the page back to where it belongs. I've noted my complaint on [[User talk:Quinser's]] and have filed a complaint at [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]] since it appears to me that [[User:Quinser's]] may be vandalizing more than just this page.[[User:Trilobitealive|Trilobitealive]] ([[User talk:Trilobitealive|talk]]) 18:48, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Secondly, the eleventh type listened is OCD, which does not even appear in the cited source at all, nor is it classified as a neurodevelopmental disorder in the DSM-5.
::I'm sorry, I should have written it here, but it was me. My standpoint is that all Quinser's moves get reverted, and thereafter, Quincer's can start a discussion about moving the article here on the talk page, and try to get consensus. [[User:Lova_Falk|<font size="2"><span style="font-family:Segoe Print;color:#e75e03">'''Lova Falk'''</span></font>]] [[User talk:Lova Falk|<font size="2"><span style="font-family:Segoe Print;color:#336699">talk</span></font>]] 18:57, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
I am unsure what other inaccuracies there are, but the DSM-5 chapter on neurodevelopmental disorders contains the following groups of disorders: Intellectual disabilities; Communication disorders; Autism spectrum disorder; ADHD; Specific learning disorder; Motor disorders. There is no mention at all of things like OCD or fragile X syndrome in this chapter. Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders have their own chapter. It is also worth noting that the DSM-5 chapters are in a logical order (e.g. they state that the chapter on bipolar-type disorders is between the chapters on psychotic disorders and mood disorders to represent its theoretical position between those groups) and the obsessive-compulsive and related disorders do not come immediately after the neurodevelopmental disorders, so the DSM-5 does not even hint at there being a relationship between these groups, let alone OCD being a neurodevelopmental disorder itself.
:::I was looking for a random article to edit and ran across this one, but I would like to know why any genetic disorder is included on a page about Neurodevelopmental disorder. I would like to seek a consensus on removing that from the page, and also on WP I see that new users edits are often reverted and I don't want to do a lot of work and that happens. What do I need to know to edit this page? I see that better references are needed, but what else?[[User:AlF6Na3|AlF6Na3]] ([[User talk:AlF6Na3|talk]]) 17:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
I shall remove OCD from this list but am unsure how to go about fixing this section so will not make any further edits without more discussion. [[User:Anditres|Anditres]] ([[User talk:Anditres|talk]]) 22:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:33, 9 September 2024

No basis for this article

[edit]

I agree, there is no real medical or scientific research to support this article. Autism and ADHD has nothing to do neurodevelopment disorders. Simply put this article should be scrubbed as it has the potential to misinform an enormous public and new generation of wellness advisors to the abilities or disabilities of at least 20% of the worlds population. It also misinforms to what actual neurodevelopment disorders are and the potential people with these disorders truly have. There has got to be a better system in place for actual facts verses public opinion on Wikipedia as the sad fact is you now carry a greater responsibility of the real well researched encyclopedias of yore. 86.31.122.93 (talk) 03:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Every reliable source classifies Autism and ADHD as a neurodevelopmental disorder, what are you talking about?--Megaman en m (talk) 06:37, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Types at present

[edit]

Currently the "Types" section states that "According to the DSM V, the neurodevelopmental disorders include the following:" Firstly, it should be DSM-5 by convention (we use Roman numerals for the first through fourth editions, Arabic numerals from the fifth edition onwards). Secondly, the eleventh type listened is OCD, which does not even appear in the cited source at all, nor is it classified as a neurodevelopmental disorder in the DSM-5. I am unsure what other inaccuracies there are, but the DSM-5 chapter on neurodevelopmental disorders contains the following groups of disorders: Intellectual disabilities; Communication disorders; Autism spectrum disorder; ADHD; Specific learning disorder; Motor disorders. There is no mention at all of things like OCD or fragile X syndrome in this chapter. Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders have their own chapter. It is also worth noting that the DSM-5 chapters are in a logical order (e.g. they state that the chapter on bipolar-type disorders is between the chapters on psychotic disorders and mood disorders to represent its theoretical position between those groups) and the obsessive-compulsive and related disorders do not come immediately after the neurodevelopmental disorders, so the DSM-5 does not even hint at there being a relationship between these groups, let alone OCD being a neurodevelopmental disorder itself. I shall remove OCD from this list but am unsure how to go about fixing this section so will not make any further edits without more discussion. Anditres (talk) 22:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Neurodevelopmental_disorder&oldid=1244858646"