Jump to content

Sacred king: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Monarch with a religious significance}}
{{Short description|Monarch with a religious significance}}
{{for|the ancient Roman position|Rex Sacrorum}}
{{about|the tradition in general|the ancient Roman position|Rex Sacrorum|Western tradition|Divine right of kings|Sinosphere tradition|Mandate of Heaven}}
{{Redirect|Priest king|the sculpture belonging to the Indus Valley Civilization|Priest-king (sculpture)}}
{{Redirect|Priest king|the sculpture belonging to the Indus Valley Civilization|Priest-king (sculpture)}}
{{More footnotes|date=November 2010}}
{{More footnotes|date=November 2010}}
[[Image:God by eyck.JPG|thumb|200px|Figure of Christ from the [[Ghent Altarpiece]] (1432).]]
[[Image:God by eyck.JPG|thumb|200px|Figure of Christ from the [[Ghent Altarpiece]] (1432).]]

In many historical societies, the position of [[kingship]] carries a [[Sacred|sacral]] meaning, that is, it is identical with that of a [[high priest]] and [[judge]]. The concept of [[theocracy]] is related, although a '''sacred king''' need not necessarily rule through his religious authority; rather, the temporal position has a religious significance.
In many historical societies, the position of [[kingship]] carried a [[Sacred|sacral]] meaning and was identical with that of a [[high priest]] and [[judge]]. Divine kingship is related to the concept of [[theocracy]], although a '''sacred king''' need not necessarily rule through his religious authority; rather, the temporal position itself has a religious significance behind it. The monarch may ''be'' divine,<ref>
This applies more particularly to the more mythical sovereigns, for example: the Chinese [[Yellow Emperor]].
{{cite book
|author1 = Jean Kuo Lee
|year = 2022
|chapter = The Most Powerful Ruler
|title = Huangdi: Yellow Emperor
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=NhqcEAAAQBAJ
|series = Chinese Mythology
|publication-place = Minneapolis, Minnesota
|publisher = ABDO
|page = 5
|isbn = 9781098275150
|access-date = 5 August 2024
|quote = In the land of mythical China, a Divine Emperor ruled part of the region. His name was Huangdi, or the Yellow Emperor.
}}
</ref>
''become'' divine,<ref>
{{cite book
|last1 = Gilbert
|first1 = Michelle
|editor-last1 = Cannadine
|editor-first1 = David
|editor-last2 = Price
|editor-first2 = Simon
|editor-link2 = Simon Price (classicist)
|date = 23 April 1992
|orig-date = 1987
|chapter = The person of the king: ritual and power in a Ghanaian state
|title = Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=foaituObjPQC
|series = Past and Present Publications, ISSN 1754-792X
|publication-place = Cambridge
|publisher = Cambridge University Press
|page = 298
|isbn = 9780521428910
|access-date = 5 August 2024
|quote = That kings are sacred is an anthropological and historical truism, but they are not born so, and must be made sacred by those over whom they reign.
}}
</ref>
or ''represent'' divinity to a greater or lesser extent.<ref>
{{cite book
|last1 = Hani
|first1 = Jean
|author-link1 = Jean Hani
|translator-last1 = Polit
|translator-first1 = Gustavo
|date = 2011
|orig-date = 1984
|chapter = Sacred Royalty
|title = Sacred Royalty: From the Pharaoh to the Most Christian King
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Joqu8GJsVbcC
|series = The Matheson monographs
|publication-place = London
|publisher = The Matheson Trust for the study of comparative religion
|pages = 26; 28
|isbn = 9781908092052
|access-date = 5 August 2024
|quote = The character of 'divine royalty' is not as marked in all traditions, and what can be seen is an approach by degrees towards another conception, that of 'royalty by divine grace'. This is what occurs in the Indo-European zone, in India and Iran, for example. [...] the sovereign is not personally 'divine'. In India, it is royalty that is divine, not the king as an individual. He is revered as a god only because his ''state'' and his ''role'' are divine.
}}
</ref>


== History ==
== History ==
[[Sir James George Frazer]] used the concept of the sacred king in his study ''[[The Golden Bough]]'' (1890–1915), the title of which refers to the myth of the [[Rex Nemorensis]].<ref>{{Cite book|url= http://www.bartleby.com/196/|title= The Golden Bough|last= Frazer|first= James George, Sir|publisher= New York: The Macmillan Co|year= 1922|location= Bartleby.com|at= http://www.bartleby.com/196/1.html}}</ref> Frazer gives numerous examples, cited below, and was an inspiration for the [[myth and ritual school]].<ref>R Fraser ed., ''The Golden Bough'' (Oxford 2009) p. 651</ref> However, "the [[myth and ritual]], or myth-ritualist, theory" is disputed;<ref>{{Cite book|title= Myth: A Very Short Introduction|url= https://archive.org/details/mythveryshortint00sega_920|url-access= limited|last= Segal|first= Robert A.|publisher= Oxford UP|year= 2004|location= Oxford|pages= [https://archive.org/details/mythveryshortint00sega_920/page/n73 61]}}</ref> many scholars now believe that myth and ritual share common [[paradigms]], but not that one developed from the other.<ref>{{Cite book|title= The Poetics of Myth|last= Meletinsky|first= Eleazar Moiseevich|publisher= Routledge|year= 2000|isbn= 0-415-92898-2|pages= 117}}</ref>
[[Sir James George Frazer]] used the concept of the sacred king in his study ''[[The Golden Bough]]'' (1890–1915), the title of which refers to the myth of the [[Rex Nemorensis]].<ref>{{Cite book|url= http://www.bartleby.com/196/|title= The Golden Bough|last= Frazer|first= James George, Sir|publisher= New York: The Macmillan Co|year= 1922|location= Bartleby.com|at= http://www.bartleby.com/196/1.html}}</ref> Frazer gives numerous examples, cited below, and was an inspiration for the [[myth and ritual school]].<ref>R Fraser ed., ''The Golden Bough'' (Oxford 2009) p. 651</ref> However, "the [[myth and ritual]], or myth-ritualist, theory" is disputed;<ref>{{Cite book|title= Myth: A Very Short Introduction|url= https://archive.org/details/mythveryshortint00sega_920|url-access= limited|last= Segal|first= Robert A.|publisher= Oxford UP|year= 2004|location= Oxford|pages= [https://archive.org/details/mythveryshortint00sega_920/page/n73 61]|isbn= 978-0-19-280347-4}}</ref> many scholars now believe that myth and ritual share common [[paradigms]], but not that one developed from the other.<ref>{{Cite book|title= The Poetics of Myth|last= Meletinsky|first= Eleazar Moiseevich|publisher= Routledge|year= 2000|isbn= 0-415-92898-2|pages= 117}}</ref>


According to Frazer, the notion has [[prehistoric religion|prehistoric roots]] and occurs worldwide, on [[Java]] as in [[sub-Saharan Africa]], with [[shaman]]-kings credited with [[Rainmaking (ritual)|rainmaking]] and assuring fertility and good fortune. The king might also be designated to suffer and atone for his people, meaning that the sacral king could be the pre-ordained victim in a [[human sacrifice]], either killed at the end of his term in the position, or sacrificed in a time of crisis (e.g. the [[Blót]] of [[Domalde]]).
According to Frazer, the notion has [[prehistoric religion|prehistoric roots]] and occurs worldwide, on [[Java]] as in [[sub-Saharan Africa]], with [[shaman]]-kings credited with [[Rainmaking (ritual)|rainmaking]] and assuring fertility and good fortune. The king might also be designated to suffer and atone for his people, meaning that the sacral king could be the pre-ordained victim in a [[human sacrifice]], either killed at the end of his term in the position, or sacrificed in a time of crisis (e.g. the [[Blót]] of [[Domalde]]).


The [[Ashanti people|Ashanti]] flogged a newly-selected king (''[[Ashantehene]]'') before [[enthronement|enthroning]] him.
The [[Ashanti people|Ashanti]] flogged a newly selected king (''[[Ashantehene]]'') before [[enthronement|enthroning]] him.{{cn|date=August 2024}}


From the [[Ancient Near Eastern religion|Bronze Age in the Near East]], the enthronement and [[anointment]] of a [[Monarchy|monarch]] is a central religious ritual, reflected in the titles "[[Messiah]]" or "[[Christ]]", which became separated from worldly kingship. Thus [[Sargon of Akkad]] described himself as "deputy of [[Ishtar]]",{{cn|date=August 2017}} just as the modern [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] [[Pope]] takes the role of the "[[Vicar of Christ]]".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15403b.htm|title=CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Vicar of Christ|website=www.newadvent.org|access-date=2017-08-23}}</ref>
From the [[Ancient Near Eastern religion|Bronze Age in the Near East]], the enthronement and [[anointment]] of a [[Monarchy|monarch]] is a central religious ritual, reflected in the titles "[[Messiah]]" or "[[Christ]]", which became separated from worldly kingship. Thus [[Sargon of Akkad]] described himself as "deputy of [[Ishtar]]",{{cn|date=August 2017}} just as the modern [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] [[Pope]] takes the role of the "[[Vicar of Christ]]".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15403b.htm|title=CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Vicar of Christ|website=www.newadvent.org|access-date=2017-08-23}}</ref>
Line 26: Line 87:


=== Frazer's interpretation ===
=== Frazer's interpretation ===
A sacred king, according to the systematic interpretation of [[mythology]] developed by Frazer in ''[[The Golden Bough]]'' (published 1890), was a [[monarch|king]] who represented a [[solar deity]] in a periodically re-enacted [[fertility rite]]. Frazer seized upon the notion of a substitute king and made him the keystone of his theory of a universal, pan-[[Europe]]an, and indeed worldwide fertility myth, in which a consort for the [[Goddess]] was annually replaced. According to Frazer, the sacred king represented the spirit of vegetation, a divine [[John Barleycorn]].{{citation needed|date=September 2014}} He came into being in the spring, reigned during the summer, and ritually died at harvest time, only to be reborn at the [[winter solstice]] to wax and rule again. The spirit of vegetation was therefore a "[[Life-death-rebirth deity|dying and reviving god]]". [[Osiris]], [[Dionysus]], [[Attis]] and many other familiar figures from [[Greek mythology]] and [[classical antiquity]] were re-interpreted in this mold. The sacred king, the human embodiment of the dying and reviving vegetation god, was supposed to have originally been an individual chosen to rule for a time, but whose fate was to suffer as a [[sacrifice]], to be offered back to the earth so that a new king could rule for a time in his stead.
A sacred king, according to the systematic interpretation of [[mythology]] developed by Frazer in ''[[The Golden Bough]]'' (published 1890), was a [[monarch|king]] who represented a [[solar deity]] in a periodically re-enacted [[fertility rite]]. Frazer seized upon the notion of a substitute king and made him the keystone of his theory of a universal, pan-[[Europe]]an, and indeed worldwide fertility myth, in which a consort for the [[Goddess]] was annually replaced. According to Frazer, the sacred king represented the spirit of vegetation, a divine [[John Barleycorn]].{{citation needed|date=September 2014}} He came into being in the spring, reigned during the summer, and ritually died at harvest time, only to be reborn at the [[winter solstice]] to wax and rule again. The spirit of vegetation was therefore a "[[Life-death-rebirth deity|dying and reviving god]]". [[Osiris]], [[Dionysus]], [[Attis]] and many other familiar figures from [[Greek mythology]] and [[classical antiquity]] were re-interpreted in this mold (Osiris in particular is conspicuous in this as he was a figure of Egyptian mythology). The sacred king, the human embodiment of the dying and reviving vegetation god, was supposed to have originally been an individual chosen to rule for a time, but whose fate was to suffer as a [[sacrifice]], to be offered back to the earth so that a new king could rule for a time in his stead.


Especially in Europe during Frazer's early twentieth century heyday, it launched a [[cottage industry]] of amateurs looking for "[[paganism|pagan]] survivals" in such things as traditional [[fair]]s, [[maypole]]s, and folk arts like [[Morris dance|morris dancing]]. It was widely influential in [[literature]], being alluded to by [[D. H. Lawrence]], [[James Joyce]], [[Ezra Pound]], and in [[T. S. Eliot]]'s ''[[The Waste Land]]'', among other works.
Especially in Europe during Frazer's early twentieth century heyday, it launched a [[cottage industry]] of amateurs looking for "[[paganism|pagan]] survivals" in such things as traditional [[fair]]s, [[maypole]]s, and folk arts like [[Morris dance|morris dancing]]. It was widely influential in [[literature]], being alluded to by [[D. H. Lawrence]], [[James Joyce]], [[Ezra Pound]], and in [[T. S. Eliot]]'s ''[[The Waste Land]]'', among other works.
Line 33: Line 94:


== Examples ==
== Examples ==
* [[Cakravartin]], a righteous king derived from Indian religious thought.
* [[Chakravartin]], a righteous king derived from Indian religious thought.
* [[Devaraja]], cult of divine kings in Southeast Asia.<ref>{{cite book |url= http://www.easternbookcorporation.com/moreinfo.php?txt_searchstring=7306 |title= God and King : The Devaraja Cult in South Asian Art & Architecture |author= Sengupta, Arputha Rani (Ed.) |year= 2005 |isbn= 8189233262|access-date= 14 September 2012}}</ref>
* [[Devaraja]], cult of divine kings in Southeast Asia.<ref>{{cite book |url= http://www.easternbookcorporation.com/moreinfo.php?txt_searchstring=7306 |title= God and King : The Devaraja Cult in South Asian Art & Architecture |author= Sengupta, Arputha Rani (Ed.) |year= 2005 |publisher= National Museum Institute |isbn= 8189233262 |access-date= 14 September 2012 |archive-date= 9 December 2012 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121209215215/http://easternbookcorporation.com/moreinfo.php?txt_searchstring=7306 |url-status= dead }}</ref>
* [[Germanic kingship]]
* [[Germanic kingship]]
* [[Holy Roman Emperor]]
* [[Holy Roman Emperor]]
Line 40: Line 101:
* The [[Omukama]] of [[Empire of Kitara|Kitara]] ruled as a heavenly sovereign.
* The [[Omukama]] of [[Empire of Kitara|Kitara]] ruled as a heavenly sovereign.
* The [[High King of Ireland]], according to medieval tradition, married the [[sovereignty goddess]].
* The [[High King of Ireland]], according to medieval tradition, married the [[sovereignty goddess]].
* [[Almami|Almamy]]—derived from al-Imam, meaning "the one leading the prayer" in Arabic—regnal title of theocratic monarchs of [[Almamyate of Futa Toro|Futa Toro]], [[Imamate of Futa Jallon|Futa Jallon]] and [[Samori Ture|West African rulers]].
* The [[Eze Nri]], ruler of the defunct [[Igbo People|Igbo]] [[Nri Kingdom]] in present-day [[Nigeria]]. He was addressed as "[[Igwe]]," meaning "heavenly one" in the [[Igbo language]], and has bequeathed his title to the monarch of a contemporary traditional state of the same name.
* The [[Eze Nri]], ruler of the defunct [[Igbo People|Igbo]] [[Nri Kingdom]] in present-day [[Nigeria]]. He was addressed as "[[Igwe]]," meaning "heavenly one" in the [[Igbo language]], and has bequeathed his title to the monarch of a contemporary traditional state of the same name.
* The [[Emperor of Japan]] is known in Japanese as ''Tennō'' – "heavenly sovereign", and was formerly believed to be a living [[Kami]].
* The [[Emperor of Japan]] is known in Japanese as ''Tennō'' – "heavenly sovereign", and was formerly believed to be a living [[kami]].
* The [[Kende]] was the sacred king of the Magyars in the 9th century.<ref>{{cite book|author= Gyula Kristó|title= Hungarian History in the Ninth Century|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=N616AAAAMAAJ|year= 1996|publisher= Szegedi Középkorász Műhely|isbn= 978-963-482-113-7|page= 136}}</ref>
* The [[Kende]] was the sacred king of the Magyars in the 9th century.<ref>{{cite book|author= Gyula Kristó|title= Hungarian History in the Ninth Century|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=N616AAAAMAAJ|year= 1996|publisher= Szegedi Középkorász Műhely|isbn= 978-963-482-113-7|page= 136}}</ref>
* The [[Khagan]] ([[Ashina tribe|Ashina]]){{Relevance inline|date=June 2016}}
* The [[Khagan]] ([[Ashina tribe|Ashina]])
* The [[Kings of Luba]] became deities after death.
* The [[Kings of Luba]] became deities after death.
* The [[Temporal power (papal)|temporal power]] of the [[Papacy]]
* The [[Temporal power (papal)|temporal power]] of the [[papacy]]
* [[Pharaoh]], title of Ancient Egyptian rulers. The pharaoh adopted names [[Ancient Egyptian royal titulary|symbolizing holy might]].
* [[Pharaoh]], title of Ancient Egyptian rulers. The pharaoh adopted names [[Ancient Egyptian royal titulary|symbolizing holy might]].
* The last vestige of Athenian monarchy, [[Archon basileus]], mainly retained the duties of overseeing certain religious rites.
* The last vestige of Athenian monarchy, [[Archon basileus]], mainly retained the duties of overseeing certain religious rites.
* [[King of Rome]]
* [[King of Rome]]
** ''[[Rex Sacrorum]]''
** ''[[Rex Sacrorum]]''
** ''[[Pontifex Maximus]]'' – a title inherited by the Papacy
** ''[[Pontifex Maximus]]'' – a title adopted by the papacy
** [[Roman triumph]], according to legend first enacted by [[Romulus]]
** [[Roman triumph]], according to legend first enacted by [[Romulus]]
** [[Augustus]]
** [[Augustus]]
Line 59: Line 121:
* The pre-colonial emperors and kings of the [[Yoruba people]], the [[Oba (ruler)|Oba]]s, and their contemporary successors
* The pre-colonial emperors and kings of the [[Yoruba people]], the [[Oba (ruler)|Oba]]s, and their contemporary successors
* [[Madkhalism]] in Islam
* [[Madkhalism]] in Islam
* [[Germanic kingship|Kings in pre-Christian Scandinavia and England]] claimed descent from gods such as [[Odin]] (''[[House of Wessex]]'', ''[[House of Knýtlinga]]'') and [[Freyr]] (''[[Yngling]]''). Scandinavian kings in pre-Christian times served as priests at sacrifices.


Monarchies carried sacral kingship into the [[Middle Ages]], encouraging the idea of kings installed [[by the Grace of God]]. See:
Monarchies carried sacral kingship into the [[Middle Ages]], encouraging the idea of kings installed [[by the Grace of God]]. See:
* [[Capetian Miracle]]
* [[Capetian Miracle]]
* [[Royal touch]], supernatural powers attributed to the Kings of England and France
* [[Royal touch]], supernatural powers attributed to the kings of England and France
* The [[Serbs|Serbian]] [[Nemanjić dynasty]]<ref>{{cite book|author= Даница Поповић|title= Под окриљем светости: култ светих владара и реликвија у средњовековној Србији|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=mEzaAAAAMAAJ|year= 2006|publisher= Српска академија наука и уметности, Балканолошки институт|isbn= 978-86-7179-044-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author= Sima M. Cirkovic|title= The Serbs|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=2Wc-DWRzoeIC&pg=PA35|year= 2008|publisher= John Wiley & Sons|isbn= 978-1-4051-4291-5|page= 35}}</ref>
* The [[Serbs|Serbian]] [[Nemanjić dynasty]]<ref>{{cite book|author= Даница Поповић|title= Под окриљем светости: култ светих владара и реликвија у средњовековној Србији|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=mEzaAAAAMAAJ|year= 2006|publisher= Српска академија наука и уметности, Балканолошки институт|isbn= 978-86-7179-044-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author= Sima M. Cirkovic|title= The Serbs|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=2Wc-DWRzoeIC&pg=PA35|year= 2008|publisher= John Wiley & Sons|isbn= 978-1-4051-4291-5|page= 35}}</ref>
* The [[Hungarian people|Hungarian]] [[House of Árpád]] (known during the Medieval period as the "dynasty of the Holy King"')
* The [[Hungarian people|Hungarian]] [[House of Árpád]] (known during the Medieval period as the "dynasty of the Holy King"')
Line 107: Line 170:
*G. van der Leeuw, ''Religion in Essence and Manifestation'' (1933, English 1938, 1986)
*G. van der Leeuw, ''Religion in Essence and Manifestation'' (1933, English 1938, 1986)
*Geo Widengren, ''Religionsphänomenologie'' (1969), pp.&nbsp;360–393.
*Geo Widengren, ''Religionsphänomenologie'' (1969), pp.&nbsp;360–393.
*Lily Ross Taylor, ''The Divinity of the Roman Emperor'' (1931, reprint 1981).
*[[Lily Ross Taylor]], ''The Divinity of the Roman Emperor'' (1931, reprint 1981).
*[[David Cannadine]] and Simon Price (eds.), ''Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies'' (1987).
*[[David Cannadine]] and Simon Price (eds.), ''Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies'' (1987).
*Henri Frankfort, ''Kingship and the Gods'' (1948, 1978).
*Henri Frankfort, ''Kingship and the Gods'' (1948, 1978).
Line 129: Line 192:


{{Imperial and royal styles}}
{{Imperial and royal styles}}

[[Category:Anthropology of religion]]
[[Category:Anthropology of religion]]
[[Category:Comparative mythology]]
[[Category:Comparative mythology]]
Line 137: Line 199:
[[Category:Paganism]]
[[Category:Paganism]]
[[Category:Priests]]
[[Category:Priests]]
[[Category:Sacrifice]]
[[Category:Human sacrifice]]
[[Category:Folk religion]]
[[Category:Folk religions]]
[[Category:William II of England]]
[[Category:William II of England]]
[[Category:Sargon of Akkad]]
[[Category:Inanna]]

Latest revision as of 06:50, 10 September 2024

Figure of Christ from the Ghent Altarpiece (1432).

In many historical societies, the position of kingship carried a sacral meaning and was identical with that of a high priest and judge. Divine kingship is related to the concept of theocracy, although a sacred king need not necessarily rule through his religious authority; rather, the temporal position itself has a religious significance behind it. The monarch may be divine,[1] become divine,[2] or represent divinity to a greater or lesser extent.[3]

History

[edit]

Sir James George Frazer used the concept of the sacred king in his study The Golden Bough (1890–1915), the title of which refers to the myth of the Rex Nemorensis.[4] Frazer gives numerous examples, cited below, and was an inspiration for the myth and ritual school.[5] However, "the myth and ritual, or myth-ritualist, theory" is disputed;[6] many scholars now believe that myth and ritual share common paradigms, but not that one developed from the other.[7]

According to Frazer, the notion has prehistoric roots and occurs worldwide, on Java as in sub-Saharan Africa, with shaman-kings credited with rainmaking and assuring fertility and good fortune. The king might also be designated to suffer and atone for his people, meaning that the sacral king could be the pre-ordained victim in a human sacrifice, either killed at the end of his term in the position, or sacrificed in a time of crisis (e.g. the Blót of Domalde).

The Ashanti flogged a newly selected king (Ashantehene) before enthroning him.[citation needed]

From the Bronze Age in the Near East, the enthronement and anointment of a monarch is a central religious ritual, reflected in the titles "Messiah" or "Christ", which became separated from worldly kingship. Thus Sargon of Akkad described himself as "deputy of Ishtar",[citation needed] just as the modern Catholic Pope takes the role of the "Vicar of Christ".[8]

Kings are styled as shepherds from earliest times, e.g., the term applied to Sumerian princes such as Lugalbanda in the 3rd millennium BCE. The image of the shepherd combines the themes of leadership and the responsibility to supply food and protection, as well as superiority.

As the mediator between the people and the divine, the sacral king was credited with special wisdom (e.g. Solomon or Gilgamesh) or vision (e.g. via oneiromancy).

Study

[edit]

Study of the concept was introduced by Sir James George Frazer in his influential book The Golden Bough (1890–1915); sacral kingship plays a role in Romanticism and Esotericism (e.g. Julius Evola) and some currents of Neopaganism (Theodism). The school of Pan-Babylonianism derived much of the religion described in the Hebrew Bible from cults of sacral kingship in ancient Babylonia.

The so-called British and Scandinavian cult-historical schools maintained that the king personified a god and stood at the center of the national or tribal religion. The English "myth and ritual school" concentrated on anthropology and folklore, while the Scandinavian "Uppsala school" emphasized Semitological study.

Frazer's interpretation

[edit]

A sacred king, according to the systematic interpretation of mythology developed by Frazer in The Golden Bough (published 1890), was a king who represented a solar deity in a periodically re-enacted fertility rite. Frazer seized upon the notion of a substitute king and made him the keystone of his theory of a universal, pan-European, and indeed worldwide fertility myth, in which a consort for the Goddess was annually replaced. According to Frazer, the sacred king represented the spirit of vegetation, a divine John Barleycorn.[citation needed] He came into being in the spring, reigned during the summer, and ritually died at harvest time, only to be reborn at the winter solstice to wax and rule again. The spirit of vegetation was therefore a "dying and reviving god". Osiris, Dionysus, Attis and many other familiar figures from Greek mythology and classical antiquity were re-interpreted in this mold (Osiris in particular is conspicuous in this as he was a figure of Egyptian mythology). The sacred king, the human embodiment of the dying and reviving vegetation god, was supposed to have originally been an individual chosen to rule for a time, but whose fate was to suffer as a sacrifice, to be offered back to the earth so that a new king could rule for a time in his stead.

Especially in Europe during Frazer's early twentieth century heyday, it launched a cottage industry of amateurs looking for "pagan survivals" in such things as traditional fairs, maypoles, and folk arts like morris dancing. It was widely influential in literature, being alluded to by D. H. Lawrence, James Joyce, Ezra Pound, and in T. S. Eliot's The Waste Land, among other works.

Robert Graves used Frazer's work in The Greek Myths and made it one of the foundations of his own personal mythology in The White Goddess, and in the fictional Seven Days in New Crete he depicted a future in which the institution of a sacrificial sacred king is revived. Margaret Murray, the principal theorist of witchcraft as a "pagan survival," used Frazer's work to propose the thesis that many kings of England who died as kings, most notably William Rufus, were secret pagans and witches, whose deaths were the re-enactment of the human sacrifice that stood at the centre of Frazer's myth.[9] This idea used by fantasy writer Katherine Kurtz in her novel Lammas Night.

Examples

[edit]

Monarchies carried sacral kingship into the Middle Ages, encouraging the idea of kings installed by the Grace of God. See:

In fiction

[edit]

Many of Rosemary Sutcliff's novels are recognized as being directly influenced by Frazer, depicting individuals accepting the burden of leadership and the ultimate responsibility of personal sacrifice, including Sword at Sunset, The Mark of the Horse Lord, and Sun Horse, Moon Horse.[14]

In addition to its appearance in her novel Lammas Night noted above, Katherine Kurtz also uses the idea of sacred kingship in her novel The Quest for Saint Camber.[15]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ This applies more particularly to the more mythical sovereigns, for example: the Chinese Yellow Emperor. Jean Kuo Lee (2022). "The Most Powerful Ruler". Huangdi: Yellow Emperor. Chinese Mythology. Minneapolis, Minnesota: ABDO. p. 5. ISBN 9781098275150. Retrieved 5 August 2024. In the land of mythical China, a Divine Emperor ruled part of the region. His name was Huangdi, or the Yellow Emperor.
  2. ^ Gilbert, Michelle (23 April 1992) [1987]. "The person of the king: ritual and power in a Ghanaian state". In Cannadine, David; Price, Simon (eds.). Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies. Past and Present Publications, ISSN 1754-792X. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 298. ISBN 9780521428910. Retrieved 5 August 2024. That kings are sacred is an anthropological and historical truism, but they are not born so, and must be made sacred by those over whom they reign.
  3. ^ Hani, Jean (2011) [1984]. "Sacred Royalty". Sacred Royalty: From the Pharaoh to the Most Christian King. The Matheson monographs. Translated by Polit, Gustavo. London: The Matheson Trust for the study of comparative religion. pp. 26, 28. ISBN 9781908092052. Retrieved 5 August 2024. The character of 'divine royalty' is not as marked in all traditions, and what can be seen is an approach by degrees towards another conception, that of 'royalty by divine grace'. This is what occurs in the Indo-European zone, in India and Iran, for example. [...] the sovereign is not personally 'divine'. In India, it is royalty that is divine, not the king as an individual. He is revered as a god only because his state and his role are divine.
  4. ^ Frazer, James George, Sir (1922). The Golden Bough. Bartleby.com: New York: The Macmillan Co. http://www.bartleby.com/196/1.html.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ R Fraser ed., The Golden Bough (Oxford 2009) p. 651
  6. ^ Segal, Robert A. (2004). Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford UP. pp. 61. ISBN 978-0-19-280347-4.
  7. ^ Meletinsky, Eleazar Moiseevich (2000). The Poetics of Myth. Routledge. p. 117. ISBN 0-415-92898-2.
  8. ^ "CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Vicar of Christ". www.newadvent.org. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
  9. ^ Murray, Margaret Alice (1954). The Divine King in England: a study in anthropology. British Library: London, Faber & Faber. ISBN 9780404184285.
  10. ^ Sengupta, Arputha Rani (Ed.) (2005). God and King : The Devaraja Cult in South Asian Art & Architecture. National Museum Institute. ISBN 8189233262. Archived from the original on 9 December 2012. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
  11. ^ Gyula Kristó (1996). Hungarian History in the Ninth Century. Szegedi Középkorász Műhely. p. 136. ISBN 978-963-482-113-7.
  12. ^ Даница Поповић (2006). Под окриљем светости: култ светих владара и реликвија у средњовековној Србији. Српска академија наука и уметности, Балканолошки институт. ISBN 978-86-7179-044-4.
  13. ^ Sima M. Cirkovic (2008). The Serbs. John Wiley & Sons. p. 35. ISBN 978-1-4051-4291-5.
  14. ^ Article about Rosemary Sutcliff at the Historical Novels Info website; paragraph 15
  15. ^ Katherine Kurtz, The Quest for Saint Camber, ISBN 0-345-30099-8, Ballantine Books, 1986, p 360-363.

References

[edit]

General

  • Ronald Hutton, The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles, (Blackwell, 1993): ISBN 0-631-18946-7
  • William Smith, D.C.L., LL.D., A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, (London, 1875)
  • J.F. del Giorgio, The Oldest Europeans, (A.J. Place, 2006)
  • Claus Westermann, Encyclopædia Britannica, s.v. sacred kingship.
  • James George Frazer, The Golden Bough, 3rd ed., 12 vol. (1911–15, reprinted 1990)
  • A.M. Hocart, Kingship (1927, reprint 1969)
  • G. van der Leeuw, Religion in Essence and Manifestation (1933, English 1938, 1986)
  • Geo Widengren, Religionsphänomenologie (1969), pp. 360–393.
  • Lily Ross Taylor, The Divinity of the Roman Emperor (1931, reprint 1981).
  • David Cannadine and Simon Price (eds.), Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies (1987).
  • Henri Frankfort, Kingship and the Gods (1948, 1978).
  • Colin Morris, The Papal Monarchy: The Western Church from 1050 to 1250 (1989),
  • J.H. Burns, Lordship, Kingship, and Empire: The Idea of Monarchy, 1400–1525 (1992).

"English school"

  • S.H. Hooke (ed.),The Labyrinth: Further Studies in the Relation Between Myth and Ritual in the Ancient World (1935).
  • S.H. Hooke (ed.), Myth, Ritual, and Kingship: Essays on the Theory and Practice of Kingship in the Ancient Near East and in Israel (1958).

"Scandinavian school"

  • Geo Widengren, Sakrales Königtum im Alten Testament und im Judentum (1955).
  • Ivan Engnell, Studies in Divine Kingship in the Ancient Near East, 2nd ed. (1967)
  • Aage Bentzen, King and Messiah, 2nd ed. (1948; English 1970).
[edit]